Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Folk arts and crafts of Ugra: problems of terminological interpretation

Moldanova Nadezhda Anatolyevna

ORCID: 0000-0002-1469-706X

Researcher, Ob-Ugric Institute of Applied Researches and Development

628007, Russia, Khanty-Mansiysk, Yugorskaya str., 17

nmoldanova-nauka@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2023.12.69067

EDN:

NYDRWG

Received:

22-11-2023


Published:

31-12-2023


Abstract: The purpose of the study is to analyze the concepts of "folk arts and crafts" and their comparison with folk and decorative arts. The use of materials on the culture of the Ob Ugrians allows us to define the boundaries of these phenomena, which are interpreted differently in legal, educational and cultural contexts. The concepts of "folk arts and crafts" and "folk art" have similarities in that they both relate to traditional forms of culture that were created and passed down from generation to generation by the people. The concept of "decorative and applied art" includes various objects of art that are created for the purpose of decorating clothes, dishes, and interiors. The equivalence of these concepts lies in the fact that this activity of creating handmade products has unique artistic qualities. The materials for the study were the works of Soviet and Russian art historians and ethnographers. The author relies on the fundamental research of the art historian M.A. Nekrasova on the theory of folk art. Special attention is paid to the works of northern historians specializing in the traditional art of the Ob Ugrians. The article analyzes the conceptual framework in federal and regional legislation. Having studied various forms of artistic creativity – folk crafts and folk art, we have identified their specific features, which were formed under the influence of historical, socio-economic, cultural changes. Adherence to tradition is an important feature of the folk culture of the indigenous peoples of the North, which allows us to preserve its unique characteristics. Folk arts and crafts of the Ob Ugrians today continue to develop and adapt to modern realities, while maintaining their identity. Folk art and crafts have a special system of meanings, which are determined by their history, functioning, and specific expression, including in modern reality. The folk art of the Ob Ugrians has its own trajectory of development within the settlement of these peoples. At the same time, all traditional culture has deep roots in the ethnic environment and is transmitted through mechanisms related to ethnic identity and social translation.


Keywords:

folk art and crafts, craft, folk art, decorative and applied art, traditional culture, Ob-Ugric peoples, indigenous peoples, professional art, Yugra, Western Siberia

This article is automatically translated.

 

Introduction

One of the first researchers who put the problem of terminology at the forefront was the art historian M.A. Nekrasova, who put forward the question "about a new paradigm for the formation of key concepts in the definition of folk art, including folk crafts as one of its forms, in the cultural system, their place in modern culture as a spiritual phenomenon" [30]. V.B. Koshaev notes that "folk art as a type of culture and a type of artistic creativity is still not realized in the depth and scale of its genetic nature, as a carrier and exponent of the deep beginnings of human culture, archetypes of being and is not the basis for the formation of regulations of the state all-Russian policy in education and culture. The problem here is that the form of the artistic object of folk art is not yet fully realized in the essence of its mythological and symbolic functions due to a lack of understanding of its content" [14].

There are differences in the interpretation of the concepts used – "folk crafts", "folk art", "decorative and applied art". The relevance of this problem is confirmed by the research of the authors, who pay attention to the methodological aspects of the terminology of contemporary art.  The content of the concepts of "decorative and applied art" and "folk art" was revealed in the works of the Ural researcher A.S. Maksyashin. In the period from 2009 to 2022, in a series of articles, he identified their problems – the essence of folk art turns out to be replaced by decorative and applied art, which causes confusion among art theorists and practitioners [18-22]. Terminological problems have also attracted the attention of other researchers [5; 36; 42]. The artistic and stylistic features of Ob Ugrian folk art products are discussed in articles by art historian N.N. Fedorova and ethnographer T.A. Moldanova, who have knowledge of the local traditions of the Ob Ugrians [24-27; 38-40].

Folk art crafts

As part of our research, we will first turn to the meaning of the term – folk art crafts.  Article 3 of Federal Law No. 7-FZ "On Folk Art Crafts" defines them as one of the forms of folk art, which is based on the collective development and continuous development of folk art traditions. They include the creation of artistic products for utilitarian and/or decorative purposes. Their manufacture can be carried out both manually and using the mechanized labor of craftsmen of folk arts and crafts.

