Library
|
Your profile |
Philology: scientific researches
Reference:
Rostovtseva, Yu. A.
Mikhail Kheraskov’s ‘Numa Pompilius’ and ‘Nakaz (Instruction) of Catherine the Great’: Literary Utopia in Terms of
Historical Mythology
// Philology: scientific researches.
2014. ¹ 4.
P. 305-314.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65770
Rostovtseva, Yu. A. Mikhail Kheraskov’s ‘Numa Pompilius’ and ‘Nakaz (Instruction) of Catherine the Great’: Literary Utopia in Terms of Historical MythologyAbstract: The research is focused on Mikhail Kheraskov’s ‘Numa Pompilius or the Flourishing Rome’ (1768). The writing is viewed in terms of the legislative policy carried out by Catherine the Great. The Established Commission for creating the project of the New Establishment has become a general topic in the history of novel. Many Russian researchers of the Russian literature of the 18th century underline that (V. Sipovsky, G. Gukovsky and A. Zapadov) as well as foreign Slavicist researchers (S. Bayer). The fact that the writing was devoted to the activity performed by the Commission in 1766 – 1767 could be explained not only by the times when the work was written and ideological orientation of Mikhail Kheraskov (according to L. Kulakova) but also the peculiar genre of the novel (according to G. Gukovsky). However, despite these traditional approaches, the influence of the main document of the legislative campaign, ‘The Great Nakaz of the Empress’ has never been an individual subject of research. Analysis of the novel in term of Catherine’s Nakaz (1767) gave an opportunity to reconsider established scientific views on the ideological and genre peculiarities of the novel. This approach has allowed to interpret Kheraskov’s writing as a panegyric to Catherine’s legislative initiatives and to understand the role of Kheraskov’s ‘Huma Pompilius’ in the process of creating the state mythology of the period of Enlightened absolutism. Keywords: Enlightened absolutism, Mikhail Kheraskov, Catherine the Great, New Establishment, legislative policy, ‘Instruction’, Big Commission, utopia, political novel, state myth.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Solov'ev S. M. Istoriya Rossii s drevneyshikh vremen. Kn. IV. T. XXVII. SPb., 1851-1879. 1178 stlb.
2. Sipovskiy V. V. Kheraskov / Russkiy biograficheskiy slovar' pod red. A.A. Polovtseva. T. XXV. SPb., 1901. C. 309-318. 3. Sipovskiy V. V. Ocherki iz istorii russkogo romana. T. I. Vyp. 1. (XVIII vek). SPb., 1909. 715 s. 4. Sipovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy slovesnosti (Istoriya literatury s epokhi Petra do Pushkina). Ch.II. SPb., 1908. 340 s. 5. Proskurina V. Peterburgskiy mif i politika monumentov: Petr Pervyy Ekaterine Vtoroy // NLO. ¹. 72. 2005. C. 103-132. 6. Sergeevich V. I. Otkuda neudachi Ekaterininskoy zakonodatel'noy komissii? // Vestnik Evropy. ¹ I. SPb., 1878. S. 188-264. 7. Pis'mo iz Saturna // Dnipropetrovs'kiy istoriko-arkheografichniy zbirnik. Vip. 3. Dnipropetrovs'k. 2009. S. 157-160. 8. Nezelenov A. I. Literaturnye napravleniya v Ekaterininskuyu epokhu. SPb., 1889. 395 s. 9. Nakaz eya imperatorskogo velichestva Ekateriny Vtoryya samoderzhitsy Vserossiyskiya, dannyy komissii o sochinenii Novogo ulozheniya. SPb.: Imperatorskaya Akademiya Nauk. 1770. 402 s. 10. Moryakov V. I. Russkoe prosvetitel'stvo vtoroy poloviny XVIII veka: iz istorii obshchestvenno-politicheskoy mysli Rossii. M., 1994. 216 s. 11. Mankheym K. Ideologiya i utopiya. M.: INION, 1992. 245 s. 12. Kalinin I. Slepota i prozrenie. Ritorika istorii Rossii i «Ritorika temporal'nosti» Polya de Mana // NLO. ¹ 59. 