Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Lyubimova T.B. We ourselves and the fact

Abstract: Problem of authorship in art is a modern problem which had not existed in traditional culture. An author often hides behind own characters. This happens due to the motivation reasons of creativity (which can be understood on a psychological level of analysis) when an emotional move or event in the author's fate becomes the turning point for revealing own Self or some internal divine spirit. Therefore, this problem can be regarded on the metaphysical level as well. Metaphysical perspective on the works by Alexander Pushkin, Nikolai Gogol, William Shakespeare takes us to some new meanings of art and authorship. The examples from other fields of art: cinema, music – provide additional arguments in the article. The suggested method of research – quasi artistic construction of the study itself. In this case an interconnection between semantic turning points occurs in the course of the text.The main conclusions of the paper are: that the authorship of a work of art has a complex structure, which creates a certain amount, which requires constant change of view, referring to topics indirectly related to the main topic of research. This particular aspect of the consideration of authorship is a new philosophy and aesthetics. The problem of authorship is a specifically modern problem of culture


Keywords:

a work of art, duality, factuality, genius, public space, stage, characters, , Author, Russian culture, language passion


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Yaspers K. Filosofiya Kniga tret'ya. Metafizika. M., 2014.
2. Shekspir U. Sobr. soch. v 2 t. T. I. Na osnove izdaniy F. A. Brokgauza i I. A. Efrona, na russkom i angliyskom yazykakh. Bez ukazaniya vremeni i mesta izdaniya.
3. Platon. Sobr. Soch. v 4 t. T. 2. M., 1993.
4. Kant I. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. M., 1994.
5. Novalis. Fragmenty. «Dukh privodit vechnoe dokazatel'stvo samogo sebya» SPb., 2014.
6. Maakovel'skiy. A. O. Dosokratiki. M., 1999
7. Ibn-Arabi. Traktat o Edinstve. Perevod abdul-Hâdi (1911). L'Identité suprême dans l’ésotérisme musulman». http://esprit-universel.over-blog.com/Publié par Abdoullatif (Mars 2013).
8. Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. y 4 t. T.4. M., 1984.
9. Gogol' N. V. Sobr. soch. v 6-ti t. T. IV. M., 1937. S.160-162.
10. Coomaraswamy. Ananda K. Hindouisme et bouddhisme. Traduit de l.anglais par René Allar et Pierre Ponsoye. Paris. 1943.