The problem of the U.S. National Missile Defense placement in Europe in the context of relations Russia-NATO relations


	Conflict Studies / nota bene Reference: Kalachev D.N. The problem of the U.S. National Missile Defense placement in Europe in the context of relations Russia-NATO relations // Conflict Studies / nota bene. 2015. № 3. P. 335-343. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66900 Kalachev D.N. The problem of the U.S. National Missile Defense placement in Europe in the context of relations Russia-NATO relations Abstract: The article analyzes the history and current state of the US national missile defense system deployment in Europe in the context of the evolution of Russia - NATO relations. To prove the thesis of the inefficiency of placement of the defense complex for the purposes of protection against Iranian missiles, the author pays special attention to the analysis of its technical capabilities. The methodological basis of the study consists of the systemic, structural-functional, comparative-historical, comparative-political, geo-political, cultural and civilizational approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation. The NMD deployment project in Eastern Europe is incapable of enhancing the defensive capabilities of Europe, nor the U.S., nor Russia. The partnership between the two parties can be continued only on the basis of equality, within the framework of international law on the basis of legally binding intergovernmental agreements. Keywords: interests, democracy, color revolutions, hybrid war, state, USA, society, politics, OTAN, security This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article References 1. Putin: argumenty za razmeshchenie sistemy PRO v Evrope nesostoyatel'ny// RIA Novosti. – 2007. – 1 fevr.:URL: http://www.rian.ru/world/20070201/60044160.html 2. Medvedev D.A. Poslanie Federal'nomu Sobraniyu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Prezident Rossii. Ofitsial'nyy sayt. – 2008. – 5 noya.: URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/appears/2008/11/05/1349_type63372type63374type63381type82634_208749.shtml 3. Kupriyanov A. Raketnyy zanaves // Lenta.ru (Sayt), 1 sentyabrya 2014. URL: http://lenta.ru/articles/2014/09/01/euromissiles/ 4. Kulagin V.M. Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost': uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov. – M.: Aspekt Press. – 2007. 5. Dvorkin V., L'yuis Dzh., Podvig P., Postol T. PRO yabloko razdora // Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie. – 2007. – 28 sent. URL: http://nvo.ng.ru/forces/2007-09-28/1_pro.html 6. Gorovoy V. Dialog Rossii i SShA po PRO otlozhen // «Izvestiya» (Sayt), 30 maya 2014. URL: http://izvestia.ru/news/571738 7. Vasil'ev V.A. Vozmozhnye tseli dlya tret'ego pozitsionnogo rayona // Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie. – 2008. – 21 marta.: URL: http://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2008-03-21/1_pro.html 8. Putin V.V. Vystuplenie i diskussiya na Myunkhenskoy konferentsii po voprosam politiki bezopasnosti 10 fevralya 2007 goda, Myunkhen.: URL: http://www.kreml.org/opinions/141778985. 9. Razvedka SShA: U Irana net urana dlya yadernoy bomby // rg.ru. – 2008. – 11 marta.: http://www.rg.ru/2009/03/11/iran-anons.html 10. Rossiysko-amerikanskie otnosheniya v oblasti sokrashcheniya yadernykh vooruzheniy: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy / Pod red. A.S. D'yakova, izdanie tsentra po izucheniyu problem razoruzheniya, energetiki i ekologii pri MFTI, Dolgoprudnyy. – 2001. 11. Sistema protivoraketnoy oborony SShA. Spravka // RIA Novosti. – 2007. – 2 mar.: http://www.rian.ru/spravka/20070302/61470953.html 12. Solov'ev V. SShA forsiruyut vykhod iz dogovora po PRO // Nezavisimaya gazeta. – 2001. – 13 iyulya. URL: http://www.ng.ru/politics/2001-07-13/1_usa.html 13. Sorokina N. Pol'skiy skhod // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2008. – 21 avg. – № 4733 14. Spravochnik NATO. Bryussel': NATO. – 2001. 15. Utkin A.I. Amerikanskaya imperiya. – M.: Eksmo. – 2003 16. Shmygin A. Stavka na «blestyashchie kameshki i glazki» //Krasnaya zvezda.