Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Historical informatics
Reference:

The hypothesis of Nostradamus using cryptographic methods to arrange quatrains in the "Prophecies".

Razumov Il'ya Kimovich

ORCID: 0000-0002-7277-2638

Doctor of Physics and Mathematics

Senior Researcher, Institute of Metal Physics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

620108, Russia, Yekaterinburg, S.Kovalevskaya str., 18

ilya.k.razumoff@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2585-7797.2024.1.70073

EDN:

AXGWPK

Received:

07-03-2024


Published:

11-04-2024


Abstract: Despite the extensive bibliographical material, scientific study of the life and work of Nostradamus has only relatively recently begun. Currently, it includes a detailed examination of the predictor's biography and historical-philological commentaries on the quatrains. The unordered arrangement of the quatrains is one of the main problems hindering the understanding of the prophecies. In particular, it has been discovered that many quatrains describe presumed future events through comparison with the past, and therefore cannot be adequately understood without a reasoned arrangement by dates. Although Nostradamus himself unequivocally states in an epistle to King Henry II that the quatrains should be arranged using the biblical chronology he provided, with a reference point determined by the retrograde movements of planets (1606 year, as shown by prof. Brind'Amour), discussions of such cryptographic approaches were absent in Nostradamus literature until now. This work presents, for the first time, a detailed argument for the hypothesis that Nostradamus used a modified «scytale» algorithm to encrypt the correct sequence of quatrains and assign them certain dates. It is shown that the predictor indeed employed cyclically repeating biblical chronologies placed in the epistle to King Henry II for this purpose. The final date of the prophecies turns out to be the year 2242, close to the end of the 6000 years in the Jewish calendar (2240 AD) and the completion of the cycle of planetary epochs in the astrological concept of Abraham ibn Ezra (2241 AD), which aligns well with existing historical research. The results of the analysis indicate that although the «Prophecies» were published in parts, they form a coherent work following a strict plan. Consequently, the obtained results are relevant to the history of cryptography in Europe and have significant implications for a correct understanding of Nostradamus' texts.


Keywords:

Nostradamus, prophecies, quatrains, centuries, cipher, chronologies, scytale, cryptography, steganography, planetary cycles

This article is automatically translated.

1. The multilayered nature of "Prophecies" and the problem of elusive meaning.

Despite the widespread popularity of the "Prophecies" of Nostradamus [1,2,3] and the extensive bibliographic material associated with them [4,5], the scientific study of the life and work of the French fortune teller began relatively recently. At the moment, the biography of the seer has been studied in detail [6,7] and historical and philological comments on the quatrains have been compiled [8,9,10]. An unexpected result of these studies was the conclusion that in many cases the text of the quatrains is not informative enough. On the one hand, it is difficult to associate a large group of quatrains with any events, since they have either too banal or, on the contrary, too surreal a plot. On the other hand, it turned out that quatrains often describe events preceding the first publication of the Prophecies (1555). Probably, Nostradamus believed in the repeatability of historical events, describing the supposed events of the future by comparing them with the past. However, in the absence of arguments about linking such quatrains to future dates, they do not look predictive, and even create the impression of a hoax. Given these facts, Professor Denis Kruse makes a radical statement: "Nostradamus wrote quatrains without understanding what they mean. Even if we assume that the predictive text was endowed with meaning, it loses it, filling the reader with a sense of his own helplessness and sinfulness [...] Nostradamus makes it clear to his reader that he must boldly look beyond the words" [11]. Note that the confusing structure and vague content of the prophetic text, as well as the description of past events in it retroactively, may well serve as indirect signs of its use as a carrier of a hidden message.

The middle of the XVI century in Europe was marked by an increasing interest in the development of secret writing methods. Since the time of Ancient Greece, a simple "scytale" cipher has been known, in which a paper tape is wound around a cylinder, after which the text is written on the tape along the axis of the cylinder. To decrypt such a message, it is enough to select a cylinder of a suitable radius. The "Caesar cipher" was also known, in which an encrypted message is obtained by replacing the letters of the original message by shifting by a given number of positions in the alphabet. In 1518, the "Polygraphy" by Johann Trithemy was published, which describes a number of new, more advanced ciphers [12]. Around 1499, the same abbot Trithemius wrote "Steganography", which was included in the index of forbidden books, and partially published only in 1606 [13]. In 1550, the Italian J.Cardano proposed a new method of steganography, the so-called "Cardano lattice" [14]. In 1553 and 1555, that is, almost simultaneously with the first publication of the "Prophecies" of Nostradamus, J. Belazo proposed an important improvement to the Caesar cipher – an algorithm for replacing the letters of the original message in accordance with a given repetitive sequence of shifts in the alphabet [15], which can be expressed by a set of numbers or a mnemonic keyword. The general intention of the above-mentioned and some other authors (Leon Battista Alberti, Giovanni Battista della Porta, etc.) was to improve existing methods of cryptography. At the same time, the researchers' thought developed in two directions – on the one hand, the creation of encryption methods resistant to decryption (cryptography), and on the other hand, the imperceptible embedding of hidden messages in ordinary texts (steganography).  

