Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Demin, I. V. Comparative Analysis of Interpretations of Historical Experience by Frank Ankersmit and Hans Gadamer

Abstract: The author of the article compares the two different concepts of historical experience offered by Frank Aknersmit and Hans Gadamer. The interest for the phenomenon of historical experience as well as the narrative is one of the most typical features of the modern post-metaphysical philosophy of history. The author of the article pays special attention to the problem of the relation between historical experience and historical narrative. Gadamer’s and Ankersmit’s theories are viewed as the alternative and competing strategies in the sphere of the post-metaphysical philosophy of history. The corner stone in these two theories is the interpretation of the correspondence between historical experience and the language of historical narrative. In his research the author used hermeneutic methods, historical method and historicalcomparative method as well as the problem oriented analysis. Gadamer focused on the positive role of traditions and language as the ontological conditions of historical experience. Gadamer understood historical experience as the experience of appealing to traditions and their interpretation. Ankersmit focused on the negative role of the language. Ankersmit related the authenticity of historical experience to the ‘release from the language jail’. According to the author, the language of history description, on one hand, inevitably distorts the authentic (pre-linguistic) historical experience and, on the other hand, represents the only possible form of its expression.

Keywords:

history, historicity, historical experience, language, historical narrative, nostalgia, philosophical hermeneutics, tradition, Gadamer, Ankersmit.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Baksheev E.S. «Dve smerti» v kul'turakh Yaponii i Ryukyu (Okinavy): dvustadiynaya pogrebal'naya obryadnost' v traditsionnykh obshchestvakh kak istoriko-kul'turologicheskaya problema (v kontekste kul'tur Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskogo regiona) // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya.-2013.-1.-C. 129-191. DOI: 10.7256/2306-420X.2013.1.470. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_470.html
2. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. – Tubingen, 2001. – 445 S.
3. Prokhorov M.M. Bytie i istoriya: vzaimosvyaz' i opredelenie // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 1-71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.113. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_113.html
4. Erfahrung und Geschichte: historische Sinnbildung im Pränarrativen / Ed. by Th. Breyer and D. Creutz. – Berlin, N.Y.: De Gruyter, 2010. – 372 r.
5. Oleynikov A. A. Istoricheskiy opyt – novyy predmet teoreticheskikh issledovaniy // Homo historicus: K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Yu. L. Bessmertnogo. V 2-kh knigakh. Kn.1. – M.: «Nauka», 2003. – S. 299-311.
6. Gadamer H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzuge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. – Tuebingen, 1990. – 495 S.
7. Suvorov G. V. «Povorot k opytu»: metod poznaniya istorii v kontseptsii «intellektual'nogo empirizma» F.R. Ankersmita // Molodoy uchenyy. – 2011. – ¹ 3. T. 1. – S. 224-229.
8. Rezvykh P. Opyt razryva i sobytie lyubvi (Tezisy ob «istoricheskom opyte» F. Ankersmita i «vechnom proshlom» F. Shellinga) // Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. 2008. ¹ 92. – S. 196-210.
9. Oleynikov A. A. Istoricheskiy opyt – novyy predmet teorii. URL: http://kogni.narod.ru/exper.htm (data obrashcheniya 14.03.14).
10. Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii kak filosofiya yazyka: osmyslenie istorii v gorizonte germenevticheskoy i analiticheskoy traditsiy // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoy Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. ¹ 6 (26).-S. 158-163.
11. Domanska E. Filosofiya istorii posle postmodernizma / Per. s angl. M. A. Kukartsevoy. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2010. – 400 s.
12. Kostyakova Yu. B. Istoricheskiy opyt: ot ponimaniya sushchnosti k opredeleniyu termina // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2012. ¹ 12 (26). Ch. II. – C. 98-105.
13. Gadamer G. G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki. – M.: «Progress», 1988. – 704 s.
14. Demin I. V. Problema istinnosti istoricheskogo znaniya v narrativnoy filosofii istorii // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnaya seriya. 2008. ¹ 1. – S. 3-10.
15. Demin I. V. Fenomen nostal'gii v gorizonte postmetafizicheskoy filosofii istorii // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Filosofiya. Filologiya». 2012. ¹ 1 (11). – S. 16-25.
16. Demin I. V. Filosofiya istorii kak regional'naya ontologiya. – Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2012. – 202 s.
17. Ankersmit F. R. Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskiy analiz yazyka istorikov / Per. s angl. O. Gavrishinoy, A. Oleynikova. – M.: Ideya-Press, 2003. – 360 s.
18. Gavrishina O. V. «Opyt proshlogo»: ponyatie «unikal'noe» v sovremennoy teorii istorii // Kazus: Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii. – M., 2002. – C. 328-350.
19. Ankersmit F. R. Vozvyshennyy istoricheskiy opyt / Per. s angl. A. A. Oleynikova, I. V. Borisovoy, E. E. Lyaminoy i dr. – M.: «Evropa», 2007. – 612 s.
20. Ankersmit F. R. Istoriya i tropologiya: vzlet i padenie metafory / Per. s angl. M. Kukartseva, E. Kolomoets, V. Kataeva. – M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2003. – 496 s.
21. Tovbin K.M.. Ontologicheskoe izmerenie traditsionnoy dukhovnosti. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 2.-C. 239-251. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.800
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.