|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:
Abgarjan D.
Elaboration by ITLOS of the Law of the Sea Rules
in different spheres of the Ocean Activity
// International Law and International Organizations.
2014. ¹ 1.
P. 96-106.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=64080
Abgarjan D. Elaboration by ITLOS of the Law of the Sea Rules in different spheres of the Ocean ActivityAbstract: Ways and methods used by ITLOS in the process of interpretation of the law of sea are discussed in the article. ITLOS elaborated a number of rules, in particular, those concerning grounds for detention of foreign vessels in the EEZ, correlation between municipal law and international law, bond or other financial security, question of confiscation, connection between the ship and the flag state. The ITLOS case law is analyzed. Author studies such cases as Juno Trader” “Saiga” “Hoshinmaru” and others. Particular topics that are subject of the study are: Grounds for detention of foreign vessels in the exclusive economic zone; bond or other financial security as well as the question of confiscation (of the haul in fisheries cases for exemple); and finally the questions of the connection between the ship and the flag state. Keywords: ITLOS, the flag state, the ship state, financial security, grounds for detention, foreign vessels, municipal law, and international law, law of sea, Saiga.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Helmut Tuerk, The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to International Law, in: 26 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 2007-2008, p. 289 at 304.
2. Bjarni Mar Magnusson , Current Legal Developments. ITLOS. Judgement in the Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (14 march 2012), in: The International Journal of Maritime and Coastal Law 27 (2012) 623-633. 3. Haritini Dipla, The role of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea in the progressive development of the law of the sea , in: UNRESOLVED ISSUES AND NEW CHALLENGES TO THE LAW OF THE SEA, Vaughan Lowe General Editor , 2006 4. A. A. Todorov. Territorial'nyi element sostava piratstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. 5. M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoi zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. 6. A. S. Kasatkina. Pravovye osnovy regulirovaniya mezhdunarodnykh passazhirskikh perevozok // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. 7. G. Ts. Li. Morskaya politika Kitaya v regione ATR // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. 8. S. N. Ovchinnikov. Pogranichnyi kontrol' morskikh sudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. 9. M. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoi sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – ¹ 2. 10. Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitaiskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. 11. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. 12. E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyi organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob''edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiei OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – ¹ 4. 13. A.M. Ibragimov. Spetsifika norm o garantiyakh v mezhdunarodnom morskom i rechnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – ¹ 9. 14. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html 15. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html 16. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html 17. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.ht |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
