Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Kulikov E.A., Bedenkov V.V. Negative legal responsibility and ordinary legal consciousness: points of juxtaposition

Abstract: The subject of this article is the points of juxtaposition between the legal responsibility (for legal infraction, negative) and ordinary (public) legal consciousness. The object of this research is the social legal phenomenon of “legal responsibility” and ordinary legal consciousness. The aforementioned phenomena are examined from the perspective of their correlation and interaction. The authors also analyze the essence and composition of the legal responsibility; each of these parts is subjected to examination regarding its interconnection with the ordinary legal consciousness or substantiation by the ordinary legal consciousness. In particular, it implies the notion of responsibility; bases of responsibility as the social legal phenomenon; special internal characteristics of responsibility, such as principles, functions, goals, types, and measure. The scientific novelty consists in comparison of the phenomena of the ordinary legal consciousness and legal responsibility. Despite the fact that at first glance the practically do not have any points of intersection, the authors determine several aspects, which demonstrate that the indicated phenomena actively interact and substantiate each other. The distinctness of the ordinary legal consciousness of one or another society defines the character, content and limits of legal responsibility; otherwise, this mechanism of legal regulation will be incompetent. The ordinary legal consciousness contains the social and philosophical grounds of responsibility; the correspondence to the ordinary legal consciousness justifies the efficiency of legal responsibility in application of its functions, as well as achievement of the goals. The measure of responsibility must correlate with the ordinary legal consciousness of society; in other case, the effect of responsibility can turn out to be directly opposite to that planned by the government authority.


Keywords:

Responsibility, Legal infraction, Grounds of responsibility, Measure of responsibility, Legal education, Efficiency of law, Legal nihilism, Legal relation, Ordinary legal consciousness, Legal consciousness

