Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

The sacredness of history as a subject of theoretical discussions and socio-cultural practice

Gavrilov Oleg Fedorovich

PhD in Philosophy

Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Kemerovo State University

650066, Russia, Kemerovo region, Kemerovo, Michurina str., 55a

gof57@yandex.ru
Zhukova Ol'ga Ivanovna

ORCID: 0000-0001-9689-208X

Doctor of Philosophy

Doctor of Philosophy, Head of the Department, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Kemerovo State University

650043, Russia, Kemerovo region, Kemerovo, Krasnaya str., 6

oizh@list.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2023.5.40592

EDN:

XPKSNH

Received:

27-04-2023


Published:

09-05-2023


Abstract: The subject of the study is the correlation between the variants of relation to the sacred as a phenomenon of perception of the past and the practical embodiments of these modalities in various sociocultural forms. As a methodological basis, the principle of separation of history (historical science) and collective memory, implemented in "memory studies", in particular, by M. Hvalbvaks and P. Nora, was used. The original application of this principle in this study made it possible to establish two interdependencies between internally differentiated value-ideological attitudes (secular/sacred) regarding the historical past and their objectifications in the norms of law and the scientific ethos, the features of the education and education system, in the development of art. The secular assessment of sacred involves its elimination from the field of being, the mechanisms of spiritual development of the past, and finds expression either in the use of strict, formalized tools of historical knowledge, in the requirement of maximum deideologization of the latter, or in such a relation to the past, in which it turns into a material of subjective interpretations. In the opposite setting, the sacred is understood as a necessary and irreparable part of collective memory, the source of which in one interpretation is the transcendental plan of being, and in the other - the transcendental universals of culture. This installation turns out to be an obstacle to the complete elimination of sacred and from the practice of specialized historical knowledge, which finds normative expression in the integration of theological discourse into the structure of scientific knowledge.


Keywords:

sacred, history, past, symbols, reconstruction, historical knowledge, interpretation, theology, myth, collective memory

This article is automatically translated.

IntroductionIn the Russian language, the concept of "history" is used in two meanings — as a sequence of events and as knowledge about this process.

 

Both meanings of this concept are interrelated: the requirements for the cognitive activity of the historian depend on how we understand the nature of the historical process; in turn, the paradigm within which the scientific community works determines the vision of the historical process. This is clearly manifested in the clash of sacred and secular interpretations of the historical process. Within the framework of the first approach, it is considered as the realization of the divine plan, which formulates the task of historical cognition as comprehension of manifestations of the transcendent principle in time. On the contrary, as a result of the secular research position, the past loses its sacredness, interest in the knowledge of immanent factors of human history is formed. It is precisely the analysis of the implementation in practice of ideological attitudes in which the sacred component of history is either recognized or, on the contrary, denied, that will constitute the task of this study. Speaking about the universal tendencies of global humanity in the field of memory formation, specialized historical knowledge, education, spiritual culture in general, we will first of all turn to the peculiarities of their expression in modern Russia. The main part

 

E. Durkheim and M. Halbwax made a significant contribution to the study of the relationship between the sacred and the secular in history, both as a process of human development and as knowledge about it; later it was further developed in "memory studies" — an interdisciplinary direction of the study of cultural memory, which was initiated in the West in the 1980s.

 

Its representatives stated the existence of a basic anthropological need for the consecration of certain elements of culture and individual components of the content of cultural memory, that is, in the sacralization of certain historical symbols. This need reveals itself in different ways, but at the same time everywhere. We observe its implementation even in the process of law-making.  Thus, in one of the federal laws of the Russian Federation, the Victory Banner of 1945 is considered as a relic, that is, a sacred and revered thing [1].

The sacred is the most important component of religion, but it is not limited to it at all. The need for the sacred is also present in secular society, being realized in forms sometimes far from religious. Although "secular culture explicitly or implicitly contains meanings that are very close in essence to religious meanings" [2. p. 50], the procedures of sacralization should not be considered only as manifestations of the clericalization of society. Secular rituals of honoring the memory of ancestors are not identical to religious rites. Sacralization manifests itself not only within the framework of religion: we see it in the products of mythological (pre-religious) consciousness, in secular symbols, traditions and customs of folk culture. A similar understanding of the nature of the sacred is demonstrated by S. N. Zenkin, who, formulating the task of his research with the characteristic title "The Undivine sacred: theory and artistic practice", announces his intention "to show that the sacred can and even must be thought separately from the figure of any personal deity, not as a result of divine emanation, but as a product of cultural activities of people" [3. p. 13].

