Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Man and Culture
Reference:

The development of self-therapeutic documentary films in China

Bai Do

ORCID: 0009-0007-7735-720X

Postgraduate student, Department of History of Western European and Russian Culture, St. Petersburg State University

199034, Russia, Leningrad region, Saint Petersburg, Mendeleevskaya line, 5

baiduorabota@163.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2024.4.71035

EDN:

ZBULOK

Received:

16-06-2024


Published:

24-07-2024


Abstract: This article is devoted to the study of the development of self-therapeutic documentaries in China since 2000. The object of the study is a Chinese documentary about self-therapy. The subject of the research are documentaries about self-therapy in the early 2000s: "More than One is unhappy" (2000), "Home Videotape" (2001), "Nightingale is not the only Voice" (2001), as well as films that appeared after 2016: "Small Talk" (2016), "Minding the Gap" (2017) and "The Lovely Widow and Her Annoying Son" (2019). Special attention is paid to self-therapeutic documentaries presented at the Mother Film Festival and the documentary masterclass FamilyLens, created in China in 2022. The author examines in detail such aspects of the topic as the causes of its occurrence, the definition of the genre and the form of the film text. To understand the trajectory of development of Chinese documentaries about self-therapy, as well as the causes and characteristics of each period, this study uses an integrated approach using content analysis and text analysis, as well as psychoanalytic theory to explain the filming of documentaries about self-therapy. The author argues that the key point in the foundation of the subgenre of documentaries about self-therapy in China is the presence of the director as the main character of the film, filming himself. The study identifies two distinct periods in the development of self-therapeutic documentary films in China, both of which are closely related to the development of film equipment. In conclusion, the author not only evaluates the positive attitude of self-therapeutic documentary practice towards self-awareness and raising public awareness of problems related to the native family, but also argues that researchers should pay more attention to potential ethical problems present in films. This is because, in fact, directors do not heal during filming, but use it as a means of attacking their parents.


Keywords:

self-therapy documentary, history of development, stages of development, reasons for origin, textual features, art therapy, the Mother Film Festival, Grassland Workshop, FamilyLens Workshop, ethical importance

This article is automatically translated.

The concept of documentary films about self-therapy was proposed by Paul Arthur in 2007 [1]. Studying first-person documentaries [2] and autobiographical documentaries [3] that have gained popularity in the United States since the 1990s, Arthur discovered films with a clear theme of personal trauma, such as "The Sherman Expedition", "Bright Leaf" and "My Architect", and classified them as documentaries about self-therapy. A self—therapeutic documentary is a thematic offshoot of the practice of personal documentaries, which in its scope intersects with a first-person documentary and an autobiographical documentary. In the United States, the practice of personal documentary filmmaking dates back to the beginning of the equal rights movement in the 1960s [4]. In Europe, it can be traced back to 1948, when Alexander Astryuk promoted the idea of a "camera-stylo" ("la caméra-stylo") [5].

The history of personal documentary practice in China has no long-standing roots. In the late 1980s, after digital video cameras became popular, young freelance artists and directors who quit TV stations began the first practices of independent documentary filmmaking. At the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, the films of Wang Feng, Yang Lin and Tang Danhong were distributed to a niche audience. Unlike the main documentaries of that time in China, they pointed the camera at themselves, their relatives and friends and talked about their hidden psychological problems and personal memories right in front of the camera.

The film "There are more than one Uncountable" ("More than one is unhappy", 2000, dir. Wang Feng, 45 min.) is similar to Wang Feng's personal diary. She presents her questions to her parents, an understanding of marriage and life, as well as reflections on her own position during the production of the film. In the film "Home video" ("Home video", 2001, dir. Yang Lin, 65 min.) Yang Lin is trying to find out the truth about her parents' divorce through interviews with them and with her brother in order to avoid the impact of this story on her. In the film "Nightingale is not the only voice" ("Nightingale is not the only voice", 2001, dir. Tan Danhong, 180 min.) Tan explores the problem of "how the self is formed." She believes that she has always had a nihilistic and painful attitude towards life and that childhood traumas have shaped her personality. In the film, Tan tries to find out from her parents the true reason why her father beat her when she was seven years old. She also records her conversation with a psychotherapist, which took place in connection with a relapse of her mental illness. These films not only marked the beginning of the practice of the earliest private documentary films in China, but also contributed to the inclusion of personal trauma in the selection of topics for such films. They can be seen as an early Chinese documentary about self-therapy. However, unfortunately, the early films were not distributed on the market, and some of the directors decided not to show them publicly due to the intimacy of the topic [6-8].