Federal legislation establishes the legal basis for the maintenance and development of folk arts and crafts, as well as other concepts such as handicrafts, a standard sample of folk arts and crafts, a master of folk arts and crafts, etc. The Duma of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug - Yugra in 2004 adopted a similar regulatory legal act operating within our region - The Law of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Yugra No. 98-oz "On folk arts and crafts in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Yugra". In its main provisions, it repeats the federal law.

 The definition of "folk" suggests that creativity is formed by the people – through the efforts of many generations. The people are the "author", and the skills of manufacturing are passed on "on the basis of collective development", from generation to generation in the conditions of continuity of tradition. "The totality of artistic means of expression, techniques of craftsmanship and traditional technology of making handicrafts that reflect historical, cultural, social and natural factors in the place of its traditional existence" – is the essence of the legislative definition of the word "artistic".

The term "fishery" has several meanings: 1) the extraction of animals, birds, fish and 2) small craft production [37]. The purpose of these activities is to earn a living. Handicraft production involves the manufacture of small items by hand. The inherent need for creativity of the people and the established cultural artistic tradition are combined with the material interest of the artisan in satisfying the inner need for everyday objects and their sale [35]. Thus, the word crafts in the meaning of handicraft suggests that the product is intended for sale. And this feature is of crucial importance – in a market economy, products become a commodity, where their value is determined not only by artistic qualities, but also by the possibility of their sale.

The time of the origin of folk arts and crafts in the sense of the beginning of various industries is considered to be the end of the XVIII century. XIX century: it was during this period that most types of folk arts and crafts working for the market were formed" [17]. Folk crafts are part of the art industry. Currently, this industry, which is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation, is experiencing certain crises [11]. In the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug, this area is coordinated by the district Department of Culture. Since 2020, in connection with the adoption of the law of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Ugra "On creative industries in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Ugra", folk arts and crafts of Ugra began to be considered as a direction in the creative economy and placed on a par with the "fashion and decorative arts industry".

Folk art

In the culture of the indigenous peoples of the North, artistic products existed in the form of household (family) crafts with a variety of types of products and materials from which they are made, functional and decorative elements, semantic integrity and local features [40]. The term "folk art" as an activity for the creation of artistic products in accordance with folk traditions has become entrenched among specialists engaged in the study of the traditional culture of the Ob Ugrians [6; 24; 39]. According to art historian N.N. Fedorova, "traditional folk art is, in general, a different layer of culture, unlike folk crafts, associated with a certain social organization."  At the same time, the term "traditional art" includes other directions: choreographic, instrumental, vocal, folklore [8]. This emphasizes the syncretic nature of the traditional culture of the peoples of the North. An example of this is the ritual complex "Bear Games", which is a rather complex system covering all aspects of the life of the Ob-Ugric community – language, folklore, dance, folk theater, folk art, economic and labor activities, social relations.

It may seem that these concepts are similar, but the term "traditional folk art" refers to creativity that has an ethnic character and traditional transmission mechanisms: "Traditional and folk cultures are defined by different aspects:  traditional culture is defined through the type of social translation – reproduction of tested samples. Folk culture is formed by an ethnogenetic community united by ethnic identity" [15].

A specific feature of folk art is its commitment to tradition as a way of being and reproducing elements of social and cultural heritage, fixing the stability and continuity of the experience of generations, times and epochs [37].  "One must live by tradition, think, feel, perceive the world, only then it is alive. And that is why folk art lives as a living art, carrying its own way of artistic vision and artistic expression. By virtue of preserving its primordial nature and special specificity, it is the art of tradition" [28].

In science, the division of the Ob-Ugric peoples into ethnographic and territorial groups is accepted. It is generally accepted to divide Mansi into four groups: northern, western, eastern and southern. Khanty is divided into northern, eastern and southern.  Each territorial group has its own norms, its own aesthetics, its own set of glorified reference products, so the traditions of different groups rarely mixed with each other [24]The ethnonyms of the Khanty and Mansi already contain a locus, this is reflected in their self-designation, for example, the Kasum ex 'Kazim Khanty' live in the basin of the Kazym river. Thus, one of the essential features of folk art is its territorial marking. In the Russian legislative framework on folk crafts, this is designated by the term "place of traditional existence of folk art crafts" and is defined as "the territory within which folk art craft has historically developed and is developing in accordance with original traditions." In museum practice, an obligatory section of the attribution of an object is to indicate the place of birth (residence) of the author and the place of manufacture of the object itself. 