However, in some cases, it is difficult to separate the sacred, manifested in the content of religious consciousness, and the sacred, which finds expression within the framework of secular culture. This is especially noticeable when people's need to sanctify objects of reality is purposefully used as a means of translating patterns of religion to society. To confirm this, it is enough to refer to the phenomenon of civil religion, the mechanisms of institutionalization of which are most fully described by the example of the USA [4], but are not alien to us. Recently, a serious step has been taken in Russia to consolidate the sacred character of the historical tradition by appealing to the potential of religion. The new version of the Constitution states that the history of the country preserves "continuity" and "the memory of the ancestors who gave us ideals and faith in God" [5]. Involuntarily you will think – is this the norm of secular society? Leaving aside the question of the expediency of this amendment, we note that its inclusion in the text of the Basic Law shows that the state seeks to strengthen and legitimize the constitutional system in the institute of religion, regardless of the specific religion of various social groups. Indirectly, this also means an attempt to sacralize history, as a result of which faith in God is affirmed as a value bequeathed by the ancestors.

From the specifics of the procedures and products of sacralization, revealed in the perspective of specific approaches (cultural studies, anthropology, psychology, etc.), in the context of our study, we can distract and focus primarily on the general characteristics that manifest themselves in the spheres of functioning of religious consciousness and consciousness of secular society. The ways of producing sacred meanings in each of these areas are different, but, in our opinion, they are organically interconnected. Sacralization within the framework of religious ideas is based on faith in the transcendent principle of all things, which is especially noticeable on the example of the Abrahamic religions. In the secular perception of being, sacralization is carried out by appealing to the transcendental universals of culture. The latter appear as a set of products of human creativity that have an extra-individual, directive, relatively constant character, in contrast to changeable opinions, subjective assessments, temporary agreements about relational priorities of activity. The universals of human culture in their secular interpretation, of course, cannot be considered as religious phenomena, but in perception and in the forms of their practical expression they acquire the status of sacred. These cultural values are not directly endowed with religious meanings, but at the same time they have many signs of the latter. So, relatively recently, within the framework of the atheistic ideology of Soviet society, individual participants in revolutionary events and these events themselves were given a sacred status. V. Mayakovsky, expressing not only a personal attitude to the death of the creator of the Soviet state, but also the mentality of the masses, wrote: "Lenin is even now more alive than all the living."

The principle of historicism presupposes the consideration of the subject of knowledge from the point of view of its historical continuity. Therefore, the similarity that exists between the procedures of sacralization in religion and in secular society is predetermined by the very course of historical development. The source of secular culture is religious practices, so even if religion is forced out of public life, the forms of secular life inherit them. The reverent attitude to secular symbols, the ideological dogmatism of non-religious ideologies are to a certain extent derived from the former religious sacralized phenomena of public life. In this context, we can speak, at least, about the similarity of secular and religious mechanisms of sacralization, including the sacralization of historical memory. This closeness may not be fully realized or denied at all. But not oblivion, but recognition of the historical role of religion is a necessary condition for a balanced approach to understanding the phenomena of secular culture.

The presence of the sacred in the content of collective memory implies a special attitude to what it applies to. First, the sacred turns out to be an object of worship, a source of higher feelings — fascinations (p. Otto), covering those who communicate with him. Moreover, "higher feelings" should not be interpreted only in their positive connotation as a feeling of delight: the sacred has a reverse side, it simultaneously causes fear. By the way, even the etymology of the term "sacred" reveals this ambivalence. In Ancient Rome, "it is both dedicated to the gods, and marked by an ineradicable stain, majestic and cursed, worthy of reverence and causing horror" [6. p. 348]. It is no accident that V. Lebedev-Kumach (1941) includes in the famous text the words: "There is a people's war, a holy war!". A terrible calamity, a terrible war acquires a sacred character.

