Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Restructuring of the industrial production of Leningrad under the blockade (1941-1944)

Gribacheva Anastasiya Pavlovna

ORCID: 0009-0005-3594-0881

Postgraduate student; Higher School of Social Sciences of the Humanitarian Institute; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

195251, Russia, Saint Petersburg, Politechnicheskaya str., 29

gap.418@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2024.7.43874

EDN:

NLXGCG

Received:

22-08-2023


Published:

01-08-2024


Abstract: The article is devoted to the problem of studying the organization of military production in besieged Leningrad. The subject of the study is the restructuring of industry for the needs of wartime. The author examines the activities of factories. Special attention is paid to the process of transition of local industry in the conditions of the blockade and the work of military-oriented enterprises. Since the first days of the blockade, the activities of the factories have been aimed at implementing the production of military equipment for the needs of the army. All the factories that remained and operated in the city were repurposed for the needs of wartime. All efforts were directed to maintaining the production process. During the entire period of the blockade of the city, the work continued. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that archival documents are involved in the work. The analysis of sources is aimed at reviewing the activities of enterprises. The factories kept in touch with each other and fulfilled special orders of the navy and Lenfront. The existing problems with energy and fuel slowed down production, but it was impossible to stop, there was a critical need to continue working for the front, for victory. The conclusion is formulated that all types of production were involved. The difficult military situation in the city, especially the winter of 1941-1942, is emphasized. The working process was difficult, but all efforts were directed to building work and producing the necessary military equipment for the front.


Keywords:

Blockade, Leningrad, industry, Izhora factory, front orders, technology, Bolshevik factory, local industry, production, enterprises

This article is automatically translated.

At the time of the outbreak of the war, there were large factories and factories in the city and region, which had different directions. There were about 1000 enterprises operating: the Kirovsky Plant, the Izhorsky Plant, the Electrosila plant, the Bolshevik plant, the plant named after him. Voroshilov, the plant named after Lenin , etc . They produced a wide range of goods: wooden toys and furniture, civilian clothes and uniforms, as well as weapons: shells, ammunition, machine guns, sights, armored vehicles, tanks, etc. The enterprises were engaged in the repair of machinery, machine tools and their parts.

The organization of the industry of besieged Leningrad has gone the way of reorganizing the entire production for the production of military products. The relevance of the research of this article is due to the scientific interest in the organization of the industrial production process of besieged Leningrad. Currently, there are little studied aspects in this field that require special attention, due to the demand in the scientific community.

The purpose of the article is to study the restructuring of industrial production of enterprises under blockade. To achieve this goal, the following research methods are used in the article: 1. Historical, which made it possible to explore the industrial production of besieged Leningrad; 2. Historical and chronological, which made it possible to consistently consider the events taking place at the enterprises of the city. 3. Historical and structural, through which it is possible to trace the general trend of the development of industrial production in besieged Leningrad.

In the course of the study, an analysis of scientific literature and sources was carried out. The main sources are documents from the Central State Archive of St. Petersburg [17], the Central State Archive of Historical and Political Documents of St. Petersburg [18] and the Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg [19]. The documents contained information about the transition of the city's enterprises to the production of military equipment, parts, and uniforms.