Recent papers [16,17] present the results concerning the detection of a graphic cipher in the "Prophecies" of Nostradamus and propose approximate methods for recovering encrypted images. It turned out that the coordinates of words or letters (century number, quatrain, quatrain lines) carry information about the elements of the images. The images themselves show mostly human faces, executed in a manner reminiscent of modern surrealism. It is worth noting that such a cipher is unique, especially for the XVI century, so its development represented a new word in steganography. Therefore, the encrypted images themselves may well be of a formal nature (for example, an image of a human eye or a cat's head), which was obtained by us in some cases. Along this path, the tasks of improving pattern processing methods and attempts to recognize encrypted faces in a historical context remain relevant.

The purpose of this work is to show that the hidden message of Nostradamus is by no means limited to a graphic cipher. Nostradamus himself, in an epistle to King Henry, unequivocally states that the biblical chronology given by him with a reference point determined by the retrograde movements of the planets (1606, as shown by Professor Brand'Amour [8]) should be used for the arrangement of quatrains: "I have calculated and calculated the real prophecies entirely according to the order in [this] chain, which contains my own cycle, all through astronomical teaching and my natural gift." Although the numerical "circuit containing a circuit" is easily associated, for example, with a cyclically repeating sequence of shifts in the Belazo algorithm, there is no reasoned discussion of such cryptographic hypotheses in the Nostradaman literature.

Here we come into contact with a philosophical problem concerning the criteria of the truth of scientific knowledge. The leading criterion is considered to be the confirmation of hypotheses and theories based on the coincidence of the consequences arising from them with the observed reality [18]. Therefore, the assessment of statistical significance, non-randomness, or any coincidences (the repeatability of observed facts, the coincidence of theory with experiment, the coincidence of experiments or consequences from different theories with each other) is always at the heart of science. Often such non-randomness can be accepted as obvious, otherwise estimates of random realizations must be performed within the framework of a statistical approach. The analysis of statistical anomalies is, among other things, one of the main methods of cryptanalysis [19], but the Nostradamus cipher is too specific to use any standard techniques. Nevertheless, the methodological feature of this work is the author's desire to obtain maximum information from the analysis of statistical anomalies in the texts of Nostradamus. This approach seems to be the most adequate for solving the task.

 

2. Discussion about the end date of prophecies.

Before proceeding to the search for the cipher, it is necessary to discuss for what period of time the "Prophecies" were calculated. Discussions of the end date are based on several statements by Nostradamus in epistles to his son Cesar, King Henry, as well as in quatrains:

1. "I have compiled books of prophecies [...], this is continuous divination, from the present moment to the year 3797" (from a Letter to Cesar).

2. "The planet Mars has completed its epoch [...] And now we are led by the Moon, with the help of the full power of the eternal God, until she completes her circle; the Sun will come, and then Saturn. For according to the heavenly signs, Saturn's reign will return..." (from a Letter to Cesar)

3. "Although we are in the seventh thousandth number, which completes everything, we are approaching the eighth [...] where the great eternal God will complete the cycle" (from a Letter to Cesar)

4. "I was thinking of leaving records of the years, cities, towns, regions where most [events] [...] will take place, reaching the very [The Second] coming, which will happen later, at the beginning of the seventh millennium" (from a Letter to Henry).

5. "The renewed Kingdom of Saturn will come, and the Golden Age. God the Creator will speak, heeding the sorrow of his people, Satan will be taken and bound in the abyss of the abyss in a deep pit: and then universal peace will come between God and people, and [Satan] will remain bound for 1000 years" (from a Letter to Henry).

6. "20 years of the reign of the moon have passed, / In the year 7000 another will take over / When the Sun ends its tired days, / Then my prophecy will be completed and fulfilled" (C1K48).

7. "At the end of the great seventh day / The hecatomb games will take place / Shortly before the great thousandth milestone / When the dead will come out of their graves" (C10K74).

The commentators' discussions are due to the fact that although some of the above statements agree well with each other, other statements, at first glance, contradict them. The argumentation used below is borrowed mainly from books and articles by historians P.Brand'Amour [8,20], A.Penzensky [4,10] and P.Ginar [21]

In the quoted quotations of Nostradamus 3 and 7, it is stated that the history of the modern world will end at the end of the "seventh thousandth number". It follows from quote 6 that the prophecies end in the year 7000, along with the end of the age of the Sun – therefore, from a comparison with statements 3 and 7, it is logical to think that the "seventh thousandth number" corresponds to the year 7000. It follows from quote 2 that after the age of the Sun comes the age of Saturn. Phrase 5 connects the beginning of the age of Saturn with the beginning of the 1000-year reign of Christ, when Satan will be bound. Thus, the prophecies extend all the way to the Second Coming, which is expected at the end of 7000 years from the Creation of the world.

However, quote 4 unexpectedly states that the Second Coming will take place at the beginning (and not at the end!) the seventh millennium, while from statement 1, when compared with 4.6, it formally follows that either the beginning or the end of the seventh millennium falls on the year 3797. In our opinion, the reason for the apparent discrepancy is the increased caution of Nostradamus. The predictor expresses himself openly and consistently to the extent that his statements correspond to Christian eschatology.  At the same time, in order to avoid accusations of heresy, he masks the specific original date of the onset of the Kingdom of Saturn (the Golden Age, the Second Coming), pointing to it with hints, the understanding of which implies familiarity with the astrological tradition and requires deeper immersion in prophecies.