In the following decade, personal documentary works such as Nostalgia (2006, dir. Shu Longhao, 70 min.), "Springtime in Wushan" ("Springtime in Wushan", 2003, dir. Zhang Ming, 110 min.), "The Man" ("The Man", 2004, dir. Hu Xinyu) and "The Days" ("The Days", 2011, dir. Wei Xiaobo). But there were no films about personal injuries, with the exception of "Therapy" ("Therapy", 2010, dir. Wu Wenguang, 80 min.) and "Self-portrait with three women" ("Self-portrait with 3 women", 2010, dir. Zhang Mengqi 70 min.), which in recent years have sometimes been shown at film screenings organized by amateurs. And according to the existing literature, at the moment there are no more studies on the topic of personal injury. This is mainly due to the fact that, compared to the prevailing concept of "direct cinema" in Chinese documentary, personal documentary has always been on the periphery and has not been taken seriously by the theoretical community. Moreover, under the influence of the traditional concept of documentary cinema, even if the director films his relatives and friends, he consciously uses the external perspective of the narrative, showing family members as representatives of a certain social group, hiding his relationship with the characters of the film. Accordingly, there is no question of presenting himself as the main character.

From 2015 to 2017, several films appeared at the Chinese International Documentary Film Festival (Guangzhou), which is close to the author of this study, in which the directors filmed members of their families. For example, in the film "Please Remember Me" ("Please Remember Me", 2015, dir. Zhao Qing, 78 min.) Director Zhao Qing tells the love story of his uncle and aunt. The film touches on the problem of old age and shows what life is like for people with Alzheimer's disease. However, Zhao is not present in the film, and it was only in an interview after the screening that the audience learned that she was filming her own relatives. In the film "Live as He Likes" ("Live as He Likes", 2017, dir. Yang Liju, 20 min.) Yang Liju films her grandfather, whom she only really got to know when he divorced her grandmother. She complains that her grandfather was unable to realize his ambitions because of a marriage that limited his freedom. The film is built using the classic method of narrative biographies to maintain the rhythm of the narrative and give the grandfather's experience a legendary dimension. Although Yang uses first-person narration, she has not adjusted her approach to filming due to her relationship with her grandfather.

In all the films listed above, even the presence of the director's voice or his figure is unintentional. The director is placed in the film to maintain narrative coherence during editing, his embodiment does not form the basis of the narrative thread of the film. Therefore, the discussion of the film at that time did not imply the word "private" at all. The author concludes the film by adopting the traditional position of a documentary filmmaker, without developing his own relationship with the film or its characters.

The film "Small Talk" ("Small Talk", 2016, dir. Huang Huizhen, 88 min.) has truly attracted public attention to personal documentaries and has caused a surge in self-therapy documentaries in China over the past two years. Director Huang Huizhen directly appears in the film as the main character to tell the story of her estrangement from her mother, exposing the latter's lesbianism, and to reveal the psychological trauma that she received as a child in the family. This act of discussing private family matters in public contrasts with the traditional concept of keeping family secrets from the public and the establishment that family shame is not subject to disclosure. Huang's accumulated psychological problems, which arose as a result of such a traumatic upbringing, arouse sympathy from viewers who grew up in the same culture. Therefore, the possibility of resolving the conflict between Huang and her mother is not just a key thread of the narrative, but it is very exciting for viewers: will children be able to receive apologies from their parents for the wrong methods in the parenting process?

At that time, China already had a relatively well-established mechanism of film festivals and private screenings, and the film quickly spread through the media, which recommended it for viewing after the awards it received. Starting with this film, the discussion about family-themed documentaries was no longer about the function of recording documentaries, but about the intervention of the documentary in family relationships or even in therapy.