The issues of industrial production of besieged Leningrad are considered in his monographs by A. R. Dzeniskevich. [4],[5],[6]. He explores different aspects of the life of the besieged Leningrad in 1941-1944. The work of industrial enterprises is of particular interest. The author writes that with the beginning of the blockade days, the restructuring of industry began to take place in a military manner. In his writings, he provides data on the production of military products, affecting enterprises of heavy and light industry. The monographs of A. R. Dzeniskevich reflect the difficult situation in which Leningraders had to live and work. He emphasizes the contribution of workers to the production business. The author also considers the following industries separately: shipbuilding, tank building, and the aviation industry, as a result of which he analyzes and summarizes their work as a whole. Researcher Ryabkov A.M. in his articles [13],[14] pays attention to how the process of labor restructuring of Leningrad factories took place in wartime conditions. The author examines the activities of enterprises, the difficult situation in the city, provides information about the problems caused by the blockade and provides information about building new production links. The scientific works of Bystrova I. V. [1], Burov A.V. [2], Kovalchuk V. M., Chistyakova A. N. [9] provide information about the Great Patriotic War and the siege of Leningrad. In scientific articles by M. V. Khodyakova [15], E. E. Krasnozhenova, S. V. Kulika [10],[11], A.V. Zotova [7], A. N. Shcherba and A.V. Losika [20], B. P. Belozerova [3], N. D. Khudyakova [16], the following are considered issues of industrial production of besieged Leningrad. In the works, information is given on the manufacture of military equipment at enterprises, data on product output and its application in the life of the city are given. The authors emphasize the importance of the transition to military rails of all remaining factories in Leningrad, as the future fate of the city depended on them. The article by A.V. Zotova [8] examines the process of functioning of the local industry during the years of the blockade. The author examines the activities of enterprises and their contribution to the victory of the Great Patriotic War.

A review of sources and literature showed that they contain a fairly detailed description of the industrial restructuring of besieged Leningrad. Archival materials have had the status of "confidential" for a long time and are now becoming available for review. Based on them, it is possible to study in more depth the features of industrial restructuring from peacetime to wartime. Research on this topic is of interest to modern authors, since it is possible to expand existing knowledge.

On September 8, 1941, Leningrad found itself in the most difficult conditions, in a blockade ring, surrounded by the enemy. All enterprises began to rebuild their production for the needs of the front. The reorganization of the production process has begun. Plans for the production and manufacture of military equipment have changed.

Military actions are pushing the government to evacuate factories deep into the state. In the rear, active activity began to unfold in the backup factories. Equipment, machinery and people began to be sent there. In total, from July to October 1941, the city was evacuated: 70 industrial enterprises, 22 design, 11 design and 7 construction organizations, as well as their equipment and boiler units [12, p. 428.]. At the same time, some factories remain operating in besieged Leningrad and already in the new realities, it was necessary to continue producing military equipment to ensure the front line.

The production of military products began to be carried out by all factories in Leningrad. They produced: armored vehicles, boats, armored trains, naval artillery towers, hulls and towers for KV tanks, armored towers for pillboxes, armored cabins, armored shields for naval guns, hand pumps, minelayers, shells for cannons, mines, parts of Maxim machine guns, etc. The production process required special attention. The city was repeatedly bombed, which was inevitably followed by massive destruction. The enterprises were in a difficult situation, some had to be mothballed, as it was impossible to restore work. It took a lot of time to set up production. The leadership of the bureau and the secretariat of the city committee of the CPSU(b), instructions were given on the transfer of some of the equipment from one plant to another. Also, the work could be divided into stages and several factories could be used at once to assemble equipment.

From the first days of the war, it was decided to extend the working day at Leningrad factories to eleven and a half hours. Measures were taken to complete work at the aircraft factories under construction as soon as possible. To help, workers from other enterprises were sent there, but this decision did not change the situation in many ways and the deadlines for the completion of work were shifted to the autumn of 1941 [12, pp. 426-427].

Military orders began to increase in the city, which led to a shortage of raw materials in production. The Bureau of the City Committee of the party adopted a document on the dismantling of non-ferrous metals, which contributed to a lesser extent to solving this issue. [12, p. 427].

During the war, in the difficult situation of the siege of Leningrad, the enterprises of local industry were repurposed. They focused on the production of military equipment and parts for the front. Such plants as Krasny Khimik, Krasnoe Znamya, the MOPR plant, etc. worked in this direction. They were engaged in the manufacture of: aircraft bombs, mines, hulls for tanks and cars, heavy anti-tank guns. The most common military products of local production were hand grenade shells, fire-fighting equipment and temporary stoves. They also produced bombs, frames, assemblies for Katyusha rocket mortars, special fittings for gas shelters, aviation gasoline tankers and chemical heaters [8].

