Prefix ot: semantic class "Deprivation of functions" in the Russian language of the XI-XVII centuries.

Sereda Dmitrii Mihailovich ORCID: 0009-0003-8674-7008 Senior Lecturer; Institute of Philology, Journalism and Intercultural Communication; Southern Federal University 344052, Russia, Rostov region, Rostov-On-Don, Pushkinskaya str., A, 150 dsereda@sfedu.ru

The proposed article is devoted to the issues of verbal word formation, namely, the emergence and development in the pre-national period (XI-XVII centuries) of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" of verbs with the prefix from- (derivatives of the type to crush, to wither), as well as the analysis of its denotative structure. Research on this issue relates to both the field of synchrony ^[1-3] and the field of diachrony ^[4-7].

The term "semantic class", used in works on the formal description of verb prefixes of the Russian language ^{[1, 3, 8]}, denotes a set of derivatives characterized by a single morphemic structure, united by one meaning and being an element of a broader concept of a semantic network. In turn, the semantic network is a nonlinear structure that covers all the meanings of the prefix, as well as establishing links between them according to the degree of semantic proximity to each other. It is the inclusion in a broader structure that defines the connections between all the meanings of a single word-formation formant that distinguishes the term "semantic class" from the term "word-formation type" traditionally used in works on derivatology, which means a scheme for constructing words of a certain part of speech, abstracted from specific lexical units characterized by: a) the commonality of the part of speech directly motivating words and b) a formant that is identical in material and semantic terms" ^{[9, p. 133]}.

One of the relevant methods of studying verbal semantics, which arose within the framework of the cognitive approach, is the method of polysituative analysis developed by N. B. Lebedeva ^[10], which considers the denotative structure of the verb as consisting of separate situations related to each other by spatial, temporal or logical (causal, conditional) relationships.

To determine the specifics of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions", we will identify its denotative structure using the method of polysituative analysis at the synchronous-diachronic level. Let's denote the main terms used in such an analysis: "a situateme is an open unit of the content plan with complex architectonics, including a number of situations (events, propositions) marked with lexical and morphemic-derivational elements of the verb expression plan" ^{[10, p. 6]}, the subject is an animated participant in the situation, the Causer is the creator of the situation, the patient is an object‒type actor existing before the situation (presumption of existence) and subject to change, the Result is an object–type actor (object, image, text, state, situation, etc.) that appears as a result of the implementation of the situation (there is no presumption of existence), may also be in the form of a new "state of affairs", the Object of Damage is a Disinterested Addressee who finds himself in some kind of (psychological, social, informative, etc.) loss ^{[10, pp. 66-67, 69-70]}.

In modern Russian, according to AG-80, the prefix from- stands out among others the meaning "to bring to an undesirable state (damage, fatigue) as a result of an action called a motivating verb" ^{[9, pp. 362-363]}. As examples, the following "derivatives are called: to lie down (to tire by lying down (about some kind of body parts)), crush, dance (legs), sit, defend, trample, move away (all ‒ razg.)" ^{[9, p. 363]}. It is noted that this word–formation type is unproductive, and all verbs are transitive, controlling a name that denotes something that is damaged, tired.

In turn, M. A. Krongauz, among other meanings of the prefix, distinguishes the meaning of "Deprivation of functions", which is divided into three parts depending on the nature of the motivating verb: 1) intransitive motivating verbs denoting the position of the body in space when it comes to damage to one's own part of the body as a result of prolonged static exposure (to lie down, sit out, defend); 2) verbs denoting an excessively intense action performed with the help of a part of the body and bringing it into "disrepair" (to beat off one's hand, to move away 3) verbs, the action of which is directed towards another person who receives damage to a part of the body (trample / give someone legs) ^{[1, pp. 101-102]}.

Thus, when identifying and analyzing derivatives of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" in the pre-national period, we consider both lexemes naming cases of damage to one's own body part, and lexemes denoting a negative impact on another person.

In general, the situation of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" can be represented as follows: the physiological side or specifically any part of the Subject's body acting in the function of the Patient is negatively affected by himself or the Causer, as a result of which the Subject becomes the Object of Damage.

Russian Russian Let us consider the history of the emergence and development of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" in the Russian language of the pre-national period of the XI-XVII centuries, based on the data of the Dictionary of the Old Russian language (XI-XIV centuries) and the Dictionary of the Russian language of the XI-XVII centuries.