Thus, in the epistle to King Henry (see Appendix), two chronologies with the lifetimes of biblical characters are given, which poses the reader with the problem of dating the Creation of the World. According to these chronologies, the Creation of the World is dated differently: 4758 BC (I chr.) and 4174 BC (II chr.)

Therefore, the first chronology provides the only opportunity for the final date of the prophecies – 7000 years from the Creation of the World end in 2242 BC. This date is consistent with the mysterious figure "3797" at the hint level: 1555+2242=3797, where 1555 is the year of the first publication of the "Prophecies". It follows that the number "3797" is called by the predictor conditionally, while in fact it means the year 2242. The coincidence has the character of a statistical anomaly: although the researcher may assume that the correct understanding has been achieved, strictly speaking, the appearance of the same number in two equalities, 4758+2242=7000 and 1555+2242=3797, could have happened by chance. If we still assume that the coincidence is not accidental, then phrase 4 from the above collection of quotations finds an explanation. The fact is that the year 2242 BC is at the beginning of the seventh millennium according to the Jewish calendar (6000 years from the Creation of the World end in 2240 BC). When Nostradamus mentions the end of the "seventh thousandth number" in statements 3,7, he means 7000 years in the chronology system corresponding to the I chronology. When, in statement 4, he speaks of the beginning of the seventh millennium, he already means the Jewish calendar. In our opinion, it was the proximity of the end date of the "Prophecies" to the 6,000 years of the Jewish calendar that could have prompted Nostradamus to resort to methods of disguise in order to avoid accusations of sympathy for Judaism.   

The second chronology formally provides two possibilities for the end date: 6000 years and 7000 years from the Creation of the world end, respectively, in 1826 and 2826 BC. If we assume that the prophecies end in 1826 BC, statement 4 finds an explanation, but the rest of the statements turn out to be unclear. If we assume that the final date is 2826 BC, statements 1 and 4 turn out to be unclear. Thus, the second chronology falls out of the semantic context, and is given, in our opinion, solely for a technical purpose – as a key to the arrangement of quatrains (see the following sections). 

These arguments are valid regardless of what meaning is given to planetary epochs in statements 2,5,6. Meanwhile, the meaning of the concept of "planetary epochs" is found by historians in modern astrological beliefs of Nostradamus. In particular, statement 2 is compared with a quote from the astrological treatise of Richard Russ [22]: "After the third time, Mars ruled until 6732 and 4 months, and at the end of his reign, the Moon began a reign that should last 354 years and 4 months, until 7086 years and 8 months, and after it the Sun will rule until 7441, and after the Sun Saturn should rule for the fourth time, if only the world will not end its existence and will not come to an end." At the same time, Russa dates the Creation of the World to 5200 BC, according to Eusebius of Caesarea, from where the year 7441 CM named by him corresponds to 2241 BC. It can be seen that this result is quite consistent with the assumptions made above regarding the end date of the prophecies of Nostradamus. Of course, Russa himself was not the author of this astrological concept. The idea of planetary epochs repeating in a sequential order, lasting 354 years and 4 months each, belongs to the Jewish philosopher and astrologer of the XII century, Abraham ibn Ezra, to whom Russ refers. Also at the beginning of the XVI century, this idea found authoritative support in the treatise of Abbot Trithemius [23]. Therefore, Nostradamus had every reason to accept this concept as the basis for his calculations.  

An alternative point of view on the concept of planetary epochs is presented by the comments of T.W.M. van Berkel [24]. According to this researcher, Nostradamus in statements 2,5,7 could mean not the era of Abraham ibn Ezra lasting 354 years and 4 months each, but the "days" of the great planetary week, where each millennium is assigned one day and some planet in a similar sequence. In this case, the new Kingdom of Saturn corresponds to the onset of the eighth millennium and does not carry any additional semantic load. The date "3797" can be searched for somewhere in the eighth millennium according to the chronology II chronology (why exactly according to it?) The coincidence of the year 2241 from the treatise of Russ with the end of 7000 years of the First chronology of Nostradamus should be considered accidental, as well as the "hint" of the year 2242, arising from the equality of 1555+2242 =3797.

In our opinion, the concept of T.W.M. van Berkel does not look convincing – not only because it ignores significant coincidences of numbers, while in no way explaining the remarkable accuracy of the number 3797, but also for the reason that it does not allow to explain quote 6. Indeed, Nostradamus claims that at the time of writing the "Prophecies"20 years of the Moon era have passed. When subtracting two planetary epochs (Sun and Moon) of 354 years and 4 months from 2242, we get 1533. Considering that the quatrain C1K48 was first published in 1555, it is logical to assume that it was written in 1553, or the number of 20 years is named in it in a rounded manner, but in any case, Nostradamus here refers the reader specifically to the cycles of Abraham ibn Ezra, and not to the millennial periods. Another thing is that the first chronology was arranged by Nostradamus in such a way that the seventh millennium ends in 2242 BC. Consequently, both the new Saturn epoch (354 years and 4 months) and the Saturn Millennium (Golden Age) will start from this year.                    

