Library
|
Your profile |
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:
Nesterova S.V.
Inclusion of the institution of ensuring protection of the participants of an armed conflict into the modern international legal system
// International Law and International Organizations.
2016. № 2.
P. 180-199.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=67876
Nesterova S.V. Inclusion of the institution of ensuring protection of the participants of an armed conflict into the modern international legal systemAbstract: The subject of this research is the institution of ensuring protection of the participants of an armed conflict as a generally recognized institution of modern international law. In the conditions of the established international legal prohibition of war and prevention of threat of force or its application, the institution of ensuring protection of the participants of an armed conflict act as the protector of legal security of private parties during an open armed conflict. As soon as an armed conflict has emerged, the modern international law provides legal protection of all involved private parties through the institution of ensuring protection of the participants of an armed conflict. The author makes the following conclusions: according to the objective indexes of its existence, the institution of protected individuals, as it subjectively demonstrates itself within the framework of international humanitarian law, carries a character that is integral in its form and complete in its nature. The general concept here consists in presentation of a complex of subjective rights (on protection by international law) as a response to the demand for obedience to the norms of international humanitarian law. As in any other branch of law, incompliance with set responsibilities activates legal responsibility of the corresponding figures. The parameters of rights of the subjects of the protected group are justified by the right to humane treatment; respect, honor, and dignity; defense and aid; protection. Keywords: Participant of an armed conflict, Supremacy of law, UN Millennium Declaration, Protection of human rights, UN Charter, Armed conflict, Right to life, Protected individuals, Modern world order, International normative system
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Savryga K.P. Pravomernost' tselevykh ubiystv v mezhdunarodnom prave: mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo i prava cheloveka. // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 6. - C. 826 - 839. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.6.15525.
2. Zverev P.G. Problemy vzaimodeystviya mezhdunarodnoy zashchity prav cheloveka i mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava vo vremya vooruzhennykh konfliktov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2015. - 4. - C. 1 - 22. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2015.4.16552. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_16552.html. 3. Savryga K.P. Pravomernost' tselevykh ubiystv v mezhdunarodnom prave: mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo i prava cheloveka. // Pravo i politika. - 2015. - 6. - C. 826 - 839. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.6.15525. 4. Aleshin V.V. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo vooruzhennykh konfliktov. M., 2007. S. 200. 5. Al'ma Bachchino-Astrada. Prava i obyazannosti meditsinskogo personala v vooruzhennykh konfliktakh. M., 1995. S. 29. 6. Nakhlik S.E.. Kratkiy ocherk mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava. M., S. 29. 7. Kotlyarov I.I. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. M., 2009. S. 74-76; Katazhin N. Pravovye aspekty zashchity detey v vooruzhennykh konfliktakh//Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2007. № 4. S. 217. 8. Pustogarov V.V. Problemy mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava// Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1997. № 9. S. 74-76. 9. Levie H.S. Protection of War Victims, Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. N.Y., 1979. Vol. IV. P. 135. 10. Katazhin N. pravovye aspekty zashchity detey v vooruzhennykh konfliktakh//Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2007. № 4. S. 217. 11. Krill' F. Zashchita ob'ektov v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom prave/ Sbornik statey i dokumentov. M., 1999. S. 108. 12. Singer S. Deti i voyna/ Sbornik statey. M., 1995, S. 44 13. Zhenevskaya konventsiya ot 12 avgusta 1949 g./O zashchite grazhdanskogo naseleniya vo vremya voyny, st.30, 42, 43. 14. Artsibasov I.N., Egorov S.A. Vooruzhennyy konflikt: pravo, politika, diplomatiya. M., 1989. S. 248. 15. Dopolnitel'nyy protokol I k Zhenevskim konventsiyam ot 12 avgusta 1949 g., kasayushchiysya zashchity zhertv mezhdunarodnykh vooruzhennykh konfliktov. St. 58. 16. Batyr' V.A. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. M., 2011. S. 319-329. 17. Furkalo V.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya zashchita grazhdanskogo naseleniya v usloviyakh vooruzhennykh konfliktov. Kiev, 1986. S. 44. 18. Kal'skhoven F. Ogranicheniya metodov i sredstv vedeniya voyny. M., 1999. S. 51. 19. Voeeno-teoreticheskiy zhurnal «Voennaya mysl'» № 4//Oruzhie neletal'nogo deystviya na osnove izlucheniy: fizicheskie osobennosti i perspektivy primeneniya. M., 2013. S. 31. 20. Gasser Kh.P. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. M., 1995. S.34; Pikte Zh. Razvitie i printsipy mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava. M., 1993. S. 50. 21. Lukasheva E.A. /Prava cheloveka. M., 2001. S. 547. 22. Egorov S.A. Aktual'nye problemy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov: Uchebnoe posobie. M., 2000. S. 25. 23. Jackson S.W. The rule of low among nations// The rule of low. Dallas. 1961. P. 71-86. 24. Kalamkaryan R.A. Mezhdunarodnyy sud v miroporyadke na osnove gospodstva prava. M., 2012. 25. Dicey A.V. Introduction to the study of the low constitution. London,1960; Renouf A. Rule of Law in international affairs//Australian Foreign Affairs Record.1975. July. P.345-405. 26. Ivanov I.S. Verkhovenstvo prava v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh//Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2000. № 12. S. 62-67. 27. Kalamkaryan R.A. Gospodstvo prava Rule of Law v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. M., 2004. |