Apparently, the beginning of the formation of this semantic class dates back to the Old Russian period, when two lexemes were fixed: ognemagati(xia) ‒ ‘lose strength, get exhausted’ and withdraw – ‘withdraw, stop acting'.

The lexeme otnemagati (xia), which has the variants otnemogati (xia), otnemochi (-shchi), otnemochis (-shisha), is chronologically the most ancient and means ‘to lose strength, to be exhausted’, for example, due to illness or hunger. It is first recorded in the "Izbornik" of 1073: For this reason, in you, many are dumb and sick and dead, the essence of many, they are dying and dying. St. 1073, 52. ^{[11, p. 280]}. In this passage from the First Epistle to the Corinthians by the Apostle Paul, we are talking about those "who eat and drink unworthily", as a result of which they become "weak and sick" ^[12].

At the denotative level, the situation of the derivative of the subject has the following components: Participants (the Subject; The Patient – the physiological side of the Subject, the health resource as an Object of loss; the component ‘tool-the cause of the negative state of the Subject’) and the Result ‒ the state of loss of strength and health of the Subject.

Since the Subject is animate, it has a hidden objectness (physiological side). The component ‘the tool is the cause of the negative state of the Subject' is some kind of internal negative factor (illness, hunger, etc.) that affects its physiological side, which is not lexically expressed. This component is not included in the communicative focus, is in an adjacent, non-lexicalized situation, and is not directional. It can also be considered a separate proposition. It is the physiological side that is negatively affected that performs the function of the Patient, and the Subject himself becomes the Object of Damage. A new situation arises in the Community: with the exhaustion of the Health Resource, illness occurs (with partial exhaustion) or death of the Subject (with complete exhaustion).

Almost at the same time, the non-fixed form of the gift is also fixed, cf.: As long as you grieve and write away, you are deprived of such sweetness, you are deprived of relaxation and peace of mind. St. 1076, 248 ^{[11, p. 280]}. The peculiarity of the situational system of this verb is that the subject is not the Subject, but the Patient, the meaning of which is specified: this is not the physiological side at all, but the body. At the syntactic level, the patient can also be expressed by the form of creation. p., cf.: And the threescore years of the preba (Anthimus) in the n and (cells) in old age<you are relaxed, blessed Sava, seeing him in the flesh, you are exhausted [var.: seeing him with old age and a great illness], pray for him to enter the cell, so that there will be no work for whom to serve him. J. Sav. Osv., 229. XIII century ^{[11, p. 280]}. In such contexts, where there is a clear designation of the physiological side of the Subject being negatively affected, the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" is gradually forming.

In most cases, in situations of a non-postfix derivative, the Subject is the Subject (the personal pronoun in the role of the subject can be omitted), and its physiological side acts as a Patient, not expressed lexically, cf.: You are a force(n)e.e.e. I'm against you... put me down. GB K. XIV, 211 b ^{[13, p. 262]}; and the beginning of Liu(d)ѥ on Moses gl. Russian literature and||zъ gupta. Everyone is on the way. Pal 1406, 143a-b ^{[13, p. 262]}.

The lexeme othnemagati (xia) in the meaning of ‘to lose strength, to become exhausted’ is also noted in the monuments of the Old Russian period, cf.<e> to nei [Danila] Sapson: if they tie me with wet and not rotten bowstrings for a week, I will be exhausted and I will be one of them (ἀσθενήσω). (Judgment XVI, 7) Bibl. Genn. 1499 ^{[11, p. 280]}; The belt of the man of the cross is girdled by the Budeshi<and >well, may you not be exhausted by the force of the fall<I am in the hands of the enemy. Food. Balash., 421. XVI century. ^{[11, p. 280]}. Note that in the last example, a circumstance in the form of creation (by force) denotes a Resource that the Subject is deprived of.

This is a carbon copy of derivative forms of the Greek verb ἀσθενέω ‒ ‘weak, feeble’: prefix ἀ-, which in the ancient verb corresponds to the combination of consoles acne- expresses the semantics of absence (ἀ privativum), and the root σθένω, for the translation of which was taken based magatia (magatia) / Mochica, means ‘to be able, able, able’.

