Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Mineral and raw material resources of the European North of the RSFSR in the program of scientific study of the natural productive forces of the country in the early years of Soviet power.

Filippova Tatiana Petrovna

PhD in History

Scientific Associate, Komi Scientific Centre of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

167000, Russia, Komi Republic, Syktyvkar, 24 Kommunisticheskaya str., office 311

tanya.tatiana-fil@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2025.5.74029

EDN:

HNIVBM

Received:

09-04-2025


Published:

14-05-2025


Abstract: The article brings attention to the problem of mastering the mineral and raw material potential of the European North of Russia through the lens of understanding the historical experience of researching this territory in the early years of Soviet power – from 1917 to the early 1920s, in the context of addressing state tasks related to the study and practical use of the natural productive forces of the RSFSR. The object of study is the activities of state departments and scientific institutions of the RSFSR aimed at the development of natural resources in the European North. The subject of research is the historical role of science in studying the mineral and raw material resources of the European North of the RSFSR and the significance of the results obtained for further industrial development of the region. The basis of the research consists of documents from the funds of the Russian State Historical Archive, the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, the Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg, and the St. Petersburg branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences, some of which are being introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. One of the foundations of the source base of the work consists of published legislative acts that characterize the work of the Soviet government, as well as scientific works by researchers of the North. The methodological basis of the work includes the main principles of modern historical science: historicism and scientific objectivity. The research is based on a systematic approach that allowed for the creation of an objective historical reconstruction of events related to the study of mineral and raw material resources in the European North during the specified time period. Based on the analysis of sources and reliance on methodological approaches, it has been determined that after 1917, the European North was in a zone of special priorities for the government. The need to address state tasks aimed at expanding the mineral and raw material base of the RSFSR to overcome the economic crisis necessitated the wide application of mineral resources from this territory in economic development. This marked the beginning of the intensive activities of scientific institutions (the Geological Committee, the Northern Scientific and Industrial Expedition, the Russian Academy of Sciences), whose main directions became the study of resource potential and its assessment for industrial use. It is concluded that during this period the problem of developing the European North gained national significance, which provided a powerful impetus for its systematic study and industrial development. Familiarity with this historical experience is essential for the implementation of modern plans for the development of the European North of Russia.


Keywords:

European North, scientific study, mineral and raw material resources, productive forces, RSFSR, USSR, state plan for electrification, scientist, geological research, expedition

This article is automatically translated.

Modern Russia is in search of ways for the future development of the Far North and Arctic regions, and one of the key factors in paying close attention to these territories is their strategic importance in providing the country with valuable mineral resources [1, 2]. Under these conditions, questions about the history of the study of these areas have become noticeably relevant among the scientific community. Of great interest to modern scientists is the analysis of the mobilization model for the development of the North and the Arctic, implemented during the Soviet period of our country's history [3, 4, 5]. Under the influence of significant political changes and the economic crisis after 1917, the Soviet government initiated a large-scale process of studying and evaluating the productive forces of peripheral regions. The implementation of this program contributed to the development of the mineral resource base, and gave rise to the accelerated formation of the mining industry in remote parts of the country. In the context of the formation of modern projects for the development of the North and the Arctic zone, the assessment of historical experience, plans and projects of the past is becoming extremely relevant, which, combined with the latest scientific and technological achievements, can give a new impetus to understanding the problem of developing the mineral resource potential of these territories. One of the northern regions where the experience of forced development during the Soviet period was tested was the European North of Russia, which occupies a vast area on the map of our state – from the Kola Peninsula and Karelia in the west to the Northern Urals in the east. Administratively, it includes the Arkhangelsk, Vologda and Murmansk Regions, the Republics of Karelia and Komi, and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug. Today, this region is of strategic importance for the development of the country, it is one of the main suppliers of mineral raw materials (oil, coal, ores, gas, etc.) to the central regions of Russia.

A significant number of published works are devoted to the history of knowledge of this territory [6, 7, 8]. The researchers focus on the history of expeditions, the activities of scientific institutions, and the creative role of individual scientists in the study of this territory. However, at present, aspects of the relationship between the results of scientific research and the further industrial development of the region remain little explored. The purpose of the article is to analyze the key tasks and areas of activity in the scientific study of the European North of the RSFSR–USSR in the context of the implementation of tasks to expand the mineral resource base of the country in the early period of the history of the Soviet state in the 1917-1920s.

The conducted research is based on the analysis of unpublished and published sources. It is based on a set of archival documents deposited in the collections of the Russian State Historical Archive, the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, the Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg, the St. Petersburg branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the National Archive of the Komi Republic, which preserved documentary evidence about the history of the study of the North. In addition, a significant part of the source base consisted of published legislative acts characterizing the work of the Soviet government – resolutions, orders of state authorities on the development of economics and science. Among them, the State Plan for the Electrification of Russia (GOELRO) in 1920 and the materials of the First Five–year Plan for National Economic Construction of the USSR (1928-1932) were of paramount importance, the study of which made it possible to determine the tasks that the state set for the scientific community in the study of the European North. An equally important component of the research was the work with the works of scientists who recorded information about their opinions and scientific research.

