|
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:
Smirnova E.S.
The universal norms of UN aimed at resolving the problems
associated with the forming of the citizenship institution:
the stages of a 50-year cooperation of nations
// International Law and International Organizations.
2015. ¹ 1.
P. 15-25.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65947
Smirnova E.S. The universal norms of UN aimed at resolving the problems
associated with the forming of the citizenship institution:
the stages of a 50-year cooperation of nations
Abstract:
This article reviews the problems associated with development of the UN norms that
address the issues of forming a citizenship institution in its modern concept. It examines the questions
of correlation between the universal norms of UN and the national legislation of countries in
the area of regulating a person’s right to citizenship and all its aspects. The author notes that the
international conventions carry a more or less recommending character in this regard. Various conventions
developed within UN and pertaining to the status of the citizens, foreigners, and stateless
persons are being analyzed. The method of studying the correlation of the norms of international
conventions in the area of human rights and national law allows conducting a complex review of
the problems of collaboration of the two branches of law. As a conclusion, the author asserts the
significance of not only particular UN conventions in the sphere of the citizenship institution, but
also the entirety of the international legal documents of this universal organization in the area of
human rights.
Keywords:
State, population, citizenship, choice of citizenship, freedom, security, regionalism, cooperation, equality.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Aksenov A.B. Sovremennye tendentsii mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regulirovaniya voprosov grazhdanstva v svyazi s pravopreemstvom gosudarstv. M.: RAP, 2011.
2. Alebastrova T.A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. M., 2001.
3. Brounli Ya. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Kniga vtoraya.M.,1977.
4. Brutents K.K. O restrukturizatsii sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy//Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.2009.¹12.
5. Dmitrieva G.K. Moral' i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M.: 1991.
6. Konyukhova I.A. Mezhdunarodnoe i konstitutsionnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika vzaimodeystviya. M.2006.
7. Lukashuk I.I. Konstitutsii gosudarstv i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M.,1998.
8. Mezhdunarodnye dokumenty o pravakh cheloveka. Sbornik dokumentov. 2-e izd. /Sost. Kartashkin V.A., Lukashova E.A. M., 2002.
9. Peregudov S.P., Semenenko I.S. Korporativnoe grazhdanstvo: kontseptsii, mirovaya praktika i rossiyskie realii. M.: Progress traditsii. 2008.
10. Sbornik mezhdunarodnykh dokumentov v otnoshenii bezhentsev. Zheneva, 1990.
11. Smirnova E.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy grazhdanstva stran SNG i Baltii v svete evropeyskogo opyta. M: Nota Bene, 1999, 1–e izd.; M: Nota Bene, 2001, 2– e izd.; Tver' –SFK ofis, 2012, 3–e izd.
12. Fan I.B. Ot geroya do statista: metamorfozy zapadnoevropeyskogo grazhdanina. Ekaterinburg, 2006. IFiP. UR. RAN.
13. Khabermas Yu. Esse k Konstitutsii Evropy. M.: Ves' mir, 2013.
14. Chernichenko S.V. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. T.1. M., 1999.
15. Anheir H., Glasius M. Kaldor M.Global Civil Society in an Era o Regressive Globalization//Global Civil Society 2003.Oxford,2003.r.4.
16. Cohen S. The resilienceof the state: Democracy and the challenges of globalization/Transl.from the Fr.by Derrick J. Boudler (Col.)L, Rienner, 2006. R.65.
17. Held D. Between State and Civil Society :Citizenship // Citizenship, edited by G. Andrews. London: Lawrence and Wishart , 1991. R.21.
18. Mavrommatis, Palestine Concessions Case, 1924, P.C.I.J. Reports, Ser. A.P.2,12.
19. Roeder Ph. G. Where nation statescme from: Institutional in the age of nationalism. Princeton, 2007.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