According to etymological dictionaries, other-Russian. I can, urine ‘to be able, able (to do something), to be healthy’ goes back to praslav. *Mogǫ, *mogt'i (sę) ^{[14, p. 635; 15, p. 339; 16, p. 110-111]}. "Goth is the closest. mag ‘I can, in a state’, inf. magan; further brought closer to lit. mãgulas ‘many’ (Bug, RFV 72, 192), magus ‘desirable’, mėgstu, mėgti ‘I like’, ltsh. mêgt ‘to be able, to have a habit’ (Endzelin, RS 11, 37)" ^{[14, p. 635]}. A. S. Melchuk, exploring prefix formations such as extort, extort, harass, connects the semantics of praslav. *mogt'i with the initial value of ‘pull' ^{[16, pp. 110-111]}.

In the history of the Russian language, similar derivatives are also noted without the prefix from-: a) the verb nemagati ‒ ‘to be sick, to be sick’, which occurs only with the prefix not - and is recorded in a monument of the XV century., which, however, is a list of an earlier source of the XI century.: Herod was then in Damascus nemagaa. But Fasail beat him with an Oligom, and defeated him with an Oligom. Flavius. It's full. Hierus. I, 36. XV century. ~ XI century. ^{[17, p. 167]}; b) the verb nemagasy ‒ ‘to weaken', referring to the XIV century.: Drink from the jam of wheat (and) sowing, as nemagasy (ἐκλείπω). (Gen. XXV, 30) Five Books, 25 vol. XIV century. ^{[17, p. 167]}, where this derivative is used as the semantic equivalent of the Greek verb ἐκλείπω ‒ ‘to leave, to be deprived', in which the prefix ἐκ- expresses the effective meaning of ‘completion', and the root λείπω means ‘to be exhausted; to lack’. Unlike lexemes with the prefix from, these verbs express a certain painful state of the Subject, which does not lead to complete loss of strength and death. It is with the addition of the prefix in the semantics of derivatives that both the idea of separateness from the normal physiological state and the value of effectiveness appear, indicating the complete exhaustion of the forces and resources of the Subject.

Thus, the lexeme of negation arises in translated texts, where the form of magati is the imperfective of the verb to be able with alternating vowels o and a at the base. In the monuments of Old Russian and Old Russian writing, this form is recorded only in combination with the prefix not-, together with which it acquires the destructive meaning of ‘to be sick, to have no strength'. The subject, being in a painful state, is deprived of internal resources to fight the disease, does not have the strength to "drag out his life" further.

Based on the time of fixation of the derivatives in question in the monuments of writing, it can be assumed that at the word-formation level, the lexeme of negation could historically be formed either in a postfix way from the verb of negation, or in a prefixed-postfix way from the verb of nemagati, and the basis of nemagati marks the result of a negative impact.

The postfix expresses a general irrevocable meaning, emphasizing the isolation of the negative action in the Subject himself, as a result of which he becomes the Object of Damage. At the same time, there is variability in the use of both postfix and non-postfix forms of this derivative.

The second derivative of the Old Russian period with the meaning of a negative physical condition is the verb to withdraw, which has a basis with the meaning of possession (the associated root is ny-/him-). Initially, with the addition of the prefix from- with the semantics of separativeness, the non-prefix lexeme take away meant ‘take by force, take away’, and the direct addition pointed to the object being taken away, cf. Far away. St. George. and who vysoce(t) NTI ) stage of Georgia. Wake up the procl(t). Eb ca. 1363, 165b, a (note) ^{[13, p. 265]}.

In contexts where the basis marked the connection of the subject with the damaged sense organ or part of the body, the semantics of a negative physical state is taken away from the postfixal derivative, cf. The atmosphere is dark and gloomy. And the hood is placed on the main floor. and Wyss SVe(t) go and Oum go NS. Pr 1313, 36. ^{[13, p. 265]}.

A similar meaning is fixed for this token in the Old Russian period. In figurative uses, syntactically constructed according to the type of passive construction, the animate Subject being negatively affected is usually expressed in the form of a genus. p. with the preposition y, whereas the Patient is the subject, cf.: sv was taken away (from whom-L.) – about the loss of vision: And that de cheremisin was taken away, and In those days Cheremisin learned to see you again, because he prayed with tears. AI IV, 52. 1647 ^{[11, p. 286]}, the mind was taken away (from someone-L.) – about the loss of reason: And taco, sitting on a tree, rose higher from it, and from fear almost the mind did not go away. A fairy tale. about the hen and the fox, 209. XVIII century. ~ XVII century. ^{[11, p. 286]}.