Throughout history, the territory of the European North of Russia has been the focus of close attention of science and the state, however, harsh climatic conditions and remoteness from the center have long been obstacles to its exploration. The first steps in the scientific study of the European North of Russia were made at the end of the XVIII century, when the expeditions of academicians P. S. Pallas [9] and I. And Lepekhina [10] laid the foundation for the physico-geographical and geological study of the territory. During the 19th century, the research was continued by individual expeditions of the Imperial St. Petersburg Russian Geographical Society, the Corps of Mining Engineers, the Imperial St. Petersburg Mineralogical Society, and the Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences. The needs of the development of the Russian economy, when industry needed mineral resources, determined the key directions in the study of the European North - the search for minerals and the expansion of knowledge about its geological structure. The research results of N. V. Shirokshin (1834) [11], A. I. Schrenk (1837) [12], K. M. Baer (1837-1840) [13], A. F. Miedendorf (1840) [14], A. A. Keyserling (1843) [15], E. K. Hoffmann (1847-1950) [16] and others. Scientists began studying the Timan Ridge, the Polar Urals, and the Khibiny mountain range. The presence of minerals such as coal, gold, pyrite, and oil–bearing rocks has been determined.

The beginning of systematic research of this territory is connected with the activities of the first state geological survey of the country, the Geological Committee, organized in 1882 as part of the Mining Department. The studies of the Northern Urals, Timan, and the Kola Peninsula (E. S. Fedorov, F. N. Chernyshev, P. B. Rippas, and others) [17-19] provided new information about the geology of the European North of Russia. In the beginning. The most important area of the committee's research was the study of the Ukhta oil–bearing region and the assessment of its prospects for industry - P. I. Polevoy (1907) [20], A. N. Zamyatin, N. N. Yakovlev (1909-1910) [21].

The importance of the European North became clearly recognized by the government of the Russian Empire only at the beginning of the 20th century, when the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War set the country the task of developing the Northern Sea Route as the most important transport artery connecting the West and the East. This necessitated the development of areas adjacent to the waters of the northern seas. An important step in solving the issues of colonization and exploration of the European North was the construction of a seaport on the Kola Peninsula and the laying of the Murmansk Railway (1915-1916). An important role in updating attention to the North was played by the surveys of the Geological Committee conducted along the laying of the railway line on the Kola Peninsula and the territory of Karelia, conducted in 1916-1917 (A. A. Polkanov, N. G. Kassin, V. I. Sokolov, D. V. Sokolov, etc.) [22-23]. As a result, deposits of iron ores, building materials, pegmatite rocks, etc. were identified. Nevertheless, the surveys carried out covered only certain areas of the European North of Russia, most of this territory remained a "white spot" for science by the end of 1917.

1917 was an epoch-making year in the history of Russia, which marked the scrapping of the entire existing structure of the country. Under the influence of major political changes and the outbreak of the economic crisis, the issues of using the natural resources of remote regions have become relevant. The need to find new sources of mineral raw materials such as coal, oil, and non-ferrous metal ores led the government to pay close attention to the study of peripheral territories in the early years of Soviet rule.

The problem of the need to involve the country's raw materials in the economy was raised after the Bolsheviks came to power. In the 1918 work of the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR, V. I. Lenin, "The Next Tasks of the Soviet Government," which actually became a plan for future socialist construction, the need to provide the country's large industry with a material basis was emphasized. The main key to this was the "gigantic reserves" of minerals located in the bowels of Russia [24, p. 188]. The program of studying the country's natural productive forces, which was being formed in the RSFSR, was directly linked to the tasks of economic recovery, which urgently required the organization of a search for sources of mineral raw materials. In this regard, the work of the entire state Geological Survey, which acquired new organizational forms in the early years of Soviet power, was also subject to fundamental restructuring.

The government entrusted the management of geological prospecting to the Supreme Council of the National Economy (VSNH), formed in 1917 as the central governing body of the national economy. The organization of specialized committees responsible for issues related to mining and processing of minerals (the Main Peat Committee, the Main Petroleum Committee, and the Main Coal Committee) began in the Supreme Economic Council system [25, pp. 462-463, 503]. As part of the new priorities, the role of the Geological Committee was strengthened, and its work was also subject to restructuring. In 1918, it was transferred to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Economic Council, and its activities focused on the search for raw materials. In the new conditions, the committee became the organizational center of the complex of geological research in the country. Despite the events of the Civil War, by the summer of 1918, the relevant geological departments had begun work on the search and exploration of minerals in the central provinces, Orenburg Region, Astrakhan province, near Petrograd [26, p. 85].

In order to achieve its objectives of expanding the productive forces, the Soviet government needed to involve all scientific forces in cooperation and build a new system of interaction between government and science. In April 1918, V. I. Lenin recommended that the Supreme Economic Council instruct the Russian Academy of Sciences to organize the work of commissions to draw up a plan for the reorganization of industry and the economy to provide the country with the main types of raw materials (oil, coal, iron ores). The Commission for the Study of the Natural Productive Forces of Russia (CEPS) was involved in solving this problem. It has been functioning as part of the Academy of Sciences since 1915, collecting information about the natural productive forces of Russia. After 1917, the Commission's activities noticeably intensified, and its forces began searching for mineral raw materials on the Murmansk coast, in the Vologda province, as well as in the center of the country [27].

In 1918-1923, the staff of the Geological Committee and the KEPS published the collection "Minerals", which presented a summary of the country's subsoil [28, 29]. These publications highlighted the inextricable link between geological research and the assessment of mineral reserves and became the basis for expanding the mineral resource base.

During 1918, a new structure of the geological survey took shape in Soviet Russia, which made it possible, under state control, to launch intensive surveys in promising resource areas of the RSFSR. However, the external and internal conditions during this period were unfavorable. In the context of the Civil War and foreign intervention, when the country was cut off from the main suppliers of raw materials, the government brought to the fore the issues of finding new sources of valuable mineral resources. At that time, the study of the European North was designated at a high government level as an important strategic direction.