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Sizov I.Yu. Problemy informatsionnogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del pri protivodeistvii migratsionnoi prestupnosti // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2012. ¹ 1. C. 26-30.
2. Nobel' A.R. Material'no-pravovoe i protsessual'noe znachenie kharakteristik sobytiya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya kak odnogo iz obstoyatel'stv, vkhodyashchikh v predmet dokazyvaniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (na primere del v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy) // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. ¹ 1. C. 25-29. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.1.9884.
3. Bashkirova N.N. Eticheskie osnovy vozniknoveniya nalogovykh riskov gosudarstva // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. 2013. ¹ 9. C. 705-713. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.9.9672.
4. Ramazanov R.U. Zaprety i ogranicheniya dlya gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh i munitsipal'nykh sluzhashchikh kak effektivnyi sposob protivodeistviya korruptsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. ¹ 1. C. 38-43.
5. Baiteryakov R.E. O vozmozhnosti vvedeniya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits (na primere krupneishikh nalogoplatel'shchikov) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2015. ¹ 2. C. 231-234. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15778.
6. Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovaya kul'tura kak ob''ekt nauchnogo issledovaniya: metodologicheskie podkhody, struktura i kriterii otsenki // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 4. C. 135-158. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2013.4.635. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_635.html
7. Lipinskii D.A. Funktsii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2015. ¹ 3. C. 63-93. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.3.15975. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15975.html
8. Kretov V.V., Sevryugin V.E. O neobkhodimosti ustanovleniya administrativnoi otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo khozyaistva Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. ¹ 4. C. 380 - 387. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.14614.
9. Lipinskii D.A. Social Bases of Positive Responsibility // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2015. ¹ 3. C. 41-69. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2015.3.16009. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psen/article_16009.html
10. Dresvyannikova E.A. Ob effektivnosti realizatsii administrativnogo zakonodatel'stva v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. ¹ 8. C. 48-75. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.8.15591. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_15591.html
11. Ostroushko A.V., Bukalerov A.A. O neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya normativnoi bazy sfery informatsionnoi bezopasnosti detei // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2016. ¹ 2. C. 218-226. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.2.18077.
12. Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' pravonarusheniya v nauchnykh i zakonodatel'nykh opredeleniyakh Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Voprosy bezopasnosti. 2015. ¹ 3. C. 24-44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2015.3.15941. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_15941.html
13. Molchanov A.A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v tamozhennoi sfere // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. ¹ 3. C. 67-70.
14. Razgil'dieva M.B. Teoreticheskie problemy byudzhetno-pravovoi otvetstvennosti // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2013. ¹ 2. C. 102-118. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2013.2.9876.
15. Kashkina E.V. Administrativnyi nadzor organov vnutrennikh del za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. ¹ 5. C. 25-29.
16. Mindagulov A.Kh. O proekte novoi redaktsii Ugolovnogo kodeksa Respubliki Kazakhstan // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2013. ¹ 1. C. 70-76.
17. Frolov V.A. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii realizatsii zapretov i ogranichenii pri vvoze ili vyvoze cherez tamozhennuyu granitsu Tamozhennogo Soyuza // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. ¹ 11. C. 1154-1159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.11.12500.
18. Astanin G.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh po zakonodatel'stvu RF i Ukrainy: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. ¹ 7. C. 753 - 757. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9038.
19. Lipinskii D.A., Stankin A.N. O roli reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda v formirovanii sistemy konstitutsionnoi otvetstvennosti // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. ¹ 10. C. 50-62. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016.10.19460. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_19460.html
20. Abdulgalimov R.Z., Suntsov A.P. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' obshchestvennykh ob''edinenii kak sub''ekta upravleniya delami gosudarstva. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. ¹ 8. C. 807 - 813. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12358.
21. Kulikov E.A. Printsip pravovoi ekonomii kak odno iz vedushchikh proyavlenii kategorii «mera» v pravovoi sisteme obshchestva // Pravovaya sistema obshchestva: preemstvennost' i modernizatsiya: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Barnaul, 4-5 oktyabrya 2012 g. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2013. S. 24-27.
22. Kontseptsiya pravovogo vospitaniya Rossiiskogo obshchestva: kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. V.V. Sorokina i A.A. Vasil'eva. Barnaul: AZBUKA, 2014. 272 s.
23. Mal'tsev V.V. Printsipy ugolovnogo prava i ikh realizatsiya v pravoprimenitel'noi deyatel'nosti. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr «Press», 2004. S. 73, 76-77.
24. Dostoevskii F.M. Dnevnik pisatelya: Kniga ocherkov. M.: Eksmo, 2007. S. 186-218.
25. Sorokin V.V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava perekhodnogo perioda: uchebnik. Barnaul: OOO «Altaiskii poligraficheskii kombinat», 2007. S. 364-365.
26. Malakhov V.P. Filosofiya prava. Idei i predpolozheniya: uch. posobie. M., 2012. S. 148.
27. Pravosoznanie rossiiskogo obshchestva: tipologicheskaya kharakteristika: kollektivnaya monografiya / Pod red. V.V. Sorokina i A.A. Vasil'eva. Barnaul, 2013. S. 18.
28. Demchenko T.I. Pravovoe soznanie v drevnerusskoi i rossiiskoi gosudarstvenno-pravovoi zhizni: monografiya. M., 2013. S. 85.
29. Voplenko N.N. Pravosoznanie i pravovaya kul'tura: uch. posobie. Volgograd, 2000. S. 13.
30. Shchedrin O.G. Etnicheskie osobennosti russkogo pravosoznaniya: diss… kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01 / O.G. Shchedrin. Rostov-n/D, 2004. S. 13-14.
31. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik dlya vuzov / Otv. red. V.D. Perevalov. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2005. S. 210-211, 206.
32. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsii / Pod red. N.I. Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2013. S. 220, 213-214.
33. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: ok. 100 000 slov, terminov i frazeologicheskikh vyrazhenii / Pod red. prof. L.I. Skvortsova. 27-e izd., ispr. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo Oniks»: OOO «Izdatel'stvo «Mir i obrazovanie». 2010. S. 663-664.
34. Polyakov A.V. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Kurs lektsii. SPb., 2001. S. 263.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.