At the same time, in the Old Russian period, the concretization of the damaged part of the Subject's body occurs, with which he loses a functional connection, cf.: The name of the tsar Ivan Ramanov was taken away... the language was taken away, lies at the end. AI II, 45. 1602. ^{[11, p. 285]}; On the Don, in the lower town of Chiru, he stuck to the god of prayer in the Chirov monastery, so that his arms and right leg were gone. DAI X, 432. 1683 ^{[11, pp. 285-286]}. Note that in the first example, the particle xia is an enclitic form of the vin. p. of the reflexive pronoun itself, which is already equal in function to the future postfix, however, in preposition and use separate from the verb.

At the denotative level, the situation of the derivative is taken away consists of the following components: Participants (Subject; Patient – a part of the Subject's body that is negatively affected; component ‘tool-the cause of the negative state of the damaged part of the body’ – an unidirectional component located in an adjacent non‒lexicalized situation) and the Result - the loss of the Subject's functional connection with a part of the body, as a result of which he becomes the Object of Damage. In contrast to the situation of the verb, the role of the Patient is not the physiological side of the Subject as a whole, but the sense organ (vision), thinking (mind) or a specific part of his body (tongue, arm, leg), therefore, as a result, the Subject is deprived not of a health Resource in general, but of a functional connection with the damaged organ.

A similar denotative structure has the non-postfix lexeme taken away, marked in the meaning of ‘to be damaged, to cease to act’ since the XVII century. and used in an impersonal construction, related by origin to the passive one. Here, the patient, the damaged part of the body, acts as a direct complement. cf.: My legs were taken away. X. You. Gag., 8. 1637 ^{[11, p. 285]}.

Similar semantics were fixed in the Old Russian period and the non-fixed lexeme was taken away in the active meaning, which also controls the direct complement denoting the damaged part of the body. As a result, stable phrases were formed, cf.: take away the eyes – ‘take away the sight’: And then God's blessing came upon him: God took away his eyes, and the blisko year was without eyes. Az. pov. (special), 31. XVII century. ^{[11, p. 285]}; take away the mind – ‘take away the mind’: And God took away the mind from me, according to my many gr. Nick. years old. X, 225. ^{[11, p. 285]}; [Patriarch Nikon took away the mind of the tsar from Milov, from nynshnevo, as it was near. Author of the Book of Tolk., 458. XVII‒XVIII centuries. ~ 1677 [11, p. 285]. The peculiarity of the situation of this derivative is that instead of the component 'the tool is the cause of the negative physical condition of the damaged part of the body', a lexically expressed purposeful Causer appears in the form of names. p. In such contexts, where the lexeme is taken away in a figurative, metonymic meaning, the Subject experiences a negative impact by the will of God ("God's will: God took away his eyes"), and in the example where Patriarch Nikon is the Causer, Protopop Habakkuk, who was an opponent of church reform, gives such a negative characterization of the patriarch's actions: "Protopop Habakkuk says: "Nikon took away the mind from Milov (i.e., the tsar), from the current one, how close he was. I was here then, I know everything" ^{[18, p. 4]}.

In the Old Russian period, the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" is replenished with 9 more derivatives, namely 5 causatives: repel ‒ 'damage with blows, repel', give away ‒ to ‘crush’, to get rid of‒ ‘frostbite', trample – ‘mutilate, disfigure, trampling underfoot’ and kick away (kick away) ‒ ‘bruise’, as well as 4 non-causative verbs: untie – ‘weaken', freeze‒ ‘to freeze, to be frostbitten', to drink off (mind) ‒ ‘lose your mind due to intoxication’, dry up ‒ ‘stop acting due to illness (about body parts).

Depending on the denotative structure and the nature of the negative impact, these derivatives are divided into three subclasses.

1. The subclass "the impact of a negative state" includes the tokens get rid of, freeze and wither (as well as the above-discussed token get rid of). The negative impact can be both internal (the painful state of the Subject – the situation of the verbs to detach, withdraw, dry out) and external (damage from cold – the situation of the verb to freeze).

