Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Yakovleva E.L. Secret as the Existential Nothingness or Existence of Nothing

Abstract: The subject of the research is the component of the subjective life of the person presented in the form of the hidden. The complexity of the analysis is due to the fact that a secret as something that exists in everyone's life is deliberately hidden: a secret can be a powerful source for personality development but at the same time be hidden and carefully controlled. Only an individual himself can perform 'pro-of-knowledge' and partially or fully withdraw his secrets from the subjective sphere into the objective sphere where they stop being secrets. He can also keep a secret to/in himself. According to the author, even partial disclosure of the hidden still leaves the room for exploration and interpretation from the point of view of another subjectivity. Based on the results of the analysis, the author creates a classification of the hidden as the existential nothingness (secret-in-itself), existence of nothing (secret-out-of-itself) and the transition between them (secret-from-itself). The problem is viewed by the author in the form of a narrative description using dialectical and phenomenological methods and the principle of intentional analysis that helps to reveal partiular features of this psychic phenomenon. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the researcher analyzes a complex psychic phenomenon and offers a classification of different types of this phenomenon in terms of individual existence.  Terms and findings of the research can be used when working with people as well as interpreting various kinds of texts and writing psychological profiles. 


Keywords:

incomprehensible, nothingness, non-existence, secret, the hidden, existential nothingness / secret-in-itself, secret-from-itself, existence of nothing / secret-out-of-itself, il y a, posture, pro-of-knowledge, original


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Sartr Zh.-P.Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. M.: AST, 2009. 925 s.
2. Kolyadko V.I. Predislovie// Zh.-P. Sartr. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. M.: AST, 2009. S. 5-28.
3. Frank S.L. Nepostizhimoe. Ontologicheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu religii //S. Frank. Sochineniya. M.: Pravda, 1990. 608 s.
4. Levinas E. Izbrannoe: total'nost' i beskonechnoe. M.-SPb.: TsGNII INION RAN, 2000. 409 s.
5. Melikh Yu. B. Lichnost', lik, lik drugogo: opyt neobychnogo istoriko-filosofskogo sopostavleniya (Levinas, Kirkegor, Florenskiy, Karsavin) / Sushchnost' i Slovo. Sbornik nauchnykh statey k yubileyu professora N.V. Motroshilovoy. M.: Fenomenologiya–Germenevtika. 2009. S. 551-571.
6. Khaydegger M. Vopros o tekhnike// M. Khaydegger. Vremya i bytie. M., 1993. S.221-238.
7. Markov B.V. Znaki bytiya. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 562 s.
8. D.L. Rodzinskiy Rol' svobody i znaniy
9. v dostizhenii chelovekom sostoyaniya
10. nebytiystvennogo sovershenstva. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 11. - C. 36 - 42.
11. Shugurov M.V. Sootnoshenie smysla i nebytiya v antropologicheskoy ontogermenevtike: kul'turo-filosofskie proektsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1353 - 1367. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.10.9473.
12. Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2013. - 5. - C. 1 - 102. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.5.284. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html