Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Bartashevich, S.V. Efficiency of judicial doctrines on counteractions against tax evasion as a criterion for the evaluation of the economic security of Russia.

Abstract: The article concerns the problems regarding application of the judicial doctrines on counteractions against the tax evasion, which are formed in the practice of tax dispute resolution regarding the tax optimization means used by the taxpayers. The author defines place and role of judicial doctrinal norm-making as a methodological instrument for guaranteeing economic security of the state and having special value in the absence of due legislative regulation in this sphere in combination with the large-scale spread of tax evasion and its deep penetration into the economic relations. The author provides critical analysis of the most popular judicial doctrines in the Russian practice, evaluating their efficiency from the standpoints of their application on one hand in order to protect the economic interests of the state from the abuse by the fiscally obliged persons, and on the other hand in order to form unburdening conditions for the good faith implementation of the tax obligations, guaranteeing a fair balance of public and private economic interests. The author draws a conclusion that the provisions of currently used doctrines involve systemic contradictions, and they often contradict each other, both by their internal structures and grounds for their application, the are more or less unspecific and abstract, or they have very narrow sphere of implementation. Finally, the author provides provisions allowing for the harmonization of the practice of doctrinal lawmaking in the tax sphere.


Keywords:

tax, judicial doctrine, avoiding taxation, economic security, state, taxpayer, good faith, tax profit, business goal, arbitration practice.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Antropova T. G. Institutsionalizatsiya sistemy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva: Avtoref. … dokt. ekon. nauk. Kazan': KGTU im. A.N.Tupoleva, 2010.-48 s.
2. Ardashev V. L. VAS RF: dobrosovestno o nedobrosovestnosti // Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika.-2006.-¹11.-S. 10-12.
3. Badaev A. E. Nalogovaya prestupnost'-slagaemoe ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti (po materialam regionov Rossiyskoy Federatsii) // Bezopasnost' biznesa.-2008.-¹3.-S. 35-41.
4. Batalova L. A. Primenenie ponyatiy nedobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchika i nalogovoy vygody v sudebnoy praktike // Arbitrazhnye spory.-2007.-¹4.-S. 89-93.
5. Bespalov M. V., Filina F. N. Skhemy minimizatsii nalogooblozheniya / Pod red. D. V. Solov'evoy.-M.: GrossMedia, RosBukh, 2010.-368 s.
6. Bykov S. A. Gosudarstvennye i konsaltingovye uslugi v sisteme obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossii: Avtoref. … dokt. ekon. nauk. SPb: SPbGUEF, 2012.-38 s.
7. Voloshin D. A. Neobosnovannaya nalogovaya vygoda vmesto nedobrosovestnosti: chto izmenilos'? // Glavbukh.-2006.-¹21.-S. 110-119.
8. Glukhikh T. A. K voprosu o nedobrosovestnosti v nalogovykh pravootnosheniyakh // Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika.-2005.-¹12.-S. 20-22.
9. Goryunov A. R. O dobrosovestnosti i nedobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchika // Vash nalogovyy advokat.-2006.-¹2.-S. 44.
10. Guseva T. A. Nalogovoe planirovanie v predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti: pravovoe regulirovanie: monografiya / T. A. Guseva; Pod red. N. I. Khimichevoy.-2 izd.-M.: Volters Kluver, 2007.-432 s.
11. Dzhal'chinov D. L. Sdelki pod kontrolem: upravlenie nalogovymi riskami / D. L. Dzhal'chinov.-M.: Bukhgalterskiy uchet, 2009.-176 s.
12. Zaklyuchenie Instituta ekonomicheskoy politiki im. E. T. Gaydara na proekt federal'nogo byudzheta na 2013 g. i na planovyy period 2014 i 2015 gg. // Vestnik Evropy.-2012.-¹34-35.-S. 21-65.
13. Kornaukhov M. V. K voprosu o meste kategorii «nedobrosovestnost'» v nalogovom prave // Arbitrazhnye spory.-2005.-¹1.-S. 149-162.
14. Kostin A.A. Kriterii nedobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchika // Auditorskie vedomosti.-2002.-¹8.-S. 56-60.
15. Kurbatov A. Ya., Podmarkova A. S. Nedopustimost' zloupotrebleniya pravom kak obshchepravovoy printsip realizatsii prav // Khozyaystvo i pravo.-2009.-¹2.-S. 106-117.
16. Modenov A. K. Metodologiya formirovaniya mekhanizma protivodeystviya kriminalizatsii ekonomiki Rossii v usloviyakh globalizatsii: Avtoref. … dokt. ekon. nauk. SPb: SPbGUEF, 2005.-38 s.
17. Paramonov D. I. K voprosu ob opredelenii nedobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchika // Finansovye i bukhgalterskie konsul'tatsii.-2006.-¹6.-S. 34-35.
18. Pozner R. A. Ekonomicheskiy analiz prava: v 2-kh t. / Per. s angl. pod red. V. L. Tambovtseva.-T. 1.-SPb: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 2004.-524 s.
19. Prishchepa M. A. Metody bor'by s neuplatoy nalogov // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika.-2004.-¹7.-S. 34-39.
20. Rusyaev N. A. O prevrashchenii nedobrosovestnosti v neobosnovannuyu nalogovuyu vygodu // Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika.-2007.-¹2.-S. 11-14.
21. Savseris S. V. Kategoriya «nedobrosovestnost' v nalogovom prave / S. V. Savseris.-M.: Statut, 2007.-191 s.
22. Smirnykh S. E. Pravovye posledstviya nedobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchikov // Sovremennoe pravo.-2007.-¹1.-S. 26-30.
23. Suvorov E. D. Obkhod zakona. Sdelka, oformlyayushchaya obkhod zakona / E. D. Suvorov.-M.: Izdatel'skiy dom V. Ema, 2008.-188 s.
24. Ustinova Ya. I. Ponyatie «dobrosovestnost'» v nalogovykh pravootnosheniyakh // Bukhgalterskiy uchet.-2005.-¹6.-S. 59-61.
25. Chirkov M. O. Innovatsionnye podkhody k formirovaniyu modeley povedeniya nalogoplatel'shchikov // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.-2012.-¹2-1(74).-S. 347-352.
26. Shchekin D. M. Dobrosovestnost' eksportera // Nalogoved.-2005.-¹9.-S. 37-39