Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Goncharuk, E. A. The Meaning of Neurotic Suffering

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the masochistic personality in research of Karen Horney. Analyzing Karen Horney’s theory, the author of the present article distinguishes between definitions of masochism in classical psychoanalysis and Neo-Freudianism. Sigmund Freud related the genesis of that psychological structure with the mystery of child’s psychosexual development. However, he did not limit masochism to sexual behavior as Karen Horney believed. Unlike Freud, Horney viewed masochism as a social phenomenon. She believed that masochism had roots in the personality conflict. In the course of their life people demonstrate different patterns of behavior – adjustment to the reality or escape from the reality, strengthening of a personality core or elimination of individuality. Karen Horney believed escapism to be the main feature of masochism. This approach allows to solve the main paradox of the masochistic personality, i.e. combination of suffering and enjoyment. The author of the article has used psychological methods for analyzing stereotypes and mechanisms. The author has also applied research methods of philosophical anthropology. In general, the author is based on methods of Neo-Freudianism and takes into account achievement of social psychology. The novelty of the article is in the author’s attempt to provide a comprehensive description of Karen Horney’s concept of masochism. For the first time in Russian philosophical and psychological literature the author provides a full description of her views. Comparing Freudian and Neo-Freudian interpretations of masochism, the author also pays attention to errors made by Karen Horney when analyzing that phenomenon.


Keywords:

psychology, neurosis, masochism, masochistic personality, personality, individuality, sexuality, ambivalence of feelings, suffering, enjoyment.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Goncharuk K. Mazokhizm kak navazhdenie // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2009. ¹ 6 (9). S. 52-59.
2. Gurevich P.S. Mazokhizm kak antropologicheskaya zagadka // Teoreticheskii zhurnal «CREDO NEW». 2008. ¹ 4 (56). S. 112-131.
3. Gurevich P.S. Psikhoanaliz: V 2-kh tt. M.: Yurait, 2013.
4. Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya cheloveka (lektsii) // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2006. T. VIII. ¹ 1. S. 184-201.
5. Gurevich P.S. Freid konechnyi i beskonechnyi // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2007. T. IX. ¹ 2. S. 130-145.
6. Zakher-Mazokh L. Venera v mekhakh. Demonicheskie zhenshchiny. M., 1993.
7. Kouen Lin. Mazokhizm: yungianskii vzglyad. M., 2005.
8. Kraft-Ebing R. Polovaya psikhopatiya, s obrashcheniem osobogo vnimaniya na izvrashchenie polovogo chuvstva. M., 1996.
9. Matutite K.P. Fridrikh Nitsshe o psikhologii. Chast' 1 // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2009. ¹ 1. S. 19-24.
10. Matutite K.P. Fridrikh Nitsshe o psikhologii. Chast' 2 // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2009. ¹ 2. S. 17-25.
11. Trufanova E.O. Eskapizm: begstvo v poiskakh smysla // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2014. ¹ 6. S. 597-608.
12. Fromm E. Dusha cheloveka. M.: AST, 2014.
13. Khorni Karen. Nevroticheskaya lichnost' nashego vremeni. Samoanaliz. M., 2004.
14. Eros. Filosofskie marginalii prof. P.S. Gurevicha. M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2014.
15. Deutsch H. Motherhood and sexuality // Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 1933. Vol. 2. P. 476-488
16. Goncharuk E.A. Sootnoshenie stradaniya i viny v nasledii N.A. Berdyaeva. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 503 - 507. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.5.11486.
17. P.S. Gurevich Kak skladyvaetsya kharakter // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 10. - C. 4 - 8.
18. E.M. Spirova Antropologicheskii aspekt myshleniya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2012. - 5. - C. 38 - 49.