Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Shikhanov V.N. The questions of qualification of crimes that have caused harm to multiple persons

Abstract: Currently, there is an objective lack of scientific knowledge that would allow giving precise legal assessment to crimes that have inflicted damages upon multiple victims, if coincidentally the corresponding Articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code do not contain the qualifying characteristic with regards to “two or more persons”. In the law enforcement practice such cases are not uncommon, but the legal positions of various courts that examines such cases often turn out to be opposite. The issue is aggravated by the current processes of transformation of separate positions of the doctrine and theory of qualification of crimes, as well as multiple exemptions to the rules in the legal language in the Decrees of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the substantial change in the approaches towards interpretation of the Article of the Criminal Code, and the overall trend towards the loss of systematization and universality of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Based on the conducted analysis, the author formulated the rules of qualification of crimes in cases where it caused harm to multiple persons.


Keywords:

Divisible offense, Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Composition of crime, Crime record, Multiple victims, Single of crime, Cumulative crimes, Judicial practice, Multiple offenders, Qualification of crime

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Prigovor Mokshanskogo raionnogo suda Penzenskoi oblasti ot 22.02.2012 g. v otnoshenii Sevyana K.E. i Rakhmanova A. po «a», «v», «g» ch. 2 st. 126 UK RF po faktu pokhishcheniya M.N. i primeneniya nasiliya k ee synu M.A. // Ofitsial'nyi sait Penzenskogo oblastnogo suda [Elektronnyi resurs ] : URL : http://www.oblsud.penza.ru/article/?id=511&cat=p (Data obrashcheniya – 15.02.2015 g.).
2. Prigovor Surgutskogo gorodskogo suda Khanty-Mansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga–Yugry ot 11.03.2015 g. v otnoshenii Maisuradze O.L. po ch.1 st. 162 UK RF // Rospravosudie [Elektronnyi resurs] : URL : https://rospravosudie.com/court-surgutskij-gorodskoj-sud-xanty-mansijskij-avtonomnyj-okrug-s/act-479841290/ (Data obrashcheniya – 15.08.2016 g.).
3. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 18 iyunya 2008 g. ¹ 163-P08 (Izvlechenie) // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2008. ¹ 11 [Elektronnyi resurs] : URL : http://www.supcourt.ru/vscourt_detale.php?id=5548 (Data obrashcheniya – 14.08.2016 g.).
4. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29 dekabrya 2008 goda ¹ 41-008-92 // Bank sudebnykh reshenii Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Elektronnyi resurs] : URL : http://vsrf.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=250046 (Data obrashcheniya – 14.08.2016 g.).
5. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o legalizatsii (otmyvanii) denezhnykh sredstv ili inogo imushchestva, priobretennykh prestupnym putem, i o priobretenii ili sbyte imushchestva, zavedomo dobytogo prestupnym putem: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 07.07.2015 g. ¹ 32 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-2015.-¹ 9.
6. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh protiv polovoi neprikosnovennosti i polovoi svobody lichnosti: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 04.12.2014 g. ¹ 16 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-2015.-¹ 2.
7. O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoi praktiki po delam o prestupleniyakh terroristicheskoi napravlennosti: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 09.02.2012 g. ¹ 1 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-2012.-¹ 4.
8. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya i ekspluatatsii transportnykh sredstv, a takzhe s ikh nepravomernym zavladeniem bez tseli khishcheniya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 09.12.2008 g. ¹ 25 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-2009.-¹ 2.
9. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate: postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 27.12.2007 g. ¹ 51// Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2008. ¹ 2.
10. O sudebnoi praktike po ugolovnym delam o khuliganstve i inykh prestupleniyakh, sovershaemykh iz khuliganskikh pobuzhdenii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 15.11.2007 g. ¹ 45 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2008. ¹ 1.
11. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 27.12.2002 g. ¹ 29 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2003. ¹ 2.
12. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh, svyazannykh s narkoticheskimi sredstvami, psikhotropnymi, sil'nodeistvuyushchimi i yadovitymi veshchestvami: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 15.06.2006 g. ¹ 14 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2006. ¹ 8.
13. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o narushenii pravil pozharnoi bezopasnosti, unichtozhenii ili povrezhdenii chuzhogo imushchestva putem podzhoga libo v rezul'tate neostorozhnogo obrashcheniya s ognem: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 05.06.2002 g. ¹ 14 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2002. ¹ 8.
14. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel'stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroistv: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12.03.2002 g. ¹ 5 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2002. ¹ 5.
15. O sudebnoi praktike po delam ob ubiistve (st. 105 UK RF): postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 27.01.1999 g. ¹ 1 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 1999. ¹ 3.
16. O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za banditizm: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 17.01.1997 g. ¹ 1 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 1997. ¹ 3.
17. Yani P.S. Slozhnosti kvalifikatsii prestuplenii, svyazannykh s bankrotstvom / P.S. Yani // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2007. ¹ 8. S. 76-81.
18. O sudebnoi praktike po delam o khuliganstve: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24.12.1991 g. ¹ 5 // Byull. Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-1992.-¹ 3 (utratilo silu);
19. Rogova E.V. Uchenie o differentsiatsii ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti: monografiya / E.V. Rogova. M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. 344 s.
20. Rukavishnikov, E.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prichinenie tyazhkogo vreda zdorov'yu po neostorozhnosti: Avtoref. dis… kand. yurid. nauk / E.A. Rukavishnikov. Tomsk, 2013. 21 s.
21. Popov, A.N. Ubiistvo pri otyagchayushchikh obstoyatel'stvakh / A.N. Popov. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2003. 898 s.
22. Meleshko D.A. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda "O sudebnoi praktike po delam o prestupleniyakh protiv polovoi neprikosnovennosti i polovoi svobody lichnosti": obzor novovvedenii / D.A. Meleshko // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2015. ¹ 3. S. 47-54.
23. Nikiforov A.S. Ob otvetstvennosti za sovokupnost' prestuplenii / A.S. Nikiforov // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. 1961. ¹ 5. S. 62-69.
24. Korenkova E.A. Otvetstvennost' za prestupnye narusheniya pravil okhrany truda: Diss… kand. yurid. nauk / E.A. Korenkova. M., 2002. 189 s.
25. Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestuplenii. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. / V.N. Kudryavtsev. M.: Yurist'', 2007. 304 s.
26. Garbatovich D.A. Stabil'nost' pozitsii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda kak uslovie effektivnogo primeneniya ugolovnogo zakona / D.A. Garbatovich // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2015. ¹ 8. S. 43-45.
27. Gotchina L.V. O pokushenii na ubiistvo dvukh i bolee lits / L.V. Gotchina // Ugolovnyi zakon Rossii: puti razvitiya i problemy primeneniya: sb. nauch. statei / Pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk, professora V.I. Tyunina. SPb. : Izd-vo SPbGEU, 2013. 281 s.
28. Prilozhenie ¹ 2 k prikazu General'noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii, MVD Rossii, MChS Rossii, Minyusta Rossii, FSB Rossii, Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii i FSKN Rossii ot 29.12.2005 ¹ 39/1070/1021/253/780/353/399 «O edinom uchete prestuplenii» // Ross. gaz. ot 25.01.2006 g. ¹ 13.
29. Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii / B.V. Volzhenkin. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2007. 765 s.
30. O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal'nogo zakona «O spetsial'noi otsenke uslovii truda»»: federal'nyi zakon ot 28.12.2013 g. ¹ 421-FZ // Ross. gaz. ot 31.12.2013 g. ¹ 296.
31. O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosam protivodeistviya terrorizmu: federal'nyi zakon ot 30.12.2008 g. ¹ 321-FZ // Ross. gaz. ot 31.12.2008 g. ¹ 267.
32. O praktike rassledovaniya i rassmotreniya sudami mnogoepizodnykh ugolovnykh del o prestupleniyakh korruptsionnoi i ekonomicheskoi napravlennosti: Informatsionnoe pis'mo pervogo zamestitelya General'nogo prokurora Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12.03.2014 g. ¹ 11-16-14/Ip1321-14. (AN ¹ 050584)
33. Bukalerova L.A., Pitikin R.A. Sovokupnost' i sootnoshenie sluzhebnykh podlogov s inymi prestupleniyami // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 4. - C. 218 - 229. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.4.16198.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.