Subsequently, films about personal injuries in the family were also presented at Chinese and international documentary film festivals. The film "Get ready before jumping" ("Minding the Gap"; the Chinese title of the film is "Skateboard Boys", dir. Liu Bing, 2017, 93 min.; nominated for "Best Documentary" at the 91st Academy Awards and for the Grand Jury Prize at the 34th Sundance Film Festival) tells about domestic violence by his stepfather, experienced by Liu Bing as a child. Liu is of Chinese-American descent. Influenced by American culture, he also cast two friends with different skin colors in the film to highlight the widespread prevalence of domestic violence. Liu met them as a teenager, riding a skateboard. The film "The Beautiful Widow and her annoying Son" (Chinese title — "Addiction"; "The Lovely Widow and Her Annoying Son", 2019, dir. Wang Kai, 127 min.; the best film of the Chinese International Student Documentary — 2019) tells the story of Wang Kai, who feels especially strongly dependent on his mother after the death of his father. This addiction makes him feel constrained. He cannot live the way he wants, but must take on the role of a responsible son. In both films, the directors act as the main characters, directly telling the audience about their childhood traumas or problems that arose as a result of improper upbringing. They hope to heal these injuries and change their parents through filming.

If the appearance of personal documentaries at the beginning of the century was due to the popularity of digital video cameras, today the heyday of personal documentaries is due to three reasons.

First, the increasing availability of mobile phones and digital cinema cameras has simplified filming and reduced costs. For example, Wang Kai completed the film without any institutional support. Besides, he is not a professional director. The film cannot be called refined from the point of view of visual aesthetics, but it seems very honest and simple, since traditional documentaries do not have such a close shooting distance.

Secondly, social media has provoked a trend towards the spread of first-person narratives. After 2016, the number of short videos in China grew rapidly, and all major commercial media platforms encouraged users to create their own content and upload it. Non-fiction videos, in which people talk about themselves against the background of their personal daily lives, are the main form of video in today's social networks. A blogger is a new personality that anyone who knows how to use a mobile phone can give themselves if they want to. As a result, when the means of videography became everyday [9], many young filmmakers and amateurs took up telling the stories of their families and their own traumatic experiences in documentary or other non-fiction video formats. They often explain their actions by exploring their own families with the help of movie cameras, and believe that they are performing a meaningful act.

Thirdly, the emergence of new film festivals and film screening organizations has opened up opportunities for newcomers to the film industry. In China, young directors, students or amateurs still shoot mostly personal stories. Despite the fact that the old professional directors, with the development of video technology and innovative audiovisual methods, attempted to create films that went beyond the traditional concept of documentary cinema, they rarely used first-person narration, let alone the disclosure of personal stories. And the young directors secretly chose the topic of personal trauma and together formed a new direction for the development of documentaries about self-therapy in China.

In 2022, the "Grassland" master class, created by Wu Wenguang, founded the "Mother" film Festival, documentarian Gu Xue organized the "FamilyLens" master class. Both of them advocate bringing filming activities into everyday life by documenting what is happening around themselves and their family. However, there is an interesting phenomenon in such films.

The first Mother Film Festival was originally conceived to show the role of a woman in a family or society. In 27 collected films, the directors of the early 1970s either recall their mothers or express their vision of the role of women as mothers in society. The films of the directors of the early 1980s, 1990s and 2000s tell about conflicts with mothers and the traumas they received in the process of parenting.

In the film "The Millennium Bug" ("The Millennium Bug", 2022, dir. Yang Yu Ye, 55 min.) Yang accuses his parents of neglecting him because they were too busy earning a living, and of suppressing his dreams after graduation. He interviews his mother and tries to talk about those important moments imprinted in his memory, and in response he often hears: "Really? I completely forgot about it." In the movie "Face Comics" (2022, dir. Liu Yuting, 75 min.) Liu Yuting feels his own limitations after graduating from university because of his peasant background. She analyzes in front of the camera why she was filled with a passion for drawing as a child, and now has no achievements. She never talked about it with her parents, because they, as peasants, had to rush to the market early in the morning to sell leeks. Liu Yaqin in the film "When I Get Close to You" ("Close to You", dir. Liu Yaqin, 2022, 24 min) accuses his mother of controlling and suppressing her. She believes that her father's depression and suicide are directly related to her mother's strong character. Su Yuqin is one of those young directors you can rely on. You could even say that she's really brave. Su has suffered a more serious psychological trauma than those directors who accuse their parents of improper upbringing. In her own film "Days of Love" ("Days of Love", dir. Su Yaxin, 2021, 24 min.), instead of monologuing in front of the camera, she directly addresses her parents, stating that her father harassed her.