The first and main type of military production was the grenade of the 1933 model. Its release was launched in the shortest possible time at a number of enterprises, increasing the number monthly [18, L. 1].Later, the following weapons were put into production: hand grenades, various mines, shells, shell casings, aviation bombs, shell casings (restored), barbed wire, anti-chemical agents, etc. The State Mechanical Plant is moving away from the production of nickel-plated beds and is engaged in the production of rolled sleeves, while organizing production for the restoration of spent artillery shells for guns of various calibers [18, l. 3].The next enterprise, the Metallokombinat plant, began to produce gasoline tankers and design a simplified type of fuel tanker adopted for equipping the Red Army. The plant began to manufacture defensive covers for grenades and cases for the M-13 stabilizer [18, l. 3]. The sheet rolling plant has established the production of FPUM-200 filters, KP-5 fans for gas shelters, frame boxes for a regimental cannon, iron helmets, rolled armor steel, deep-drawn sheet material, etc. [18, l. 3]. At the Novy Stroitel plant, the production of mines and RGD-33 parts was established. Chemical Plant No. 1 began to produce titanium tetrachloride for smoke screens. [18, l. 3].Industrial plants were engaged in various repairs, manufacture of household items, haberdashery and served the economic needs of the districts [18, l. 4].Companies producing furniture and wooden toys were busy making mines, fire escapes, etc. Metalworking enterprises have organized the production of blackout fittings for ABTU, fire-fighting equipment, shell cups, aerial bomb parts, hand grenades. The Sverdlovsk industrial plant and the Moskovsky industrial plant began to manufacture hand grenades. Sewing enterprises, in turn, engaged in tailoring uniforms, the production of transport stretchers, marine type "Stille", the creation of camouflage suits and various hospital equipment. Leather and shoe enterprises were engaged in sewing waist and rifle belts and field bags, making army boots and hospital shoes [18, l. 5]. At the Proletarian Victory shoe factory No. 2, workers manually sewed soldiers' underwear, camouflage robes and gas mask bags [5, p. 180]. By 1942, the output of military products was increasing.

Table 1

Data on the output of defense products of the local industry for 1941 (II half-year)

Name

Quantity

RGD-33 hand grenade

3967.2 pcs .

Shock RPG-40 g.

71.5 pcs .

TMD-40 mines

680.1 pcs .

Metal anti-tank mines

145.0 pcs .

UNA-F anti-tank mines

22.5 pcs .

Anti-personnel mines PPMS

939.0 pcs .

M-82 mines

21.7 pcs .

PD-2 high-explosive mines

80.2 pcs .

Fairing to the M-13

46.0 pcs .

Details for the mine detonator

5768.9 pcs .

Roll-up sleeve 152 mm

61.7 pcs .

Details for M-13 and M-8

93.4 pcs .

45 mm shells

43.6 pcs .

Cap for M-8

38.7 pcs .

Nozzles for M-8

387.0 pcs .

Igniters for high-explosive mines

7.1 pcs .

Propaganda bombs

3.5 pcs .

FB-200 Air bombs

1.2 pcs .

122 mm air bombs

3750 pcs .

AO-2.5 air bombs

54.0 pcs .

Barbed wire

2302.6 pcs .

Various calculating devices for Art Control and the Air Force

414.6 pcs .

Piezo crystals for radio communication

300 pcs.

Compiled by: TSGAIPD St. Petersburg. F. 24. Op. 2b. D. 5793. L.21.

The order of the People's Commissar of the Electrical Industry of the USSR dated July 24, 1942 provides information on the restoration and most effective use of gas-powered tractors and trucks available in the national economy. By Resolution No. 1221 of July 18, 1942 "On the repair and improvement of the use of gas-generating tractors and cars in the third quarter of 1942", the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR obliged: the Union and republican People's Commissariats and departments to repair gas-generating tractors and trucks using a simplified design of fuel tanks with their own funds in July-September 1942. People's Commissariats and departments should ensure at their enterprises the manufacture of spare parts for the repair of gas generator tractors and cars, and the restoration of other parts of gas generator sets that have become unusable [19, l. 119].