In 1918, the RSFSR was in the flames of a Civil War. Due to the British intervention in the south of the country, access to the oil fields of Grozny and Baku was blocked. Due to the fuel crisis that arose on July 13, 1918, the Resolution of the Council of People's Commissars ordered the Supreme Economic Council to "submit assumptions for the survey of the oil and coal resources of the Pechora Region" [30, l. 3]. This task was assigned to the Geological Committee. In the summer of 1918 The Ukhta oil-bearing region was visited by the expedition of the head of the petroleum section of the committee, geologist K. P. Kalitsky. Its results confirmed the conclusions of previous expeditions about the presence of promising oil fields, but identified the problem of the unprofitability of industrial development of this territory, which required significant financial costs [31].

At that time, there was already a discussion in the scientific circles of Soviet Russia about the oil wealth of Ukhta. Undoubtedly, at that time, scientists were dominated by the government's plan to create new fuel and energy regions. On the one hand, there were scientists from the Geological Committee who were convinced that there was oil in Ukhta, but there wasn't much of it and it wasn't profitable to develop it at the moment. On the other hand, some geologists believed that the area should be explored immediately. One of the supporters of this opinion was the head of the Main Petroleum Committee of the Supreme Economic Council, geologist I. M. Gubkin, who was convinced of the great prospects of this territory [32].

In 1919, at the initiative of I. M. Gubkin, the Main Petroleum Committee of the RSFSR decided to allocate funds for further study of the Ukhta region. The future expedition was prepared by the joint efforts of the Main Petroleum Committee and the Geological Committee [33, l. 20, 32] and took place in the summer of 1919, but due to the unfolding events of the Civil War, it could not get beyond the middle reaches of the Vym River.

The formation of a "northern" direction in the activities of the Soviet government is evidenced by the creation of a special body. January 30, 1919 By a decree of the Board of the People's Commissariat of Trade and Industry, the Commission for the Study and Practical Use of the Russian North was established at the Petrograd Branch of the Scientific and Technical Department (NTO) of the Supreme Economic Council (Chairman – geologist I. P. Tolmachev). It included representatives of government agencies (the Supreme Economic Council, the People's Commissariat of Trade and Industry, etc.) and scientific institutions (the Geological Committee, commissions of the Russian Academy of Sciences, etc.). Her task was to study the natural productive forces of the European North with a view to their practical use. To fulfill and implement them, the Commission had to collect, process, and systematize the materials accumulated on the research of this territory, develop scientific plans, and carry out expeditions [34, l. 6-7]. Within the framework of its activities, special bureaus were created that were responsible for certain issues (the Salt Bureau – the development of salt production in the North, the Fishing Bureau – the survey of marine and animal fisheries).

Taking into account one of the priorities in the knowledge of the European North – the study of the Ukhta oil fields, a special Ukhta bureau was established on April 30, 1919. It was designed to unite the work of organizations involved in surveys in the Ukhta oil-bearing region (the Geological Committee, the People's Commissariat of Railways, the Main Petroleum Committee, etc.) [35, pp. 27-27 vol.]. The bureau's work focused on studying the "Ukhto-Pechora problem", that is, on solving pressing issues related to the search for oil and coal in the basin of the Pechora River. The work of the expeditions sent to the area was discussed and coordinated at the meetings. The Bureau was engaged in the development of an industrial and economic survey plan for the Ukhta oil-bearing region.

In 1919, at the initiative of the Ukhta Bureau, with the support of the Supreme Economic Council, the issue of Ukhta oil, including the problem of transport links with this area, was considered by the Small and Large Council of People's Commissars. Such attention was dictated by the still difficult fuel crisis in the country. The discussion resulted in a Resolution of the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR dated April 9, 1919, which provided for the creation of a special commission to solve the Ukhto-Pechora problem, the deployment of expeditionary surveys in the Ukhta region, and the construction of a railway that would connect the Ukhta region with the Moscow railway [36, pp. 39-40]. However, the events of the Civil War did not make it possible to implement this project.

The involvement of a significant part of the European North in the war arena, as well as insufficient funding for the activities of the Commission for the Study and Practical Use of the Russian North, were the reasons why the Ukhta Bureau's expeditionary activities were not widely developed. The only expedition was sent to the Pechora River basin in 1919, which was led by geologist N. A. Kulik. Its tasks included the economic and geological survey of the vast area of the Pechora River basin. One of the leading areas of research was supposed to be the study of the Ukhta region, however, due to military operations in the North, scientists were unable to reach the Ukhta River.

Russian Russian North In January 1920, by the decision of the Board of the NTO of the Supreme Economic Council, the Commission for the Study and Practical Use of the Russian North was joined to the Scientific Commission of the Petrograd Branch of the NTO of the Supreme Economic Council, its task remained the comprehensive study of the Russian North for industrial use [6, pp. 21-22, 26].

The state tasks of integrating the productive forces of the European North into the general economic system of the state were outlined in the State Plan for the Development of the RSFSR Electric Power Industry, developed in 1920 by the government of the country. At its core, the document was supposed to become a unified state plan for the development of the national economy for the next decade. Electrification was declared the most important goal of the country. The plan of the State Plan for the Electrification of Russia (GOELRO), approved in December 1920 by the VIII All-Russian Congress of Soviets, for the first time officially documented the problem of industrialization of the North and the need to integrate its raw materials into the country's economy. The European North of the RSFSR was considered as the richest base of natural resources, and its potential was estimated on a par with the large industrial centers of the Urals and Donbass. The central importance was given to forest resources, fuel and energy raw materials (peat, coal, oil, oil shale), and ore minerals. Among the key areas around which scientific research of these territories was to focus was the study of the natural resources of the Kola Peninsula, Karelia and the Polar Urals [37].