The folk art of the Ob Ugrians is closely connected with traditional economic activities: reindeer husbandry, fishing, hunting, gathering wild plants, which, in turn, serve as an ethnos-preserving factor for culture and are determined by the climatic features and natural landscape of the region.

Based on the local traditional culture, historically developed in different parts of the country, folk art functions in various forms as a living tradition, representing the centers of traditional folk culture [30]. These are islands of traditional life, where folk art is organically woven into life itself, which once again shows that it is archaic, and inextricably linked with folklore traditions and language, "because each hearth has its own talents, its own traditions, its own artistic systems and methods, verified in the experience of many generations of folk craftsmen" [28]. Works of folk art, by their expressive form, material processing techniques, and functional purpose, carry information about the time and place of their origin, about the environment in which they were intended to live [3]. Thus, geographical location plays a key role in traditional cultures and is one of the components of regional identity [44].

 

The development of tradition

Cultural tradition is changeable and flexible, and folk crafts, as a living manifestation of traditional culture, are also constantly developing. This is manifested in the use of new materials or the replacement of existing ones with materials that are identical in properties. For example, the rovduga can be replaced with purchased leather, and the tendon thread can be replaced with nylon. Manual labor is partially replaced by mechanized labor, and the functional purpose of objects is changing. With regard to the color of clothing, with the advent of a wide variety of factory materials, craftsmen are beginning to move away from the classic color scheme. In ornamental art, this is manifested in a change in the configuration of the ornament, its semantics, and new stylistic solutions [46; 49]. In the legal field, this phenomenon is fixed by the concept of "creative variation", which allows you to make changes to the standard sample in terms of "compositional, color, ornamental or other artistic solutions." At the same time, in comparison with the standard sample, the quality and artistic level of the product do not decrease, since "the ratio of old and new in folk art is carried out within the boundaries of the artistic system and from the position of a common, collectively developed perception of the world by the people" [29]. Due to its variability, the tradition is enriched with new content and can even change its structure, while maintaining a semantic and meaningful core.

The relationship between traditions and innovations is the subject of active discussions [1; 10; 23; 32]. In this study, we will not delve into this topic, since the duration of existence and the degree of traditionality of products of the indigenous peoples of the North have already been considered in the works of T.A. Moldanova, E.V. Perevalova, G.P. Haryuchi and others [27; 31; 41]. It should be noted that traditional culture is subject to the greatest variability in areas of intensive industrial development [48]. Further study of changes in traditional culture in various ethnographic groups will help to understand what transformations are taking place in the material and spiritual cultures of the Ob Ugrians and identify their positive aspects for strengthening the cultural identity of the indigenous peoples of the North [45].

Decorative and applied arts

Another problem of the theoretical provisions on contemporary art is the ambiguity of the interpretation of the term "decorative and applied art". Some researchers identify decorative art with folk art, due to the fact that decorative and applied art combines the properties of folk, confessional, secular, avant-garde creativity [2; 13]. At the same time, decorative and applied art, like folk art, has a complex internal morphological structure and represents one of the types of artistic creativity based on the artistic and imaginative thinking of the author [7].

Other researchers emphasize that folk and decorative arts are two significantly different, but mutually enriching phenomena [22; 42]. Artists of decorative and applied arts use folk art as a visual resource, a source of inspiration, because they interpret the folk system of images and worldviews authorially when creating their works [9]. The branching of these two areas of contemporary art is also evidenced by the fact that the Union of Artists of Russia has ten creative commissions, including decorative arts and folk art separately [34].

Scientists also use the concept of "folk decorative and applied art". According to N.N. Fedorova, the term "decorative and applied art" is used as a clarification to folk art in order to distinguish it from painting, graphics, sculpture. This definition is necessary to characterize folk art in the context of other types of art." To find out how these terms are used in practice by workers in the field of culture, education and science, let's turn to the results of a survey on the VKontakte social network. Subscribers of the Union of Masters of Traditional Crafts of Ugra community were asked to answer the question "What do you call the activity of creating artistic products in accordance with folk traditions in a certain area, which are passed down from generation to generation?". A total of 50 people voted. The answers were distributed as follows: "folk arts and crafts" – 48%, "folk art" – 30%. The answer "decorative and applied arts" was chosen by 22% of the respondents [40]. The popularity of the first answer can be explained by the adopted legislative acts and the use of this term in the industry.

