Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V., Truntsevskiy Yu.V. Administrative prejudice as a way of decriminalization of criminal offences and distinction between criminal and administrative offences

Abstract: The article focuses on the problems of legal and organizational measures of decriminalization of crimes. The authors carry out the theoretical and legal analysis of this problem. Recently the scientific interest to the institution of administrative issue preclusion in criminal and administrative-tortious law has renewed. There are both supporters and opponents of this institution. The analysis of the existing criminal legislation shows that administrative issue preclusion is developing and it is reflected in corpora delicti formulated in the Special part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. The authors conclude that administrative issue preclusion is a means of decriminalization of some formulations of economic crimes by their incorporation into the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offences. It is important to change the ideological vector from the assessment of administrative issue preclusion as a purely punitive institution to the understanding of it as a means of decriminalization of criminal offences in economic activities. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The authors use the general philosophical and theoretical  methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal logical), as well as the methods used in the special sociological research (the statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). On the base of the research the authors conclude that at present in order to ensure law and order in the economic sphere it is necessary to improve the forms and methods of administrative-legal influence on state and private sectors of Russian economy. The authors come to the conclusion about the need to reduce the number of types of sanctions and to increase the incentive measures in criminal and administrative and tort law. 


Keywords:

decriminalization, crime, composition, distinction, coercion, crime, issue preclusion, police, administrative, court


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Kuznetsova N.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy.-M.: izd-vo MGU, 2007.-S.36.
2. Martsev A.I. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya V sb.: Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava.-Omsk, 2010.-S. 3-10.
3. Kolosova V.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya kak sredstvo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniya i sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. ¹ 5 (1). S. 246-254.
4. Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (gosudarstvennoe i material'no-pravovoe issledovanie).-Voronezh: izd-vo VGU, 1970.-S. 158.
5. Gogin A.A. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie Federal'nogo zakona «O reklame» // Pravo i politika. 2004. ¹ 5. S. 27 – 32.
6. Borzenkov G.N. Tendentsii i perspektivy ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v XXI veke (opyt sravnitel'nogo vremennogo analiza) // Ugolovnoe pravo v XXI veke. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. M., 2002. S. 114.
7. Marchuk V.V. Novyy KoAP Respubliki Belarus' i kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy, obuslovlennykh administrativnoy preyuditsiey. http: // www. law.bsu.by / pub / 11 / Marchuk_13 pdf.
8. Ragulin A.V. Proekty reformirovaniya Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF i Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: analiz soderzhaniya i predlozheniya po sovershenstvovaniyu // Evrozyuzh. 2009. ¹8.
9. Radchenko V.I. Khorosho sidim // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2008. ¹ 4741.
10. Shergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M., 2005. S. 299.
11. Targabaev A.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v ugolovnom prave // Pravovedenie. 1992. ¹ 2. S. 65.
12. Ustinova T.D. Rasshirenie ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe predprinimatel'stvo // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2003. ¹ 5. S. 102.
13. Khavronyuk N.I. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya i institutt retsidiva s tochki zreniya evropeyskikh stran // http: // www. zakon.kz/190761 – administrativnaja – prejudicija –i. html.
14. Yamasheva G.V. K voprosu o vosstanovlenii instituta administrativnoy preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakone // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. ¹ 10. S. 69.
15. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
16. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti v rossiyskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 10. - C. 75 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
17. Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Tregubova E.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na provedenie mirnykh sobraniy, mitingov, demonstratsiy, shestviy i piketirovaniya i administrativnaya otvetstvennost' kak sredstvo ego obespecheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 82 - 105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.8.9955. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9955.html