      

3. The hidden connection of the chronologies of Nostradamus with real-time dates.

In the epistle to King Henry, two chronologies of biblical events are given (see Appendix), and Nostradamus emphasizes that the calculations given do not coincide with each other. According to the first chronology, there are 4758 years from the Creation of the world to Jesus Christ, and according to the second chronology, there are formally 4092 years and 2 months between these events, although Nostradamus himself calls 4173 years and 8 months. The first chronology shows that, according to Nostradamus, 7000 years from the Creation of the World end in 2242 BC. Regarding the second chronology, it is said that it is given for a technical purpose: "I calculate and calculate the real prophecies entirely according to the order of [this] chain, which contains its own revolution, all through Astronomical teaching and my natural gift, and after a while, and understanding by this the time when ..." Followed by a set of retrograde movements of the planets (in the dates of the Julian calendar), which, as shown by Prof. Brand'Amour, clearly indicate the year 1606 [8]. Astronomical information is borrowed by Nostradamus from the ephemerides of Leowitz [25], as evidenced by the coincidence of inaccuracies in the description of the movements of celestial bodies with Leowitz's calculations.

In this regard, the question arises, from what date are the prophecies counted – from the moment of their first publication in 1555 or from the specified year 1606? The author of this article has discovered a numerical pattern, based on which it can be reasonably assumed that the prophecies are combined into an integral system with a starting point in 1555, while 1606 indicates rather a "phase" in some cyclical process.

Let's take into account that the end point of the prophecies is the year 2242 (see the previous section). If we assume that the starting point is 1555, we get the time interval of prophecies 2242-1555 = 687 years. It turns out that the lengths of both chronologies, when divided by this interval, give in the remainder the number of years indicating the year 1606 "from above" and "from below", respectively:

2242 – (4758 mod 687) = 1606

1555 + (4173 mod 687) = 1606

The resulting pattern is illustrated graphically in Fig.1.

 

Fig.1. A diagram to illustrate a numerical pattern: the remnants from dividing the lengths of the first (4758) and second (4173) chronologies into the interval of prophecies (2242-1555 = 687) indicate the year 1606 "from above" and "from below", respectively. In addition, when starting from 1606, in both chronologies, the "birth of Noah" corresponds to the same real-time date (1636).

 

Now let's look at some of the dates given in the chronologies.

According to the first chronology, "the first man Adam appeared about 1242 years before Noah," in other words, Noah was born 1242 years after the creation of the world (SEE). According to the second chronology, "1506 years have passed from the creation of the world to the birth of Noah." Thus, the numbers contradict each other. Brand'Amour drew attention [8] that both figures were obtained by distortion of those known from the Bible. Indeed, according to the Lucian edition of the Septuagint (used by Eusebius of Caesarea) and the reconstruction based on it in the Vatican Codex, the flood dates back to 2242 CM, which differs only in the first digit from the number named by Nostradamus in the first chronology. If we assume that there is a typo or error in the text of Nostradamus, it should also be recognized that we are not talking about the birth of Noah, but specifically about the flood, at the time of which Noah turned 600 years old. However, below this chronology, Nostradamus stipulates that his calculation differs from that of Eusebius of Caesarea.

The second chronology looks even more suspicious for typos. The number 1506 named by Nostradamus differs only in the permutation of digits from the number 1056, which is calculated based on the book of Genesis (chapter 5). At the same time, instead of the sum of the chronology years named by Nostradamus (4173 years and 8 months), when summing up the dates of the chronology, 4092 years and 2 months are obtained. In this regard, Brand'Amour notes that the named amount can (very approximately) be obtained if, on the basis of the Book of Genesis, 1506 -> 1056 are replaced, as well as time intervals missed in chronology (477 years from the completion of Temple I to the completion of Temple II according to Jewish tradition, 40 years of Jewish wandering in the desert, 7 years and 6 months of the construction of the temple of Solomon).   

However, maybe Nostradamus deliberately distorts known numbers in order to obtain additional degrees of freedom based on the needs of his cipher? Following the scheme shown in Fig.1, we count 1242 and 1506 years, in the first and second chronology, respectively, starting from 1606 and taking into account the boundary conditions of 1555 and 2242, upon reaching which there is a change in the direction of counting years along the real-time axis. As a result, for both cases we come to the same (!) date, 1636 AD (see Fig.1). Thus, the expected identity of the two dates denoting (as stated) the birth of Noah is realized precisely in the cipher system we propose, while the search and elimination of typos do not solve this problem.

The discussion of the remaining dates of the chronologies at the moment goes beyond the scope of logical analysis. At the same time, according to the author, the results obtained are sufficient to consider the statement about Nostradamus' use of a simple cipher scheme for sorting dates to be justified (Fig.1). This scheme is classified as a modified "scytale" cipher using a key sequence of shifts (similar to the Belazo cipher) instead of a fixed key. Based on the presented scheme, it can be reasonably argued that the prophecies extend over the time interval 1555-2242, with 1606 acting as the common starting point of the two chronologies, while the "birth of Noah" indicates the starting direction of counting years in each of them along the axis of real time. Although the scheme presumably establishes a connection between the chronology numbers and real-time dates, it leaves unresolved the question of how the resulting list of dates is aligned with the quatrains. The next section of the article is devoted to this problem.    