-2001. – 16 iyunya.: URL: http://www.redstar.ru/2001/06/16_06/3_05.html 17. Bucharest Summit Declaration. Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008. – 2008. – 3 Apr.: URL: http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2008/p08-049e.html 18. Final communiqué. Meeting of the North Atlantic Council at the level of Foreign Ministers held at NATO Headquarters. – Brussels. – 2008. – 3 Dec.: URL: http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2008/p08-153e.html 19. The Proposed US Missile Defense in Europe: Technological Issues Relevant to Policy American Association for the Advancement of Science Washington, DC August 28, 2007 http://cstsp.aaas.org/files/BriefOnEastEuropeMissileDefense.PDF. 20. Manoylo A.V. Geopoliticheskaya kartina sovremennogo mira. //Natsional'naya bezopasnost'/nota bene.-2013.-№5. – S. 149-155. 21. Manoylo A.V. Tsvetnye revolyutsii i problemy demontazha politicheskikh rezhimov v menyayushchemsya mire. / Elektronnyy zhurnal «Vestnik MGOU» / www.evestnik-mgou.ru, № 2, s. 1-14. 22. Manoylo A.V. Iran i SShA: slozhnaya igra s mnogovariantnym rezul'tatom. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2012. № 2. S. 88-95. 23. Filippov V.R. Dogovornaya federatsiya i eksklyuzivnaya etnichnost' // Federalizm. 2002. № 4. S. 185-216. 24. Budaev A.V. Prisutstvie Rossii v Brazilii: "myagkaya sila" v dvustoronnikh otnosheniyakh. // Latinskaya Amerika. 2013. № 5. S. 61-65. 25. Codagnone S., Filippov V. Equity, exit end national identity in a multinational federation: the “multi-cultural constitutional patriotism” project in Russia. // Journal of ethnic and migration studies. 2000. V. 26. № 2. P. 263-288. 26. Karyakin V.V. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskoy politicheskoy nauki i puti ikh resheniya // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 3. - C. 13 - 22. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.3.16126. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_16126.html 27. Manoylo A.V. Ubit' kotenka, ili tekhnologii konfliktnoy mobilizatsii v sotsial'nykh setyakh // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 3. - C. 1 - 12. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.3.15973. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_15973.html 28. Karpovich O.G. Demokraticheskie instituty i ikh rol' v sisteme gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 3. - C. 387 - 394. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.3.14781. 29. Nasonkin V.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody k izucheniyu sistemy obrazovaniya v sovremennom obshchestve. // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1213 - 1220. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.10166. 30. Kalachev D.N. Osnovnye napravleniya sotrudnichestva Rossii i NATO // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 1. - C. 36 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.1.13712. 31. Fedyakin I.V. Megapolisy kak sub'ekty politiki: istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 88 - 93. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10165. 32. A.G. Sokolov Krizisnyy diskurs «Edinoy Rossii» i KPRF: 33. sravnitel'nyy analiz // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2013. - 2. - C. 217 - 226. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.02.2. 34. Grudtsyna L.Yu., Petrov S.M. Vlast' i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii: vzaimodeystvie i protivo- 35. stoyanie // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 19 - 29. 36. T. P. Petrova Diplomaticheskie otnosheniya 37. mezhdu Rossiey i Peru: 38. sovremennoe sostoyanie i dinamika razvitiya // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 46 - 53. 39. S. A. Kostin Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy vzaimodeystviya 40. Rossii i NATO v obespechenii kollektivnoy 41. bezopasnosti v Evrope // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 4. - C. 101 - 106.

Journals

Books

Kalachev D.N. The problem of the U.S. National Missile Defense placement in Europe in the context of relations Russia-NATO relations