Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Filimonov I.A., Filimonov A.A.
Theory and practice of punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 6.
P. 754-760.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52648
Filimonov I.A., Filimonov A.A. Theory and practice of punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activitiesAbstract: The authors consider the law enforcement aspects of the sentencing in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities as a punishment for certain crimes. In the course of the investigation the authors used the formal-logical method, systemic analysis, comparative law, questionnaires, surveys and statistical method. The authors draw attention to the need to increase the application of the penalty of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities as an additional punishment in cases of corruption offenses. It is noted that in a number of articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code specifies commission of a crime by a person using his official position is an aggravating circumstance, but the penalties do not list the aforementioned method of punishment. The authors substantiate the feasibility of introducing sanctions in a number of articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code the penalty of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities as a mandatory additional penalty. Proposals are made to appointment of punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities of punishment by restricting the scope of the prohibition, in particular by reference to the performance of specific powers (for example, healthcare workers). Keywords: imposition of sentence, criminal penalties, crime, officer, work, title, deprivation of rights, sentence, official authority, legal precedent
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Ramazanov A.Zh. Nakazaniya, ne svyazannye s lisheniem svobody (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Ucheb. posobie / Pod obshch. red. E.V. Seredy.-SPb.: Izd-vo yurid. in-ta, 2002. – S 79.
2. Gorelik I.I., Tishkevich I.S. Voprosy ugolovnogo prava v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda BSSR. Minsk, 1973. S. 162. 3. Grigonis E.P., Leont'ev O.V. Otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya, sovershennye medrabotnikami. SPb., 2008. S. 76. 4. Osnovy meditsinskogo prava Rossii / Pod red. Yu.D. Sergeeva. M., 2007. S. 54 5. Glashev A.A. Meditsinskoe pravo: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo dlya yuristov i medikov. M., 2004. S. 51. 6. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Khabarovskogo kraevogo suda ot 14.03.2011 ¹ 44-u-63/2011 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus». Prigovor po delu o sluzhebnom podloge i poluchenii dolzhnostnym litsom vzyatki za nezakonnye deistviya izmenen: utochneno naznachennoe osuzhdennoi dopolnitel'noe nakazanie kak lishenie prava zanimat'sya vrachebnoi deyatel'nost'yu, svyazannoi s osushchestvleniem organizatsionno-rasporyaditel'nykh i khozyaistvennykh funktsii, v tom chisle s pravom opredelyat' vremennuyu netrudosposobnost' patsientov i vydavat' listki netrudosposobnosti. Opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 28.09.2010 ¹ 22-6267// SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus». 7. Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeistvie: monografiya / G.A. Esakov, T.G. Ponyatovskaya, A.I. Rarog i dr.; pod red. A.I. Raroga. M.: Prospekt, 2012. 288 s. 8. Kapelyushnik M.S. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoi deyatel'nost'yu // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2006. ¹ 12. S. 25-27. 9. Lukashov A. Lishenie spetsial'nogo prava kak vid nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. ¹ 3. S. 31. 10. Otchety o rabote ugolovno ispolnitel'nykh inspektsii po forme UII-1 za 2010-2015 gg. 11. Kudryavtsev V.N. Strategii bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M., 2003. S. 202. 12. Krylova E.S. Lishenie prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoi deyatel'nost'yu kak vid ugolovnogo nakazaniya po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: Avtoreferat diss. na soisk. uch. stepeni k.yu.n.-Kazan', 2002. S. 18. 13. Dvoretskii M.Yu. Effektivnaya realizatsiya Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 11 yanvarya 2007 goda ¹ 2 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiiskoi Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» v optimizatsii primeneniya lisheniya prava zanimat' opredelennye dolzhnosti ili zanimat'sya opredelennoi deyatel'nost'yu // Voenno-yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2008. ¹ 3. S. 29. 14. Naumov A.V. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Kurs lektsii: V 3 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast'. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2007. S. 543. 15. Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi) / G.N. Borzenkov, A.V. Brilliantov, A.V. Galakhova i dr.; otv. red. V.M. Lebedev. 13-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurait, 2013. S. 1069. 16. Informatsionnyi byulleten' Mezhparlamentskoi assamblei gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNGMPASNG. 1995. ¹ 8. S. 119-185. 17. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 ¹ 58 «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiiskoi Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» // «Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF», ¹ 2, fevral', 2016. 18. Kuleshova N.N. Dopolnitel'nye vidy nakazanii: ugolovno-pravovoi i ugolovno-ispolnitel'nyi aspekty Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2006. S. 143. 19. Bagmet A.M. Spetsial'nye mery preduprezhdeniya korruptsii v pravookhranitel'noi sisteme // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2015. - 1. - C. 36 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8681.2015.1.18591. |