According to the plan, a whole range of exploration work was planned in the European North, which was supposed to provide new knowledge about the geological structure of this territory and its subsoil. Despite the fact that this region was considered as the richest raw material base, surpassing other regions of the country in terms of natural resources, the developers of the plan emphasized that the task of exploring and industrial development of this territory is difficult and requires high costs for the economy. The key problems that hindered its industrial development were identified by the authors of GOELRO as a shortage of workers and poor development of transport and infrastructure [38]. A number of scientific institutions were involved in the implementation of these large-scale state tasks, the main tasks of which were the search and study of mineral deposits in the European North of the country.

The key event for raising the issue of studying the mineral resources of the European North was the organization on March 4, 1920, by Order of the Supreme Economic Council of the RSFSR, of the Northern Scientific and Commercial Expedition (hereinafter referred to as the Sevexpedition) (since 1925, the Scientific Research Institute for the Study of the North) (Chairman of the Presidium – R. L. Samoilovich). The organization includes representatives of leading scientific institutions: the Geological Committee, the Russian Geographical Society, the Polar Commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences, etc. The main task of the Sevexpedition was to conduct scientific research on the natural productive forces of the Russian North for their practical use, as well as to direct and coordinate scientific and practical work. Her activities included research on St. John's wort fisheries, reindeer husbandry, and the study of soil, botanical, and economic conditions. One of the general lines was geological surveys and prospecting for minerals, the development of a plan for their extraction and rational use for the needs of industry [39, l. 1-3].

After the withdrawal of the white troops from the territory of the European North in 1920, the Sevexpedition units undertook a number of geological expeditions. On the Kola Peninsula, Academician A. E. Fersman's Khibiny detachment surveyed the central part of the peninsula. The scientists managed to collect unique information about the geology of the Khibiny massif and a rich collection of rare minerals (enigmatite, eudialyte, eucolite, astrophyllite, etc.). The team led by Professor P. V. Wittenburg worked in the northern part of the peninsula, the most important result was the confirmation of the presence of iron ore deposits in the area. The first results of the work of the Sevexpedition attracted the attention of the government. At the interdepartmental meetings convened by the NTO of the Supreme Economic Council on December 10 and 13, 1920, the results of the institution's work were positively assessed, and its activities were recognized as "of national importance" [40, l. 25].

The end of hostilities in the European North of the country allowed the activities of scientific institutions to expand on a large geographical scale.

During the Civil War, the main coal regions (Kuzbass, Eastern Siberia, the Urals, etc.) were cut off from the center. One of the sources of valuable raw materials could be the territory of the Pechora River basin, where signs of coal-bearing activity were detected in the 19th century. The research of the Northern Expedition in this area was focused on this main task. Since 1921, the research teams led by geologists A. A. Chernov, D. D. Rudnev, V. A. Varsanovyeva, T. N. Dobrolyubova, E. D. Soshkina have covered the areas of the basins of the PP. Kosyu, Moustache, Pechory, Ilych, Podcherem, Shchugor [41]. The conducted surveys indicated significant reserves of coal in the north of the country. The data obtained allowed Professor A. A. Chernov to substantiate the idea of the boundaries of the Pechora coal basin by 1924, which became a key conclusion about the industrial prospects of this area [42, pp. 7-8].

Since 1924, due to the beginning of the process of reorganizing the Northern Expedition, the Geological Committee joined the research of potential coal production in the Pechora River basin. During the period 1924-1928, under the auspices of the geological survey, teams of geologists V. A. Varsanofieva, T. A. Dobrolyubova, A. A. Chernov, N. A. Kulik, and B. K. Likharev studied the basins of the PP. Kozhim and Kosyu, where the manifestations of coal and oil were identified, as well as work on compiling a ten-verst map of the Timan, Northern Urals, and Bolshezemelskaya tundra [43, 44].

By the mid-1920s, the Geological Committee had returned to discussing the Ukhta problem. In 1925, based on the available information, geologist D.V. Nalivkin proposed a new scheme of stratigraphy of the Ukhta region, justifying its prospects for oil and gas [45]. Another important factor for the actualization of this area was the need to search for deposits of radioactive elements. In 1926-1927, expeditions of the committee's staff, chemists A. A. Cherepennikov and L. N. Bogoyavlensky, worked in the Ukhta oil-bearing region. The results of the research caused a sensation – a high content of a rare metal, radium, was found in the waters of the Ukhta region [46].

Another important area of research of the scientific community was the study of the territory of the Kola Peninsula. During the first half of the 1920s, the research teams of the Northern Expedition led by A. E. Fersman did a lot of work on the study of the central part of the Kola Peninsula. The scientists conducted mineralogical and petrographic surveys of the Khibiny and Lovozero tundras. During this period, about 90 deposits of rare metals were discovered, and deposits of unique minerals were discovered. The most important conclusions were the presence of apatite-nepheline rocks on the peninsula. The first finds of apatite, in which a high content of phosphorus and potassium was determined, allowed A.E. Fersman to suggest the widespread use of raw materials for the production of fertilizers. The problem of artificial fertilizers was very acute for the USSR during this period, most of them for the agricultural complex were imported from abroad. The expedition studies of the staff of the Scientific Research Institute for the Study of the North, geologists A. N. Labuntsov and V. I. Vlodavets, conducted in 1925-1928 in the Khibiny tundra, confirmed the conclusions of previous expeditions. Indigenous apatite-nepheline deposits were discovered on the Rasvumchorr plateau, along the slopes of the Kukisvumchorra and Yuksporra mountains [47].

