Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Khrenov, N. A. The Project of Semiotics of Cinema Several Decades Later: Interpretation of Sergei Mikhailovich Eizenshtein’s Theoretical Heritage by Vyacheslav Vsevolodovich Ivanov

Abstract: The article is devoted to the semiotic interpretation of the theoretic heritage of a film director Sergey Eizenshtein by Vyacheslav Ivanov whose jubilee was celebrated this year. Sergey Eizenshtein foresaw the structural methodology that became so popular after the 60s. Vyacheslav Inavov has a wide range of academic interests. The present article is devoted only to his interest towards cinematograph, in particular, the theoretic heritage of a film director Sergey Eizenshtein. Vyacheslav Ivanov is interested in Eizenshtein because Vyacheslav Ivanov believes that Eizenshtein tended to see cinema as a language or, more specifically, a sign system. Vyacheslav Ivanov couldn’t have left it without attention because the formation of semiotic methodology is closely related to Eizenshtein in Russia. So it is quite natural that Vyacheslav Ivanov wanted to interpret the pre-history of semiotics, too. In cinematograph such pre-history is directly related to Sergey Eizenshtein. Trying to clarity the significance of Vyacheslav Ivanov’s research of Sergey Eizenshtein’s esthetics, the author of the present article also touches upon applying semiotic methodology to cinematograph as a sign system in general. For this purpose, the author describes the atmosphere of those times when Russian theorists of cinematograph were interested in semiotics. However, interest towards structuralism and semiotics started to fade away decades later when new approaches related to pot-structuralism and post-modernism were introduced by the humanities. Some theorists started to speak against semiotic approaches and suggested to apply philosophical and, in particular, phenomenological approach to studying cinematographic art. These approaches are appropriate and efficient, however, they do not replace the semiotic approach. The author of the article shows that such attempts to refuse from the semiotic approach to cinematograph were too early and superficial. Vyacheslav Ivanov’s works on cinematograph are a great source that proves the efficiency of the philosophical approach. In particular, Vyacheslav Ivanov’s book ‘Eizenshtein’s Esthetics’ is devoted to this topic. Interpreting the meaning of the title, the author of the present article shows that the concept of semiotics was already created at the initial stage of the development of esthetics as a branch of philosophy.


Keywords:

Semiotics, linguistics, structuralism, phenomenology, esthetics, language, cinema, sign system, formal school, culture of grammar, culture of text.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Avtonomova N. Derrida i grammatologiya// Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M., 2000;
2. Berdyaev N. Sud'ba Rossii. Opyty po psikhologii voiny i natsional'nosti. M., 1918;
3. Gegel' G.Estetika. t.1., M. 1968;
4. Derrida Zh. Struktura, znak i igra v diskurse gumanitarnykh nauk // Frantsuzskaya semiotika: Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. M., 2000;
5. Derrida Zh. Teatr zhestokosti i zavershenie predstavleniya // Frantsuzskaya semiotika; Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. M., 2000;
6. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M., 2000;
7. Derrida Zh. Freid i stsena pis'ma // Frantsuzskaya semiotika: Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. M., 2000;
8. Ivanov Vyach. Ocherki po istorii semiotiki v SSSR. M., 1976;
9. Ivanov Vyach. Ocherki po predystorii istorii semiotiki// Ivanov Vyach. Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kul'tury., t.1. Znakovye sistemy. Kino. Poetika., M., Yazyki russkoi kul'tury. M., 1998;
10. Ivanov Vyach. Estetika Eizenshteina //Ivanov Vch. Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kul'tury., t. 1.. M., 1998;
11. Ivanov Vyach. Yazyk kino // Inostrannaya literatura. 1967., ¹ 6;
12. Ivanov Vyach. O strukture znakov kino// Tezisy dokladov IU Letnei shkoly po vtorichnym modeliruyushchim sistemam. Tartu. 1970;
13. Ivanov Vyach. O strukturnom podkhode k yazyku kino // Tochnye metody v issledovaniyakh kul'tury i iskusstva. M., 1971;
14. Ivanov Vyach. Iz zametok o stroenii i funktsiyakh karnaval'nogo obraza // Problema poetiki i istorii literatury. Sbornik statei k 75-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya i 50-letiyu nauchno-pedagogicheskoi deyatel'nosti M. M. Bakhtina. Saransk. 1973;
15. Ivanov Vyach. Znachenie idei M. M. Bakhtina o znake, vyskazyvanii i dialoge dlya sovremennoi semiotiki // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. UI., Tartu., 1973;
16. Ivanov Vyach. Funktsii i kategorii yazyka kino // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. UII. Tartu., 1975;
17. Ivanov Vyach. Doktor Faustus (Osnovnye problemy teorii iskusstva S. M. Eizenshteina) // Rossiya-Russia., ¹ 3., 1977;
18. Ivanov Vyach. Dostoevskii i Eizenshtein // Tvorcheskii protsess i khudozhestvennoe vospriyatie. L., 1977;
19. Ivanov Vyach. Esteticheskaya kontseptsiya zvukozritel'nogo kontrapunkta u Eizenshteina // Vzaimodeistvie i sintez iskusstv. L., 1979;
20. Ivanov Vyach. Fil'm v fil'me // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. KhIU., Tartu., 1981;
21. Ivanov Vyach. Eizenshtein i kul'tury Yaponii i Kitaya // Vostok i Zapad: Issledovaniya. Perevody. publikatsii. M., 1988;
22. Ivanov Vyach. Montazh kak printsip postroeniya v kul'ture pervoi poloviny KhKh veka // Montazh: Literatura. iskusstvo. Teatr. Kino. M., 1988;
23. Ivanov Vyach. Ot struktury k arkhetipu // Kinovedcheskie zapiski. !993., ¹ 19;
24. Ivanov Vyach. Funktsii i kategorii yazyka kino // Iz rabot moskovskogo semioticheskogo kruga., M., 1997;
25. Istoriya estetiki. Pamyatniki mirovoi esteticheskoi mysli v 5 t., t. 2. Esteticheskie ucheniya KhUII-KhUIII vekov. M., 1964;
26. Kristeva Yu. Izbrannye trudy:Razrushenie poetiki. M., 2004;
27. Lotman Yu. O semioticheskom mekhanizme kul'tury // Lotman Yu. Izbrannye stat'i v 3-kh t., t.3. Tallinn., 1993;
28. Lotman Yu. Problema "obucheniya kul'ture" kak ee tipologicheskaya kharakteristika // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Vypusk 5., Tartu., 1971;
29. Medvedev P. Formal'nyi metod v literaturovedenii. L., 1928;
30. Motroshilova N. S. Frank i N. Berdyaev o "novom varvarstve"// Kul'tura i forma. M., 2010;
31. Papernyi V.Kul'tura Dva. M., 1996;
32. Sokolov V. Kinovedenie kak nauka. M., 2010;
33. Khansen-Leve O. Russkii formalizm. Metodologicheskaya rekonstruktsiya razvitiya na osnove printsipa ostraneniya. M., 2001;
34. Khrenov N. Esteticheskii renessans epokhi ottepeli // Eksperimental'noe iskusstvo. Vliyanie teorii na khudozhestvennoe tvorchestvo. Pod redaktsiei O. Lichchiardello, S. Lombardo, V. Petrova. M., 2011;
35. Khrenov N. Ot tekhnologii suggestivnogo vozdeistviya k estetike dialoga // Mezhdu obshchestvom i vlast'yu. massovye zhanry ot 20-kh k 80-m godam KhKh veka. M., 2002;
36. Khrenov N. Kino kak reabilitatsiya arkhetipicheskoi real'nosti //Kinovedcheskie zapiski. 2006., ¹ 79;
37. Khrenov N. Istoriya iskusstva v rakurse tsiklicheskoi paradigmy // Teoriya khudozhestvennoi kul'tury. Vypusk 5., M., 2001;
38. Khrenov N. Sergei Eizenshtein: ot tekhnologii suggestivnogo vozdeistviya k estetike dialoga // Kinovedcheskie zapiski. 2000., ¹46;
39. Fedotov N. Sud'ba i grekhi Rossii. Izbrannye stat'i po filosofii russkoi istorii i kul'tury. t. 2., SPb., 1992;
40. Shpigel'berg G. Fenomenologicheskoe dvizhenie. M., 2002;
41. Eizenshtein S. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 6 t., t. 2., M., 1964;
42. Eizenshtein S. Metod. t. 1. Grundproblem. M., 2002;
43. Eizenshtein S. Metod. t. 2. Tainy masterov. M., 2002;
44. Eikhenbaum B. Teoriya "formal'nogo metoda" // Estetika i teoriya iskusstva KhKh veka. Khrestomatiya. Otvetstvennye redakutory N. Khrenov, A. Migunov., M., 2007;
45. Yakobson R. Noveishaya russkaya poeziya. Nabrosok pervyi: Pordstupy k Khlebnikovu // Yakobson R. raboty po poetike. M., 1987;
46. Yakobson R. Formal'naya shkola i sovremennoe russkoe literaturovedenie. M., 2011;
47. Yampol'skii M. Vidimyi mir. Ocherki rannei kinofenomenologii. M., 1993;
48. Yampol'skii M. Yazyk-telo-sluchai: Kinematograf i poiski smysla. M., 2004
49. V.V. Sofronov Predlozhenie boli. Semioticheskie
50. i fenomenologicheskie aspekty
51. analiza romana Marselya Prusta
52. «V poiskakh utrachennogo vremeni». // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 5 - 18.