The typology of the subject art

Specialists typologically divide the subject art into professional, folk and amateur. Professional art is practiced by specially trained artists who have deeply studied the ways of creating expressive images. We have considered the basic principles of folk art above. It is important to emphasize that folk art focuses on collective folk traditions ("dissolves its subjective perception in general" [29]), while professional and amateur art represents the individualized creativity of individuals synthesizing various cultural layers.

It should be noted that the reconstruction of folk art products is one of the areas of professional activity. This is a kind of representation of archaeological finds and museum objects, when there are no living carriers anymore, and therefore the continuity of the folk tradition has ceased [12; 43; 47]. The main task of the reenactor artist is to create a reliable copy (replica) of the subject of the corresponding historical period. His work presupposes certain professional competencies and the study of archaeological, pictorial, and written sources.

Amateur art exists as a parallel world in relation to traditional folk art and professional art. M.A. Nekrasova defines amateur art as the free artistic creativity of people who do not have special professional training in art [28]. Amateur artists can practice various types of art, depending on their preferences and interests. If the products of folk art are distinguished by pronounced local features of the ethnographic group, then "amateur creativity is characterized by the use of traditional materials, object forms with an eclectic mix of them, an increase in external decorativeness", which can be perceived as "modernity" [40]. Folk art is the most eternal art: "it is understandable to all epochs and generations, and unlike individualized art, it does not outlast itself and does not age" [22].

Conclusion

Having studied various forms of artistic creativity – folk crafts, crafts, folk art, decorative and applied arts, we have identified their specific features, which were formed under the influence of historical, socio-economic, cultural changes. Adherence to tradition is an important feature of the folk culture of the indigenous peoples of the North, while the folk art of the Ob Ugrians continues to develop and adapt to modern realities, preserving its identity. It is worth noting that these changes are taking place slowly, and are gradually being fixed by the ethnic collective consciousness.

A clear distinction should be made between professional, folk and amateur art. The identification of the latter two leads to a distortion of the forms and content of folk art, weakens its connection with folk traditions. Professional art is the result of special training and individual creativity of artists, folk art expresses collective traditions and cultural heritage, and amateur art represents individual and informal artistic creativity. Folk art is always "national", professional and amateur art is "cosmopolitan".

There is an opinion that industrial production is the next stage in the development of folk art. As we discussed above, folk crafts have a special system of meanings that are determined by their history, functioning, and specific expression, including in modern reality. The folk art of the Ob Ugrians has its own trajectory of development in the territory of settlement of these peoples. At the same time, all traditional culture has deep roots in the ethnic environment and is transmitted through mechanisms related to ethnic identity and social translation.