The Geological Committee has launched systematic research in the north of the Kola Peninsula. From 1923-1927, under the leadership of A. A. Polkanov, route surveys were conducted in order to compile a ten-verst geological map of the European part of the Union. As a result of the research, the scientist for the first time gave a description of the diverse rocks of this part of the peninsula. Information about deposits obtained by A. A. Polkanov – ore minerals (gold, molybdenum, iron and nickel ores, etc.) and non-metallic minerals (pyrite, titanium raw materials, barite, feldspar and mica, clays, etc.) became a significant contribution to the formation of a consolidated picture of the geological bowels of the Kola Peninsula [48].

The scientists' conclusions about the colossal mineral reserves of the Kola Peninsula determined its further history as a powerful mining center of the USSR.

Karelia became one of the regions of the European North, where intensive searches for mineral raw materials necessary for the country's economy began in the 1920s. Even during the revolutionary events and the Civil War, the Geological Committee developed a research program for the Olonets province (until 1917, the territory of Karelia was part of three provinces – Arkhangelsk, Vyborg, and most of Olonets) [49, pp. 12, 51]. In accordance with it, it was supposed to begin the implementation of a ten-mile survey of the area, the study of the geological structure, and the search for minerals. Despite the military events, geologist V. M. Timofeev began conducting research in Karelia in 1919, continuing them in the 1920s. The result of the research was the scientist's conclusion about the high importance of stone rocks (granites, quartzites, sandstones, marbles, etc.) for the industrial development of Karelia. Due to the increasing needs of the country for building materials, this area of research was particularly relevant and in demand at that time [50].

The peculiarity of the geological structure of Karelia, which is rich in natural geological formations, led to the formation in the 1920s of another relevant area in its study – the search for deposits of pegmatites, a rock whose components are rare minerals – feldspar, quartz and mica. This raw material was in high demand by the glass, cement, porcelain and electrical industries of the USSR, but the country imported a significant part of it from abroad. In 1921, a Northern Expedition team led by mining engineer E. A. Kupfer identified extensive deposits of pegmatite in the area of the Kandalaksha Bay [41, pp. 29-34]. In 1924-1925, the research was continued by Professor P. A. Borisov, an employee of the Scientific Research Institute for the Study of the North. He surveyed the area of the Karelian coast of the White Sea, identifying a significant distribution of pegmatite formations. By the mid-1920s, Karelian pegmatite deposits were the main sources of lumpy monomineral feldspar (microcline) and lumpy quartz for industry [51, p. 10]. Systematic studies of North Karelian pegmatites were conducted in 1925-1929 by A. N. Labuntsov. During this period, scientists have studied about 200 pegmatite veins and collected a large mineralogical collection. In his opinion, pegmatites deserved the closest attention from science and the state, as one of the important directions in the study of the North of the country [52, pp. 224-227].

The close attention of the Soviet government to the study of the northern territories led to the strengthening of this area within the framework of the work of the Russian Academy of Sciences (since 1925 – the Academy of Sciences of the USSR). The Polar Commission, which had been working in its composition since 1914, took an active part in organizing the activities and expeditions of the Commission for the Study and Practical Use of the Russian North, then the Sevexpedition. At the meetings, where representatives of scientific institutions dealing with the problems of studying the North were invited, issues of the development of the northern territories (transport, infrastructure, etc.) were considered, projects and results of expeditionary research were discussed. During 1922-1923, it included the Novaya Zemlya Subcommission, which for the first time began coordinating the work of scientific institutions studying the Novaya Zemlya archipelago. Under the chairmanship of Academician A. P. Karpinsky, it included experienced researchers of the northern and polar territories, representatives of leading scientific organizations: the Main Hydrographic Department, the Russian Hydrological Institute, the Northern Expedition, the Geological Committee, the Main Physical Observatory, the State Botanical Garden, etc. [53, L. 13]. Its members managed to develop the first scientific research program for Novaya Zemlya, one of the key directions of which was the study of the geology of the archipelago and its subsoil [54].

During the 1920s, scientific institutions of the country organized a number of scientific expeditions to study the mineral resource potential of Novaya Zemlya. In 1921, the expedition teams of the Geological Committee (B.K. Likharev) and the Northern Expedition (R. L. Samoilovich) searched for coal deposits in the archipelago. This urgent task was prompted by the successful experience of developing the nearby Svalbard archipelago, where coal mining had been carried out since 1915. Systematic research of Novaya Zemlya in 1921-1927 was conducted under the leadership of R. L. Samoilovich. As a result, a number of "white spots" on the map of the Arctic islands have been eliminated and extensive geological material has been collected [55]. Industrial mineral deposits on Novaya Zemlya in the 1920s could not be identified.

The conclusions about the resource potential of the European North, obtained by scientists in the 1920s, became decisive factors for the inclusion of this territory in the first five-year national economic plan of the USSR (1928-1932). During the first five-year plan, further progressive "conquest" of the European North of the country was planned. Industrial infrastructure facilities were supposed to be built in the areas of explored mineral resources, including factories and plants for the exploitation and processing of raw materials (the Khibiny apatite mines, the Pegmatite Plant, the Mica Factory near Petrozavodsk, the Celestine Plant on the Ust-Pinega River, etc.). The priorities for the industrialization of the USSR were further intensive geological exploration and development of deposits, primarily of apatite-nepheline ores, coal, oil and pegmatites [56].