Watching the first Mothers Film Festival, it is easy to notice that most of the directors of today's documentaries about self—therapy are students or graduates of universities related to cinema or television. They have hundreds of dreams, but they are not sure that they will be able to realize them. In an attempt to resolve the conflict between the desire to become happy and successful and the lack of confidence in their own abilities and abilities, they turn to their families, trying to find reasons in the past to explain their failure, vulnerability and incompetence in the present. As Arthur predicted in 2007, the audience felt that "they would be able to apply what they had learned from watching a film about self-therapy to solve their own family conflicts." More than one director mentioned the film "Small Talk" as a source of inspiration. Laura Rascaroli's work is popular among directors. They master the methodology of personal documentary films based on the historiography of subjective cinema presented in Raskaroli's book. The directors have mastered the methods of treating injuries based on Sigmund Freud's book "Interpretation of Dreams": they returned to their families, pointed out to their parents their wrong actions during upbringing and forced them to admit their mistakes.

The "FamilyLens" master class, organized by Gu Xue, a documentary filmmaker, began in May 2022 with a collaboration with the "Meaning Creators" master class specializing in healing from injuries. The participants of FamilyLens are people aged 20 to 40 years old who live in big cities. Among them there are both working people and housewives, as well as independent artists who are just starting their career. The master class lasts two months. During this time, Gu Xue teaches participants how to find themes in their own lives, turn objects into themes, as well as shooting and editing techniques, that is, the standard production process of a documentary. After two months, the participants present their short films in the online space. Starting in October 2022, students studying in specialties related to cinema or television began to participate in FamilyLens. Thanks to the master class, many documentaries about personal trauma were created, such as "Hope" (directed by Jingxi, 18 min., was shown on August 18, 2022), "Our Invisible Scars" (directed by Lee Sing Sing, 13 min., was shown on October 31, 2022), "Let's Talk to you" (directed by Li Andi, 23 min., was shown on October 31, 2022), "Tears are the smallest sea" (dir. Liu Ting, 31 min., was shown on August 12, 2023).

The efforts of independent documentary filmmakers have played an important role in bringing Chinese personal documentaries into the mainstream. At first, the academic community of Chinese documentary films did not pay much attention to the phenomenon of personal documentaries. Usually, young scientists paid attention to him. It was only in 2022 that the authoritative scientific journal Modern Cinema published a research column on private documentary films [10-13]. And it was only in January 2023 that the Chinese Academy of Documentary Films (organized by the Chinese Collegiate Association of Visual Arts) selected the documentary about self-therapy "Let's Talk to You" as the best student documentary. Compared to the International Documentary Film Festival in China (Guangzhou), it is obvious that recognition from the theoretical circle came four years later. On March 19, 2023, Grassland and FamilyLens jointly organized a forum on the topic "The role of the camera in family video", inviting Fan Qipeng, a documentary film researcher from Beijing Pedagogical University, to it. Fan published the article "Changes and Challenges of Private Documentary in China" in 2007. He was one of the first theorists to focus on the subgenre of private documentary, but his subsequent research did not advance further in this area. A number of changes that have occurred to some extent symbolize that Chinese documentaries about personal life have received serious recognition in academic circles. The themes of intimate family stories and personal traumas are no longer perceived by directors as narrow-mindedness, but as social symptoms of modern youth that deserve to be studied.

And this syndrome was even more pronounced at the second Mother Film Festival in 2023. In the first two thematic sections of the festival, "Fight in the Family" and "Between Us", eight new documentaries about self-therapy were presented. This leads to further reflections: why are more and more directors making films specifically on this topic — because first the directors make documentaries about self-therapy, and then thematic sections appear at film festivals, or because the focus of interest of film festivals is aimed at the topic of self-therapy?

