Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Titlina, M. V.
The Problems of Religious Freedom in Russian Philosophy, Theology and Law at the Turn
of the 19th — 20th Centuries
// Philosophy and Culture.
2011. ¹ 8.
P. 157-165.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58552
Titlina, M. V. The Problems of Religious Freedom in Russian Philosophy, Theology and Law at the Turn of the 19th — 20th CenturiesAbstract: The article analyzes the public discussions on religious freedom at the turn of the 19th — 20th centuries. The author of the article gives a brief description of legislation in the sphere of religion and traces back actualization of such terms as ‘freedom of conscience’, ‘religious tolerance’, freedom of belief’, ‘religious freedom’, and etc. The author reconstructs the public polemics on religious freedom and describes different approaches to it. In his study the author uses the method of a c omparative analysis and t ypologization. The author concludes that there were no clear and common understanding of questions related to religious freedom at the end of the 19th — beginning of the 20th in Russia. The author shows the poly semantic nature of all terms related to religious freedom. The most controversial is the question about the ‘freedom of conscience’. The author defines the four basic interpretations of this term: 1) freedom of conscience is equal to the freedom of choice of the world view; 2) freedom of conscience does not relate to the sphere of legislation because it is a philosophical and theological idea meaning a) freedom from the sin; b)freedom of the thought and dogmatic beliefs; c)free will; 3) freedom of conscience is interpreted as a propaganda of atheism; 4)freedom of conscience is a meaningless term and we should refuse from using it. Keywords: philosophy, religion, f reedom, consciousness, tolerance, religious tolerance, confession, pre-revolutionary, Russia, Soloviev.
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Aksakov I.S. Sleduet li dat' evreyam v Rossii zakonodatel'nye i administrativnye prava // Gazeta «Den'», 16 fevralya 1862 (¹ 19).
2. Antoniy (Khrapovitskiy). Mitropolit. O svobode veroispovedaniy // Novyy opyt ucheniya o bogo-poznanii. SPb., 2002. 3. Bonch-Bruevich V.D. «Vladimir Il'ich i religioznyy vopros» // Izbr. soch. v 3-kh tt. T. 1. M., 1959. 4. Vishnyakova I.N. Konstitutsionno-pravovoe regulirovanie svobody veroispovedaniya: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. 5. Gosudarstvo Rossiyskoe: vlast' i obshchestvo (sbornik dokumentov). M., 1996. 6. Deklaratsiya o printsipakh tolerantnosti ot 16 noyabrya 1995 g. St. 1. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.tolerance.ru/declar.html 7. Dorskaya A.A. Problema zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya svobody sovesti v Rossii v nachale KhKh v.: Diss. ... kand. yuridich. nauk. SPb., 2001. 8. Zapiski peterburgskikh religiozno-filosofskikh sobraniy 1901-1903. M., 2005. 9. Krasnozhen M. Inovertsy na Rusi. Yur'ev, 1903. 10. Mikhaylov A.Yu. Kontsept «svoboda sovesti» v religiozno-obshchestvennoy mysli Rossii vtoroy po-loviny XIX–XX vv.: bogoslovskaya i yuridicheskaya interpretatsiya // Pravoslavnyy sobesednik. 2006. ch. 2 ¹ 1 (11). 11. Otzyvy eparkhial'nykh arkhiereev po voprosu o tserkovnoy reforme. SPb., 1906. T. 1, 2. 12. Reysner M.A. Gosudarstvo i veruyushchaya lichnost'. SPb., 1905. 13. Religiovedenie. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 2006. 14. Pinkevich V.K. Veroispovednye reformy v Rossii v period dumskoy monarkhii (1906-1917 gg.). M., 2000. 15. Solov'ev V.S. Rossiya i Vselenskaya Tserkov'. Minsk, 1999. 16. Solov'ev V.S. Russkaya ideya. Bryussel', 1952. 17. Solov'ev V.S. Soch. v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M., 1989. 18. Solov'ev V.S. Spor o spravedlivosti. Moskva-Khar'kov, 1999. 19. Stetskevich M.S. Svoboda sovesti. SPb., 2006. 20. Tsvetaev Dm. Polozhenie inoveriya v Rossii. Varshava, 1904 |