The factory life of heavy industry enterprises has also changed with the onset of the blockade. Izhorsky Plant transfers its work to a barrack position, sends the directorate to Leningrad and transports some of the equipment to other Leningrad plants. The workers of the enterprise were obliged to comply with the curfew, on Sunday they must return to work no later than 8 pm. In September, a problem arises at the plant, it is disconnected from electricity. In the current conditions, Izhora power engineers found a way out of the situation, they repaired the non-working hydroelectric power plant, which was able to meet the minimum needs of the enterprise. Most of the equipment was evacuated inland and production work was optimized. Izhorsky plant began to take an active part in the defense of the city. At its base, work was carried out on the repair of armored vehicles, mortars and small artillery systems. Izhora armor began to be used for the manufacture of defensive structures on defensive lines. 363 artillery pieces were manufactured and transferred to the front for guns from 45 to 152 mm, 1184 pillboxes for machine gunners, 588 pillboxes for calculations of anti-tank guns, 2300 frontal armor plates with flaps for bunkers [12, p. 452].

Izhora armor was also used for boats, minelayers, the Baltic Fleet armored train, and armored train No. 30. They produced B-13 and B-34 naval artillery turrets, hulls and turrets for KV tanks, BA-10 armored cars, produced M-30 mines, pipes for barrels.

In the spring of 1942, 600 tons of Izhora pumping pipes were sent from Kolpino to the shore of Lake Ladoga, from which a pipeline was laid. With the help of it, fuel will be supplied to Leningrad. By the middle of 1942, the Izhora plant began to produce shells for 152 mm guns, armored turrets for pillboxes, hand pumps for pumping water from trenches and trenches. At the end of 1942, at the site of plant No. 174 named after Voroshilov, the plant has organized its main production. In the winter of 1943, an order was received to produce a series of small fleet vessels: sea hunters, minesweepers, skerry monitors. In addition, the plant continued to produce M-13, M-20 and M-31 shells, B-13-Ns armor shields for naval guns, armored cabins, turrets, and parts of Maxim machine guns [12, p. 458].

The work of the Bolshevik plant also changed with the advent of the war. A large number of its employees volunteered for the front and the People's militia army. From among them, a second regiment of the people's militia was formed, which included more than 1,000 people. Some of the workers went to volunteer resistance units and to the construction of defensive structures. The blockade took away many men, which caused a shortage of personnel at the plant. The issue that arose was resolved due to the fact that they began to hire women, children and the elderly.

In the autumn of 1941, the enterprise was subjected to numerous bombings. Problems with fuel and electricity began, the water supply and sewerage did not work, but the work did not stop. In November, the factory began to repair artillery installations, made machine guns and railway batteries. The most difficult period was in the winter of 1941-1942, due to the existence of the same problems [12, pp. 466-468].

At the beginning of April, the production of mines, metal melting, and projectile production began to unfold. During the entire period of the blockade, more than 30 new artillery batteries were created at the Bolshevik plant on railway platforms equipped with guns of different calibers. Artillery pieces were produced: 130-mm, 152-mm, 180-mm. The plant was engaged in the repair of artillery batteries and artillery pieces. During all this time, 3,000 individual barrels with valves of naval guns in caliber from 76 to 152 mm were fired. Armor-piercing and high-explosive shells of 130, 305, 356, 406 mm caliber were manufactured, reactive mines of the MTV-280 type with 280 mm caliber were assembled, parts for the Maxim machine gun were produced and adapter bushings for RTM fuses were manufactured [12, p. 472].

In addition to the main work, orders were sent to the plant from the headquarters of the Leningrad Front. According to them, the company carried out the creation of armored pillboxes and bunkers, landing sleds, pumps for pumping water, protective armor bibs for pilots and soldiers, sapper accessories and trench tools [12, p. 473].