Although both viewers and theorists often praise the directors of such films for the boldness of their stories about personal trauma and believe that filming has a healing function, however, the author believes that the filming method used in documentaries about self-healing does not heal injuries. Since almost all directors see themselves as victims, they demand an apology from their parents. Thus, they do not have to take responsibility for their current predicament. But it is the cognitive patterns transformed by trauma that need healing. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the methodology of perceptual phenomenology, psychology and other sciences into the practice of self-therapeutic documentary films in order to allow directors to truly achieve healing and give them inspiration to create more diverse forms of film texts.

References
1. Arthur, P. (2007). The Moving Picture Cure: Self-Therapy Documentaries. Psychoanalytic Review, 94(6), 865–885.
2. Patricia, A. (1997). Public Intimacy: The Development of First-Person Documentary of ‘Afterimage’. Vol. 25, July-august, 16-18.
3. Renov, M. (2004). Subject of Documentary. University of Minnesota Press.
4. Renov, M. (2008). First-Person Films: Some Theses on Self-Inscription. Edited by Austin T. and Jong W. Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives and Practices. Open University Press.
5. Rascaroli, L. (2009). The personal camera subjective cinema and the essay film. New York: Wallflower Press.
6. Xu, Y.P. (2009). To the Real Life: Study on Chinese Self-documentary. [Master's Thesis], 8-12. Beijing: Communication University of China.
7. Yu, J., & Guan, D.W. (2011). On the style of Chinese private documentary images. Movie Literature, 4, 12-14.
8. Zhu, J. J., & Mei, B. (2004). China's Independent Documentary Film Archive. Shaanxi Normal University Press.
9. Wang, X. H. (2013). The Everydayness of Online Video Discourse. Contemporary Communication, 35(02).
10. Jia, K. (2022). From "Self-Media" to "Self-Photography": Change of Concept, Transformation of Form and Future Trend. Contemporary Cinema, 9.
11. Shi, X. (2022). On the European Documentary Self-Portrait: Retrograde Self-Reflection. Contemporary Cinema, 9.
12. Li, R. H. (2022). A Study of the Jonas Mekas Film Diaries. Contemporary Cinema, 9.
13. Liu, Y. (2022). Exploring Otherness in Japanese Self-Documentaries. Contemporary Cinema, 9.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the article submitted for publication in the journal "Man and Culture", the author specifically defined the subject and object of research in the title ("The development of self-therapeutic documentary films in China"). The author focuses on the development (subject of research) of one of the genres of Chinese documentary — self-therapeutic documentary films (the object of research). Having explained the specifics of the genre with references from theorists in the USA (P. Arthur) and Europe (A. Astryuk), the author draws attention to the earliest works of Chinese documentary filmmakers of the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. (films by Wang Feng, Yang Lin and Tang Danhong), who stayed away from the dominant documentary film theme in China and further traces how gradually by 2020 a kind of mainstream youth documentaries is being formed, focused on the intimate aspects of traumatic parenting in the family. Of course, the development of the genre was influenced by the international recognition of individual films and the festival movement ("Please Remember Me" — "Please Remember Me", 2015, dir. Zhao Qing, 78 min.; "Live as He Likes" — "Live as He Likes", 2017, dir. Yang Liju, 20 min.; "Get ready before jumping" — "Minding the Gap", the Chinese title of the film is "Skateboard Boys", dir. Liu Bing, 2017, 93 min., nominated for "Best Documentary" at the 91st Academy Awards and for the grand Jury Prize at the 34th Sundance Film Festival; "The Beautiful Widow and Her Annoying Son", Chinese title — "Addiction"; "The Lovely Widow and Her Annoying Son", 2019, dir. Wang Kai, 127 min.; the best film of the Chinese International Student Documentary — 2019). A factor in popularizing the genre of sal and public response in the media ("Small Talk" — "Small Talk", 2016, dir. Huang Huizhen, 88 min.). The author also notes that a circle of fans of the genre has gradually formed, primarily among students seeking creative and professional self-realization in the field of cinema. There are separate sections at famous film festivals, forums ("The role of the camera in family video"), master classes ("FamilyLens", "Grassland") and even special festivals ("Mother" 2022, 2023). And in the end, the author legitimately asks a rhetorical question: "why are more and more directors making films specifically on this topic — because first the directors make documentaries about self-therapy, and then thematic sections appear at film festivals, or because the focus of interest of film festivals is aimed at the topic of self-therapy?" In addition to the appearance of digital video cameras, which significantly facilitated the production technology of personal documentaries, the author notes three more objective factors: 1) the improvement of technical devices that simplify filming and