Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Korolev, S. A. (2009). Pseudomorphosis as a form of development: the case of Russia . Philosophy and Culture, 6. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=56706
Library
|
Your profile |
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Korolev, S. A. (2009). Pseudomorphosis as a form of development: the case of Russia . Philosophy and Culture, 6. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=56706
Korolev, S. A. Pseudomorphosis as a form of development: the case of RussiaAbstract: Abstract: the article is devoted to the pseudomorphosis as a specific mechanism of development in the Russian history. The author identified the two forms of pseudomorphosis, the classical form described by Spengler and the “organic” form, the unique mirror reflection of the former. Special attention is paid to the role and place of disciplinary technologies in the structure of speudomorphic drivers in the government. In particular, the author showed that despite Spengler and a number of his followers, the government in Russia was characterized by the macro technological structure dominating over weak European disciplinary mechanisms. Keywords: pseudomorphosis, civilization, disciplinary technologies, inversion, civil society, Spengler, Florensky, Tsymbursky, Ahieze.
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
|
We use cookies to make your experience of our websites better. By using and further navigating this website you accept this. | Accept and Close |