Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Conflict Studies / nota bene
Reference:

Interaction between Russia and China in the military-technical field: features and trends

Li Valerii N.

Postgraduate student, Department of theory and history of international relations, Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 10/2, room 302

valeriy_li_ir@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0617.2025.1.73872

EDN:

SYXBOG

Received:

25-03-2025


Published:

01-04-2025


Abstract: The article examines the main directions of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China, including the transfer and adaptation of military technologies. It analyzes the process of reverse engineering of Russian weapons samples, as well as their modernization in China with subsequent implementation in national armament programs. Particular attention is paid to aviation technologies, including Russian jet engines and their use in Chinese fighters Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-35/FC-31. Examples of borrowing electronic systems are discussed, such as shipborne radars "Frigate" (type 382) and fire control systems type 366, as well as the modernization of anti-aircraft missile systems, including analogs of Russian SAM systems "Tor-M1" and "Pantsir-S". Special attention is given to technology transfer in the field of submarines, including diesel-electric submarines of the "Kilo" class and their Chinese analogs of type 041 with air-independent propulsion. The methodological foundation of this study is an interdisciplinary approach based on the main tenets and methods of structural realism (neorealism). Referring to this scientific school allows for an analysis of the tools and substantive content of Russian-Chinese cooperation in the military-technical sphere. In conclusion, the author notes that the transfer of technologies from Russia to China is a trend in Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation, and there are no prerequisites for its change. A forecast is made that this trend will continue, given China's strong desire to develop its own defense manufacturing capabilities. The article conducts a comparative analysis of Chinese and Russian weaponry, demonstrating the degree of technological divergence and identifies trends towards reducing China's dependence on Russian military technologies. Additionally, a perspective on bilateral cooperation is presented in light of current geopolitical challenges and potential risks for the Russian defense industry. The author predicts that in the absence of fundamental changes in this area, a scenario that would be beneficial for Russia is gaining broader access to Chinese commercial technologies and dual-use technologies, which would help both maintain its defense industry in the context of military confrontation with the Collective West and develop a more innovative economy.


Keywords:

military-technical cooperation, Russian-Chinese relations, Russia, China, strategic partnership, air forces, naval forces, military modernization, missile technologies, People's Liberation Army of China

This article is automatically translated.

An important indicator that reflects the close degree of strategic cooperation is military-technical cooperation (MTC). Military-technical cooperation is closely linked to military-political interaction, as it increases the mutual dependence and compatibility of military equipment, which can be crucial for allies during the war, when joint supplies of equipment and logistical and technological support can determine the effectiveness of the partner's armed forces. At the same time, having experience in the field of technology requires significant political trust. In addition, the organization of the production and technological base for military-technical cooperation requires a high level of coordination between numerous institutions (research centers, manufacturers and various government agencies), common procedures and standardized training. The progress from a low to a high level of cooperation within the framework of the military-technical cooperation is evidenced by the transition from the simple provision of technical training and assistance related to the purchase of weapons to the actual transfer of military technologies and long-term projects for the joint design and production of weapons and their components.

An illustrative example of a meaningful modernization of military-technical cooperation is the relations between Russia and China, which have gone from the transfer of individual units of military equipment to technology transfer. The ability to access advanced Soviet technologies gave the PRC a chance to re-equip the PLA relatively quickly and with minimal costs for system interaction, logistics and basic doctrinal postulates. For Russia, it was an opportunity to earn much-needed hard currency and purchase goods in exchange for former Soviet military surplus. It was also an opportunity to provide the Russian defense industry with the opportunity to receive financing to support this industry. Therefore, it is not surprising that just four years after the Western countries imposed an arms embargo, a number of major defense contracts were signed, and Russian military equipment began to arrive in China in large quantities.

The purpose of this article is to identify the features of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China, with an emphasis on technology transfer, their adaptation and integration into the Chinese armed forces. The key areas of military-technical cooperation, including aviation, missile, radio-electronic and marine technologies, as well as the impact of this interaction on the strategic balance and prospects of bilateral relations in the field of defense, are considered.

The methodological foundation of this research is an interdisciplinary approach based on the basic principles and methods of structural realism (neorealism). Referring to this scientific school allows us to analyze the tools and content of Russian-Chinese cooperation in the military-technical sphere. The study uses historical-comparative, historical-typological, and problem-chronological methods, which allowed the author to study the approaches of the two countries to military-technical cooperation, as well as evaluate its results for China's military modernization.

