Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Beregovaya, E. V. The Problem of the Dual Status of Justices of the Peace in Russia

Abstract: Academic community widely discusses the problem of the dual status of justices of the peace in the structure of judicial power. Are they the judges of the constituents of the Russian Federation as it is stated by law or do they in fact have the status of federal judges? The problem of the dual status of justices of the peace is related to the question whether the position of the justice of the peace should be legally assigned to the public position of the Russian Federation or public position of the constituent of the Russian Federation. Solution of the aforesaid problem is associated with the questions whether the organizational support of activity performed by the justices of the peace should be referred to the federal level or regional level. In general, the solution of the problem reduces to suggestions about future development of the commission of the peace as an element of the judicial system, from the lowest courts of the law magistrate to autonomous judicial systems of the constituents of the Russian Federation. Based on the analysis of numerous points of view on the solution of the aforesaid problem as well as taking into account the results of the opinion survey, the author of the present article provides a better insight into the problem and evaluates the practical importance of solving the problem of the dual status of justices of the peace. Conclusions made by the author question the solution of the problem related to assigning the position of the justice of the peace or organizational support of activity performed by the justice of the peace to the federal or regional level. According to the author, the problem is more profound and it is necessary to take another look at the role and place of the commission of the peace in the system of judicial power.

Keywords:

judicial power, judicial system, justice of the peace, dual status of justices of the peace, prospects for further development, the problem of the status of judges/magistrates, courts of the Russia’s constituent.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Postanovlenie Soveta sudei Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 15.05.2008 g. ¹ 219 «O pravovoi reglamentatsii dolzhnosti mirovogo sud'i i sovershenstvovanii statusa sotrudnikov ego apparata» // Inform. byul. Prokuratury Resp. Tatarstan. – 2008. – ¹ 8 – S. 153–154.
2. Popondopulo V. F. Sistema tret'ei vlasti: ot gorizontal'noi vlasti k vertikal'noi // Zakon. – 2004. –¹ 10. – S. 113–118.
3. Postanovlenie VII Vserossiiskogo s''ezda sudei ot 04.12.2008 g. «O sostoyanii sudebnoi sistemy Rossiiskoi Federatsii i prioritetnykh napravleniyakh ee razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya» // Sud'ya. – 2008. – ¹ 12.
4. Pashkov V. O pravovoi reglamentatsii dolzhnosti mirovogo sud'i i sovershenstvovanii statusa sotrudnikov ego apparata (s ocherednogo zasedaniya Soveta sudei Rossiiskoi Federatsii) // Mirovoi sud'ya. – 2008. – ¹ 7. – S. 31–32.
5. Muratshina G. P. Organizatsiya sudebnoi vlasti v Respublike Bashkortostan (na primere mirovykh sudei) // Mirovoi sud'ya. – 2012. – ¹ 9. – S. 23–32.
6. Maksimov V. V. Istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie mirovoi yustitsii v Rossii // Zhurn. ros. prava. – 2001. – ¹ 9. – S. 26–28.
7. Kosolapov M. F. Sud v sisteme gosudarstvennoi vlasti Rossiiskoi Federatsii (konstitutsionnye aspekty): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2001. – 25 s.
8. Knyaz'kin S. Institut mirovykh sudei: problemy funktsionirovaniya // EZh-Yurist. – 2012. – ¹ 17. – S. 6.
9. Zhuikov V. M. O roli mirovoi yustitsii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Nastol'naya kniga mirovogo sud'i, rassmatrivayushchego grazhdanskie dela. – M.: SPARK, 2002. – 265 s.
10. Doroshkov V. V. Mirovoi sud'ya. Istoricheskie, organizatsionnye i protsessual'nye aspekty deyatel'nosti. – M.: Norma, 2004. – 320 s.
11. Doroshkov V. V. 10-letnii yubilei instituta mirovykh sudei v Rossii i perspektivy ego dal'neishego razvitiya // Mirovoi sud'ya. – 2009. – ¹ 1. – S. 2–5.
12. Dmitriev Yu. A., Cheremnykh G. G. Sudebnaya vlast' v mekhanizme razdeleniya vlastei i zashchite prav i svobod cheloveka // Gos. i pravo. – 1997. – ¹ 8. – S. 44–50.
13. Garifullina A. R. Nekotorye aspekty organizatsionnogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti mirovykh sudei // Ros. sud'ya. – 2012. – ¹ 6. – S. 5–10.
14. Bredikhin A. L. Federativnaya sistema Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2012 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
15. Beregovaya E. V. Mirovaya yustitsiya v rossiiskoi politicheskoi sisteme (po materialam sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya) // Politika i O-vo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 988–993.
16. Anokhina V. Yu. Voprosy organizatsionnogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti mirovykh sudei // Ros. yustitsiya. – 2006. – ¹ 11. – S. 43–44.
17. Aleksandrova R. Edinstvo sudebnoi sistemy – vazhneishii printsip sudoustroistva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Arbitr. i grazhd. protsess. – 2006. –¹ 11. – S. 10–14.
18. Avdeev D. A. Pravovoi mekhanizm obespecheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v sub''ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Tyumen', 2004. – 27 s.
19. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 06.03.2003 g. ¹ 103-O «Po zaprosam Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya Respubliki Bashkortostan i Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Tatarstan o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 1 stat'i 27 Federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo zakona «O sudebnoi sisteme Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 2003. – ¹ 17. – St. 1658.
20. O mirovykh sud'yakh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 17.12.1998 g. ¹ 188-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – 1998. – ¹ 51. – St. 6270.
21. Terekhin V. A. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti peredachi mirovoi yustitsii na federal'nyi uroven' // Ros. yustitsiya. – 2009. – ¹ 2. – S. 27–31.
22. Terekhin V. Pochemu urezana kompetentsiya mirovykh sudei // Ros. yustitsiya. – 2000. – ¹ 10. – S. 2–3.
23. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sudebnoi sistemy // Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: rol' sudebnoi praktiki. – M.: GU-VShE, 2002. – S. 7–16.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.