Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

The daily life of teachers in the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the WWII period

Mezit Lyudmila Edgarovna

ORCID: 0000-0003-3341-4237

PhD in History

Associate Professor, Department of Russian History, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University

660041, Russia, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, ul. Kurchatov, 1a, sq. 79

mezit@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Filippova Karina Renatovna

ORCID: 0009-0008-4001-3486

Independent researcher

660049, Russia, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Krasnoyarsk, Lebedeva str., 89, office 230

filipp0va.kar@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2025.2.72785

EDN:

GGSDCO

Received:

20-12-2024


Published:

02-03-2025


Abstract: The subject of the research is to identify the changes that occurred in the activities of teachers in the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the WWII. The mass composition of this professional group, which worked both in the city and in the countryside, however, was not the subject of a special study. The main attention is paid to regional peculiarities, which make it possible to assess the effectiveness of the state policy of the period under study. The attention of the party and state bodies to the education system did not weaken during the war years, which cannot be said about the care of teaching staff, due to the objective and subjective conditions of the period under study. The identification of an array of typologically diverse historical sources in the State Archive of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, which were first introduced into scientific circulation, makes it possible to obtain answers to a number of key questions of teachers' daily practice. The research methodology is based on the principles of a critical understanding of the activities of the party-state bodies for the social protection of teachers in the region. The historical and anthropological method made it possible to reconstruct the working and living conditions of a mass professional group, their impact on the results of activities aimed at solving state tasks facing the education system during the period under study. Due to limited material resources, the decisions of higher authorities were not fully implemented in the region, however, control over the implementation of the Law on Universal Education and Patriotic Education of Students was systematic. In the context of the mass conscription of the region's population into the Red Army, the teachers who remained in the province were overloaded not only with the academic load, but also with socio-political, cultural and educational work with the population, participation in agricultural work, etc. All this had a negative impact on the quality of education, the moral and psychological state of teachers. The teaching staff courageously overcame material and household problems along with the entire population of the region, while maintaining dignity and the status of professional affiliation. Therefore, during the war years, a significant number of teachers were awarded high state awards.


Keywords:

production daily life, supply system, deficit, cards, coupons, awards, general education, instructions, special settlers, prices

This article is automatically translated.

Military anthropological research makes it possible to expand the research field of a well-studied period of history by understanding life problems from the perspective of its participants, to trace the logic of people's actions in extreme conditions. On the other hand, the regional features of everyday life during the war years have great potential for exploring the human dimension of war.

Analyzing the degree of study of the topic, it should be noted that the works of the predecessors focused on the implementation of the law on universal education and the role of teachers in fostering patriotism among children and adolescents, as the main tasks of the education system during the Great Patriotic War [1-3].

The difficulties of the material and domestic nature of teachers were only mentioned in the works devoted to the social policy of the country during the war [4-10].

In the publications and dissertation research of Belova N.A., based on the materials of the Kostroma region, devoted to the everyday life of teachers of the period under study, the problems of everyday work and the solution of housing issues, as well as the supply problems of one of the mass professional groups in the region are comprehensively analyzed [11].

At the same time, the problems of industrial activity that arose in connection with the restructuring of the education system during the war period and the problems of the financial situation of teachers in the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the war period are little explored.

The source base of the work was made up of materials from the State Archive of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, personal memoirs of teachers who worked in schools in the region during the war period, and periodicals.

Methodology and methods. The anthropological approach allowed us to see Soviet everyday life through the eyes of the teachers themselves, it helps to fill the gap in the study of the lifestyle of educational workers during the war period. The principle of historicism allowed us to consider historical phenomena and processes in their formation and development, the principle of scientific objectivity, contributed to the analysis of the totality of facts in their interrelation. The research methods include comparative historical constructions, on the basis of which the functioning of Soviet teaching was traced in chronological and regional comparison. The ideographic method provided an opportunity to describe the events of the teachers' daily lives.

The war affected all spheres of Soviet society, including the public education system, and radically changed the lives and activities of teachers. With the outbreak of the Great Patriotic War, teachers, like all residents of the country, responded to the need to help the Fatherland, some teachers were mobilized, another group went to the front as volunteers. In the first months of the war, there was a reduction in teaching staff, but soon 716 teachers evacuated from the western regions of the country arrived in the region, 348 of them got jobs in schools in the region. Thus, 11 people were employed in the Idrinsky district, and 7 in the Mansky district [2; p. 257]. In the conditions of a shortage of teachers, in many districts of the region, even special settlers from among those deported to the Krasnoyarsk Territory were involved in teaching. In the 1943-44 academic year, 39 special settlers (from among Kalmyks, Germans, and Finns) were involved in teaching in the Mansky district of the region, including three of them who worked as school principals, 4 as heads of the educational unit [12; d. 336. L. 173]. At the same time, due to the systematic increase in the number of schools, the problem of shortage of teaching staff was not solved during the study period, which contributed to the overload of working teachers.

Table 1 Dynamics of the number of teaching staff in the region [3; p.216]

padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt'>

1944-1945

Academic year

Number of teaching staff

1941-1942

12 433

1942-1943

13 340

1943-1944

14 953

13 230

Working conditions. Since the beginning of the war, school buildings in the cities of the region were transferred to hospitals, evacuated enterprises, orphanages, and therefore the vast majority of schools worked in two or three shifts. It was common practice for one teacher to work in several classes, so work on correcting handwriting, individual work with weak students, overgrown students, and organizing excursions were curtailed [3; p.216]. A similar trend was observed in other regions of the country [6; p.11; 8; pp.151-152; 11; p.22].

A serious challenge to teachers was the severing of the parent-child bond during this period, due to the massive involvement of women in the real sector of the economy. Therefore, they could not pay due attention to children, which means that teachers were placed under increased demands for the results of their work with schoolchildren.

In wartime conditions, it was necessary to change the methods of work, because the students did not have the conditions for independent work at home (lack of textbooks, lack of light, etc.). The predominant method was storytelling, but the teachers tried as much as possible to activate the cognitive activity of the children in order to maintain motivation to study, to achieve the assimilation of new knowledge. Thus, the Russian language teacher E.I. Okladnikov from the Aban school conducted selective dictation in order to save paper, and used newspaper material for the texts of the presentations [2; p. 306].

Inspectors of the regional Department of Education, staff of the Institute of Teacher Training paid special attention to the practical orientation of the educational process. The teacher of the Aban primary school used her personal herbarium of poisonous and medicinal plants to study the topic "Plants", and in the spring she carried out potato improvisation with the students. To develop the vocabulary of the students, patriotic poems were memorized with them, etc. As a result, academic performance in her classes was high. In the Dzerzhinsky district, teachers of history and literature, when studying new material, linked it with modernity. [2; c.305]. Krayono sought to spread the experience of teachers who made visual aids, non-standard working methods from improvised tools and achieved good results.

Young teachers did not have sufficient experience in teaching children without homework, forming solid knowledge, made mistakes in their work: they did not know how to systematically form the reading technique of the children, carried out a breakaway study of grammar and literary reading, etc. The Regional Department of Education, together with the Institute for Teacher Training, systematically conducted methodological meetings, short-term courses to improve professional skills However, due to their excessive workload, it was not possible to change the situation during the war years, and teachers did not have the means to purchase methodological literature. The quality of knowledge in mathematics and the Russian language remained low in the region throughout the study period.

During the war period, teachers were not given vacations, and plans were made to recruit them to work on collective farms and industrial enterprises in the region in their free time. Teachers participated in harvesting firewood, processing school grounds, and were on duty in crowded places (bazaars, train stations) in order to identify street and street children, etc.

In the spring of 1942, all schools in the region joined the All-Union competition for agricultural work. Together with the students, the teachers grew vegetables and cereals on school grounds, helped collective farms with harvesting, starting in 1941. The school year in grades 5-8 began on October 1, grades 9-10 – on October 15. In the summer of 1943 alone, 2,138 city teachers of the region worked together with students in the farms of the region [3; p.225]. Teachers were fully responsible for organizing agricultural teams of students, while at the same time conducting propaganda work among collective farmers. The work of children and teachers, as well as the work of collective farmers, was paid for in workdays. Every 6th grade student in the city had to work 45 workdays over the summer, students in grades 7-8 had 60 workdays, grades 9-10 had 85 workdays. The standards were higher for rural schoolchildren [13; p.98].

From the memoirs of Olga Lavrova, who worked as a teacher in Ilansk during the war years: "Teachers gave 8-10 lessons. The new material had to be given in such a way that the children not only understood it, but also remembered it, because the children had no time to do homework, a lot of homework and social assignments that they carried out. Since the first winter of the war, free meals have been provided to students in all schools in the city. A titanium was installed, where carrot tea was boiled, and the children were given a piece of bread and boiled potatoes" [13; p. 115].

The teacher of the Dzerzhinsky district, A.P. Semenov, recalled that there were not enough notebooks and pencils, they wrote in lessons with beet juice and blueberries in self-sewn notebooks made from old books and used them in their work. One textbook was for several students [14; p.271].

At the annual regional pedagogical meetings, according to archival materials, the leaders of the region stated that many resolutions of the Ministry of Education of the RSFSR in the region were not implemented properly. The region was unable to stabilize the school network and ensure the implementation of the law on universal education, overgrown students who entered the first grade, as a rule, left school without completing their studies, the law on the separate education of boys and girls in most districts of the region was not implemented, etc. During the war, the leadership of teachers by the party was strengthened. Teachers constantly had to work beyond the norm, at the expense of sleep and rest [2; p.257]. Despite all the difficulties, the teachers tried to fulfill their duties faithfully, teaching and educating the children as patriots of their country. We can agree with N.A. Belova that teachers sought to be an example for the families of their students in their attitude to the cause, considering it their contribution to the common cause of Victory [11; p.26].

Financial situation. The teachers' difficult working conditions were accompanied by difficult living conditions. In January 1942, at a regional meeting, the head of the regional university noted that many teachers of the region were not provided with fuel and kerosene, so they had to check their notebooks at the furnace with a beam (Kuraginsky, Askiz districts). In Askiz district Teachers did not receive the required 400 grams of bread, and their family members' rations were generally halved. In the Mansky district, rural settlements delayed the distribution of bread on cards for 10-15 days [12; d.336. L. 173]. In the Kuraginsky district, bread was not given out for 1-2 months, in the Birilussky district – for 2-3 days. City teachers received meager rations on cards, as a result of which starvation faints occurred due to malnutrition, and medical care was poor [15; D. 502. L. 45].

According to the memoirs of I.N. Popov, who lived in the Yenisei region of the region during the war period: "We ate poorly. The main course was potatoes, vegetables, river fish, meat was rare, they often starved. They used to eat salt and drink water for three days. It was difficult" [16; pp.353-354].

In the 1943-1944 academic year, a one-time campaign was held in the region to provide teachers with additional rations, which included sugar, soap, salt, matches, and kerosene. In a number of districts, they found an opportunity to allocate warm shoes and industrial goods. Special canteens were opened for city teachers. In the direction of the medical institution, weakened teachers were given the opportunity to receive additional meals in these canteens, food stamps in these canteens were also used as incentives for particularly distinguished workers [18; D.475. L. 6].

The issues of domestic and material support for teachers were constantly in the focus of attention of the party-Soviet bodies. Young teachers who came to work in rural areas of the region were in a particularly difficult situation. Since the end of April 1942, teachers of the region in cities and rural areas have been on a card supply of food and industrial goods. However, the centralized funds allocated to the region and the products of local cooperatives were not enough to supply the population without interruption, according to the standards set by state authorities, therefore, harvesting wild plants and gardening significantly facilitated the survival of teachers during this period[15; D. 840. L. 33]. Local education authorities sought additional reserves to solve their urgent tasks, to secure teachers in their districts. In 1942, the head of the Boguchansky district Department of Education, Tretyakov N.I., appealed to the chairman of the cooperative with a request to allocate 50 pairs of stockings for teachers who wear shoes and stockings should not be darned [17; p.145].

During the war years, the income of teaching staff decreased, although from August 1, 1943-1944 academic year, wages increased by 30-40% [2; p.265]. During the war years, the amount of taxes and deductions paid by teachers increased. The military tax, which was levied on the entire able-bodied population in the rear; contributions to the Defense Fund; the distribution of government loans, the volume of which increased during the war; the payment of income tax, led to the fact that the amount of contributions to the state reached 50 rubles at the rate of a teacher of the first category 240 rubles and the second category 300 rubles. We were not able to find in the regional archive the pay statements for teachers in agricultural and forestry work, only a mention that payments had been made.

The amount of food that they received on the cards was not enough for proper nutrition, so the teachers resorted to the services of the market. The prices of consumer goods in the markets of the regional center are shown in the table below.

Table 2 Cost of goods in Krasnoyarsk [18; d. 537. Ll. 20, 64; D. 14, L.71-72; D.457, L.19]

mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext .5pt; mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt'>

180-350 rubles

years

The cost of 1 kg of meat

The cost of 1 liter of milk

The cost of 1 bucket of potatoes

1942

60 rubles

10 rubles

30 rubles

1943

40-60 rubles

240-280 rubles

Outwardly, the teachers tried to look neat, while it was impossible to hide the wear and tear of things, because the teachers had practically no money and opportunity to update the wardrobe. Photographs of wartime teachers allow us to reconstruct their appearance: their hair is well-styled, they are dressed modestly, as a rule, a dark skirt, a light blouse with a thick knitted jacket, vest. Shoes are usually worn out after being repaired. Most of the teachers endured hardships stoically and did not often turn to higher authorities for help.

However, according to archival materials, the financial situation of many teachers was close to catastrophic. In 1943, the regional committee of the CPSU(b) heard the results of a commission that examined the financial situation of teachers in the city of Krasnoyarsk. The report cited egregious examples. So a young teacher at school No. 3 in Krasnoyarsk, a student at the pedagogical institute, goes to lessons in a coat, because she does not have a dress, and a teacher with many children at School No. 21, whose husband recently died at the front, has absolutely no shoes, so she goes to work in rags. The members of the commission drew attention to the fact that all educational institutions in the city have bosses and those organizations that live by the interests of the school, help teachers who find themselves in a difficult life situation, so the teachers of the girls' school No. 47 received fat cards, 50 meters of canvas, and by March 8 even small bonuses. A number of teachers at the girls' school No. 40 (the bosses of the Norilkombinat) attached weakened teachers to their own cafeteria, and some were given fat cards [12; d. 336. L. 126].

In July 1943, 46 wagons of ready–made outerwear and underwear arrived in the region - new and used under Lend-Lease, sent by the Allies. His distribution by special orders was carried out among university teachers, teachers, military families, orphanages [19; p. 361].

Despite the enormous hardships and difficulties in the region, there were many teachers who, in difficult conditions, showed a creative approach to work, achieved good results, and were usually awarded government awards. The Krasnoyarsk Worker newspaper No. 33 for 1945 contains a photo of 7 teachers who received the highest state awards for their work (the Order of Lenin, the Order of the Badge of Honor, the Order of the Red Banner of Labor) [21; p.1].

During the war, school groups acted as a single unit, and the distance between teachers and students, characteristic of the educational process, was reduced during joint mobilization campaigns aimed at helping the front. Due to the lack of parental attention, children were drawn to teachers who took care of them. Among the teachers of that time, women prevailed, who retained their dignity, sought to conform to the status of a teacher, adapting to the limitations of wartime, selflessly fulfilled their civic duty and made every possible contribution to the common cause of victory.

The conducted research allows us to conclude that during the war years, studies for many children faded into the background, as the standard of living of families fell sharply, and the state was interested in the earlier involvement of teenagers in the real sector of the economy instead of mobilized men and women. All this increased the role and responsibility of teachers for universal education, for educating decent citizens of their country. However, in the region, due to limited financial and material resources, local leaders, unlike in other regions of the country, were unable to fully implement the decisions of the Ministry of Education of the RSFSR on the restructuring of the educational process during the war, to ensure that schools and teachers working in them were supplied with everything necessary according to approved standards. The shortage of teaching staff has led to teachers being overloaded with public assignments in addition to the main work in two shifts. This practice has developed in most of the country's rear regions. However, due to its vast territory, Krayono has not organized regular methodological work with young teachers in the region.; They were attracted by specialists without teaching experience, which affected the poor preparation of such teachers for lessons, and this, in turn, led to a decrease in the quality of knowledge among students and a large dropout of children from school.

The teachers solved the material and household problems mostly on their own, since the local authorities did not have enough resources for this. Teachers had to save on almost everything. His modest teaching income did not allow him to have even one good suit. Despite the difficult financial situation of the teachers, they actively participated in fundraising for the Defense Fund and other patriotic actions. It can be argued that despite all the difficulties of daily life during the war, teachers, like all Soviet people, made a great contribution to the cause of the common victory over Nazi Germany.

References (оформлена автором)
1Public education of the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the years of Soviet power: collection. scientific works. (1970). Krasnoyarsk, KSPI.
2. Bibikova, V.V. (2016). Implementation of the law on universal education during the Great Patriotic War in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Krasnoyarsk: JSC "Luna-River".
3. Fedorova, V.I. (Ed.). (2014). Essays on the history of public education in the Krasnoyarsk region in the 17th – early 21st centuries. Krasnoyarsk: KSPU named after. V.P. Astafieva.
4. Shalak, A.V. (2000). Social problems of the population of Eastern Siberia in 1940–1950. Irkutsk: IGEA Publishing House.
5. Tverdyukova, E.D. (2021). Deputy corps of district soviets of Leningrad during the Great Patriotic War: staff composition and activity. Genesis: Historical research, 11, 72-81. doi:10.25136/2409-868X.2021.11.36836 Retrieved from http://en.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_36836.html
6. Ovchinnikov, A.V. (2020). Power and teaching in Russia during the Great Patriotic War. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, 2(66), 7-17.
7. Zhukova, O.G. (2011). Sociocultural policy in the USSR during the Great Patriotic War. Vlast, 8, 142-144.
8. Lapteva, Yu. V. (2022). Universal education as a system for preserving children's contingents in 1941–1945: based on materials from the Molotov and Sverdlovsk regions Global challenges to demographic development: a collection of scientific articles in 2 volumes. – Vol. I. – Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – P. 146-158. – doi:10.17059/udf-2022-1-13
9. Emirkhanov, I.A. (2017). Daily life of the population of the rear region during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 (based on materials from the Dagestan Autonomous Republic. History: facts and symbols, 4(13), 128-136. doi:10.24888/2410-4205-2017-13-4-128-136
10. Vycherov, D.A., & Prishchepa, A.S. (2021). School staff during the Great Patriotic War (based on materials from the city of Tyumen). Questions of history, 2, 94-103. doi:10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202102Statyi11
11. Belov, A.M., & Belova, N.A., (2015). Everyday life of teachers in the Kostroma region during the Great Patriotic War. Bulletin of KSU named after. N.A. Nekrasova, 4, 21-26.
12. State Archives of the Krasnoyarsk Territory (GAKK). F.P-26, Op.15.
13 Labor Front of Krasnoyarsk. 1941–1945. (2018). Krasnoyarsk: Polikor.
14 War veterans and home front workers. Dzerzhinsky district. (2020). Krasnoyarsk: Amalgema.
15. GACC. F.R- 1383. Op. 1.
16We remember... (2005). Krasnoyarsk: Amalgemа.
17. Krasnoyarsk residents in the Great Patriotic War. Proceedings of the regional interuniversity conference. (2005). Krasnoyarsk: KRISEP Publishing House.
18. GACC. F. P-26. Op. 3.
19Krasnoyarsk region during the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945. (according to documents from the archive agency of the Krasnoyarsk Territory). Collection of documents.(2010). Krasnoyarsk: KASS publishing house.
20. GACC. F. P26. Op. 14a.
21. Presentation of orders and medals of the USSR to teachers of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Krasnoyarsk worker, 33(7903) dated February 17, 1945.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article is presented as a "military anthropological study" devoted to the little-studied topic of the life and everyday life of teachers during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. The author gives examples of the difficulties faced by teachers during the war: overloads, material deprivation, lack of resources. If we consider the article as the result of an anthropological study, then its positive aspects include a focus on everyday life, a description of teachers' lives, which allows us to see the social reality of wartime. The descriptions are based on sources "from below" – personal memories, diaries and other sources created by the participants of the events themselves are used, which gives the research additional depth and authenticity. This is a characteristic feature of the anthropological approach. The article indirectly touches upon issues of cultural practices, for example, ways of adapting to new living conditions, changes in the value system. The study examines teachers not in isolation, but in the context of broader social processes that took place in the country during the war years. At the same time, the author did not formulate a justification for the relevance of the research, including the "increased relevance" of the subject of the article in the context of the anthropological field. The scientific novelty of the research is not expressed. The article does not clearly trace the theoretical and methodological basis of the research. It is unclear which specific anthropological concepts and techniques were used by the author, and how important they were for interpreting the data identified from the sources. The author could justify an interdisciplinary approach to the topic of the article, since the methods of history, sociology, and psychology are used in anthropological research – the integration of these disciplines could enrich the research. Geographically, the article does not go beyond the Krasnoyarsk Territory, however, it was advisable to apply the comparison method and compare the experience of teachers in the Krasnoyarsk Territory with the experience of teachers in other regions, to identify common and specific features. The article has no clear structure. The main part of the text clearly needs to highlight logical sections devoted to various aspects of teachers' lives: workloads, financial situation, living conditions, social support, moral climate, relationships with students, etc. The text could be structured using subheadings to make it easier for the reader to understand. The lack of a clear structure can be explained by the fact that the data in the article is fragmentary, random, the author did not set clear goals for a consistent study of various aspects of professional and everyday life of teachers and the creation of an information base, but simply inserted into the article what he came across in archival documents and literature. The statistical data presented in the single table can be visualized to provide more visual information about the number of teaching staff. Data on the cost of meat, sugar, and other foodstuffs could also be presented in tabular and graphical formats. In this article about the daily life of teachers, the teachers themselves are missing – their reactions to everyday problems, experiences, behavior, personal qualities, relationships with colleagues, students, relatives, etc. The bibliography needs to be updated – the latest publications over the past 5 years make up less than 15% of the list. It is advisable to expand the bibliography by involving research on other regions and the entire country as a whole. Of course, teachers during the Great Patriotic War faced many difficulties – overloads, material deprivation, lack of resources, changes in the educational process; the social situation of teachers during the war worsened significantly; despite the difficulties, teachers continued to do their job, provided education to children in difficult conditions, contributed to the victory - all this It's common knowledge. At the same time, the article does not contain enough representative data for convincing conclusions about teachers of the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the war years, it contains fragmentary examples of difficulties faced by teachers during the war. The author's conclusions generally correspond to historical reality, but need to be confirmed by systematic data and other studies on the situation of teachers during the war. The article needs a high-quality revision.