Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Tagaeva S.N. On the essence of family law liability in the Republic of Tajikistan

Abstract: The author substantiates the position on the existence of an independent type of liability – that of family law. This work explores various views on the essence of family law liability. The author determines the distinctive features of family law liability and substantiates its interbranch nature. The author supports the notion of family law liability as protective legal relations, which emerge in cases of violation of the rights of family members within the framework of regulative family legal relations, established by law or an agreement. This work is the first in Tajikistan to present the substantiation of the essence of family legal liability as protective legal relations, emerging as the result of legal agreement or commission of family delict that has a interbranch nature. At the same time, the author believes that the family law liability is a separate type of legal responsibility. Therefore, the author distinguishes the contractual and non-contractual family law liability.


Keywords:

contract, delict, regulative legal relations, family legal relations, object of legal infraction, liability, legal relations, family, protective legal relations, family law liability

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Chicherova L.E. Otvetstvennost' v semeynom prave: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. –Ryazan',2004.-212 s. Rostovskaya I.V.. Kharakteristika sovremennogo konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel'stva o nesovershennoletnikh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
2. Cherdantsev A.F., Kozhevnikov S. N. O ponyatii i soderzhanii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie.-1976.-¹ 5.-S. 39-48.
3. Chicherova L.E. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' v semeynom prave//Tsivilisticheskie zapiski: Vyp. 5. Problemy kodifikatsii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva v RF// Pod red. V.A. Rybakova, A.Ya. Grishko.-M.: Yurist, 2004. –S.592-602.
4. Obshche uchenie o pravootnoshenii. M.:Yurid. lit. 1974.-348 s.
5. Khachaturov R.L., Lipinskiy D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. –Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo R.Arslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2007. –950 s.
6. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii/ L.N. Bashkatov [i dr.]/ otv. red. I.L. Petrukhin.-M.: TK Velbi, 2006.-644 s.
7. Sidorova S.A. Voprosy primeneniya mer grazhdansko-pravovoy i semeyno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v semeynom prave: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. –Ryazan',2007.-216 s.
8. Romovskaya Z.V. Zashchita v sovetskom semeynom prave.-L'vov, 1985.-180 s.
9. Podkorytova O.V. Zashchita lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav i zakonnykh interesov roditeley kak uchastnikov semeynykh otnosheniy. Diss…kand.yurid.nauk.-Dushanbe, 2009.-194 s.
10. Makhmudov M.A. Rol' sovetskogo semeynogo prava v sokhranenii i ukreplenii braka: Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1986.-249 s.
11. Malein N.S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i spravedlivost'. –M., 1992.-215 s.
12. Makhmudov M.A. Pravovye sredstva sokhraneniya i ukrepleniya sem'i v Tadzhikistane. –Dushanbe: TNU, 1998. –156 s.
13. Lifshits R.Z. Teoriya prava. –M., 1994.-224 s.
14. Malein N.S. Zashchita semeynykh prav.-M., 1972.-216 s.
15. Zvyagintseva L.M. Mery zashchity v sovetskom semeynom prave.-Sverdlovsk, 1980.-202 s.
16. Zvyagintseva L.M. Osobennosti semeyno-pravovykh sanktsiy//Pravovedenie.-1980.-¹5. –S.53-56.
17. Emel'yanov A.S. Realizatsiya okhranitel'noy funktsii finansovogo prava: Avtoref. diss.... d-ra yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.-42 s.
18. Vorozheykin E.M. Pravovye osnovy braka i sem'i.-M.: Yurid. lit., 1969.-156 s.
19. Glushkova L.I. Otvetstvennost' v sovetskom semeynom prave. Avtoref. dis… kand.yurid.nauk.-M., 1982.-24 s.
20. Grishaev S.P. Semeynoe pravo v voprosakh i otvetakh.-M.: Novaya pravovaya kul'tura, 2008. – Elektronnaya spravochnaya sistema «Garant» [data obrashcheniya 12.03.2012].
21. Vvedenie v filosofiyu otvetstvennosti. Monografiya / A. I. Orekhovskiy [i dr.]; pod obshch. red. A. I. Orekhovskogo. — Novosibirsk: SibGUTI, 2005.-186 s.
22. Antokol'skaya M. Semeynoe pravo.-M., 2003.-333 s.
23. Bratus' S.N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i zakonnost'.-M. 1976.-215 s.
24. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik. T. 1. / Pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, Yu.K. Tolstogo.-M.: Prospekt, 1999.-S. 533.
25. A. S. Galyautdinova. Sem'ya kak uchastnik nalogovykh pravootnosheniy // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107.
26. K.N. Averina. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya brachno-semeynykh otnosheniy, oslozhnennykh inostrannym elementom // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
27. Chuprina A.A. Dukhovno-nravstvennaya paradigma sem'i v usloviyakh sovremennoy Rossii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-¹ 2.-S.31-59. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2014.2.11058. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_11058.html
28. Gulyaikhin V.N. Sem'ya kak sub'ekt ranney pravovoy sotsializatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 7.-S.56-66. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.9007. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9007.html
29. Abel'beysov V.A.. Obzor zakonodatel'noy bazy v otnoshenii zhizneustroystva i vospitaniya detey-sirot i detey, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditeley // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.5094
30. Afon'kin G.P. Sovremennye problemy pravovogo obespecheniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za semeynoe (domashnee) nasilie v Rossii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.56-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.3.8912. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_8912.html
31. Abel'beysov V.A.. Siroty i deti, ostavshiesya bez popecheniya roditeley v sovremennoy Rossii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.5093
32. Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. Sovremennye problemy pravovogo obespecheniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za semeynoe (domashnee) nasilie v Rossii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8702
33. A.A. Chuprina. Filosofskiy kontekst osmysleniya sem'i kak indikatora kul'turnogo razvitiya obshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.2
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.