 

4. The hidden connection of chronologies with the order of quatrains.

The simplest way to establish a relationship between the numbers of chronologies and the ordinal numbers of quatrains is to take one quatrain in one year and count the quatrains in accordance with a periodically recurring series of numbers from the chronology, starting from some starting point. Then, depending on the choice of the starting point and boundary conditions (periodic or mirror), several options for the arrangement of quatrains arise, from which the correct one should be chosen. However, no results have been obtained on this path so far. D.Hamatulin [26] proposed the idea of counting the quatrains themselves instead of counting the letter combinations "an" (the word "an" translates from French as "year") in prophetic texts. Unfortunately, this analysis did not take into account discrepancies due to typos between editions, and probably that is why the patterns that most clearly indicate the presence of a cipher were not noticed within its framework.

First of all, it is necessary to determine which sources are preferable to carry out such calculations, and which calculation method to choose, because due to typos made by the publisher, even copies corresponding to different proofs of the same publication can lead to different results, not to mention different editions. If you do the proofreading yourself, eliminating the most obvious typos, then it is difficult to avoid suspicion of fitting the results.

As you know, the "Prophecies" were published in three parts: in 1555, a Letter to Cesar and the first 353 quatrains were published, in 1557, along with the previous quatrains, 289 new ones were published, and finally, the well-known edition by Benoit Rigaud, in which, together with the previous prophecies, the epistles to King Henry and the final 300 quatrains were published, dated 1568. The 1555 edition is known in two copies (kept in Vienna and Albi), which differ little from each other. The 1557 edition is known in three copies, of which the most reliable is kept in the library of Utrecht, and the other two ("Moscow" and "Budapest") are presumably pirated copies [4]. Finally, the 1568 edition is known in several versions, facsimiles of which (however, as well as facsimiles of previous editions) can be found in the electronic library on Mario Gregorio's website [27].

On the one hand, it is reasonable to assume that the first editions should be considered more adequate for counting words or letter combinations, since Nostradamus himself could participate in the proofreading and rely on previously published texts in his further work. Then it is logical to consider the Letter to Cesar and the first 353 quatrains according to the 1555 edition (for certainty, "Albi"), the next 289 quatrains according to the "Utrecht" copy of the 1557 edition, and finally the Letter to Henry and the final 300 quatrains according to one of the versions of the 1568 edition (for certainty, the version 1568-004 (Chomarat: A6587) from the Mario Gregorio library; versions 002, 003, 005, 006 differ slightly from it). On the other hand, if we assume that Nostradamus managed to take part in the preparation of the 1568 edition, earlier inaccuracies could be corrected in this edition. For comparison, we also calculated the 1597 edition, made by the heirs of Benoit Rigaud. In addition, the situation is considered when the "Letter to Cesar" and the first 353 quatrains are taken from the "Utrecht" copy of the 1557 edition, i.e. the first edition (1555) does not participate in the summary calculation. The results of the calculations of the letter combinations "an" in various publications are summarized in Table 1. The rightmost column of the table shows the estimated number of correct numbers. 

  

 

Summary of the editions of 1555, 1557, 1568.

According to the edition of 1568

According to the edition of 1597

Summary of the editions of 1557, 1568 (D.Hamatulin)

The assumed series of correct numbers

Letter to Cesar

155

153

153

152

155  (153)

I c.

210

211

209

209

210

I–II c.

453  

454

455

449

453

I–III c.

676

676

677

668

676

I–IV c.

(353 quatrains)

777

778

779

771

777

I–IVc.

(400 quatrains)

890

888

891

883

888

I–V c.

1113

1111

1116

1106

1111

I–VI c.

(599 quatrains)

1329

1326

1330

1322

1326 

I–VI c.

+warning

1331

1328

1332

1324

1328 

I–VII cc.

(642 quatrains)

1426

1424

1427

1419

1424 

I–VIII cc.

1661

1659

1663

1654

1659

I–IX c.

1862

1860

1863

1855

1860

I–X c.

2089

[2087]

2087

2087

2082

2087

The sum of the Letter to Cesar and I-X centuries

2244

[2242]

2240

2240

2234

2242 (2240)

A letter to Henry

325

325

325

325

325

 

Table 1. The results of counting the letter combinations "an" according to various editions of the Prophecies. The cells are shaded in gray, the numbers in which do not look random (see the explanations in the text). The amounts shown in square brackets [*] do not include the unnumbered quatrain 6-100 ("warning to critics"). 

 

Let's discuss the main features of the performed calculation.

(1) The 353 quatrains of the first edition of the Prophecies (1555) contain 777 letter combinations of "an". Given the popularity of the number 7 in Christian symbolism, where it expresses perfection and completeness, it can be confidently argued that the appearance of this number when counting is the result of the author's intention, i.e. Nostradamus really counts the letter combinations "an".

(2)                The letter to Cesar in the same edition (1555) contains 155 "an", which may serve as a hint at the date of its writing and the starting point of the prophecies, i.e. 1555.

(3)                There are 888 "an" in the I-IV centuries, and 1111 "an" in the I-V centuries – according to the 1568 edition. These numbers seem to be correct for the reason that they continue the logic of the first edition, where the number 777 was used – Nostradamus continues to highlight the correct numbers in a special way. The "Utrecht" copy (1557) and the edition of the heirs of Benoit Rigaud (1597) somewhat distort these amounts.