After 1917, the European North of the RSFSR-USSR was in the zone of special priorities of the Soviet government. The solution of state tasks to expand the mineral resource base to overcome the country's crisis has necessitated the widespread use of mineral resources in the development of the economy of this territory. On the one hand, the new leadership inherited from the previous government of the Russian Empire the understanding that this territory is resource-significant, on the other, it has formed new ideas about it. The most important state tasks in the study of the productive forces of the European North were outlined in the GOERLOH plan adopted in 1920, according to which the mineral resource base of the territory was subject to study and industrial exploitation. The country's leading scientific forces were involved in the implementation of these large-scale state tasks, which began to study the resource potential of the European North and assess the possibility of its industrial application. Expeditionary research in the 1920s yielded a huge amount of new scientific data, the most important of which was information about the presence of minerals of industrial importance - apatite–nepheline ores, pegmatites, coal, etc. The results showed the importance and validity of the research of this region, which served as the basis for its inclusion in the first five-year national economic plan of the USSR (1928-1932). Thus, in the period 1917-1920, the problem of the development of the European North became of national importance, which gave a powerful message to its systematic study and further industrial development. The study of the rich history of knowledge of the northern territories, combined with modern scientific achievements, can give a new impetus to understanding the problems of developing the mineral resource potential of the European North of Russia.

The article was prepared as part of the state assignment on research and development No. 1022041400015-8-6.1.1 "Science in the North of Russia as the basis for sustainable development of the regions of the European North and the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation".