Historical periods of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China

Russian experts M.S. Barabanov, V.B. Kashin, and K.V. Makienko divide Sino-Russian military–technical cooperation into four periods [1]. The first stage, covering 1992-1999, was related to China's purchase of export modifications of standard Soviet weapons, which were at the technology level of the 1970s – mid-1980s. These systems had simplified specifications, like all export versions of Soviet weapons. In particular, the Su-27SK fighters, developed back in the late 1970s, had an outdated H001 airborne radar, the technology of which dates back to the 1960s. A similar situation was observed with the destroyers of the 956E project of the Modern type, the technical design of which was approved back in 1977. During this period, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) mainly purchased existing serial weapons and did not order their adaptation to their needs.

In May 1990, China began negotiations on the purchase of Su-27 fighter jets, sending General Liu Huaqing to Moscow. In 1992, China received the first 24 Su-27s worth $1 billion (35% in currency, the rest in barter). By 1996, the parties had agreed on the licensed production of 200 Su-27s in China with technology transfer [2]. In the 1990s, China purchased up to 25% of Russian weapons: 138 Sukhoi aircraft (Su-27, Su-30), 40 Il-76/78, hundreds of Mi-17 helicopters, S-300 and Tor-M1 air defense systems, destroyers, submarines, missiles, aircraft engines, and more. [3]. Since 1992, the joint commission on military-technical cooperation has been working annually.

In the second phase, from 1999 to 2004, China began to acquire weapons designed specifically for the PLA. Despite the increase in the technological level, there was no significant breakthrough: the purchased equipment were upgraded versions of standard models, and reliability and proven technologies remained the priority, not innovation. The most notable acquisitions of this period were the Su-30MKK multipurpose fighters and the upgraded 956EM project destroyers. However, during the same period, China for the first time ordered advanced air defense systems such as the S-300PMU-2, which indicated an increase in its requirements for the quality of weapons.

The third stage, which lasted from 2004 to 2012, was a period of pause in the procurement of major combat systems. Instead, China focused on acquiring auxiliary equipment such as transport planes and tanker planes, as well as individual high-tech components such as engines, radars and missile homing heads, which were used in the development of its own Chinese weapons. In parallel, purchases of ammunition and helicopters continued. During this period, the volume of new contracts with Russia decreased sharply, and by 2006-2007. China lost leadership to India, Algeria, and Venezuela, and by 2009-2010, to Vietnam as well. However, thanks to previously concluded contracts, the total volume of supplies remained significant, ensuring China's first place among buyers of Russian weapons in 2004-2005 and second in 2006-2007.

After 2006, military-technical cooperation between Russia and China noticeably weakened and remained at a low level until 2013-2014. The main reasons were the reduction in Chinese purchases, the expansion of Russia's customer base and its priority on domestic orders [4].

China expected the lifting of the European embargo, but it remained due to US pressure. Russia, in turn, has focused on technological alliances with the West, which has also affected the defense sector. By 2011, China's share in Russian arms exports had decreased from 46.5% (in 2005) to 5%, as Beijing mastered its own production [5].

However, China continued to depend on Russia in the field of aircraft engines. The signing of an intellectual property agreement in 2008 reduced Russian concerns about technology copying, which allowed the resumption of supplies of modern weapons. In 2012, aircraft engines and anti-aircraft systems accounted for 90% of Russian arms exports to China [6].

Major contracts included the supply of Mi-14 helicopters, Su-35 and Il-76MD-90A fighters, S-400 air defense systems, as well as joint projects to modernize the RD-33 engine and manufacture Tiger armored vehicles in China [7]. These supplies have strengthened China's defense capabilities in strategically important regions, including Taiwan and the South China Sea.

The fourth stage, which began in 2013 and continues to the present, was marked by China's return to purchasing modern Russian combat platforms. This may be due to the fact that China has faced difficulties in developing its own advanced military equipment, especially in the field of aviation and shipbuilding. This showed the limits of his technological development in the defense industry, as a result of which he again turned to Russia for the latest available systems. In particular, in 2013, an agreement was signed to purchase 24 Russian Su-35 fighter jets, which confirmed China's interest in high-tech Russian weapons.

In 2015, contracts for the Su-35 and S-400 worth $5 billion were signed, which resumed large-scale arms supplies to China. This was followed by deals on helicopters, aircraft engines, and submarine technology [8], indicating a shift from arms sales to technology transfer. Joint projects cover new strategic areas, including armaments, space, and AI [9].

The importance of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China for the military modernization of China

Military-technical cooperation between Russia and China is important for the development of the Chinese defense industry, since the principle of the PRC's action in the military-technical cooperation with Russia is the purchase of military-technical equipment units with the further acquisition of licenses and/ or design documentation (CD) for the samples they are interested in. For example, based on the Russian Su-27 fighter jets, China has developed its own J-11 fighter. He did this faster than originally planned, so he prematurely stopped licensed production, while simultaneously stating that he had completed the development of the J-11B [10].

China is also actively pursuing reverse engineering (reverse engineering), while acquiring manufacturing experience that has helped China develop domestic structures. This procedure includes the process of developing design documentation based on the initial data obtained in the form of a finished product sample.

Today, within the framework of military-technical cooperation, China is showing interest in a number of Russian weapons. One of the key areas is the Su-35 fighter, which attracts the Chinese side with the Al-41F jet engine with supercruise capability, the N035 Irbis multi-mode radar with a passive electronically scanned array (PESA) and modern avionics. It is noteworthy that China has purchased six spare Al-41F engines for each Su-35 instead of the standard two, which indicates its intention to use these engines for its own program to create fifth-generation J-20 fighters.

China also continues to receive S-400 systems, but deliveries have been difficult. The first batch arrived in 2018, but some of the equipment was damaged during transportation due to a storm, and the completion of deliveries was delayed due to the pandemic. In addition, China is showing interest in diesel-electric submarines of the Lada 677 project, probably in order to gain access to advanced sonar technologies and noise reduction systems, which, combined with Chinese power plants and fire control systems, can form the basis for the development of a new generation submarine.

The issue of the supply of Russian RD-180 rocket engines deserves special attention. For a long time, Russia was in no hurry to sell these engines to China, preferring to offer services for the delivery of Chinese astronauts on Russian carriers. However, in 2022, China achieved a breakthrough by successfully testing the YF-130 two-cylinder liquid rocket engine developed by CASC Corporation. With a maximum thrust of 500 tons, this engine surpassed the Russian RD-180, which calls into question China's continued interest in this technology.

Despite progress in certain areas, Russian aircraft engines remain an important factor in military-technical cooperation between the two countries. In the period from 2017 to 2021, aircraft engines accounted for more than 54% of Chinese arms imports in value terms, with most of them supplied from Russia [11]. For example, Chinese Chengdu J-20 stealth fighters are equipped with Russian Al-31 engines, and the Shenyang J-35/FC-31 fighter under development uses RD-93 engines.

Assessment of the current stage of military-technical cooperation

Important for characterizing the current stage of the military-technical cooperation between the Russian Federation and China is the fact that traditional roles are changing, with China also becoming a supplier to Russia of the most important items for the development and modernization of Russian weapons. Areas in which the Russian supplier remains include electronic components, for example, for the Russian space program; marine diesel engines, where the Chinese Henan Diesel Engine Corporation has already received an order for 8 diesel engines for the Buyan-M rocket corvette and patrol boats. The purchase of composite materials and unmanned technologies also looks attractive to Russia.

The "joint projects" of Russia and China are a separate area of development of promising types of weapons and military equipment. In the "joint" heavy–lift helicopter project, Russia's role was reportedly reduced to technical support and supply of engines, transmission and tail rotor, while China's role was reduced to the overall helicopter design, assembly and testing. At the same time, Russia will reportedly transfer its core technologies of the Mi-26 heavy multipurpose transport helicopter to China as a contribution to the design of the new helicopter [12]. Having declared its willingness to cooperate with China on the deployment of the early warning system (early warning system), Russia officially received only one software development contract, although it is reported to provide technical assistance on space control issues and possibly on other aspects of the system [13].

Russia and China are participating in a joint development project for a "new generation non-nuclear submarine." In this project, China is mainly interested in sonar systems and noise reduction technologies. Another potentially new and interesting joint Russian-Chinese project concerns the research and development of an experimental "reconnaissance UAV" launched from the shell of an ammunition launched by the Smerch MLRS [14].

Beijing and Moscow "recognize the potential synergies from joining forces in the development of these dual-use technologies, which have clear military and commercial significance." As a result, Russia and China are developing cooperation in such technology sectors as artificial intelligence, robotics, 5G telecommunications, biotechnology, and the digital economy. The technological partnership, based on subcontracting work on various joint defense innovation programs, is changing the nature of the usual transactional Sino-Russian military-technical cooperation, translating it into a more complex interdependence.