Secondly, the sacred is that which is opposed to the profane, is withdrawn from it. And again, you can not do without etymology. "One of the supposed meanings of the Latin word sanctus is "surrounded by a fence"" [3. p. 22], while "profane" is a person who is behind a fence (Latin — in front of a temple). In order for the border between them to be preserved, special measures must be applied. The taboo established regarding the sacred does not need any rationalization, moreover, it resists it. As A. G. Vasiliev notes, "... images of collective memory should not be treated as scientific concepts and points of view that are subject to discussion. These are “sacred things“, the absolute truth and significance of which has been established for this community once and for all and cannot be discussed [7. p. 161]. However, in our opinion, the author immediately contradicts himself, allowing for the possibility of such a dialogue on religious issues, in which what is perceived by some as sacred will not necessarily be accepted by others in the same way, however, the desacralization of the subject of faith by disputants will not be regarded as blasphemy.

Of course, the topic of dialogue, and in particular interfaith dialogue, has been of great interest since a certain moment. Catholic and Protestant researchers write a lot about this, representatives of Orthodoxy also turn to this topic. Different points of view are expressed, but we are close to the one according to which the possibility of dialogue of carriers of sacred meanings exists only when they (carriers) do not touch these meanings, but relate, say, to issues of interfaith interaction, social activities of the church, security issues, etc. For example, S. V. Melnik asserts that "... each religion as a special ideological and value system asserts its exclusivity and is organically integral, self-sufficient. In this regard, from the point of view of religious consciousness, the possible motivations for entering into a dialogue with representatives of another religion are very limited" [8. p. 211]. Let us note for ourselves that dialogue about sacred meanings is difficult not only in the sphere of religion, but also in any area where the sacred is present. Taboo also applies to the universals of culture, which, after going through the procedure of sacralization and being included in rituals required for systematic reproduction, turn out, like religious shrines, to be protected not only by public opinion, but also by the burrows of law. Thus, in the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation cited above, it is recorded that "belittling the significance of the feat of the people in the defense of the Fatherland is not allowed" [4], and in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the state establishes responsibility "for the dissemination of information expressing obvious disrespect for society about the days of military glory and memorable dates of Russia related to the defense of the Fatherland, as well as the desecration of symbols of military glory of Russia, committed in public" [9]. These formulations of the law close the possibility of dialogue on sensitive issues of national history or, at least, severely restrict — in fact, taboo is imposed on these topics.

Recognizing a certain measure of unconditionality for the sacred universals of culture, we note that the degree of their immutability is significantly inferior to the degree of categoricality of religious meanings. Thus, secular society seems to recognize patriotism, the institution of the family, childhood and motherhood as the unifying principles of society, that is, to a certain extent, sacred universals of culture, but at the same time allows discussions about their content and general significance. In this transition from the transcendent basis of sacredness to the transcendental, there is a tendency aimed at getting rid of the sacred as a component of being and culture, respectively, at eliminating the sacred from the processes of spiritual mastery of the past. Let's consider how and how successfully this happens.

The intention to remove the sacred from historical knowledge finds expression in the idea of the separation of history and memory, expressed first by M. Halbwaks [10], and then developed by P. Nor [11], who replaced the concept of collective memory with the concept of "places of memory". Let's analyze what is meant by "history" and what is meant by "memory" in this context, in order to understand how feasible in practice is the intention to remove the sacred from knowledge about the past in its variants of the scientific cognitive process and forms of extra-scientific exploration of the past.  

"Memory" should be interpreted as a kind of means of preserving the past in people's knowledge and feelings, in their sense of belonging to something important, more significant than the events of the current everyday life. "Places of memory" should not be reduced only to objects of material culture — museums, archives, exhibitions, memorials, cemeteries; in addition to the material, they reveal themselves in symbolic and functional meanings. P. Nora says that fixation on the past is not a completely natural form of human activity, people usually live with concern for their present, concern for everyday life, projecting at the same time their activity for the near or long term. Of course, such an assessment of the appeal to the past as something "unnatural" is too radical, but nevertheless devoid of uniqueness. Something similar can be guessed, for example, in the covenant "to remember the Sabbath day", found by Moses as a call to make a strong-willed effort and escape from the captivity of the "vanity of vanities" of today, or in the recommendations of gestalt psychologists to learn to live "here and now" instead of a full immersion in memories and dreams harmful to mental health. In this regard, it seems curious and the fact given by Y. M. Lotman that the former participants of the Patriotic War of 1812 tried not to remember their recent past: "In the years after the Patriotic War, death seems to disappear from the consciousness of those young people who, having returned from the battlefields, having come from abroad, felt with special force the thirst for life and the need for activity. Death seems to be transferred to yesterday — we thought about tomorrow, about projects, reforms, sometimes about successes in the service. Few people cared about thinking about death. Everyone tried to move" [12. p. 228]. But we understand that in order to maintain social solidarity, it is important to return to the past, finding unifying values in it, joining them and maintaining contact with them, and doing so in a specially organized and formalized way. The "places of memory" serve to achieve this goal. P. Nora insists: "We need to create archives, we need to celebrate anniversaries, organize celebrations, make funeral speeches, notarize acts, because such operations are not natural" [11. p. 26].