By the beginning of 1944, about a third of the pre-war equipment remained at the industrial enterprises of Leningrad. 840 industrial buildings were destroyed, and more than 3,000 jobs were damaged. The working factories of the city were in a difficult situation, as planned major repairs were not carried out. However, factory workers tried their best to restore production workshops and equipment destroyed by frequent shelling [4, p. 92]. After the blockade was broken, due to the growing needs of the population and the front, the GKO adopted a number of resolutions on restoration work at the largest factories in Leningrad [4, p. 94]. Also during 1941, a number of decisions were made on the restoration of enterprises and branches of the Leningrad urban economy [10].

Thus, despite the difficult wartime situation and the long period of the siege of Leningrad, all types of production were involved to meet the needs of the front. The most difficult time for Leningrad was the winter of 1941-1942. The lack of communications, fuel, energy, and water supply forced factories to stop their work, and some were completely mothballed. The workers of the enterprises have done an incredibly great job. As mentioned earlier, factories were transferred to the barracks position and workers could stay at their jobs all the time. They tried their best to fulfill the newly emerging orders for the front. Despite the fact that there was a constant threat of shelling, bombing and destruction, the work of the enterprises continued. The production process was difficult, but all efforts were directed at building work and producing the necessary military products.

Table 2

Data on the production of military products by industrial enterprises of besieged Leningrad

1941

Name

Quantity

Naval artillery systems (II floor)

97 pcs .

76 mm guns of the 1927 model

1479 pcs .

Artillery mines

1375000 pcs .

M-13 and M-8 rocket mines (II floor)

56 thousand pieces .

High-explosive, fragmentation, incendiary bombs (II floor)

41 thousand pieces .

Walkie-talkies

4 thousand pieces .

Military field wire

50 thousand km.

the end of 1941 – March 1942

Repair of various tanks

53 pcs .

Regimental guns

88 pcs.

PPD vending machines

2657 pcs .

Mortars

479 pcs .

Machine gun belts

1500 pcs.

Repair of artillery pieces

43 pcs .

Aircraft repair

37 pcs .

Repair of optical devices

700 pcs.

Shells and mines with a caliber from 37 to 180 mm

95 thousand pieces .

Grenades

380 thousand pieces .

Equipped with fuses

435 thousand pieces .

Equipped with a capsule

29 million units .

Greatcoats

6900 pcs .

Sets of warm uniforms

84 thousand pieces .

Hats with earflaps

135 thousand pieces .

Underwear

267 thousand pieces .

1942 (I half-year)

New types of weapons and ammunition

15 pcs.

Tanks

14 pcs.

Land guns

45 pcs .

Naval artillery systems

4 pcs.

Mortars of all calibers

228 pcs .

Heavy machine guns

275 pcs .

Artillery mines

174804 pcs .

M-13 and M-8 rockets

12044 pcs .

Aerial bombs

5255 pcs .

Gunpowder and charges

74.8 t .

Different fuses

523 thousand pieces .

Walkie-talkies

1445 pcs .

Military field wire

1997 km .

PPD vending machines (in April)

648 pcs .

PPD vending machines (in May)

2857 pcs .

1942 (II half-year)

Warships

38 pcs .

Tanks

60 pcs.

Mortars

1.5 thousand pieces .

Heavy machine guns (I-II floor)

2692 pcs .

DP light machine guns (I-II floor)

139 pcs .

PPD machines (I-II floor)

34936 pcs .

Automatic PPS machines

620 pcs .

1942 – (I quarter) 1943

Automatic PPS machines

20.7 thousand pieces .

Naval artillery systems

15 pcs.

76 mm guns of the 1927 model

999 pcs .

Liners for marine artillery systems

93 pcs .

ZURO Installations

14 pcs.

M-13 and MTV installations on motor vehicles

85 pcs .

