Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Zheldybina T.A. Judicial practice and legal precedent: acceptance as the source of law in light of modernization of lawmaking in Russia

Abstract: The problem of judicial lawmaking is one of the relevant for the modern legal science. The subject of this research is judicial practice and legal precedent as the possible, acceptable, and valid sources of Russian law. The goal of this work consists in development of the theoretical positions, which contain substantiation of the importance of the official recognition of judicial practice and legal precedent as the sources of law in the conditions of promotion of the judicial reform along with the work on harmonization of legislation. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this article is first to examine a complex of questions pertaining to inclusion of the judicial practice and legal precedent into the ranks of the sources of law in light of modernization of the Russian lawmaking. The author suggests theoretical positions and practical recommendations which allow developing the doctrine of judicial practice and legal precedent in Russia.


Keywords:

Internationalization of legislation, Globalization of law, Judicial authority, Law enforcement, Judicial legal provisions, Sources of law, Lawmaking, Prejudice, Legal precedent, Judicial practice

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Usanov V.E. Sudebnyi pretsedent: problemy konvergentsii v rossiiskuyu pravovuyu sistemu // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2008. ¹ 2(7).
2. Smirnova M.G. Pravopolozheniya sudebnoi praktiki kak netipichnyi istochnik prava // Leningradskii yuridicheskii zhurnal.2006. ¹ 1.
3. Neshataeva T.N. K voprosu ob istochnikakh prava – sudebnom pretsedente i doktrine // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2000. ¹ 5 (90).
4. Marchenko M.N. Sudebnyi pretsedent: raznoobrazie ponyatii i mnogoobrazie form proyavleniya // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2006. ¹ 6.
5. Marchenko M.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudeiskoe pravo. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.
6. Malyshev Kr. Kurs obshchego grazhdanskogo prava Rossii. T.1. SPb., 1880.
7. Lazarev V.V. Normativnaya priroda sudebnogo pretsedenta // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2012. ¹ 4.
8. Krasina E.N. Mezhdunarodnyi sudebnyi pretsedent kak element modernizatsii pravovoi sistemy Rossii // Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi Akademii advokatury i notariata.2011. ¹ 1(20).
9. Zor'kin V.D. Pretsedentnyi kharakter reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2004. ¹ 12.
10. Dzhura V. V. O sudebnom pretsedente v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik. 2005. ¹ 2.
11. Voitovich E.P. Sudebnaya praktika v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2006.
12. Brezhnev V. E. Sudebnyi pretsedent v Rossii: polemika i predlozheniya // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanii. 2011. Vyp. 9.
13. Bodrov S.Yu. Sudebnyi pretsedent v sisteme istochnikov rossiiskogo prava: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan', 2004.
14. Balasanyan A.R. Sootnoshenie obychaya delovogo oborota s sudebnym pretsedentom i sudebnoi praktikoi // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. ¹ 3(31.
15. Fetishchev D. Sudebnaya praktika kak istochnik prava // Nauchno-analiticheskii zhurnal Obozrevatel'-Observer. 2008. ¹ 5.
16. Markov P.V. Usloviya osushchestvleniya sudebnogo usmotreniya v stranakh kontinental'noi i anglosaksonskoi pravovoi sem'i // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2012.-¹ 4.-S.73-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.318. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_318.html
17. Romanova E.V.. Sudebnaya doktrina kak istochnik (forma) prava v nalogovom prave SShA // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
18. V. A. Oganesyan. Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka kak osobyi istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
19. N. Yu. Erpyleva. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i formirovanie istochnikov mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – ¹ 3.
20. Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.753
21. R. A. Gurbanov Vzaimodeistvie organov pravosudiya gosudarstv-chlenov ES s organami
22. pravosudiya Evropeiskogo soyuza // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 3. - C. 128 - 143.
23. Sokolov T.V. Konstitutsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo – mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoi vlasti?!. // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 313 - 325. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.3.11168.
24. S.V. Kodan Formirovanie istochnikovedeniya istorii gosudarstva i prava Rossii (XVIII – pervaya chetvert' XIX vv.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 649 - 661. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.14.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.