The presence of "places of memory" is evidence that the past is slipping away, dissolving into nothingness, and therefore special efforts are needed to retain it. However, in the process of preserving collective memory ("places of memory"), its content undergoes noticeable metamorphoses, it turns out to be the result of construction. Information about the past is simplified, becoming more accessible for its assimilation by large and diverse social groups. The premise of simplifying knowledge is that any subject of specialized cognitive interest is so multifaceted that certain statements about it cannot but be the result of reduction. Moreover, this is typical for the assimilation and reproduction of historical material by non-professionals. Therefore, any textbooks, not to mention other means of broadcasting history, will not fully satisfy a specialist. The picture of the past that emerges on the pages of a textbook, a work of art, on TV and cinema screens, in the words of a politician and a publicist, is very conditional.

In addition, information about the past acquires a vivid emotional coloring and imagery of expression. "... Memory is an emotional experience associated with a real or imaginary memory and allowing for all kinds of manipulations, changes, repression, oblivion," P. Nora continues [13. p. 75]. And, finally, information about the past in the part in which it meets the needs of modernity and concerns the iconic symbols of history, is shrouded in a veil of sacredness. Although this form of transformation of historical knowledge can also be replaced by the opposite: what was previously "sacred" is quite capable of losing this quality, for example, as a result of the desecration procedure, that is, "desecration". This term, adopted in the church-religious environment, means "not only acts of vandalism, but also the organized liquidation of objects of material memorial culture by the state" [14. pp. 3-4]. In any case, both in the processes of "sanctification" and in the processes of "enlightenment", algorithms for constructing the past are guessed, which are most often implemented not spontaneously, but purposefully.

Those who carry out the construction of the past within the public space using the procedures of sacralization / desacralization are most often politicians, as well as those who react to their ideological request with varying degrees of awareness — representatives of education, media, art. For example, as the latest innovations in the field of higher education, we can consider the introduction of such academic subjects as "The Great Patriotic War: without a statute of limitations" and "Fundamentals of Russian Statehood", focused, in particular, on the patriotic education of young people. The content content of these subjects shows the intention to consolidate in the minds of students a certain ideological-symbolic, value framework through its sacralization. Among other things, this suggests that from some point on, representatives of the clergy lose their monopoly on contact with the sacred and it turns into an effective tool of political activity. In collective rituals organized by the authorities, cultural and educational institutions or individuals (the "Immortal Regiment"), there is a connection with the sacred without the mediation of the church. We have before us "the tendency of the disappearance of boundaries between the memory of religious and political communities" [15. p. 13].

Of course, the attitude to the past as an object of construction, including through sacralization, meets resistance from a certain part of professional historians — scientists and teachers who negatively perceive any bias in historical knowledge. They understand it as a way of "false sacralization" (N. A. Berdyaev). V. O. Beklyamishev says: "The state, declaring interest in the implementation of historical policy aimed at achieving the goals of innovative development, in practice did not attempt to revise the existing mythologies even at the level of expert discussion" [16. p. 99]. Historians, following the generally accepted requirements for the cognitive process, apply proven criteria for the selection of material and rules for the design of the results obtained. There are no such sufficiently formalized procedures in memory formation, this is largely a subjective and very variable process. In this respect, "history" (as a historical science) is unified and rational, while "memory" is multiple and emotional. The purpose of historical science, according to P. Nora, is to expose the past as an unreliable history, to deprive it of any sacred features. He says: "History is a delegitimization of the experienced past. On the horizon of historicized societies and in a world that has reached the limit of historicization, there would be a complete and final desacralization" [11. pp. 20-21].

