Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Ogleznev V.V. Legal language, ascriptive legal utterances, and law enforcement

Abstract: This article demonstrates that within the legal language there have been discovered the so-called ascriptive legal utterances (ascriptions), which differ from the descriptive statements. The author determines that the ascriptions in law help realize a special function of the language – the performative one, or taking action using words. It became possible as a result of implementation within the legal language of a methodological and conceptual apparatus of the theory of speech acts, developed by an English language expert John Austin and American philosopher Searle. The methodology of philosophy of common language, as well as the conceptual apparatus of the theory of speech acts was being used in the course of this work. The author’s main contribution consists in establishment of semantic specificity of the ascriptive legal utterances, and development of the linguistic formula of ascriptions, which reflects theirs special character and importance for the legal language. It is also highlighted that ascription represents a separate speech act, which mostly occurs in the legal environment.


Keywords:

law enforcement, pragmatics, semantics, speech act, descriptive utterances, ascriptive legal utterances, legal language, court decision, action, legislative norm


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Searle J.R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language [Text]. Cambridge, 1969. 204 pp.
2. Kasatkin S.N. Kak opredelyat' sotsial'nye ponyatiya? Kontseptsiya askriptivizma i otmenyaemosti yuridicheskogo yazyka Gerberta Kharta [Tekst]. Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2014. 472 s.
3. Ostin Dzh.L. Slovo kak deystvie [Tekst] // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike / Pod red. B.Yu. Gorodetskogo. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevykh aktov. S. 22–130.
4. Afonasin E.V., Didikin A.B. Filosofiya prava [Tekst]. Novosibirsk: Novosib. gos. un-t, 2006. 92 s.
5. Khart G.L.A. Pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti i prav [Tekst] // Pravovedenie. 2010. ¹ 5(292). S. 116-135.
6. Ogleznev V.V. G.L.A. Khart i formirovanie analiticheskoy filosofii prava [Tekst]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2012. 216 s.
7. Devitt M. The Metaphysics of Nonfactualism [Text] // Nous. 1996. Vol. 30. P. 159-176.
8. Ogleznev V.V., Tarasov I.P. Askriptivnost' kak ontologicheskoe svoystvo yuridicheskikh ponyatiy [Tekst] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2010. ¹ 4(12). S. 101-110.
9. Ushakov A.A. Ocherki sovetskoy zakonodatel'noy stilistiki. Pravo i yazyk [Tekst]. M.: RAP, 2008. 314 s.
10. Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya, yuridicheskiy yazyk i filosofiya prava [Tekst]. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2016. 236 s.
11. Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Opredelenie per genus proximum et differentiam specificam i yuridicheskiy yazyk [Tekst] // Scholae. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 228-240.
12. Lezov S.V. Yuridicheskie ponyatiya i yazyk prava v sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh (nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor) [Tekst]. M.: INION, 1986. 71 s.
13. Serl Dzh.R. Klassifikatsiya illokutivnykh aktov [Tekst] // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike / Pod red. B.Yu. Gorodetskogo. M., 1986. Vyp. XVII. S. 170-194.