References
1. Alekseeva, M.Yu., Volkova, T.N., Ershova, L. V., & Krokhina N.P. (2018). The ratio of traditionality, dialogicality and innovation in the functioning of folk art. Humanities Bulletin of the Tolstoy State Pedagogical University, 4(28), 94-104.
2. Alieva, M.N. (2020). The essence of the concept of decorative and applied art. Economics and Society, 1(68), 978-981.
3. Amirzhanova, A.S. (2011). Traditional folk art of Western Siberia: features of the phenomenon. Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 3(98), 204-208.
4. Bubnovene, O.D. (2022). On the sustainability of the traditions of artistic processing of birch bark of the Ob Ugrians. Fine Arts of the Urals, Siberia and the Far East, 1, 40-45.
5. Wagner, G.K. (1982). On the correlation of folk and amateur art. Problems of folk art. Moscow: Fine Arts.
6. Velichko, N. I. (2015). Folk art of the Ob Ugrians (akan dolls, packs): method. recommendations in the educational field of "technology". Khanty-Mansiysk: RIO IRO.
7. Vlasov, V. G. (2012). Fundamentals of the theory and history of decorative and applied art: educational and methodical manual. St. Petersburg.
8. Voldina, T.V. (2018). The traditional art of the Ob Ugrians as a means of communication with the world of spirits. Bulletin of Ugrovedenie, 1, 99-111.
9. Grafova, E. S. (2019). Images of traditional artistic crafts – an actual trend of modern design. Traditional applied art and education, 2(28), 139-149.
10. Yerasov, B.S. (2000). Social cultural studies: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions. M: Aspect Press.
11. Kapitonova, E. The fight against counterfeiting in the field of folk crafts: theory and practice. [DX Reader version]. Retrieved from https://wiselawyer.ru/polezno.
12. Korneva, E.A. (2022). Stand-up collar in Ostyakov women's shirts of the late XIX-XX century. Culture in the Eurasian space: traditions and innovations, 1(6), 35-39.
13. Koshaev, V.B. (2014). Decorative and applied art: Concepts. Stages of development: studies. a manual for university students studying in the specialty "Decorative and applied arts". M: Humanitar. ed. center VLADOS.
14. Koshaev, V.B. (2018). Preface or ... folk art mystery. III International Congress of Traditional Art culture: fundamental research of folk art, 6-10.
15The round table "Traditional and folk. The problem of terminology. [DX Reader version]. Retrieved from https://events.webinar.ru/procultrf/5258425/0bf6fe18bff2e25dd2f161989fc25ddc.
16. Kurakina, I. I. (2018). On the question of the specifics and typology of the concepts of "folk art", "folk crafts", "traditional applied art". Scientific concept of folk art by M.A. Nekrasova in the practice of the Higher School of Folk Arts (Academy). St. Petersburg: HSE.
17. Makarova, E.V. (2014). Historical dynamics of folk art crafts of the Moscow region (Con. XVIII – beginning. XXI century). In the world of science and art: issues of philology, art criticism and cultural studies, 12(43), 7-12.
18. Maksyashin, A.S. (2016). Decorative and applied and folk art from the perspective of their meaningful characteristics. Decorative and applied art: historical experience, current state, development prospects, 44-48.
19. Maksyashin, A.S. (2009). Decorative and applied arts and folk art: do we understand them correctly? Questions of cultural studies, 8, 60-62.
20. Maksyashin, A.S. (2015). On the issue of scientific and theoretical foundations of folk and decorative and applied art. Materials of the VII International Scientific and practical conference "Education. Science. Culture". Gzhel: GSU, 45-148.
21. Maksyashin, A.S. (2022). On the question of the essence and content of folk and decorative and applied art. Materials of the II International Scientific and practical Conference "Dialogues on the protection of cultural values", 277-280.
22. Maksyashin, A.S. (2017). Folk and decorative and applied art: essence, content, differences. Decorative and applied arts and education, 4(23), 50-60.
23. Moldanova, N.A. (2023). Trends in the development of traditional art on the example of Khanty and Mansi dolls (based on the materials of the district exhibition "Traditional toy of the Ob Ugrians"). Materials of the XVI interregional scientific and practical conference named after A. A. Dunin-Gorkavich – forester and local historian of Yugra. Khanty-Mansiysk: Sector of editorial and publishing work to the SOUTH, 228-230.
24. Moldanova, T.A. (2013). Products of folk art of the Ob Ugrians: the degree of preservation at the present stage. Bulletin of Ugrovedenie, 2(12), 130-136.
25. Moldanova, T.A. (2013). Kazymsky ornament. Khanty-Mansiysk: LLC "Printing world of Khanty-Mansiysk".
26. Moldanova, T.A. (2004). Folk art of khanty R. Kazym. Kazym readings-2003: materials of the scientific and practical conference. Khanty-Mansiysk, 16-17.
27. Moldanova, T.A. (2017). Transformation of the decoration of the traditional costume of the Khants of the Tromjegan River in the XXI century. Folk costume in Siberia. Novosibirsk: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 208-212.
28. Nekrasova, M.A. Folk art as a part of culture: theory and practice. [DX Reader version]. Retrieved from https://www.booksite.ru/fulltext/nekra/sova/narod/index.htm.
29. Nekrasova, M.A. (1985). Folk masters. Traditions. Schools. Moscow: Fine Arts.
30. Nekrasova, M.A. (2003). Folk art of Russia in modern culture. Moscow: "Collection M".
31. Perevalova, E.V., Kisser, T.S., Konkova, Y.S. (2021). Souvenir and ethnicity (the experience of Yamal and Taimyr). Cabinet of curiosities, 4(14), 249-261.
32. Pivneva, E. A. (2015). Dynamics of tradition in the Arctic dimension. Problems of Arctic exploration, 2(47), 98-107.
33The Union of masters of traditional crafts. [DX Reader version]. Retrieved from https://vk.com/wall-99599620_1669.
34The Union of Artists of Russia. [DX Reader version]. Retrieved from https://shr.su.
