Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Fedotova, V. G., Yakovleva, A. F. Science as the Phenomenon of Modern (Article No. 2)

Abstract: This is the continuation of the article ‘Science and Modernization’ published by V. Fedotova and A. Yakovleva in 2012 (Issue No. 9, P. 63-72). The present article is devoted to transformations in science under the influence of changing Modern. One of the results of such transformations is the variety of definitions of science and the ‘battle’ over definition, goals and efficiency of science caused by the effort to influence the organization of science and education. The author gives an estimation of the current situation of reformation of Russian science from the point of view of historical experience of functioning of science and social sciences, in particular, in the first, second and third periods of Modern. Due to the process of reformation of the Russian Academy of Sciences started by the Russian government, the author of the article analyzes particular periods in history of organization of science and education and makes conclusions about what is supposed to substitute for the academic school aimed at obtaining fundamental knowledge.

Keywords:

scientific community, humanitarian knowledge, science, social science, reforms in science, education, organization, personnel grading, forms of Modern, scientist.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Stepin V.S. Nauchnoe znanie i tsennosti tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. ¹ 10.
2. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotova N.N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: Tri velikie transforma-tsii. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz vzaimootnosheniy ekonomiki i obshchestva. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008.
3. Rozov N.S. (Ne)myslyashchaya Rossiya: antiteoreticheskiy konsensus kak faktor intellektual'noy stagnatsii // Prognozis. 2007. ¹ 3.
4. Fedotova V.G. Shtarnberskaya gruppa (FRG) o zakonomernostyakh razvitiya nauki// Voprosy filo-sofii. 1984. ¹ 3.
5. Tu Veymin. Mnozhestvennost' modernizatsiy i posledstviya etogo yavleniya dlya Vostochnoy Azii // Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona. M., 2002.
6. Chudinov E.M. Priroda nauchnoy istiny. M., 1977.
7. Wagner P. Social Sciences and Social Plannung during the Twentieth Ctntury // The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 7. The Modern Social Sciences. Ed. by Th. M. Porter, D. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
8. Wagner P. The Uses of the Social Sciences // The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 7. The Modern Social Sciences. Ed. by Th. M. Porter, D. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.