The lexeme untie is part of the figurative expression and your hands will not be untied – ‘let not your hands weaken', cf.: At that time there will be no peace going out and entering: but from everywhere to all who dwell on the earth... You will be satisfied: and your hands will not let go, there will be a reward for your (dissolvantur). (2 Para. XV, 5-7) Byblos. Genn. 1499 ^{[11, p. 213]}. It is formed in a postfixal way from a verb with the meaning of separation to untie and is a tracing paper of the form of the passive voice of the Latin verb dissolvantur, in which the prefix dis means separation, separation, and the basis solvo is translated as ‘untie, untie'. The postfix, like the verb to be taken away, has a general irrevocable meaning.

Derivatives of chill and dry are formed in a prefixed way from the basics with the meaning of a physiological state (chill – ‘freeze, die of cold’ ^{[19, p. 73]}) or some kind of painful condition (dry – ‘lose vitality, get sick, wither, dry’ ^{[20, p. 256]}), cf. I am afraid that my legs are frozen up to my ankles and have fallen away. J. Paul's Obn., 97. XVII century. ~ XVI century. ^{[11, p. 241]}; And that cursed [metropolitan] before his death, his legs withered away according to the law, because he did not have the right to enter. (On the execution of God. Fed. Iv.) Sub. Mat. VI, 251. 1666 ^{[21, p. 31]}.

The bases of these derivatives mark the connection of the Subject with the damaged part of the body (the roots of the ny-/him- and knitting), as well as the cause (chill) or result (dry) of the negative state.

A feature of the situations of this subclass is the long–term negative impact, as a result of which the patient side of the Subject suffers - the damaged part of the body. This effect is carried out beyond the lexicalized situation, not purposefully. As a result, the Subject loses its functional connection with the Patient and becomes the Object of Damage.

At the syntactic level, the Patient is the subject (hands, feet), and the Subject is an addition in the form of a genus. p. with the preposition y (however, it may sometimes be absent) (for me, for that damned one).

This subclass is adjoined by the derivative of chilliness, formed in a prefixed way from the base with the meaning of a physiological state (chilliness – ‘to expose to cold, to make one freeze’ ^{[19, p. 52]}), cf.: It went [Stepanko] before the winters<b>I was<I'm Kurochkin and I'm going to get cold feet up to the ankles and my nose is cold and fell off.<b>. Yakut, A., map. 4, n 12, cst. 12. 1642 ^{[11, p. 241]}. Note that in relation to the object "legs" the verb is used to chill, and in relation to the object "nose" ‒ from the chill, from which it can be concluded that the prefix from- indicates a stronger manifestation of a negative impact than the prefix po-, while also updating its separation semantics, since as a result the nose "fell off.<b>".

The situation of this derivative is similar to the situations of other lexemes of the subclass "the impact of a negative state", however, at the syntactic level, the Subject is the subject (Stepanko), and the Patient is a direct complement (nose), to which the action is directed, expressed by the verbal basis and marking the cause of damage to the Patient.

2. The "causative effect" subclass consists, in addition to the verb take away discussed above, of the lexemes take away, give away, trample and reject, formed in a prefixal way and motivated by the basics with the meaning of striking and pressure, cf.: And the Streltsy took me from the Arkhangelsk monastery... And my stomach was trampled and beaten off, and my face was beaten. AHU III, 345. 1680 ^{[11, p. 184]}; As on Saturday [the patriarch] came out of the fire from the tomb of Christ, and there he was stolen by the world and his leg, they say, was crushed. Ars. Dry. Proskinitarian, 88. 1653 ^{[11, p. 221]}; And that Semyon came and taught me to beat the floor and trampled on me with stompers, and broke off my arms and legs, and trampled on my stomach, and with a knife. AHU III, 129. 1632 ^{[21, pp. 50-51]}; Ivashka hit him with a tree and knocked off his hands for nothing. Olon. a., maps. V, cst. 3. 1664 ^{[21, p. 68]}.

The basics of these derivatives mark the cause of the loss of functional connection between the Subject and the Patient. At the denotative level, an obligatory component is a lexically expressed active Causative agent, which purposefully affects a part of the Subject's body that turns out to be the Object of Damage as a result.