Installation "frame" M-30

150 pcs.

82 mm mortars

1220 pcs .

Mortars of 50 mm

590 pcs .

Heavy machine guns

3552 pcs .

DP light machine guns

984 pcs .

PPD vending machines

34936 pcs .

Automatic PPS machines

21398 pcs .

Rifle bayonets

33880 pcs .

Machine gun belts

11408 pcs .

Mine detectors

5108 pcs .

Different aircraft sights for bombing

216 pcs .

Trench periscopes

33100 pcs .

Red Army helmets

10404 pcs .

Artillery mines

1527346 pcs .

Reactive mines of the M-32, M-28, M-30, M-20 types

19642 pcs .

M-13 and M-8 rocket-propelled mines

29524 pcs .

Naval torpedoes

70 pcs.

Artillery shells of twelve different calibers (from 406 mm to 37 mm anti-aircraft) of 16 types

1035324 pcs .

High-explosive, fragmentation, incendiary bombs

50930 pcs.

Fuses of different types

More than 14 million units.

Walkie-talkies

13 thousand pieces .

Military field wire

7.2 km

Special equipment ("Owl", "Carp", "Sable")

1072 pcs .

Radio detection stations of the "Redoubt" type

2 pcs.

1943

B-13 artillery systems

23 pcs.

Laners

98 pcs.

Heavy machine guns

2300 pcs .

Light machine guns

4450 pcs .

Automatic PPS machines

120,000 pcs .

General information of the Leningrad industry 1941 – the end of 1943.

New tanks

836 pcs .

Repaired tanks

1346 pcs .

Heavy naval guns

150 pcs.

Ground artillery of different calibers

more than 4.5 thousand units.

Mortars

12 thousand pieces .

Machine guns and light machine guns

over 12 thousand pieces.

Vending machines

more than 200 thousand pieces.

Ship repairs

about 850 pcs.

Ships of different classes

407 pcs .

Wool and cotton fabrics

more than 70 million meters

Footwear

8.5 million pairs

Sewing products

20 million pieces .

Spools of thread

78 million units .

Compiled by: Dzeniskevich A.R. The front at the factory walls. Little–studied problems of the defense of Leningrad (1941-1944). - St. Petersburg: Nestor, 1998. pp. 212-230

References
1. Bystrova, I.V. (2006). Soviet military-industrial complex: problems of formation and development (1930-1980s). Moscoe: Ros. Acad. sciences, in-t ros. Stories.
2. Burov, A.V. (1979). Blockade day after day. Leningrad: Lenizdat.
3. Belozerov, B.P. (Ed). (2014). City-front. To the 70th anniversary of the complete liberation of Leningrad from the fascist blockade. Sat. articles (2014). St. Petersburg: Poltorak.
4. Dzeniskevich, A.R. (1978). Factories on the front line: Leningrad workers to the front. Moscow: Politizdat.
5. Dzeniskevich, A.R. (1990). On the eve and in the days of trials. Leningrad workers in 1938-1945. Leningrad: "Nauka".
6. Dzeniskevich, A.R. (1998). Front at the factory walls. Little-studied problems of the defense of Leningrad (1941-1944). St. Petersburg: "Nestor".
7. Zotova, A.V. (2014). Industry of building materials in the initial period of the blockade. Actual problems of the humanities and natural sciences (pp. 181-184). Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21803289_55949990.pdf
8. Zotova, A.V. (2014). Local industry of Leningrad during the Great Patriotic War. Management consulting, 1(61), 109-116.
9. Kovalchuk, V.M., Chistikov, A.N. (2005). Leningrad during the Great Patriotic War: Essays. Documentation. Photos. St Petersburg: Publishing and printing service center.
10. Krasnozhenova, E.E., Kulik, S.V. (2022). Restoration and technical modernization of enterprises of the Leningrad industry (1942-1945). Modern scientific thought, 5, 168-172. doi:10.24412/2308-264X-2022-5-168-172
11. Krasnozhenova, E.E., & Kulik, S.V. (2021). Forms and methods of increasing productivity at the defense enterprises of the besieged Leningrad. Modern scientific thought, 4, 106-110. doi:10.24412/2308-264X-2021-4-106-111
12. Ignatiev, P.V., Korshunov, E.L., & Rupasov, A.I. (2019). Leningrad. War. Blockade. Front City: Materials and Research. St. Petersburg: GALART.
13. Ryabkov, A.M. (2021). On the work of industrial enterprises of Leningrad in 1941. Tekhnologos, 2, 14-29. doi:10.15593/perm.kipf/2021.2.02
14. Ryabkov, A.M. (2020). Features of the work of the Leningrad enterprises of the People's Commissariat of Ammunition in 1941. Tekhnologos, 3, 22-46. doi:10.15593/perm.kipf/2020.3.02
15. Khodyakov, M.V. (2022). Confectionery production in besieged Leningrad. 1941-1943. The latest history of Russia, 12(4), 812-839. doi:10.21638/spbu24.2022.401
16. Khudyakova, N.D. (2013). Leningrad – to the country (1943-1945). Scientific journal "CLIO", 3(75), 81-84.
17. Central State Archive of St. Petersburg (ÑGA St. Petersburg). F. 1790. Op. 36. D. 342.
18. Central State Archive of Historical and Political Documents of St. Petersburg (ÑGAIPD SPb). F. 24. Op. 2v. D. 5793.
19. Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg (ÑGANTD SPb). F. 39. Op. 11. D. 23.
20. Shcherba, A.N., Losik, A.V. (2011). The military industry of St. Petersburg-Petrograd-Leningrad-St. Petersburg as an important regional part of the domestic military-industrial complex in the conditions of the Russian Empire, Soviet and modern Russia: XX century. – the beginning of the XXI century. Journal for scientists "Klio", 6(57), 77-86.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Despite the fact that almost eight decades have passed since the end of the Great Patriotic War, the memory of the victory over Nazism does not fade in our people. One of the most striking manifestations of this is the action "Immortal Regiment", which unites millions of people both in Russia and abroad on May 9. Among the main events of the war are the Battle of Moscow, during which the enemy suffered a strategic defeat for the first time, the Battle of Stalingrad, which marked a fundamental turning point in the confrontation with Hitlerism, the liberation of Ukraine and Belarus. Without a doubt, one of the most tragic and at the same time heroic episodes of the war is the siege of Leningrad, the heroes of which remain in the hearts of not only Petersburgers, but also all residents of Russia. Various aspects of the life of the besieged city have been studied in Russian historical science, but nevertheless a large amount of work remains for researchers. As the historian G.L. Sobolev rightly notes, "many books have been written about the siege of Leningrad now, but even today the question posed by the blockaders remains open about whether it is possible at all to comprehend what the Leningraders had to go through then?" These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is the organization of the industry of besieged Leningrad. The author sets out to show the restructuring of the industrial process in the city, as well as to determine the specifics of the demand of local industry. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is the historical and genetic method, which, according to academician I.D. Kovalchenko, is based on "the consistent disclosure of the properties, functions and changes of the studied reality in the process of its historical movement, which allows us to get as close as possible to reproducing the real history of the object", and its distinctive features are concreteness and descriptiveness. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the features of the industrial production process in besieged Leningrad. The scientific novelty also lies in the involvement of archival materials. Considering the bibliographic list of the article as a positive point, its scale and versatility should be noted: in total, the list of references includes 20 different sources and studies. The source base of the article is primarily represented by documents from the collections of the Central State Archive of St. Petersburg, the Central State Archive of Historical and Political Documents of St. Petersburg, the Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg. Among the studies attracted by the author, we point to the works of A.R. Dzeniskevich, A.M. Ryabkov, M.V. Khodyakov and other authors, whose focus is on various aspects of the study of industrial production in besieged Leningrad. Note that the bibliography is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research to a certain extent contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone interested in both the history of the Great Patriotic War in general and Leningrad during the blockade, in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that with the beginning of the blockade in Leningrad, "all enterprises began to rebuild their production to meet the needs of wartime." For example, as the author notes, "sewing enterprises, in turn, engaged in tailoring uniforms, the production of transport stretchers, marine type "Stille", the creation of camouflage suits and various hospital equipment." The author pays special attention to heavy industry plants: the Bolshevik and Izhorsky plants. The main conclusion of the article is that "despite the difficult wartime situation and the long period of the siege of Leningrad, all types of production were involved to meet the needs of the front." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in lecture courses on the history of Russia and in various special courses. At the same time, there are significant comments to the article: 1) The article is of an overview nature, it is necessary to give a review of the literature, identifying the existing gaps on the topic under consideration, which will enhance the scientific novelty. 2) For this article, tables with summarized data on industrial production in Leningrad are desirable, preferably broken down by the years of the blockade. 3) It was possible to say at least briefly about the subsequent stage of the transfer of enterprises to the production of civilian products after the lifting of the blockade. 4) The text should be subtracted, eliminating typos. So, the author says: "An isolated city began to survive in unbearable conditions, it turned out to be cut off from the rest of the Soviet Union," etc. Individual fragments need stylistic correction, for example: "Local industry enterprises are doing their best to meet the needs of the front." After correcting these comments, the article may be recommended for publication in the journal Genesis: Historical Research.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "Restructuring of industrial production in Leningrad under the blockade (1941-1944)" The subject of the study is indicated in the title of the article and explained in the text. The research methodology is based on the principles of objectivity, scientific approach, and consistency. The author of the article points out that in his work he used: "a historical method that allowed us to study the industrial production of besieged Leningrad. In addition, a "historical and chronological method was used, which made it possible to consistently consider the events taking place at the enterprises of the city," as well as a historical and structural method, "through which one can trace the general trend of the development of industrial production in besieged Leningrad." The relevance of research. The siege of Leningrad is one of the heroic pages of the history of our country. The study of the transfer of industry to a military manner, the organization of industrial enterprises in the most difficult conditions, the search for reserves for production, the training of workers and many other issues are of interest to researchers. The author of the reviewed article notes that "The relevance of the research of this article is due to scientific interest in the organization of the industrial production process of besieged Leningrad. Currently, there are little-studied aspects in this area that require special attention, due to the demand in the scientific community," and it is difficult to disagree with this opinion. The novelty of the study is due to the formulation of the problem and objectives of the study. The novelty is also determined by the fact that the article is written on a wide range of sources that have been classified as "secret" for a long time and many of them are being introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. The author of the reviewed work aims to study how the industrial enterprises of Leningrad were rebuilt under the conditions of the blockade. The work uses documents from the Central State Archive of St. Petersburg (TSGA SPb), the Central State Archive of Historical and Political Documents of St. Petersburg (TSGAIPD SPb) and the Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg (TSGANTD SPb). The style of the article is scientific, but there are descriptive elements and this makes the article accessible and understandable not only for specialists, but also for a wider range of readers. The structure of the work is logically structured and aimed at achieving the goal of the work. At the beginning of the article, the author gives a concise but well-structured overview of the historiography of the issue, analyzes the works devoted to the problem under study and identifies issues that have not received proper coverage so far. The content of the work is subordinated to the purpose and objectives of the study. The work contains a lot of diverse and interesting materials about the evacuation of industrial enterprises of Leningrad after the outbreak of the war, studied how the work of the remaining enterprises in the city was organized, what products they produced from 1941 to 1943. The work is provided with tables, which makes the perception of the text more visual. The bibliography of the work consists of 20 sources (these are archival materials and works by Russian researchers on the topic, including works of recent years). The bibliography of the work shows that the author knows the topic well. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of work on the topic and the results obtained. The article is written on an actual scientific topic, it will be of interest to specialists and a wide range of readers.