However, firstly, the work of professional historians is only ideally devoid of ideological bias. Since the requirement of intersubjectivity is not maintained even in the field of exact knowledge, it would be completely unjustified to expect its fulfillment from the humanities and social sciences. Moreover, these historical studies themselves are motivated by a social order and undoubtedly experience its directive influence, expressed to a greater or lesser extent. The opportunity to distance oneself from ideological bias and engage not in "mythologization", that is, not in the sacralization of the past, but in actual cognition, excluding subjectivism, is limited for historians. Moreover, this limitation, according to some versions of postpositivism, is characteristic not only for historians: the whole science turns into the result of myth-making. Thus, the construction of the past takes place not only in "memory", but also in "history", albeit in a slightly different form. This becomes especially noticeable when historical knowledge is extracted from the relatively narrow communication of professionals and becomes the property of other spheres of society, such as art, education, media, etc. On this occasion , X . White notices: as each ideology is accompanied by a special idea of history and its processes, so each idea of history is accompanied by a certain ideological subtext [17. p. 43].

Secondly, the unity of historical science, which P. Nora speaks about, cannot be understood literally, of course: various methodological programs are implemented within its framework. Among them, the modernist and postmodern paradigms of historical cognition clearly assert themselves, in particular. Modernity, as a secularized version of historical knowledge, proceeds from the belief that sources can be considered as phenomena that reveal, albeit incompletely, indistinctly, the essence of events that occurred earlier. The postmodern view of the comprehension of the past proceeds from the fact that it represents only a wide field of possible interpretations. F. R. Ankersmith states: "History here is no longer a reconstruction of what happened to us at different moments of life, but a continuous game with the memory of it... Wild, greedy and unrestrained digging into the past, inspired by the desire to discover the reality of the past and restore it from the standpoint of science, is no longer the unconditional task of the historian" [18. p. 341]. The "reality of the past" is of minimal interest to many representatives of art. Artistic creativity by its nature not only reflects the real world, but also constructs a fictional reality. This is especially evident in the example of modern domestic cinema, which is developing mainly in accordance with the principles of postmodernism. It is filled with products in which the image of the past is devoid of a referent, but is a simulacrum designed only to awaken a certain part of the audience with a sense of nostalgia, for example, for the recent Soviet period of history. There is a special designation for this genre — "pastiche" (French literally — pate), that is, an eclectic imitation. In this form, images sacred to the consumer can be reproduced, but emasculated to such an extent that they lose their true sacredness. So, despite the specifics of the modernist and postmodern approaches to the past, they coincide in one thing: in their perspective, the sacred has no place in history, neither in its ontological manifestation, nor in its epistemological.

But we cannot ignore the existence of another approach — a theological one aimed at "the perception of divine manifestations in history" [19. p. 18], in which the sacred is not just rehabilitated, but is perceived as a necessary condition for the existence of humanity, as the most important prerequisite for an adequate understanding of the past. Its representatives claim that theology and history, in the understanding of the latter as a process of human evolution and as a science, have traditionally been and remain closely interrelated. In Christianity, this was due to the appeal to the problem of the historicity of the personality of Jesus Christ and the use of special methods of historical knowledge in the study of biblical literature, the works of the Church Fathers, the history of Christianity. They point out that special historical knowledge outside the theological context is incomplete. Proceeding from the present and to a certain extent even corresponding to the projects of the future, it is aimed at studying the past, which means a subject of knowledge that is "fundamentally limited by temporality" [20. p. 120]. True knowledge of history is possible only in conjunction with the universal, therefore, as G. V. Florovsky says, any historian explicitly or covertly, consciously or unconsciously proceeds from certain assumptions of a universal, philosophical nature and therefore turns out to be a theologian to a certain extent. He claims: "An attempt to write history, avoiding the challenge thrown by Christ, is in no sense a "neutral" enterprise" [21. pp. 691-695]. This approach does not necessarily eliminate the need for secular historical science. They may well complement each other. Guy Bedwell comments on this: "There are two types of approaches to history — one is based on strictly scientific methods, and the other is trying to comprehend the plan of God. We can safely use both of these approaches (but consistently, not in parallel) and come to that "in-depth" history that is accepted and comprehended only through faith" [22. p. 7]. In our opinion, in this aspect, it is simply proposed to supplement the scientific version of historical knowledge with its theological (philosophical) component.

The possibility of such a compromise between a scientific and theological approach in historical science has been expanded relatively recently in Russia due to certain measures of state policy in the field of training highly qualified personnel of the higher education system. If theology in Europe is traditionally considered a field of scientific research, then in the Russian Federation it was not considered as a scientific discipline until recently. The situation changed in 2015, when Theology (cipher 26.00.01) appeared in the list of scientific specialties for which academic degrees are awarded, and in 2021 it entered the updated nomenclature as a group of scientific specialties (cipher 5.11.), within which "Theoretical theology", "Historical theology" and "Practical theology". The content of the passports of these specialties orients theologians to develop such areas as theological understanding of history, epistemological and methodological features of theological research, methodology of church historical knowledge, the Bible in the context of the history of religion and culture, Christian theology of history, etc. [22]. This decision has its supporters and opponents, but it is likely that the implementation of this rule of law will contribute to the expansion of the theological approach to historical knowledge and, possibly, closer interaction of history as a science and theology.

 

ConclusionsSome features of social activity in the field of law-making, education and upbringing of young people, media activities, and the development of art depend on understanding what place the sacred occupies in the perception of the past.

  Interpretations of the sacred as a necessary component of cognition of the past give rise to various tools for creating and preserving collective memory, regardless of how the source of the sacred is seen: the transcendent beginning of all things or the transcendental universals of human culture. This attitude to the sacred gives legitimacy to the algorithms of its consolidation in symbols and rituals protected by law and public opinion, isolated from everyday life, replicated in state events, educational and educational programs. The sacred aspect of the appeal to the past is immanently inherent in the theological discourse of historical knowledge.The secularized version of the development of the past consistently opposes sacralization, considering the latter as a process of imperceptible penetration of religion into the sphere of the spirit, which violates the principle of ideological diversity enshrined in law.

The exclusion of the sacred from the sphere of culture invalidates any attempts to establish a ban on the free discussion of any historical topics, images, symbols, and comprehension of the past, carried out in conditions of free creativity and critical attitude to the subject of knowledge, on the contrary, legitimizes. But if the modernist version of the secular vision of history realizes itself in the procedures of applying universal principles of reconstruction of the "real" past, then in its postmodern version the sacred, more precisely, the "pseudo-sacred" appears in the narrative of an artist or scientist as a result of subjective interpretations of "raw" historical material.

References
1. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (2007) Federal Law "About the Banner of Victory" (68-FL). Russian newspaper of 8th May, 2007. ¹. 9.
2. Gavrilov O.F., Gavrilov E.O. Sacred in secular symbols//Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State Institute of Culture, 2020. No. 52. p. 44-51.
3. Zenkin S. N. Non-divine sacred: theory and artistic practice. Moscow: Russian State Humanitarian University, 2014. 536 p.
4. Veselova S. B. & Egorov V. A. (2014) Civil religion in America. Robert N. Bella. Bulletin of the RCHA. 3, 162-182.
5. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (1993) Moscow, Russia. Russian newspaper of 25th December, 1993. No.237.
6. Benvenist E. Slovar’ indoevropeyskikh sotsial’nykh terminov [Indo-European Language and Society]. Moscow, Progress, Univers Publ., 1995. 456 p. (In Russ.).
7. Vasiliev A.G. Embodied memory: commemorative ritual in sociology E. Durkheim //Sociological review. 2014. Vol. 13. No. 2. Pp. 141-166.
8. Målnik S.V. Cognitive interreligious dialogue: tasks, principles, forms of implementation//Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. 2019. Volume 20. Issue 2. Pp. 209-227.
9. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 13.06.1996. No. 63-FL //Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation of June 17, 1996 No. 25 of Art. 2954.
10. Halbwax M. Social Framework of Memory/Per. from Fr. and entry. article by S.N. Zenkin. M.: New Publishing House, 2007. 348 p.
11. Nora P. Problems of memory places//France-memory. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 1999. Pp. 17-50.
12. Lotman Y.M. Conversations about Russian culture: the future and traditions of the Russian nobility (XVIII-early XIX century )/Yu. M. Lotman.-2nd ed., additional.-St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-St. Petersburg, 1999. 415 p.
13. Filippova E.I. History and memory in the era of the domination of identities (conversation with a full member of the French Academy, historian Pierre Nora )//Ethnographic Review. 2011. No 4. Pp. 75-84.
14. Kraev O.L. Deñommemoration as a factor in the formation of collective activity In South America//Sociodynamics. 2023. No. 2. pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2023.2.39834. URL: file ://D :/Downloads/Downloads/decommoration-as-a-factor-formation-collective-memory-to-south-amer-1.pdf (Accessed: 09.04.23).
15. Anikin D. A. Collective memory of religious communities in the era of globalization//Scientific notes of Kazan University. 2015. Vol. 157. Book 1. Pp. 7-15.
16. Beklyamishev V. O. (2017) "Back to the Future": Images of Modernization reforms in the collective memory of Russians. Management consulting. 2, 95-102.
17. White H. Metahistory: Historical imagination in 19th-century Europe. Yekaterinburg, 2002. 528 p.
18. Ankersmith F. R. History and tropology: the rise and fall of metaphor. M.: Progressive-Tradition, 2003. 489 p.
19. Mikhailov P. B. History as a vocation of theology//Bulletin of PSTSU II: History. History of the Russian Orthodox Church. 2012. No. 4 (47). Pp. 7-22.
20. Mikhailov P. B. History and truth: opportunities for interaction between theological and historical methodologies//Bulletin of PSTGU II: History. History of the Russian Orthodox Church. 2014. No. 5 (60). Pp. 109-122.
21. Florovsky G.V. Christianity and civilization. Selected works on theology and philosophy/Comp., Will enter, art. I. I. Evlampieva, note. I.I. Evlampieva and V.L. Seliverstova. St. Petersburg: RCGA, 2005. 862 p.
22. Bedwell Guy. History of the Church.-M.: Christian Russia, 1996. 298 p.
23. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated 24.02.2021 No. 118. "On approval of the nomenclature of scientific specialties by which academic degrees are awarded, and amendments to the Regulation on the Council for the Defense of Dissertations for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, for the degree of Doctor of Sciences, approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated November 10, 2017 No. 1093 "(Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia 06.04.2021. ¹ 62998.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The reviewed article is devoted exclusively to the topical issues of modern understanding of the place of the sacred in historical memory. The author rightly points out that the researcher's "subjective attitudes" influence the understanding of the nature and dynamics of the historical process, and therefore it seems justified to draw attention to such a fundamental feature of understanding the historical process as the recognition or denial of the manifestation of certain "sacred" forces in it, which for traditional forms of religious consciousness act in connection with with faith in the transcendent principle, the Absolute. On the other hand, it is difficult to agree with the author in his too straightforward approximation of "religious sacredness" with the way of realizing the duty of memory to ancestors, which has been so often actualized in recent years, including in connection with the ideological struggle of various social forces. The author speaks of "unconscious projections of the mind and heart to what goes beyond the boundaries of the phenomenal world," but such "emergence" does not constitute the only characteristic on the basis of which we could state the presence of at least elements of religious consciousness, it occurs very often in everyday life; from the point of view of the reviewer, it is about fundamentally different psychological and cultural phenomena, and perhaps their confusion is the main theoretical difficulty of the reviewed article. In addition, there are many "technical" flaws in the text that prevent it from being recommended for publication. Let's give at least a few relevant examples: "as a result of the implementation ..." ("as a result", of course, is written together); "each of these approaches has its own logic, is refracted in a practical plane, having its own supporters, somehow influencing the life of society" ("approaches" "have their own supporters"? Maybe they "find their supporters"? Besides, why "influencers"? To which main word does the participial turn refer?); "turning to history especially during the period of deep ..." (there are no commas); "... or opposite rehabilitating ..." (the same thing); "in history, and as a process of human development ..." (an extra comma); "more precisely, the "pseudo-sacred" appears..." (there is no comma); "in the narrative, as a result of subjective interpretations..." (on the contrary, an extra comma); "it makes no difference whether they are carried out by a scientist or an artist" (an obvious lexical and, at the same time, stylistic error – "without much difference", besides, there is no comma); "in rituals consecrating the memory of ancestors, they are considered in the status of ..." (the participial turnover is not separated by commas); "when we join the sacred symbols, rituals of the culture around us, we unconsciously behave..." (the adverbial turnover is not closed), etc., etc. Of course, all the material should be thoroughly reworked, I would also like to recommend The author should think about a more precise distinction between the two forms of the sacred, which he is essentially talking about – "religious sacred" and "secular sacred". I recommend sending the article for revision.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study in the article "The sacredness of history as a subject of theoretical discussions and socio-cultural practice" is history and the place of the process of sacralization in it. At the same time, the author clearly stipulates that history should be understood as the life of mankind in time, as well as science studying the past. Somewhat lower, to this understanding of the object of research, historical memory is also added as an image of the past, functioning in the public consciousness of the present, the bearers of which are ordinary people, not professional historians. Thus, the article addresses the understanding of how the past functions in the present, at the level of the historical narrative compiled by historians, the process of studying traces of the past and everyday ideas about the past. The author sees his task in studying this rather complex phenomenon as the analysis of the sacred attitudes present in the representation of the past, their origins and consequences. The methodology of the research, according to the author, is based on the principle of historicism, which "involves considering the subject of knowledge from the point of view of its historical continuity." Comparative analysis allows us to establish the similarities that exist between the procedures of sacralization in religion and in secular society. Hermeneutical techniques aimed at interpreting the texts of modern political discourse make it possible to identify in them the translation of sacred attitudes in relation to individual elements of the historical past. The relevance of the study can be considered from two positions. Firstly, the field of "memory studies", to which this research can be attributed, has been actively developing in the domestic scientific space in recent years. The article touches upon a little–studied aspect of historical memory - the taboo of some topics related to the representation of the past in the present by sacralizing them. Secondly, the author identifies and explores, using concrete examples, the very processes of non-religious sacralization of historical memory, which have become an element of our social reality quite recently. The article quite rightly notes that "some features of social activity in the field of law-making, education and upbringing of youth, media activities, and the development of art depend on understanding what place the sacred occupies in the perception of the past," and analyzes in his work a number of really illustrative examples of such sacralization. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the statement of such a trend that has emerged in modern Russian culture as the non-religious sacralization of topics related to the manifestation of patriotism, protection of the Fatherland, memorable dates of Russian history, which actually leads to the imposition of taboos on these topics and closure for discussion of sensitive issues of national history. The author also dwells on such an aspect of modern historical discourse as the introduction into it as a side of a full-fledged scientific dialogue of specialists in the field of theology. The style of the article is typical for scientific texts in the humanities. It combines the necessary categorical rigor and imagery, which makes it not only more accessible to the general reader, but also easier to read. Well-chosen direct quotes give the author's reflections brightness and clarity. The article is based on a vector principle, the narrative unfolds consistently and logically, includes several theses that follow from each other, supported by examples and arguments. At the beginning of the article, the author explains his vision of the problem of the sacred and profane in the modern situation. Focusing on the place of these phenomena of social consciousness in the social reality of the present and their understanding in scientific research. Next, there is a concretization of two approaches to the definition of the sacred – as a source of higher feelings (fascinations) and the antithesis of the profane, consideration of relevant examples. The author analyzes the process of constructing the historical in collective memory and historical science, noting that although "fixation on the past is not a completely natural form of human activity," returning to the past helps to ensure "social solidarity" and therefore becomes more active during periods of historical instability. The author dwells on the algorithms of purposeful construction of the past and the role of sacred values and attitudes in this process. The bibliography includes 23 titles of the most representative studies on the stated problem, which seems quite sufficient. The appeal to opponents is actively used by the author as a method of organizing the text, which allows him to back up his own theses with the ideas of other researchers that agree with them. The central figures of positive opposition are M. Halbwaks, P. Nora, F. R. Ankersmith. The interest of the readership will be aroused both by the aspect of the correlation of the religious and secular sacred in culture, and by the functioning of these attitudes in the field of historical memory and historical scientific discourse. The article will be of interest to specialists in the field of national history, political science, social philosophers, and researchers studying modern cultural trends. For non-specialists, the article will be attractive with an easy and understandable style of presentation, light irony and many vivid examples.