Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Pedagogy and education
Reference:

Karpov A.O. Cognitive Generative Principles of Research Education in Terms of the Formation of the Knowledge-Based Society

Abstract: In his research article Karpov provides the results of studying the new model of science education that ensures the formation of the knowledge-based society. The main cognitive tool of this education model is the scientific research and the main pedagogical objective is raising young people capable of creating new knowledge. The research education becomes the mission of not only a special research university but also a special 'scientific school'. The need for the continuous cognitive development of a researcher as a person requires development of general epistemological and didactical positions at universities and schools. The purpose of the present article is to analyze the concept of the transformative education programme, based on the results of such analysis formulate and prove cognitive generative principles of the research education, define types of transformative frameworks of education and determine the relation between education and truth. Researcher's attitude to truth is not only ethical but also professional basis for research knowledge. The methodological basis of the research involves interdisciplinary synthesis of contextual activity pedagogy, cognitive psychology, epistemology and education ontology. Karpov shows the role of the research education in the socio-cultural and economic development of the knowledge-based society as well as the importance of research competencies on the modern labour market. The author also offers a definition of generative didactics as the theory of research education. In addition, Karpov views the idea of knowledge transformation in terms of research education epistemology. He also describes the concept of the transformative academic programme that is capable of rebuilding its own structure and the schemes of cognitive activity taking into account generative assessment of a student. According to the researcher, the basic cognitive generative principles include cognitive flexibility, cognitive generativity and socio-cultural interactions. Karpov also analyzes transformative education frameworks associated with these principles including didactical, epistemological and ontological (environmental) concepts. The author underlines that in order to arrange for the research education it is very important to look at research as the way to find the truth. 

Keywords:

education, didactics, research, cognition, society, knowledge, transformation, generativity, teaching, context

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Mikeshina L.A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskie glavy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002. 624 s.
2. Cuypers S.E. Critical Thinking, Autonomy and Practical Reason // Journal of Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. Vol. 38, No 1. P. 75-90.
3. Karpov A.O. Issledovatel'skoe obrazovanie: klyuchevye kontsepty // Pedagogika. M., 2011. ¹ 3. S. 20-30.
4. Gumbol'dt V. fon. O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskikh yazykov i ego vliyanii na dukhov-noe razvitie chelovechestva // Gumbol'dt V. fon. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu / Per. s nem. G.V. Ramishvili. M.: OAO IG «Progress». S. 35-301.
5. Doll W.E. A Post-modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York and London: Teacher College Press, Columbia University, 1993. 215 r.
6. English A. Transformation and Education: the Voice of the Learner in Peters’ Concept of Teaching // Journal of Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2009. Vol. 43, ¹ 1. P. 75-95.
7. Bruner Dzh. Psikhologiya poznaniya. Za predelami neposredstvennoi informatsii. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Progress», 1977. 412 c.
8. Burd'e P. Universitetskaya doksa i tvorchestvo: protiv skholasticheskikh delenii / Per. s frants. N.A. Shmatko. M.: Socio-Logos, 1996. S. 8-31.
9. Bruner Dzh. Kul'tura obrazovaniya / Per. s angl. L.V. Trubitsynoi, A.V. Solov'eva. M.: Prosveshchenie, 2006. 223 s.
10. Bekon F. O dostoinstve i priumnozhenii nauk. // Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: «Mysl'», 1977. S. 81-522.
11. Bruner J.S. Science education and teachers: a Karplus Lecture // Bruner J.S. In Search of Peda-gogy.The selected works of Jerome S. Bruner. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Vol. II. P. 150-159.
12. Developing Foresight for the Development of Higher Education/Research Relations in the Perspective of the European Research Area (ERA) / by Prof. Etienna Bourgeois // Final Report of the Strata-Etan Expert Group. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Re-search. Unit RTD-K.2. 2002. 82 r.
13. The University’s Response to the Covernment’s White Paper, The Future of Higher Education // Oxford University Gazette. Oxford, 2003. ¹ 4660. URL: www.ox.ac.uk/gazette/2002-3/supps/1_4660.htm (data obrashcheniya: 29.09.2011).
14. Karpov A. Science schools – New educational reality // International Network of Philosophers of Education 9-th Biennial Conference: Voices of Philosophy of Education. Madrid, 4–7 Au-gust, 2004. Proceedings. Madrid: Universidad complutense, 2004. P. 351.
15. Yaspers K. Ideya universiteta / Per. s nem. T.V. Tyagunovoi (po izdaniyu: Jaspers K. Die Idee der Universität. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1980. 132 s.). Minsk: BGU, 2006. 159 s.
16. Simons M. «Education Through Research» at European Universities: Notes on the Orientation of Academic Research // Journal of Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 2006. Vol. 40. No 1. P. 31-50.
17. Karpov A.O. Teoriya issledovatel'skogo obucheniya i ee stanovlenie // Shkol'nye tekhno-logii, Narodnoe obrazovanie. M., 2015. ¹ 2. S. 40-54.
18. Drucker P.F. The New Society. The Anatomy of Industrial Order. N.Y.: Harper, 2010. 362 r.
19. Druker P.F. Landmarks of Tomorrow. A Report on the New «Post-Modern» World. N.Y.: Har-per, 1996. 270 r.
20. Machlup F. The Production and Distributation of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972. 416 p.
21. Drucker P.F. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to our Changing Society. London: Heine-mann, 1970. 420 r.
22. Hammershoj L.G. Creativity as a Question of Bildung // Journal of Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2009. Vol. 43, ¹ 4. P. 545-557.
23. Whinch C. Developing Critical Rationality as a Pedagogical Aim // Journal of Philosophy Edu-cation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. Vol. 38, No 3. P. 467-484.
24. Magna Charta Universitatum. URL: http://www.magna-charta.org/ (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2011 g.).
25. Communique. 2009 World Conference on Higher Education: The New Dynamics of Hi-gher Education and Research For Sosietal Change and Development. Paris: UNESCO, 2009. 10 r.
26. The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge / Communication from the Commis-sion. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2003. 23 r.
27. Thursby J., Kemp S. Growth and Productive Efficiency in University Intellectual Prorerty Li-censing // Research Policy, 2002. ¹ 1. R. 109-124.
28. Delivering on The Modernisation Agenda for Universities: Education, Research and Innovation / Communication from the Commission to the Counsil and the European Parlament. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2006. 16 r.
29. Tomlinson J. Policy and Governanse // Tomorrow’s Schools – Towards Integrity / Edited by Chris Watkins, Caroline Lodge and Ron Best. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2000. R. 153-166.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.