|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Dolgopolova, I. V.
Methods for Evaluating the Style of Academic Activity: Experience of Research and Implementation
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2014. ¹ 5.
P. 530-537.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65001
Dolgopolova, I. V. Methods for Evaluating the Style of Academic Activity: Experience of Research and ImplementationAbstract: The author of the article underlines the need for development of tools of evaluating universal educational actions in the conditions of introduction new Federal State Education Standards in elementary education. The author provides a summary of diagnostic tools for evaluating educational activity that are usually applied in psychology and teaching. Results of development and standardization of a special method aimed at evaluating a style of educational activity of younger school students – QSEA (questionnaire of style of educational activity) with use of the correlation and factorial analysis are presented. The advantage of the aforesaid questionnaire is in its coherence with meta-disciplinary results of educational activity: cognitive, regulatory and communicative actions. The method passed standardization according to standard procedures. Psychometric test of QSEA proves that it is possible to use the questionnaire at public schools for the complex assessment of style of educational activity as an indicator of educational activity. The method allows elementary school teachers to conduct independent monitoring of formation of universal educational actions of school students and to use the results in correction of their educational activity. Keywords: Federal State Education Standards, universal educational actions, educational activity, style of educational activity, standardization of a method, meta-discipline results, cognitive actions, regulatory actions, communication actions, QSEA.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Baymetov A.K. Nekotorye obuslovlennye siloy vozbuzhdeniya faktory individual'nogo stilya v uchebnoy deyatel'nosti starsheklassnikov// Tipologicheskie issledovaniya po psikhologii lichnosti. – Perm', 1967. Vyp. 4. – S. 104 – 135.
2. Volochkov A.A. Vozrastnaya dinamika uchebnoy aktivnosti shkol'nikov (Longityud)// Innovatsii v obrazovanii. – 2005.-¹ 2. – S. 85-89. 3. Volochkov A.A. Integrativnyy podkhod v diagnostike universal'nykh uchebnykh deystviy // Vestnik Yuzhno-ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2012.-¹ 19. – S. 58-67. 4. Dolgopolova, I.V. Metaeffekty svyazi stilya deyatel'nosti pedagoga i stilya deyatel'nosti i individual'nosti uchashchikhsya//Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. ¹ 4 (18), 2011. – S. 132-136. 5. Il'ina E.V. Stil' adaptatsii shkol'nikov k novym usloviyam uchebnoy deyatel'nosti/ Materialy regional'noy nauchnoy konferentsii "XV Merlinskie chteniya".-Perm', 2000.-S. 35-37. 6. Kak proektirovat' universal'nye uchebnye deystviya v nachal'noy shkole: ot deystviya k mysli/ Pod red. A.G.Asmolova.-M.: Prosveshchenie, 2008. — 151 s. 7. Rozhok T.S. Stanovlenie professional'nogo masterstva i individual'nogo stilya deyatel'nosti uchitelya nachal'nykh klassov. – Avtoreferat dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. – Moskva, 2000. – 22 s. 8. Sambikina O.S. Polovye razlichiya v stilyakh uchebnoy deyatel'nosti shkol'nikov // Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2014. ¹ 51. – s.100-110. 9. Prikaz Minobrnauki ot 06 oktyabrya 2009g. ¹ 371 «Ob utverzhdenii i vvedenii v deystvie federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta nachal'nogo obshchego obrazovaniya». 10. Venger L.A., Agaeva E.L., Bardina R.I. i dr. Psikholog v detskom sadu// Doshkol'noe vospitanie. – 2003.-¹ 6. – S.16-19. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