Military-technical cooperation between Russia and China has not stopped after the start of the Russian military-technical cooperation in Ukraine. Russia and China continued to implement the previously concluded contracts for 7 units of Tiger armored vehicles and 18 units of Mi-18 transport aircraft [15]. It is worth noting that China does not supply weapons and military equipment to Russia against the background of the events in Ukraine. Officially, Beijing means that "the US intelligence [on arms supplies to the Russian Federation] is speculation and slander against China [16]. Since the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, Beijing has consistently called for peace and negotiations, playing a constructive role in resolving the situation, as clearly evidenced by the 12 points of political settlement of the Ukrainian crisis proposed by China in February 2023 [17]. Despite the neutral position of Chinese diplomacy, the PRC rather adheres to a pro-Russian position, given that the Russian Federation is opposed by the entire consolidated West. This is evidenced by the statement of Chinese Defense Minister Dong Jun dated January 31, 2024, where he informed Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu that Beijing would not abandon Moscow's "support" on the "Ukrainian issue" [18]. It is worth paying attention to the wording of the Chinese statement, because for the first time since the beginning of its military operation, China publicly announced Russia's "support" in the Ukrainian conflict. From the point of view of Russian experts, this support may consist in facilitating military production [19] deployed in the Russian Federation, facilitating the receipt of military components and dual-use products (UAVs and anti-UAV systems).

Thus, technology transfer from Russia to China is a trend in the Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation, there are no prerequisites for its change. Moreover, this trend will continue, given China's strong desire to develop its own defense production facilities. Russia's role remains in the field of turbofan engines for helicopters, various systems for the submarine fleet, as well as in weapons samples that were not transferred to China (for example, the Iskander-E missile defense system). Russian-Chinese transactions are currently unilateral in nature, i.e. mainly Russian technologies are being transferred. This usually happens in so-called "collaborative development" projects. However, this can be explained by the catch-up development of the Chinese defense industry, which undermined Russia's previous strategy of selling its "second-rate" systems to China, while maintaining a generation ahead in weapons development. At the present stage, raising the issue of addiction looks controversial. Rather, we can talk about the operational integration of the armed forces of the two countries, at least at an informal level, because this is facilitated by the common production and technological base of the two countries. In the absence of fundamental changes in this area, the scenario of gaining wider access to Chinese commercial and dual-use technologies looks beneficial for Russia, which would help both support its defense industry in the face of military confrontation with the Collective West and develop a more innovative economy.

References
1. Barabanov, M.S., Kashin, V.B., & Makienko, K.V. (2013). The defense industry and arms trade of the PRC. Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.
2. Austin, G., & Muraviev, A.D. (2000). Red Star East: The armed forces of Russia in Asia. Allen & Unwin.
3. Muraviev, A.D. (2014). Comrades in arms: The military-strategic aspects of China-Russia relations. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 1(2), 163-185.
4. Klimenko, A.F. (2020). Some issues of the development of the Russia-China partnership in the field of security under modern conditions. China in Global and Regional Politics: History and Modernity, 25, 51-65.
5. 中俄军事技术合作领域知识产权保护协定 [Agreement on the protection of intellectual property rights in the field of military-technical cooperation between China and Russia]. (2008). DocIn. Retrieved from https://www.docin.com/p-862320234.html
6. Kashin, V.B. (2013). A stable source of income for our defense industry. Military Review. https://topwar.ru/35936-stabilnyy-istochnik-dohodov-dlya-nashego-opk.html?ysclid=lv6jbaw37d259236310
7. Военно-техническое сотрудничество России и Китая. Досье [Military-technical cooperation between Russia and China: A dossier]. (2015, September 2). TASS. https://tass.ru/info/2228966
8. Gorenburg, D. (2019). An emerging strategic partnership: Trends in Russia-China military cooperation. International Politics, 1-10.
9. Schwartz, P. (2021, June 21). The changing nature and implications of Russian military transfers to China. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/changing-nature-and-implications-russian-military-transfers-china
10. Copycat king: The Chinese Air Force's J-11B heavy fighter. (2009, July 30). Wangyi Xinwen. https://www.163.com/war/article/5FGFQE5H00011232.html
11. How deep are China-Russia military ties? China Power. https://chinapower.csis.org/china-russia-military-cooperation-arms-sales-exercises/
12. Россия и Китай договорились об условиях создания тяжелого вертолета. Кто будет строить "супервертолет" и зачем ему украинский двигатель [Russia and China agreed on the terms of creating a heavy helicopter. Who will build the "super helicopter" and why does it need a Ukrainian engine]. (2019, March 14). RBC. https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/03/2019/5c8651b29a794750bc7b799d
13. РФ и Китай сотрудничают в сфере контроля космического пространства [Russia and China cooperate in the field of space control]. (2020, February 23). Interfax. https://www.militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=527667&lang=RU
14. Kirchberger, S. (Ed.). (2022). Russian-Chinese military-technological cooperation and the Ukrainian factor in Russia-China relations: Emerging alliance or eternal rivals? Springer.
15SIPRI Arms Transfers Database. https://armstransfers.sipri.org/ArmsTransfer/TransferData
16. 宣称“中国同意向俄方支援武器”,美国这招够歹毒![Claiming that "China agrees to support arms supplies to Russia," the United States is behaving quite wickedly!]. (2023, February 27). 黑龙江 [Heilongjiang]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1758976201332989104&wfr=spider&for=pc
17. 关于政治解决乌克兰危机的中国立场 [China's position on the political resolution of the Ukrainian crisis]. (2023, February 25). 人民日报 [Renmin Ribao]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2023/0225/c64387-32631001.html
18. 董军同俄罗斯国防部长视频通话 [Protocol of the video meeting of Minister Dong Jun with the Minister of Defense of Russia]. (2024, January 31). 国防部网 [Ministry of Defense]. http://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/qwfb/16284264.html
19. Превзошли СССР: политолог Кашин оценил военную мощь Китая [Surpassed the USSR: Political scientist Kashin assessed China's military power]. (2023, March 20). Московский Комсомолец [Moskovskiy Komsomolets]. https://www.mk.ru/politics/2023/03/20/prevzoshli-sssr-politolog-kashin-ocenil-voennuyu-moshh-kitaya.html?ysclid=lv8fek50ky503000264

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is cooperation between Russia and China in the military-technical sphere as a factor of the strategic partnership between the two countries. Given the "turn of Russia to the East" observed in recent years, associated with the cooling that occurred earlier with Western countries, as well as the increasing role of the People's Republic of China in this region, it is difficult to overestimate the scientific relevance and practical significance of the topic chosen by the author. The author rightly believes that military-technical cooperation is an extremely important factor in the strategic partnership between Russia and China. The author's methodological choice seems to be quite adequate: comparative, typological, and problem-chronological methods in the context of the neorealist paradigm in the theory of international relations. The correct application of these methods in the study of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China allowed the author to obtain results with signs of scientific novelty and reliability. First of all, we are talking about the identified key trend in Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation related to the transfer of military technologies by Russia to China, as well as the interest of China in obtaining these technologies noted by the author, which "works" to strengthen the identified trend. In addition, the role of military-technical cooperation between the Russian Federation and China in the development of strategic partnership between the two countries is of scientific interest. Finally, the author identifies some problems of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China, and suggests a solution or minimization of these problems. Structurally, the reviewed work also makes a positive impression: its logic is consistent and reflects the main aspects of the research. The following sections are highlighted in the text: - an unstated introductory part, where a scientific problem is posed, its relevance is substantiated, the purpose and objectives of the study are formulated, and theoretical and methodological reflection is carried out; - "Historical periods of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China", where the history of military-technical cooperation between the Russian Federation and China is explored and the proposed other researchers have developed a four-step history of this collaboration; - "The importance of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China for the military modernization of the PRC", which analyzes the reasons for China's interest in military-technical cooperation with Russia, which allowed the author to draw one of the key conclusions from the results of the study; - "Assessment of the current stage of military-technical cooperation", which examines and evaluates the current stage of development military-technical cooperation between the two countries; - an unfinished conclusion summarizing the results of the study, drawing conclusions and outlining prospects for further research. The style of the reviewed article is scientific and analytical. The text contains some (vanishingly small!) the number of stylistic and grammatical errors (for example, mismanagement in the expression "transfer to someone (and not "to someone")" in the sentence "... Technology transfer from Russia to China is a trend in Russian-Chinese military-technical cooperation ..."; etc.), but in general it is written quite competently, in good Russian, with the correct use of scientific terminology. The bibliography includes 19 titles, including sources in two foreign languages, and adequately reflects the state of research on the subject of the article. The appeal to the opponents takes place in terms of discussing the periodization of the history of the development of military-technical cooperation between Russia and China. The specially discussed advantages of the article include a fairly large amount of empirical material used for analysis, as well as its rather systematic processing. THE GENERAL CONCLUSION is that the article proposed for review can be qualified as a scientific work that meets the basic requirements for such work. The results obtained by the author will be interesting for political scientists, sociologists, sinologists, conflictologists, specialists in the field of world politics and international relations, as well as for students of the listed specialties. The presented material corresponds to the topic of the journal "Conflictology / nota bene". Based on the results of the review, the article is recommended for publication.