References
1. Goroshko, N. V., & Patsala, S. V. (2020). On the "northern" strategy of Russia: Development or settlement. Tomsk State University Journal. Economics, 52, 88-103. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/52/6
2. Lazhentsev, V. N. (2023). Mineral resource potential of the northern regions under new industrialization in Russia. NORTH and MARKET: Formation of Economic Order, 3, 7-21. https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.3.2023.81.001
3. Saburov, A. A. (2016). Organization of Soviet Arctic research in the 1920s: Planning and coordination of scientific activities. Northern (Arctic) Federal University Bulletin. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2016.3.41
4. Timoshenko, A. I. (2013). Soviet experience in Arctic development and the Northern Sea Route: Formation of a mobilization economy. Historical and Economic Studies, 14(1-2), 73-95.
5. Karpov, V. P. (2020). Soviet historical experience in Arctic development through the lens of contemporary issues. Tomsk State University Journal. History, 63, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/63/3
6. Emelina, M. A., Savinov, M. A., & Filin, P. A. (Eds.). (2020). Chronicle of the Arctic Institute: From the Sevexpedition to the GNC of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1920-2020: History of polar research (Vol. 1). Paulsen.
7. Zykin, I. V. (2020). Regional forest industry complexes of the European North of the USSR in the strategy of the first five-year plan. Petrozavodsk State University Bulletin, 42, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2020.549
8. Brovina, A. A. (2022). Scientific exploration of the European North of Russia (late 19th-first half of the 20th century). FIC Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
9. Pallas, P. S. (1773-1788). Travels through various provinces of the Russian Empire. (3 parts in 5 volumes). Imperial Academy of Sciences.
10. Lepehin, I. I. (1805). Travels of academician Ivan Lepehin in 1772. (Part 4, 404 pages). Imperial Academy of Sciences.
11. Shirokshin, N. V. (1835). Geognostic review of the shores of the Kandalaksha Gulf and the White Sea up to the town of Kemi in the Arkhangelsk Province. Mining Journal, I(3), 397-427.
12. Schrenk, A. I. (1855). Journey to the Northeast of European Russia through the tundras of the Samoyeds to the northern Ural Mountains. Typography of Grigory Trusov.
13. Baer, K. E. v. (1838). Expedition to Novaia Zemlia and Lapland. Bulletin of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg, 3(8-9), 132-144.
14. Middendorf, A. (1845). Report on a detour through the interior of Lapland during the summer expedition in 1840. Contributions to the Knowledge of the Russian Empire, 2, 139-182.
15. Keyserling, A., & Krusenstern, P. (1846). Scientific observations on a journey to the Pechora land in 1843. St. Petersburg: Printed and available from Carl Kray.
16. Hofmann, E. K., & Kovalsky, M. A. (1853-1856). Northern Ural and the coastal ridge of Pai-Hoy: Studies of the expedition organized by the Imperial Russian Geographical Society in 1847, 1848, and 1850 (Vols. 1-2). Typography of the Imperial Academy of Sciences.
17. Fedorov, E. S. (1889). New data on the geology of the Northern Ural. Bulletin of the Geological Committee, 8(1), 7-20.
18. Chernyshev, F. N. (1915). Orthographic essay of Timan. Proceedings of the Geological Committee, 12(1), 1-136.
19. Rippas, P. B. (1898). Kola expedition of 1898 (preliminary report). Bulletin of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society, 35(3), 292-312.
20. Polevoy, P. I. (1908). Uhtinsk oil-bearing region. Notes of the Russian Technical Society, 1, 29-35.
21. Zamyatin, A. N., & Yakovlev, N. N. (1910). On the results of research in the southern Timan. Bulletin of the Geological Committee, 29(2), 158-162.
22. Sokolov, V. I., & Sokolov, D. V. (1917). Brief report on research in 1916 in the Olonets region of ore deposits, coal, building materials, and other minerals. Bulletin of the Geological Committee, 1, 94-122.
23. Kassin, N. G., & Polkanov, A. A. (1918-1926). Geological studies along the Murmansk railway line in the Kola Peninsula. Bulletin of the Geological Committee, 37(1), 129-142.
24. Lenin, V. I. (1974). Complete works (Vol. 36). Political Literature Publishing House.
25. Compilation of laws and orders of the government for 1917-1918. Administration of the Affairs of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR.
26. Volin, M. S. (1956). Organization of the study of natural resources in the Soviet country in 1917-1920. Historical Questions, 2, 80-88.
27. Review of the scientific and publishing activities of the Commission for the Study of Natural Productive Forces of Russia, 1915-1920. (Compiled by G. P. Block).
28. Fersman, A. E. (1919). Feldspars. Natural productive forces of Russia. Commission for the Study of Natural Productive Forces of Russia. Geological Committee (Vol. 4). Useful minerals.
29. Eremina, E. V. (1919). Barite and witherite. Natural productive forces of Russia. Commission for the Study of Natural Productive Forces of Russia. Geological Committee (Vol. 4, Issue 30).
30. Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) funds. D. R-1724.
31. Kalitsky, K. P. (1921). Uhtinsk oil-bearing region. Oil and Shale Economy, 9-12, 115-119.
32. Gubkin, I. M. (1918). Uhtinsk oil-bearing region. Bulletin of the Oil Committee, 1, 22-27.
33. Russian State Historical Archive (RGIA). F. 58. Op. 2. D. 763.
34. AARI funds. D. R-1728.
35. RGIA. F. 58. Op. 2. D. 763.
36. AARI funds. D. R-1726. Book 4.
37. Foundations of the Northern District Electrification Project. Compiled by the State Commission for Electrification of Russia.
38. Plan for the electrification of the RSFSR. Introduction to the report of the VIII Congress of Councils of the State Commission for Electrification of Russia.
39. Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg (CGANTD SPb). F. R-369. Op. 1-1. D. 1.
40. AARI funds. D. R-1719.
41. Proceedings of the Northern Scientific and Industrial Expedition. Issue 14: Works of the Sevexpedition teams in 1921: preliminary report.
42. National Archive of the Republic of Komi (NARK). F. r-139. Op. 1. D. 400. L. 7-8.
43. Chernov, A. A. (1927). On geological studies in 1926 in the basin of the B. Syni and Lun-Vozh (sheets 122 and 123). Report on the state and activities of the Geological Committee for 1925-1926.
44. Varsanofyeva, V. A. (1927). On geological studies in the area of sheet 124 in 1927. Report on the state and activities of the Geological Committee for 1926-1927.
45. Nalivkin, D. V. (1923). On the geological structure of the Uhtinsk oil-bearing region. Oil and Shale Economy, 4(2), 232-235.
46. Cherepenikov, A. A. (1927). Trip to the Uhtinsk region in 1926. Report on the state and activities of the Geological Committee for 1925-1926.
47Khibin apatites. Collection of articles edited by Academician A. E. Fersman. Apatite State Publishing House.
48. St. Petersburg Branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPbF RAN). F. 922. Op. 1. D. 22.
49. Geological study of the USSR. Vol. 2. Karelia ASSR. Period 1918-1940. Manuscript works. Science.
50. Timofeev, V. M., & Kupletsky, B. M. (1925). Construction materials of the Northwestern region: 1. Northern part. Natural mineral construction materials of the European part of the USSR.
51. Borisov, P. A. (1948). Ceramic pegmatites of the Karelo-Finnish SSR. State Publishing House of the Karelo-Finnish SSR.
52. Labuntsov, A. N. (1939). Pegmatites of Northern Karelia and their minerals. Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR.
53. SPbF RAN. F. 75. Op. 1. D. 33.
54. SPbF RAN. F. 75. Op. 1. D. 91.
55. Novaya Zemlya. Expedition 1921-1927 under the leadership of R. L. Samoilovich. Proceedings of the Institute for the Study of the North, 40.
56Five-Year Plan for the National Economic Construction of the USSR. Third edition. "Planned Economy" Publishing House.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the reviewed text "Mineral resources of the European North of the RSFSR in the program of scientific study of the country's natural productive forces in the early years of Soviet power" lies at the intersection of several narratives: the economic policy of the Soviet government in the early years of Soviet power, the history of the development of the Russian North, the history of Soviet science, etc. The source base of the work is a substantial set of archival materials, The author claims the novelty of the study to demonstrate the relationship between the scientific study of the European North of Russia and the tasks of expanding the country's mineral and economic base, and in a broader context, to demonstrate the relationship between the results of scientific research and the further industrial development of the region, which, in the author's opinion, is an insufficiently studied aspect of the topic. The time frame of the study stated in the title seems somewhat vague, if the starting point is obvious – 1917, the change of power, the formation of a new state in the central part of Russia, then the end point is not tied to any milestone event; the GOELRO plan, about the important role of which the author repeatedly writes in the scientific study of the North, was adopted only in 1920 Therefore, it would be premature to summarize the results of its implementation, taking into account the scientific research of the North, the dissolution of the Committee of the North in 1922. (the latest event in the author's narrative) is not a milestone in any way. It seems that some blurring of the final chronological boundary prevents the formulation of full-fledged intelligible conclusions on the topic. Attention is drawn to the author's adherence, to a large extent, to traditional Soviet