35. Semeritskaya, O.V. (2019). The problem of preserving folk art crafts as objects of cultural heritage: museological aspect. World trends and museum practice in Russia: collection of articles of the international scientific conference. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.
36. Timofeeva, E.N. (2011). On the question of the correlation of concepts in the history of folk art crafts. Bulletin of the Kazan State University of Culture and Arts, 2, 17-20.
37Explanatory online dictionary of the Russian language by T.F. Efremova. [DX Reader version]. Retrieved from https://lexicography.online/explanatory/efremova/ï/ïðîìûñåë.
38. Fedorova, N.N. (2018). The current state of the ornamental tradition of the Ob Ugrians: on the example of birch bark products. III International Congress of Traditional Artistic Culture: fundamental studies of folk art, 476-480.
39. Fedorova, N.N. (2015). The traditional costume of the Ob Ugrians at the turn of the century: artistic and figurative features. History, culture, economy of the Urals and Trans-Urals, 4(39), 36-39.
40. Fedorova, N.N. (2012). The form of existence of the traditional art of the indigenous peoples of the North. Theory and practice: problems of conservation (West Siberian region). Indigenous small peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East: traditions and innovations: Materials of the remote scientific and practical conference X Yugor readings, 210-217.
41. Haryuchi, G.P. (2001).Traditions and innovations in the culture of the Nenets ethnic group (the second half of the twentieth century). Tomsk: Publishing House Vol. unita.
42. Shabalina, N.M. (2011). Methodological problems of terminology of decorative and applied art. Historical, philosophical and legal sciences, cultural studies and art criticism. Questions of theory and practice, 206-208.
43. Shashkova, V.N. (2022). Festive headdresses of Ostyaks, Voguls of the late XVIII-early XIX centuries: research, reconstruction. Culture in the Eurasian space: traditions and innovations, 1(6), 101-105.
44. Paasi, A. (2003). Place and region: regional identity in question. Progress in Human Geography, 27, 475-485.
45. Saar, E. (2008). Folk costumes of the northern Khants. last quarter of the 20 century. Tartu: Estonian National Museum.
46. Saar, E. (2012). Home consumer property of Northants and its ornament last quarter of the 20 century. Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
47. Semayer, W. (1914). Die Tracht der Ostjaken und ihre Stickereien. Anzeiger der ethnographischen Abteilung des Ungarischen Nationalmuseums. Budapest, 6, 167‒172.
48. Tkachev, B., Moldanova, T., Tkacheva, T., & Kharina, N. (2019). Impact of oil and gas development on everyday life of indigenous peoples. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 422, 3130.
49. Vahter, T. (1953). The ornament of the Ob-Ugric peoples. Helsinki.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the presented article is a theoretical analysis of the crafts and crafts of Yugra. Theoretical methods, including the descriptive method, the method of analysis, the method of synthesis, the method of categorization, were used as the methodology of the subject area of research in this article. The relevance of the article is beyond doubt, since the scientific community is actively discussing the issue of a new paradigm for the formation of key concepts in the definition of folk art, including folk crafts as one of its forms, in the cultural system, their place in modern culture as a spiritual phenomenon. The researchers note that folk art as a type of culture and a type of artistic creativity is still not realized in the depth and scale of its nature, as a carrier and exponent of the deep beginnings of human culture, archetypes of being and is not the basis for the formation of regulations of the state all-Russian policy in education and culture. The scientific novelty of the research consists in conducting a deep theoretical analysis of the categories of crafts and crafts, as well as a detailed consideration of these concepts in relation to the peoples living in the territory of Yugra. The article is written in the language of scientific style with the competent use of terms and definitions characterizing the subject of research, as well as with a statement of the positions of scientists on the current problem under study. The structure is designed taking into account the basic requirements for writing scientific articles. The structure of this study includes the preamble, the main part, the conclusion and the bibliography. The content of the article reflects its structure. In particular, the article examines in great detail the individual categories characterizing the subject of research, provides their interpretation in various sources, including normative legal acts, and compares the opinions and approaches of various scientists in defining terms and definitions. The bibliography contains 60 sources, including domestic and foreign periodicals and non-periodicals. The article describes various positions and points of view of scientists characterizing some aspects of the theoretical analysis of crafts and crafts, and also contains an appeal to various scientific works and sources devoted to this topic, which is included in the circle of scientific interests of researchers dealing with this issue both in Russia and in other countries. The presented study contains the main conclusions concerning the subject area of the study. In particular, it is noted that adherence to tradition is an important feature of the folk culture of the indigenous peoples of the North, while folk crafts and folk art of the Ob Ugrians continue to develop and adapt to modern realities, preserving their identity. It is worth noting that these changes are taking place slowly, and are gradually being fixed by the ethnic collective consciousness. A clear distinction should be made between professional, folk and amateur art. The identification of the latter two leads to a distortion of