(4) The total number of letter combinations "an" for all quatrains of the I-X centuries in the editions of 1568 and 1597 turns out to be the same and amounts to 2087. In the summary count for the editions of 1555, 1557, 1568, the same figure of 2087 arises on the condition that the only unnumbered quatrain 6-100, written in Latin ("warning to critics"), is not taken into account.  The number 2087 seems correct and remarkable for the reason that when multiplied by two, 4174 is obtained – a number that coincides with the length of the second chronology (4173 years 7 months). This corresponds to the mental image that the chronology is counted from the beginning of the quatrains to the end, and then returns to the beginning ("contains its own cycle," as Nostradamus himself notes in its description).  In other words, it is again possible to assume the use of a modified "wandering" algorithm.  

(5) If we consider together the Letter to Cesar and the Quatrains of the I-X centuries, we get 153+2087=2240 "an" (according to the editions of 1568 and 1597). If we use the number 155 for the Letter to Cesar, which was discussed above, we get 155+2087=2242 "an". Both of these numbers have already appeared in Section 2 when discussing the end date of the "Prophecies". The year 2240 RH corresponds to the end of 6000 years of the Jewish calendar, and the year 2242 RH corresponds to the end of 7000 years of the First chronology of Nostradamus. Thus, the predictor again shows that the "Prophecies" are calculated for the time interval 1555-2242. An interesting consequence is that, apparently, Century VII remains unfinished not because its final 58 quatrains are lost, but in accordance with the author's intention, since otherwise the totals 2087 and 2242 would not have arisen.

(6) The unnumbered quatrain 6-100, written in Latin ("warning to ignorant critics"), is present in the "Utrecht" copy and subsequent editions, while in the "Moscow" and "Budapest" copies of the 1557 edition, the VI century ends with the 99th quatrain. Thus, in any case, the quatrain 6-100 stands out from the rest of the quatrains. Maybe this is an accident, but the number of letter combinations "an" equal to 1328, corresponding to this quatrain in the 1568 edition, is associated with 1328, is the date of the ascension to the French throne of Philip VI the Fortunate, the first king of France from the Valois dynasty. Although this meaning does not agree much with the features of the cipher discussed above, it is not necessary to exclude the symbolic meaning of the resulting number. Probably, by analogy with the numbers 888 and 1111, Nostradamus uses it as a recognizable "mark" confirming the correctness of counting the letter combinations "an".   

(7)                The calculation made according to the 1597 edition is noteworthy in that despite the many corrected typos of previous editions, as well as the appearance of new typos, the total numbers 2087 and 2240 coincide with the 1568 edition. It is amazing how Nostradamus managed to achieve such an accurate calculation of the amount in the publication published 30 years after his death (despite the fact that individual differences in the positions of the letter combinations "an" that interest us number in the dozens). Perhaps the publisher Benoit Rigaud and his heirs were privy to some of the secrets of Nostradamus?

(8)                The summary calculation of the editions of 1557 and 1568, made by D.Hamatulin, in which the "Utrecht" copy (1557) is used for Writing to Cesar and centuries I-VII, and for Writing to Henry and centuries VIII-X edition of 1568, loses the above patterns. In our opinion, this indicates that the "Utrecht" copy turns out to be the least accurate due to corrections and typos made by the publisher.

 

5. Conclusions.

(i) In previous studies [4,8,10,20,21], it was reliably established that the "Prophecies" of Nostradamus were calculated for the time interval 1555-2242. The end date of the prophecies is close to the end of the 6,000 years of the Jewish calendar (2240 BC).

(ii) The correct sequence of quatrains and their corresponding dates are apparently encrypted. The proposed date encryption method is classified as a modified "scytale" algorithm using a key sequence of numbers instead of a single number. The starting point (phase of the cyclic process) in this cipher is 1606, and the key sequence is set by pseudo-biblical chronologies from the epistle to King Henry II.

(iii) The correspondence between the dates of chronologies and the numbers of quatrains is established, apparently, by counting the letter combinations "an" (the French word for "year") in the texts of prophecies. The results of the calculations indicate that although the "Prophecies" were published in parts, they are a complete work, subject to a strict plan.  

(iiii) Further development of the proposed approach should make it possible to restore the correct order of quatrains and their corresponding real-time dates, which means to understand Nostradamus' ideas about the distant future more deeply.   

 

Application. Chronologies given in the epistle to King Henry II.

I chronology.

"The first man Adam appeared before Noah in about 1242, not counting the times according to the calculations of the Gentiles, as was done in the calculations of Varro, but only according to the Holy Scriptures, and according to the weakness of my mind, in my Astronomical calculations; after Noah, from him and from the Flood, Abraham came about 1080 years later, who was the greatest Astrologer, according to some, he was the first to invent the Chaldean script; then Moses came about 515 or 516 years later, and between the time of David and Moses there were 570 years approximately. Then, after, between the time of David and the time of our Savior and Redeemer Jesus Christ, who was born a single Virgin, there were (according to some chronographs) 1,350 years, someone will be able to object that this calculation is incorrect, since it differs from the calculation of Eusebius [of Caesarea]. And from the time of human redemption to the vile seduction of the Saracens, 621 years have passed, about where it is easy to generalize what times have passed; if my calculation is not acceptable to all nations, it is because everything was calculated through celestial movements, combined with an experience inspired in some secluded hours, with an experience from my ancient ancestors."