reduce production costs; 2) the development of social media, which have become a network resource for the dissemination of documentary (including amateur); 3) the emergence of new film festivals and organizations involved in the screening of films of the genre, including the work of newcomers to the film industry. In general, due to the explication of a significant amount of empirical material into theoretical circulation, the author justifiably notes the disproportionality of low theoretical attention to the intensively developing film genre. The reviewer fully agrees with the author in this, although he notes the need for an interdisciplinary approach for a comprehensive study of the popularity of the genre of self-therapeutic documentary films as a socio-cultural phenomenon. Thus, the subject of the study is considered in sufficient detail by the author at a high theoretical level, and the presented article deserves publication in an authoritative scientific journal. Although some stylistic and design aspects need to be improved. The research methodology is based on the principles of objectivity and historicism. The author restores the historical sequence of the most significant events in the development of self-therapeutic documentary cinema in China, strengthening the chronology of events (premieres of films of the genre) by describing the plots of the film text and the director's narrative broadcast in it. In essence, the article is of a methodological nature of problematizing the study of a complex socio-cultural phenomenon expressed by the intensive development of the genre of self-therapeutic documentary films in China. The author appropriately noted the theoretical and art criticism, socio-psychological, narratological and some cultural aspects of a promising study on an urgent topic. The author justifies the relevance of the chosen topic by the disproportionality of low theoretical attention to the intensive development of the socio-cultural phenomenon he has identified and consistently substantiates this thesis in the article, reviewing the increasing eventfulness of self-therapeutic documentary films in China. The scientific novelty of the study, which consists, first of all, in the inclusion in the theoretical circulation of the author's selection of films of self-therapeutic documentary films in China and the formulation of the problem of their study, deserves theoretical attention. The style of the text is generally scientific (only the statement "Zhao Qing tells the love story of his uncle and aunt" requires literary proofreading), but there are significant flaws in the design of the notes and bibliography. The structure of the article reflects well the logic of presenting the results of scientific research. The bibliography, including notes, needs to be adjusted to meet the requirements of the editorial board and GOST (see https://nbpublish.com/e_ca/info_106.html ): 1) most of the notes include references to the source, therefore they should be described in accordance with GOST and included in the general bibliographic list (now there is confusion in the references to notes and bibliography items); 2) according to GOST, all descriptions are given in the language of the described source, translations into Russian, if the author sees the need, should be placed in square brackets after the description in the source language as an additional (optional) element of the description. An appeal to opponents, taking into account the author's reliance, first of all, on the explication of new empirical material, is quite sufficient and correct. The article is of great interest to the readership of the magazine "Man and Culture" and after finalizing the design flaws can be recommended for publication.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the article "The development of self-therapeutic documentary films in China" is the history of the creation of Chinese autobiographical documentaries about self-therapy. The research methodology is diverse and includes comparative historical, analytical, descriptive, etc. methods. The relevance of the article is extremely high, especially in the light of the increased interest of the modern scientific community in the history and culture of the East, including cinematography. Let's add that there is a shortage of research on the art of cinema, and the researcher fills this gap. The scientific novelty of the work is also beyond doubt, as well as its practical benefits. The article continues a number of studies initiated by the author, which allows us to comprehensively cover the topic under study. We have before us a small but quite worthy scientific study in which the style, structure and content fully meet the requirements for articles of this kind. It is characterized by an abundance of useful information and important conclusions. Let's just note the typo that appeared in the name in the word "self-therapeutic" and is in urgent need of correction. Let's focus further on a number of positive points. In the introduction, the author notes: "The history of personal documentary practice in China has no long-standing roots. In the late 1980s, after digital video cameras became popular, young freelance artists and directors who quit TV stations began the first practices of independent documentary filmmaking. At the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, the films of Wang Feng, Yang Lin and Tang Danhong were distributed to a niche audience. Unlike the main documentaries of that time in China, they pointed the camera at themselves, their loved ones and talked about their hidden psychological problems and personal memories right in front of the camera." The author cites a number of interesting facts: "In the following decade, personal documentary works such as Nostalgia (2006, dir. Shu Longhao, 70 min.), "Springtime in Wushan" ("Springtime in Wushan", 2003, dir. Zhang Ming, 110 min.), "The Man" ("The Man", 2004, dir. Hu Xinyu) and "The Days" ("The Days", 2011, dir. Wei Xiaobo). But there were no films about personal injuries, with the exception of "Therapy" (2010, dir. Wu Wenguang, 80 min.) and "Self-portrait with three women" ("Self-portrait with 3 women", 2010, dir. Zhang Mengqi 70 min.), which in recent years have sometimes been shown at film screenings organized by amateurs. And according to the existing literature, at the moment there are no more studies on the topic of personal injury. This is mainly due to the fact that, compared to the prevailing concept of "direct cinema" in Chinese documentary, personal documentary has always been on the periphery and has not been taken seriously by the theoretical community. Moreover, under the influence of the traditional concept of documentary films, even if the director films his relatives and friends, he consciously uses the external perspective of the narrative, showing family members as representatives of a certain social group, hiding his relationship with the characters of the film. Accordingly, there is no question of presenting himself as the main character. <...> From 2015 to 2017, several films appeared at the Chinese International Documentary Film Festival (Guangzhou), which is close to the author of this study, in which directors filmed members of their families. For example, in the film "Please Remember Me" ("Please Remember Me", 2015, dir. Zhao Qing, 78 min.) Director Zhao Qing tells the love story of his uncle and aunt." During the research, the author shares important observations: "If the appearance of personal documentaries at the beginning of the century was due to the popularity of digital video cameras, today the heyday of personal documentaries is due to three reasons. First, the increasing availability of mobile phones and digital cinema cameras has simplified filming and reduced costs. For example, Wang Kai completed the film without any institutional support. Besides, he is not a professional director. The film cannot be called refined from the point of view of visual aesthetics, but it seems very honest and simple, since traditional documentaries do not have such a close shooting distance. Secondly, social media has provoked a trend towards the spread of first-person narratives. After 2016, the number of short videos in China grew rapidly, and all major commercial media platforms encouraged users to create their own content and upload it. <...> Thirdly, the emergence of new film festivals and film screening organizations has opened up opportunities for newcomers to the film industry. In China, young directors, students or amateurs still shoot mostly personal stories. Despite the fact that the old professional directors, with the development of video technology and innovative audiovisual methods, attempted to create films that went beyond the traditional concept of documentary cinema, they rarely used first-person narration, let alone the disclosure of personal stories. And the young directors secretly chose the topic of personal trauma and together formed a new direction for the development of documentaries about self-therapy in China." The bibliography of the study is extensive, includes the main, including foreign, sources on the topic, and is designed correctly. The appeal to the opponents is sufficient and made at a decent professional level. The conclusions, as we have already noted, are serious and extensive: "Although both viewers and theorists often praise the directors of such films for the boldness of their stories about personal trauma and believe that filming has a therapeutic function, however, the author believes that the filming method used in documentaries about self-healing does not heal injuries. Since almost all directors see themselves as victims, they demand an apology from their parents. Thus, they do not have to take responsibility for their current predicament. But it is the cognitive patterns transformed by trauma that need healing. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the methodology of perceptual phenomenology, psychology and other sciences into the practice of self-therapeutic documentary films in order to allow directors to truly achieve healing and give them inspiration to create more diverse forms of film texts." In our opinion, this article will also be of great importance for a diverse readership - psychologists, directors, students and teachers, historians, art historians, etc., as well as all those who are interested in psychology, cinematography and international cultural cooperation.