the forms and content of folk art, weakens its connection with folk traditions. Professional art is the result of special training and individual creativity of artists, folk art expresses collective traditions and cultural heritage, and amateur art represents individual and informal artistic creativity. The materials of this study are intended for a wide range of readers, they can be interesting and used by scientists for scientific purposes, teaching staff in the educational process, state and municipal employees of relevant ministries and departments, public organizations, experts and analysts. As a suggestion for this study, it should be noted that it is necessary to highlight the structural elements of the article and designate them with appropriate headings. There are references to sources in square brackets in the text, it is not entirely clear which source they correspond to in the bibliographic list, therefore in this case it is necessary to design them uniformly throughout the text and in accordance with the requirements of the current GOST bibliographic descriptions. The reference to normative legal acts should not be framed in square brackets, it is enough to mention these sources in the text itself. I would also like to draw attention to the very large volume of the bibliographic list (60 sources), in relation to the article, the bibliographic list should be revised as far as possible towards its reduction. These shortcomings do not reduce the high scientific significance of the study itself, however, these shortcomings must be promptly eliminated, and the article is recommended to be returned for revision.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "Crafts and crafts of Ugra: problems of terminological interpretation" to the journal Sociodynamics, in which a study of the folk culture of the peoples of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug and problems of interpretation of definitions and terms was conducted. The author proceeds in the study of this issue from the fact that there are differences in the interpretation of the concepts used – "folk crafts", "folk art", "decorative and applied art". As the author notes, the essence of folk art in both everyday and scientific discourse often turns out to be replaced by decorative and applied, which causes confusion among art theorists and practitioners. The relevance of the research is determined by the increasing scale of scientific works devoted to the methodological aspects of the terminology of contemporary art. The methodological basis was formed by an integrated approach, including general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as terminological and socio-cultural analysis. The theoretical basis of the research is the works of such art historians as M.A. Nekrasova, V.B. Koshaev, A.S. Maksyashin, N.N. Fedorova, T.A. Moldanova, etc. The purpose of the work is to determine the conceptual apparatus: "folk crafts", "folk art", "decorative and applied art". Based on the analysis of the scientific elaboration of the problem, the author concludes that there are a sufficient number of scientific papers covering both the Problems of the terminological plan and the peculiarities of the samples of folk culture of the Siberian peoples. A detailed comprehensive coverage of this issue constitutes the scientific novelty of the study. The author refers to the meaning of the term "folk art crafts" in Federal Law No. 7-FZ "On Folk Art Crafts". The federal legislation is defined by the author as an authoritative source that establishes the legal basis for the maintenance and development of folk art crafts, and also defines other concepts such as handicrafts, a standard sample of folk art crafts, a master of folk art crafts. Since 2020, in connection with the adoption of the law of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Ugra "On creative industries in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Ugra", folk arts and crafts of Ugra began to be considered as a direction in the creative economy and placed on a par with the fashion industry and decorative arts. The author defines the boundaries of the terms "folk art" as an activity for the creation of artistic products in accordance with folk traditions and "traditional art", which includes other areas: choreographic, instrumental, vocal, folklore. As the author explains, traditional culture is defined through the type of social translation – reproduction of tested samples. Folk culture is formed by an ethnogenetic community united by ethnic identity. Another problem of the theoretical provisions on contemporary art, the author defines the ambiguity of the interpretation of the term "decorative and applied art". Based on the bibliographic analysis, the author concludes that some researchers identify decorative art with folk art, due to the fact that decorative and applied art combines the properties of folk, confessional, secular, avant-garde creativity. However, the author of the article himself emphasizes that decorative and applied art, like folk art, has a complex internal morphological structure and represents one of the types of artistic creativity based on the artistic and imaginative thinking of the author. In conclusion, the author presents the conclusions of the study, including all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that both methodological cultural aspects and the study of individual ethnic groups, traditions, customs and cultural heritage objects that form their cultural identity are of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The bibliographic list of the research consists of 49 sources, including foreign ones, which is sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the studied problem. The author fulfilled his goal, received certain scientific results that allowed him to summarize the material. It should be noted that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication.