Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Berzin V.A. Social partnership in the context of social state

Abstract:   The object of this research is determination of the status of social partnership in the social state. The author explores this topic from the perspective of the key theoretical concepts, as well as defines the potential of social partnerships for the achievement of certain goals of welfare state (social state) and solution of the issues emerging within it. The author pursues correlation between the social partnership and regulation of market relations, collaboration between state, private business sector and labor sphere for solution of the urgent economic and social problems. Methodology used in this scientific work contains methods of analysis, synthesis, and forecast, as well as comparative and historical research. The main conclusion of the conducted research consists in ability of the model of social partnership to increase the likelihood of success and failure for absolutely all of the participants, including government, because each of them plays an important role in achieving the set goals along with the goals of social state (welfare state).  

Keywords:

Disadvantages of partnership, Form of government, Work principle, Types of partnership, Democratic administration, Public authority, Social partner, Welfare state, Social partnership, Social state

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Boyd S. Partnership working: European social partnership models – 59 p. – P. 2.
2. Casey B., Gold M. Social Partnership and Economic Performance: The Case of Europe. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000. – P. 9.
3. Turner L. Fighting for Partnership: Labor and Politics in a Unified Germany. – New York: Cornell University Press , 1998. – P. 18.
4. Minto-Coy I.D. Social Partnerships and Development: Implications for the Caribbean// Caribbean Paper. – 2011. – ¹ 12. – P. 4.
5. Song J. Economic Distress, Labor Market Reforms, and Dualism in Japan and Korea // Governance. – 2012 – ¹ 3.-P. 419.
6. Battisti M. Below the Surface: The Challenges of Cross-sector Partnerships // Journal of Corporate Citizenship. – 2009. – P. 96.
7. Eweje G., Palakshappa N. Stakeholder collaboration in New Zealand: adding value and legitimacy // The Journal of Corporate Citizenship. – 2011.
8. Ebbinghaus B. Reforming Bismarckian Corporatism: The Changing Role of Social Partnership in Continental Europe – 2006. – P. 2.
9. Waddock S.A. A Typology of Social Partnership Organizations // Administration & society. –-1991. – ¹ 4. – P. 512.
10. Hassel A. Policies and Politics in Social Pacts in Europe // European Journal of Industrial Relations. – 2009. – ¹ 1. – P. 11.
11. Nelson J., Zadek S. Partnership alchemy: New Social Partnerships in Europe / The Copenhagen Centre. – P. 15.
12. Zadek S. The Civil Corporation: The New Economy of Corporate Citizenship. – London: Earthscan, 2007.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.