Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Pishchulin A.V. On the question about strong states

Abstract: This article discusses various approaches towards the question about strong states, and poses a problem of inappropriateness of combination of the modern signs that determine the modern state, problem of structuring and functioning of the state, as well as problems of modelling of the modern effective and strong nation. Depending on one or another point of view a upon the strength of the nation, we can make different conclusions about the efficiency and consistency of the modern state. The author analyzes the problem of juridization of the modern states, as well as the empirics that often does not coincide with the specified juridical constructs. The scientific novelty consists in the correlation of the technological approaches towards the strong nation with the ideological. The author concludes that an attempt to stay with one of these approaches will lead to the establishment of the inefficient statehood.  


Keywords:

State, Strong, Weak, Essence, Modern, Technology, Contradictions, Consistency, Establishment, Modelling


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Kerimov A.D. Nekotorye problemy teorii sil'nogo gosudarstva // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.1-45. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.3.560. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_560.htm
2. Gryaznova E.V., Paskhin E.N., Shilovskaya E.E. Yavlyaetsya li Rossiya «khrupkim» gosudarstvom // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.1-58. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.4.573. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_573.html
3. Ottoway M. Rebuilding state institutions in collapsed states // Development and change. 33/5, 2002.
4. Menski W. Comparative law in global context. The legal systems of Asia and Africa (Second edition). Cambridge, 2010.
5. Christensen T. Narratives of norwegian governance: elaborating the strong state tradition. // Public Administration Vol. 81 ¹ 1, 2003.
6. Jabri V. War and transformation of global politics. Basingstoke, 2007.
7. Chandler D. International statebuilding. The rise of post-liberal governance. Abingdon, 2010.
8. Fukuyama F. Sil'noe gosudarstvo. Upravlenie i mirovoy poryadok v XXI veke. M., 2006.
9. Meleshkina E.Yu. Issledovaniya gosudarstvennoy sostoyatel'nosti. Kakie uroki my mozhem izvlech'? // Politicheskaya nauka. 2011. ¹ 2. Tema nomera: Gosudarstvennaya sostoyatel'nost' v politicheskoy nauke i politicheskoy praktike.
10. Fuko M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki. Spb., 2010.
11. Ivanov V.V. Teoriya gosudarstva. M., 2010.
12. Brubeyker R. Etnichnost' bez grupp. M., 2012.
13. Dmitriev Yu.A., Mironov V.O. Priznaki gosudarstva: ponimanie i interpretatsii // Gos. i pravo. 2010. ¹ 10.
14. Zatonskiy V.A. Effektivnaya gosudarstvennost'. M., 2006.