|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Danielyan A.S.
The establishment and specificities of Israeli legal system as mixed jurisdiction
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 12.
P. 1487-1491.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52741
Danielyan A.S. The establishment and specificities of Israeli legal system as mixed jurisdictionAbstract: This article examines the genesis of development of the legal system of Israel. The author gives characteristics to the main elements, which affected the formation of the current Israeli law, as well as determines certain peculiarities of the legal system of the State of Israel as an integral component of the mixed legal family. The modern Israel, formed across the Western and Eastern traditions, represents a unique cultural and legal institution. Based on this fact, the study of legal reality of the State of Israel before its establishment in 1948, as well as during its further state and legal development, presents a significant practical interest. The author analyzes the historical normative legal documents of the current Israeli legislation along with the works of foreign and Russian scholars regarding the examination of legal reality of Israel. Based on the results of this research, the conclusion is made that the study of experience of the “mixed” legal organization and functionality of Israel can be useful for development and improvement of legal system throughout the world, because namely such systems demonstrate an example of innovation and modernization in law. Keywords: multiculturalism, acculturation, globalization, civil law, case law, common law, mixed jurisdiction, legal convergence, Israeli law, legal environment
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Primakov D.Ya. Izrail'skaya model' sudeyskogo aktivizma // Pravo i politika. 2014. ¹ 1. S. 57-63.
2. Primakov D.Ya. Stanovlenie izrail'skogo prava glazami izrail'skikh pravovedov // Pravovedenie. 2010. ¹ 6. S. 144-156. 3. Vorob'ev V.P. Gosudarstvo Izrail': pravovye osnovy vozniknoveniya i status lichnosti. M., 2001. 167 s. 4. Shetreet S. Judicial Independence and Accountability in Israel // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1984. 33. p. 979-1012. 5. Harris R. The Preservation of legal Traditions in Post-colonial Societies: A Comment.Jerusalem and the British Mandate: Interaction and Legacy (ed. by Y. Ben-Arieh). Jerusalem, 2003. 522 p. 6. Likhovski A. Between Two Worlds: The Legacy of the Law of Mandatory Palestine. Jerusalem and the British Mandate: Interaction and Legacy (ed. by Y. Ben-Arieh). Jerusalem, 2003. 522 p. 7. Rivlin E. Israel as a mixed jurisdiction // McGill Law Journal. 2012. 57 (4). p.781-790. 8. Rivlin E. Thoughts on Referral to Foreign Law, Global Chain-Novel, and Novelty // Florida Journal of International Law. 2009. 21:1. p.1-27. 9. Donoghue v Stevenson, [1932] AC 562 at 580, [1932] All ER Rep 1 HL (Eng). 10. Dworkin Ronald A. ‘Natural’ Law Revisited // University of Florida Law Review.1982. 34:2. p.165-188. 11. Goldstein S. Israel: Creating a New Legal System from Different Sources by Jurists of Different Backgrounds. Studies in Legal Systems: Mixed and Mixing in Esin Orucu, Elspeth Attwooll and Sean Coyle (eds),. Kluwer, 1996. 384 p. 12. Goldstein S. Israel Reports. Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family (Ed. by Palmer Vernon V.). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 577-610 pp. 13. CA 5604/94 Hemed v State of Israel. 2004. IsrSC 58(2) 498, URL: http://www.court.gov.il/heb/home.htm. 14. Basic Law: The Judiciary, 1984, SH 78, s 20, URL: http://knesset.gov.il/laws/special/eng/BasicLawTheJudiciary.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 22.11.2016) 15. CA 6821/93 Bank Mizrahi v Migdal Cooperative Village. // Israel Law Reports. 1995. 2. 1. P. 220-223. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