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The reviewed text "The daily life of teachers of the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the war period" concerns, according to the author, the regional features of everyday life during the war, with an emphasis on overcoming difficulties of a material and domestic nature, which in fact constitutes the novelty of this study relative to previous references to this topic. The work was carried out on an extensive source base, including materials from the State Archive of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, personal memoirs of teachers, and materials from the periodical press of the wartime period. The methodological basis is based on general historical methods: historicism, the comparative historical method, in a broader interpretation of the topic under consideration, we have military anthropological research, which attempts to understand the problems of military daily life from the point of view of direct participants, to trace the logic of people's actions in extreme conditions (which gives the research topic relevance). In his work, the author highlights the systemic problems faced by education workers in the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the war: lack of personnel, distraction of teachers and students to community service, lack of basic material and technical facilities for conducting classes at school and at home. The author tracks the dynamics of the material well-being of teachers in the Krasnoyarsk Territory, comparing the level of income and prices during the described period. In conclusion, the author justifiably states that "limited financial and material resources did not allow local leaders to ensure that schools and teachers working in them were supplied with everything they needed. In addition to the main work, teachers were overloaded with public assignments, which affected the poor preparation of a number of teachers for lessons, and this, in turn, led to a decrease in the quality of students' knowledge and a large dropout rate from school." It seems that the conclusions of this study should be expanded and brought in line with the tasks set at the beginning of the article, where, in particular, the author pointed out that the study of regional features of everyday life during the war years has great potential for exploring the human dimension of war; the author also declared the use of comparative historical constructions to track the functioning of Soviet teaching in chronological order. and regional comparison. Meanwhile, in the conclusion, the author does not indicate which of the above is precisely a regional feature of military daily life, nor does he make a chronological and regional comparison in the conclusion, although such attempts are made in the course of the work. Perhaps it is necessary to clarify the structure of the article, in the present form you see two sections, Materials and methods, Financial situation, transition from the introductory part to the main and from the main to the conclusion are not indicated. In general, we have a job done at the proper scientific and methodological level. it has scientific novelty and relevance. With the correction of this defect, the article can be recommended for publication.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the reviewed article is the daily life of teachers of the Krasnoyarsk Territory during the Great Patriotic War, which allows us to look at the period under study through the prism of everyday life during the war. The essence of the research is to analyze the living and working conditions of teachers in one of the largest regions of the Soviet Union in the context of the complexities of the global conflict. The author of the article conducts a thorough study of various aspects of the daily life of teachers, including their financial situation, working conditions, social policy and participation in public life. The research methodology includes an anthropological approach that allows us to examine Soviet everyday life through the eyes of the teachers themselves, as well as the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity. This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of the historical context and makes conclusions more reasonable. The use of comparative historical constructions and the ideographic method allowed the authors to conduct a thorough analysis and present a holistic picture of the teachers' lives during the war years. The bibliography of the article covers a sufficient range of scientific research, but it is surprising that there are no works by E.S.Senyavskaya in the list of references (for example, "A Man at war. Historical and psychological essays" Moscow: IRI RAS, 1997), as well as materials from the yearbook "Military Historical Anthropology". The relevance of this study is beyond doubt. The war radically changed the life of the entire Soviet society, and studying the experiences of specific social groups, such as teachers, provides valuable knowledge about how the war affected various aspects of society and what consequences it had for the subsequent development of the country. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the use of previously unpublished archival materials deposited in the collections of the State Archive of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, personal memories and documents, which allows us to offer a new perspective on the problem. The article enriches the existing literature with new data and interpretations, making a significant contribution to the development of historical science. The style and structure of the article are designed in an academic style. The research is organized logically and consistently, creating a holistic view of the subject. The content of the article is full of facts and statistical data, which makes it interesting and informative for specialists, as well as for a wide range of readers interested in history. Unfortunately, the tabular data presented in the article are rather sparse, it would be appropriate to enrich table 1 with the dynamics of the number of teaching staff in the region with data on the distribution of these staff across the region (although divided into urban and rural schools), and table 2, showing a significant increase in the cost of consumer goods in Krasnoyarsk, with comparative data on other cities. The conclusions of the article are convincing and justified by the presented data. The authors rightly point out that despite all the difficulties and difficulties of the war years, the teachers showed perseverance and dedication to their work, which made a significant contribution to the victory and reconstruction of the country after the war. In general, this scientific article is a contribution to the historiography of the Great Patriotic War and the daily life of Soviet people during this period. Despite the comments made, we can recommend the article for publication in the journal Genesis: Historical Research.