 II chronology.

"I calculated the years from the creation of the world to the birth of Noah – 1506 years have passed, and 600 years have passed from the birth of Noah to the completion of the Ark before the Flood, Lunar or Solar [years] or mixed are given. I believe that the scriptures are based on the Sun. And at the end of these 600 years, Noah entered the Ark to escape from the Flood: and there was a worldwide flood on earth, and it lasted 1 year and 2 months. And from the end of the flood to the birth of Abraham, the number of years passed 295. And 100 years have passed from the birth of Abraham to the birth of Isaac. And from the birth of Isaac to Jacob, 60 years have passed, from the hour when he entered Egypt to the exodus from it, 130 years have passed. And 430 years passed from Jacob's going to Egypt to the exodus from there. And from the exodus from Egypt to the construction of the Temple by Solomon in the 4th year of his reign, 480 or four times twenty years passed. And from the construction of the Temple to Jesus Christ, according to the chroniclers, 490 years have passed. And so, according to this calculation, which I have done with the help of the Scriptures, it has been about 4,173 years and 8 months, more or less. From Jesus Christ, because of the difference of sects, I skip, counting and calculating the real Prophecies, entirely according to the order of the chain that contains its rotation, all through Astronomical teaching and my natural gift, and after a while, and understanding by this the time when Saturn, which will turn, will enter the 7th month of April until August 25th, Jupiter from June 14th to October 7th, Mars from April 17th to June 22nd, Venus from April 9th to May 22nd, Mercury from February 3rd to February 27th, then from June 1st to June 24th, and from September 25th to October 16th. Saturn in Capricorn, Jupiter in Aquarius, Mars in Scorpio, Venus in Pisces, Mercury in a month in Capricorn, Aquarius and Pisces, the Moon in Aquarius, the Dragon's head in Libra, the tail in the opposite sign, [then] follows the union of Jupiter and Mercury, with the quadrature of Mars and Mercury; the Dragon's head will be with the union The sun and Jupiter, the year will be calm, without an eclipse, nothing else, and it will be the beginning of what will continue from here, and starting this year the greatest persecution of the Christian Church will be committed, which has not yet been in Africa, and it will continue until 1792, which will be considered the renewal of the epoch."

References
1. Les Propheties de M. Michel Nostradamus. (1555). Lyon, chez Mace Bonhomme.
2. Les Propheties de M. Michel Nostradamus. Don’t il en y a trois cents qui n’ont encores iamais este imprimees. (1557). A Lyon, chez Antoine du Rosne.
3. Les Propheties de M.Michel Nostradamus. Don’t il en y a trois cents qui n’ont encores iamais este imprimees. (1568). Lyon, par Benoist Rigavd.
4. Ïåíçåíñêèé À À (2003). Íîñòðàäàìóñ: ìèô è ðåàëüíîñòü. Ìîñêâà, Ýêñìî.
5. Benazra, R. (1990). Repertoire Chronologique Nostradamique (1545–1989). Paris, Ed. La Grand Conjonction.
6. Lemesurier, P. (2003). The Unknown Nostradamus: The Essential Biography for His 500th Birthday. London, John Hunt Publishing.
7. Leroy, E. (1972). Nostradamus: Ses origines, sa vie, son oeuvre. Marseille, Editions Jeanne Laffitte.
8. Brind'Amour, P. (1993). Nostradamus astrophile : les astres et l'astrologie dans la vie et l'œuvre de Nostradamus, Ottawa, Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa et Éditions Klincksieck.
9. Prévost, R. (1999). Nostradamus, le mythe et la réalité: un historien au temps des astrologues. Paris, Le Grand livre du mois.
10. Ïðîðî÷åñòâà ìàãèñòðà Ìèøåëÿ Íîñòðàäàìóñà: ïîëíûé ðóññêèé êîììåíòèðîâàííûé ïåðåâîä. – Ì.: Ýêñìî, 2006. (Ïåðåâîä, âñòóïèòåëüíàÿ ñòàòüÿ, êîììåíòàðèè À.Ïåíçåíñêîãî).
11. Crouzet, D. (2011). Nostradamus: une médecine des âmes à la Renaissance. Paris, Ed. Payot & Rivages.
12. Trithemius, Johannes, Early Printing Collection, and George Fabyan Collection. Polygraphiae libri sex Ioannis Trithemij, abbatis Peapolitani quondam Spanheimensis, ad Maximilianum Caesarem. [Reichenau: Impressum ductu Ioannis Haselberg de Aia, biblipolae, anno a Christo nato , men. Iulio, 1518] Pdf. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/item/32017914/
13. Tritemius, J. (1606). Steganographia, hoc est ars per occultam scripturam animi sui voluntatem absentibus aperiendi certa. Ex officina typographica Matthiae Beckeri, sumptibus Ioannis Berneri.
14. Cardanus, H. (1550). De subtilitate rerum. Norimberga, Johannes Petreius.
15. Biermann, N. (2018). Analysis of Giouan Battista Bellaso's cipher challenges of 1555. Cryptologia, 42(5), 381–407.
16. Ðàçóìîâ, È.Ê. Ãðàôè÷åñêèé øèôð Íîñòðàäàìóñà. Íà÷àëà ðóññêîãî ìèðà, 2023, N2. Ñ. 38–63.
17. Razumov, I.K. (2020–2023). Graphic cipher of Nostradamus. SSRN, 14 Jan 2020, 3508575. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3508575
18. Ãóáàíîâ, Í.È., Ãóáàíîâ, Í.Í., Âîëêîâ, À.Ý. Êðèòåðèè èñòèííîñòè è íàó÷íîñòè çíàíèÿ. Ôèëîñîôèÿ è îáùåñòâî, 2016, N3. Ñ. 78–95.
19. Êîóòèíõî, Ñ. Ââåäåíèå â òåîðèþ ÷èñåë. Àëãîðèòì RSA. Ìîñêâà: Ïîñòìàðêåò, 2001.
20. Nostradamus, Les premières Centuries ou Prophéties, Édition et commentaire par Pierre Brind'Amour, Genève, Droz, 1996.
21. Dr. Patrice Guinard. (2015). Nostradamus occultiste: Codes et Procedes de Chiffrements dans l’oeuvre de Nostradamus. Books on Demand, Paris.
22. Roussat, Richard. (1550). Livre de l’estat et mvtation des temps, prouuant par authorites de l’Escripture saincte, & par raison astrologales, la fin du Monde ester prochaine. A Lyon, chez Guillaume Rouille, B l’Escu de Venise. Auec Priuilege du Roy; Paris: Gutenberg Reprints, 1981.
23. Trithemius, J. (1522). De septem secunda Deis id est intelligentiis sive spiritibus moventibus orbes libellus. Joannes Haselberg.
24. T.W.M. van Berkel. The millennium model versus the Trithemian cycle, 2003. Retrieved from http://nostredame.chez-alice.fr/nberk5.html
25. Leowitz, C. (1557). Ephemeridum novum atque insigne opus ab anno domini 1556 us in 1606 accuratissime supputatum: cui praeter alia omnia in caeteris editionibus addi solita, etiam haec accesserunt. Augsburg.
26. Õàìàòóëèí, Ä. (2021). Ââåäåíèå â íîñòðàäàìóñîâåäåíèå. Ìàãíèòîãîðñê.
27. Bibliotheque Nostradamus. Retrieved from http://www.propheties.it/bibliotequenostradamus.htm