2003. S. 250-273. 13. Kulakova L. I. Kheraskov // Istoriya russkoy literatury. T. IV. Literatura XVIII veka. Ch. II. M.-L, 1947. C. 320-341. 14. Kalinin I. A. Russkaya literaturnaya utopiya XVIII-KhKh vv. : Problemy poetiki i filosofii zhanra : diss. kand. filol. nauk : 10.01.01. SPb., 2002. 247 s. 15. Imennoy ukaz «Ob uchrezhdenii v Moskve Komissii dlya sochineniya proekta novogo Ulozheniya i o vybore v onuyu deputatov // Tomsinov V.A. Zakonodatel'stvo imperatora Petra III: 1761– 1762 gody. Zakonodatel'stvo imperatritsy Ekateriny II: 1762-1782 gody. M.: Zertsalo, 2011. S. 68-92. 16. Ekaterina II. O velichii Rossii. M.: Direkt – Media, 2010. 96 s. 17. Zhivov V. M. Yazyk i kul'tura v Rossii XVIII veka. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1996. 590 s. 18. Egorov B. F. Rossiyskie utopii: Istoricheskiy putevoditel'. SPb., 2007. 414 s. 19. Gukovskiy G. A. Russkaya literatura XVIII veka. M.: Aspekt-Press. 1999. 452 s. 20. General-Prokurorskiy Nakaz pri Komissii o sostavlenii proekta novago Ulozheniya, po kotoromu i Marshalu postupat' // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii s 1649 goda. T. XVIII. SPb., 1890. S. 283-283. 21. Geller L., Nike M. Utopiya v Rossii. SPb.: Giperion, 2003. 310 s. 22. Brikner A. G. Illyustrirovannaya istoriya Ekateriny Vtoroy. M., 2007. 800 s. 23. Arkhangel'skiy A. S. Imperatritsa Ekaterina II v istorii russkoy literatury i obrazovaniya. Kazan', 1897. 91 s. 24. Artem'eva T. V. Sofiokraticheskie idealy i epistemologicheskie utopii Mikhaila Kheraskova // Filosofskiy vek. Al'manakh 12. Rossiyskaya utopiya. Ot ideal'nogo gosudarstva k sovershennomu obshchestvu. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy Letney shkoly po istorii idey 9-30 iyulya 2000 g. SPb., 2000. S. 13-47. 25. Artem'eva T. V. Ot slavnogo proshlogo k svetlomu budushchemu: Filosofiya istorii i utopiya v Rossii epokhi Prosveshcheniya. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2005. 496 s. 26. Andreev A. Yu. Rossiyskie universitety XVIII – pervoy poloviny XIX veka v kontekste universitetskoy istorii Evropy. M.: Znak. 2009. 165 s. 27. Encyclopedie ou Dictionnaire universel raisonne des sciences, des arts et des métiers, par une société de gens de letters, 1751–1772. Vol.12. Denis Diderot et Jean le Rond d`Alembert.Paris.1765. 965 p. 28. Baehr S. L. The Paradise Myth in Eighteenth-Century Russia. Utopian Patterns in Early Secular Russian Literuture and Culture. California: Stanford University Press, 1991. 308 p. 29. Stennik Yu. V. A. P.Sumarokov – kritik «Nakaza» Ekateriny II // XVIII vek. Sb. 24. 2006. S. 125-143. 30. Stennik Yu. V., Stepanov V. P. Literaturno-obshchestvennoe dvizhenie kontsa 1760-kh-1780-kh godov // Istoriya russkoy literatury v IV T. T. I. Drevnerusskaya literatura. Literatura XVIII veka. L.: Nauka. 1980. C. 620. 31. Torzhestvuyushchaya Minerva // Moskvityanin. Kn. 1. ¹ 19. M., 1850. S. 109-128. 32. Uortman R. S. Stsenarii vlasti. Mify i tseremonii rossiyskoy monarkhii. (Materialy i issledovaniya po istorii russkoy kul'tury. Vyp. VIII). T. I.Ot Petra Velikogo do smerti Nikolaya I. M.: OGI, 2002. 608 c. 33. Kheraskov M. M. Numa Pompiliy, ili protsvetayushchiy Rim. M., 1803. 178 s. 34. Kheraskov M. M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Vstup. stat'ya i podgotovka teksta i primechaniy A.V. Zapadova. M. – L.: Sovetskiy pisatel'. 1961. 127 s. 35. Shikman A. P. Deyateli otechestvennoy istorii. Biograficheskiy slovar' – spravochnik. [v 2-kh kn.] A – K. M.: AST – LTD, 1997. 448 s. |