narratives that full-fledged exploration of the North began only after 1917, with special mention of Lenin's work "The Next Tasks of Soviet Power." At the same time, the author lists more than a dozen pre-revolutionary researchers of the region, mentions the construction of a seaport on the Kola Peninsula, the laying of the Murmansk Railway in 1915-1916, the work of the Geological Committee on the Kola Peninsula and in the Ukhta oil-bearing region, the expeditions of the Polar Commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences, etc. These references to scientific research activities of the pre-revolutionary period are scattered fragmentarily throughout the text, sometimes in violation of the chronology of the presentation; taken together, they seem to be able to give a more holistic view of the foundation on which the activities of Soviet scientists were based, especially since the Soviet researchers mentioned by the author were educated/their experience in tsarist Russia, at the same time their circle of scientific interests was formed, etc. In the substantive part of the work, the author tracks the activities of the Soviet government in organizing scientific research in the specified region both at the level of the legal framework and the activities of specific commissions, committees, etc. It seems that the author's task of demonstrating the relationship between the scientific study of the European North of Russia and the tasks of expanding the mineral and economic base of the country has only partially been solved, again due to the time frame chosen by the author of the research. The economic objectives of the Soviet economy in this period were different: in 1918-1920. they were determined by the civil war, the author mentions it, but more often as a factor that hinders the development of scientific research; the connection of scientific research with some successes of the Soviet military industry is not stated. In December 1920, new tasks were set according to the GOELRO plan, but the author restricts the research to the very beginning of the 1920s. Therefore, it is still too early to talk about GOELRO's successes in connection with the research conducted, moreover, the substantive part of the text is ordered by listing problems in the organization of scientific work ("... the activities of institutions were poorly coordinated. There was no long-term plan for the study of the northern territories and a unifying structure, which led to duplication of research in the region"), from which, if desired, it can be concluded that the study of the mineral resources of the North failed. The conclusions focus on the thesis that "the most important state tasks in the study of the productive forces of the European North were outlined in the GOERLOH plan adopted in 1920, according to which its mineral resource base was subject to study and industrial exploitation. The country's leading scientific forces have been involved in the implementation of these large-scale state tasks." This again implies the need to extend the time frame of the study at least to the mid-1920s. It is recommended to finalize it.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review. The subject of the research is the mineral resources of the European North of the RSFSR-USSR in the program of scientific study of the country's natural productive forces in the 1917-1920s. The research methodology is based on the principles of science, objectivity, consistency and historicism. The work uses special historical methods (historical-chronological, historical-typological, historical-comparative, historical-genetic, etc.). The article is based on a wide range of published and unpublished documents from the collections of the Russian State Historical Archive, the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, the Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation of St. Petersburg.St. Petersburg, the St. Petersburg branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the National Archive of the Komi Republic, which give an idea of the history of the study of the North and its natural resources. A significant part of the sources were "published legislative acts characterizing the work of the Soviet government (state, departmental and regional legislative materials), which made it possible to show how the state development strategy of the region under study was formed. The paper also uses documents that are devoted to the formation and development of the system of scientific institutions in the region. These are the documents of the "Commission for the Study of Natural Productive Forces (F. 132, SPF ARAN), the Polar Commission of the USSR Academy of Sciences (F. 75, SPF ARAN), SOPSa of the USSR Academy of Sciences (F. 174, ARAN)" and others. The relevance of the topic is determined by the natural resources of the region and their importance to the country. In today's difficult conditions, when the ways of developing the Russian economy are being determined, an analysis of the historical experience of studying the natural resources of the European North of the country, the activities of scientific structures for the study of mineral resources in this region can help formulate scientific priorities and economic interest in the development of the most effective scientific and technical areas. In this regard, it is most important to study the period of the 1920s, when science, as it is currently undergoing major transformational changes. The analysis of the historical goals and objectives that the scientific community solved during this period of time makes it possible to understand the nature and mechanism of interaction between science and government and society, the specifics of scientific research in the context of state-political objectives and industrial and economic development of the region and its development. Studying the development and results of scientific exploration of vast northern territories in the 1920s is important and relevant from the point of view of strengthening the role of regions in the modern life of the country. The study and understanding of historical experience will to a certain extent contribute to solving modern problems of interaction between science and government, finding ways of mutually beneficial cooperation in the context of reforming regional management structures and the state system of scientific organizations. The scientific novelty of the work is determined by the formulation of the problem and research objectives. The novelty is also determined by the fact that the article comprehensively and deeply analyzes the key goals and activities in the field of scientific research of the European North of the country to identify minerals in the region in 1917-1920 based on a wide range of archival documents and scientific literature. Style, structure, and content. The style of the article is scientific, but at the same time accessible not only to specialists, but also to a wide range of readers. The language of the article is clear, precise and specific. The structure of the work is aimed at achieving the goals and objectives of the research. At the beginning of the article, the author reveals the relevance of the topic and its purpose. The article is based on a wide range of sources, some of the materials are being introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. The text of the article is logically structured and presented consistently. The author reveals the strategic importance of the region for the country, about the first steps to explore the region since the XVIII century. and scientific expeditions of the Academy of Sciences. The main attention is paid to the first years of Soviet power, when the region began to be studied with the involvement of scientific forces comprehensively, the importance of the GOELRO plan is noted. The main focus of the work is on the forms of research: (these are large-scale expeditions to certain regions of the European North). The text contains a lot of interesting and diverse information about the work of scientific and geological expeditions and their results. In conclusion, the author notes that "expeditionary research in the 1920s provided a huge amount of new scientific data, the most important of which was information about the presence of minerals of industrial importance - apatite–nepheline ores, pegmatites, coal, etc. The results obtained showed the importance and validity of the research of this region, which served as the basis for its inclusion in the first five-year national economic plan of the USSR [...] the problem of the development of the European North became of national importance, which gave a powerful message to its systematic study and further industrial development. The study of the rich history of knowledge of the northern territories, combined with modern scientific achievements, can give a new impetus to understanding the problems of developing the mineral resource potential of the European North of Russia." The bibliography of the work consists of 56 sources on the research topic. The bibliography fully corresponds to the research topic and research objectives. The appeal to the opponents is presented in the information received during the work on the topic, the analysis carried out and the conclusions reached on the topic under study. The appeal to the opponents is also presented in the bibliography, which will help to get answers to questions on the topic under study. Conclusions, the interest of the readership. The article is written on a relevant topic and will arouse the interest of specialists.
We use cookies to make your experience of our websites better. By using and further navigating this website you accept this. Accept and Close