Syntactically, the Causer is the subject (streltsy; Semyon), the subject is an indirect complement in the date. p. or genus. p. with the preposition y (mn ѣ; at him), and the Patient is a direct complement (stomach, arms and legs).

3. The subclass "negative impact on oneself" includes the non-postfix verbs discussed above, otbiti and otshibiti, as well as the postfix verb otp.

The drink lexeme is formed in a prefixed-postfix way from a verb with the meaning of a physiological action (drink – ‘to drink intoxicating drinks’ ^{[22, p. 61]}), and its basis marks the cause of the Patient's negative condition. The postfix has a proper reflexive meaning: The subject performs an action in relation to himself.

This derivative is included in the phrasedrinking off your mind ‒ ‘losing your mind due to intoxication’, where the Subject, as a result of excessive alcohol consumption, has a negative effect on his own physiological side (Patient mind): I spoke, your bogomolets, drunk, drinking off my mind, your sovereign word, and I, your bogomolets I do not give your sovereign's word for myself and for people. Sl. and D. I, 564. 1649 ^{[11, p. 302]}.

Cf. also examples of the use of the lexemes otbiti and otshibiti as part of the subclass "negative impact on oneself": To catch fish, but to repel. Sim. Proverbs., 80. XVII century. ^{[11, p. 184]}; Apply [sulfur with wax] who will break or knock off a nail. Herbalist, 113. XVII century. ^{[21, p. 68]}.

The situation of this subclass includes a Subject who also acts as a non–directional Causative agent that has a negative impact on himself (this can be either a long intensive process – drinking, hitting, or excessive force on his own part of the body - hitting). As a result, the Subject loses its functional connection with the Patient, becoming the Object of Damage.

At the syntactic level, the Subject is the Causer - the subject (I, who), the Patient is a direct complement (mind, nose, nail).

Thus, for the first time, within the framework of the method of propositional analysis, an analysis of the denotative structure of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" in diachrony, in the pre-national period of the Russian language, is presented. Already in the ancient Russian period, in contexts where the animate Subject is an obligatory component, and the verb base has the semantics of destructive influence, the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" begins to form. At the same time, "the physical substance of the object performs the object function directly, and other substances besides it turn out to be in the patient role" ^{[10, p. 157]}. The destructive effect is directed at the physiological side of the Subject, which is the Patient, which "changes due to the presence of internal dynamics of the process with an element of destructiveness" ^{[10, p. 168]}. It is precisely this destructive semantics that is expressed by the token from the magati, which is fixed earlier than others in a similar meaning. It indicates a negative impact aimed at the physiological side of the Subject as a whole (illness and illness <...> they get tired and die; you're too tired(n)e), the concretization of the damaged part of the body occurs later. At first, in contexts with a figurative meaning, the organs of feeling and thinking acted as the damaged part of the body (oum ѥгонс;; God took away his eyes), and later, already in the Old Russian period, a specific part of the Subject's body acts as a Patient (legs withered; nose froze; stomach trampled). It was from this moment, already in the Old Russian period, that the final formation of the semantic class "Deprivation of functions" takes place.

The derivatives that make up this semantic class are divided into three subclasses depending on the cause and nature of the negative impact: 1) "the impact of a negative state" (get rid of, get rid of, freeze, dry out), 2) "causative effect" (repel, give away, take away, trample, reject) and 3) "negative impact on oneself" (repel, repel, reject). In the first case, the non-directional component ‘the tool is the cause of a negative physical condition’ is highlighted, in the second case – a targeted Causer, and in the third case – a Subject who is simultaneously a non-directional Causer.

Motivating bases denote the unsaturated processes of agentive and non-agentive activity, which mark the result in a derived word (nemagati, sohnuti, vyazyati, the root of nya-/ nim- with the meaning of possession) or the cause of destructive influence (biti, daviti, piti, toptati, shibiti, chilly, chilly).

At the word-formation level, the prefix has both the semantics of separateness (the subject from the normal state or the damaged part of the body from the Subject) and the effectiveness of the designated process. In turn, the postfix expresses either a proper return value, indicating the combination of the functions of the Subject and the Causer in one person (losing your mind, but trying to fight off), or a general return value when the negative impact closes in the sphere of the Subject, as a result of which the Resource of his health is exhausted or the functional connection with the damaged parts of the body is disrupted (and your hands will not let go, your mind is numb).