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The reviewed article is devoted to the study of the predictive legacy of Nostradamus, in which the author aims to show that in addition to explicit (albeit meaningfully encrypted) information, a more accurate link to modern chronology is necessary for the study of widely known quatrains. To this end, the author studies statistical anomalies in the texts of Nostradamus in order to extract "maximum information" from their analysis. The methodology of the article consists in the use of logical and statistical methods in relation to the study of historical chronology. To do this, the author compares the various chronological scales presented in the texts of Nostradamus, and binds to them the chronological dates mentioned by Nostradamus in quatrains and encrypted by him. The relevance of the work lies in the scientific approach to the legacy of Nostradamus. The article lacks any elements of the medieval scientist's interpretations in the spirit of predictions of the future, widely spread in quasi-scientific and amateurish statements on this topic. The scientific novelty of the article can be considered in the same direction. The rather specific subject of the study also determined the structure of the article, which looks somewhat different from the traditional scientific one, but at the same time remains completely within the framework of the scientific approach. In the first section, the problem of linking Nostradamus' texts to real chronology is posed and a brief historiographical overview of existing works is given, the purpose of the article is set and the criteria for the truth of scientific knowledge are discussed. In the second section, the author examines the essence of the discussion about the time to which the prophecies of Nostradamus extend. Further, in the next two sections, the author, using his own methodology based on statistical comparisons in historical and chronological research, offers his own interpretation of the sequence of quatrains and deciphering their dates. Convincing arguments in favor of the author's statistical observations are provided by Table 1, which contains the results of counting the letter combinations "an" for various editions of the Prophecies. These results allow the author to come to the important conclusion that, although the "Prophecies" were published in parts, they are "a complete work, subject to a strict plan." The appendix contains two small texts by Nostradamus, allowing the reader to imagine the specifics of the material analyzed in the article. Thus, the article is written in accordance with the strict logic of presentation, corresponding to the general logic of the study. It should be noted that the purely scientific and rather complex language of presentation, which will be available to a trained reader. The work contains a fairly complete bibliography (27 positions), designed for a serious scientific study of the problems set out in the text of the article. The article is written in a polemical manner and contains a discussion of issues that are debatable in nature. The author of the article conducted research on texts and substantiation of their binding to a chronological scale on the basis of fairly simple mathematical and logical operations that can make serious changes in the definition of sequences of quatrains of Nostradamus. The generalizations presented by the author concerning the history of cryptography in Europe are also of interest, they are essential for the correct understanding of Nostradamus' texts. The scientific nature of the article is also supported by the fact that the author does not consider the content of the quatrains as prophecies, but calls them "Nostradamus's ideas about the distant future." Of course, the article is not quite standard in nature, but its scientific nature, expressed by the attitude to the legacy of Nostradamus as historical texts and the desire to analyze them by methods of historical chronology, allows us to state the validity of the author's argument and recommend the publication of this work in the journal Historical Informatics.