Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Bartashevich, S. V. Qualification Mistakes in Experience of Tax Burden Reduction

Abstract: The process of calculating and paying taxes is implicitly connected with the legal evaluation of behavior leading to formation, change or termination of fiscal obligations both by the tax authorities and taxpayers. The problem of a wrong legal classification of a taxationrelated behavior including avoidance of taxes still hasn’t been conceptually established in the science of taxation. However, this is the wrong classification which causes negative financial consequences for the majority economic entities including tax overpayment and bringing to tax responsibility. The article is devoted both to the legal nature and peculiarities of the qualification mistakes arising in the practice of tax burden reduction. The author of the article also provides their classification and analyzes theoretical and methodological grounds for overcoming qualification mistakes when applying tax legislation.

Keywords:

tax, qualification, mistake, mistake, evaluation, law enforcement, burden, inactivity, law, code.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Bartashevich S. V. Nalogovoe obyazatel'stvo kak uslovie sushchestvovaniya prava nalogoplatel'shchika na umen'shenie nalogovogo bremeni // Global'nyy ekonomicheskiy krizis: realii i puti preodole niya: Sb. nauch. statey. Vyp. 7. / Pod red. V.V. Tuma leva. SPb: NOU VPO IBP, 2009.  S. 261265.
2. Bocharnikova N.A. Pravovoy mekhanizm pre duprezhdeniya, vyyavleniya i ispravleniya admini strativnykh oshibok // Vestnik VGU. 2009. ¹2. S. 214227.
3. Verstova M.E. Osnovnye puti i perspekti vy sovershenstvovaniya sposobov obespecheniya is polneniya obyazannostey po uplate nalogov i sbo rov v sovremennoy Rossii // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2008. ¹3. S.8186.
4. Dedov D.I. Rol' pravovykh pozitsii Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF v pravoprimenitel'noy praktike. Interv'yu // Arbitrazhnoe pravosudie v Rossii. 2008. ¹5. S. 7682.
5. Kazgerieva E.V. Logicheskie oshibki v sudeb nom pravoprimenenii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M.: RAP, 2006.  23 s.
6. Kazgerieva E.V. Obshchenauchnaya postanovka problemy oshibok i neobkhodimost' teoretichesko go obosnovaniya v pravovedenii // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2006. ¹3. S.37.
7. Kartashov V.N. Professional'naya yuridiches kaya deyatel'nost' (voprosy teorii i praktiki). Yaroslavl': YarGU, 1992. 89 s.
8. Kolosovskiy V.V. Zakonnost' i kvalifika tsionnye oshibki // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. ¹4. S. 9298.
9. Kolosovskiy V.V. K voprosu o kvalifikatsi onnykh oshibkakh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2009. ¹5. S.1820.
10. Kolosovskiy V.V. Kvalifikatsionnye oshib ki.  SPb: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2006. 157 s.
11. Kochetkov A.I. Nalogovye oshibki // Bukh galterskiy uchet i nalogi. 2005. ¹10. S.1217.
12. Kuznetsova N.F. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy: lektsii po spetskursu «Osnovy kva lifikatsii prestupleniy» / Pod red. V.N. Kud ryavtseva. M.: Gorodets, 2007. 336 s.
13. Kudryavtsev V.N. Izbrannye trudy po sotsi al'nym naukam: v 3 t. M.: Nauka, 2002. T.1. 567 s.
14. Lisyutkin A.B. O ponyatii kategorii «oshib ka» v yurisprudentsii: logikofilosofskiy as pekt // Pravovedenie. 1996. ¹3. S.2026.
15. Logika / Pod red. D.P. Gorskogo, P.V. Tavan tsa.  M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politiches koy literatury, 1956. 280 s.
16. Malakhatkina E.V. Chem bol'she zhalob, tem men'she nalogov // Rossiyskaya Biznesgazeta. 2008. 18 mar.
17. Morozova L.L. Analiz tipichnykh oshibok, dopuskaemykh rukovoditelyami i bukhgalterami predpriyatiy pri vedenii bukhgalterskogo ucheta. Rekomendatsii po ustraneniyu oshibok. Prakti cheskoe rukovodstvo  3 izd. SPb: Izdvo IChP «Aktiv», 1997. 320 s.
18. Mursalimov G.R. Metodologiya ponimaniya tekhnikoyuridicheskikh sredstv preodoleniya pra voprimenitel'nykh oshibok // Istoriya gosudar stva i prava. 2007. ¹16. S.56.
19. Mursalimov K.R. Pravoprimenitel'nye oshibki. Problemy teorii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD RF, 2000. 182 s.
20. Nurgaleev Sh.Kh., Chinchikova G.B. K voprosu o yuridicheskikh oshibkakh // Bezopasnost' bizne sa. 2006. ¹3. S.4648.
21. Obshchaya teoriya prava / Pod red. A.S. Pigol kina. 2e izd. M.: MGTU im. Baumana, 1998. 384 s.
22. Pepelyaev S.G. Tendentsii razresheniya nalo govykh sporov // Nalogoved. 2005. ¹3. S.1930.
23. Spiridonov L.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i pra va: uchebnik. M.: PBOYuL M.A. Zakharov, 2001. 304s.
24. Khropanyuk V.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. V.G. Strekozova.  M.: Interstil', Ome gaL, 2008. 384 s.
25. Tsvetkov I.V. Metodologiya razresheniya na logovykh sporov // Nalogovye spory: opyt Ros sii i drugikh stran: Sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch.prakt. konf. / Pod red. S.G. Pepelyaeva, Sost. M.V. Zavyazochnikova. M.: Statut, 2008. S.1927.
26. Yanitskiy Yu.A. Mezhotraslevaya teoriya kva lifikatsii pravonarusheniy: k postanovke vop rosa // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2009. ¹6. S.5456
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.