Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Krivenkova M.V.
Responsibility of a state for distortion of historical facts: international legal aspect
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 5.
P. 605-609.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52630
Krivenkova M.V. Responsibility of a state for distortion of historical facts: international legal aspectAbstract: This article examines the currently relevant issue of distortion of historical facts by private parties and the official representatives of states. As one of the main causes the author considers the absence within the existing international law of responsibility for the countries in general, as well as responsibility for falsification and distortion of information about the current circumstances, or those that took place in the past. For the purpose of developing the approach towards the solution of the aforementioned problem from the perspective of international law, the author examines and analyzes the positions of the separate legal acts (obligatory for execution by the participating states, recommended, and projects of such acts), as well as the norms of the Russian legislation that hold criminal and administrative responsibility for denying the facts established by the sentence of the International Military Tribunal for trial and punishment of the chief war criminals of the European countries of the axis; approval of crimes established by the same sentence; as well as spread of the intentionally false testimony about the activity of USSR during the World War II. The article conducts a legal analysis of the Russian and international legal norms that regulate responsibility for falsification and distortion of historical facts. The author comes to the conclusion that there is a pressing need for the international legal norms which not only establish the unlawfulness of the actions themselves, but also codify the international legal responsibility of the states for the corresponding illegal activity. Keywords: Distortion of historical facts, Formation of public opinion, International legal responsibility, State, Hold responsibility, International relations, Domestic law, Falsification, Criminal responsibility, International legal violation
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka (prinyata General'noy Assambleey OON 10.12.1948) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 1995.-¹67.
2. Doklad Komissii po nauke i tekhnike v tselyakh razvitiya / Dok. OON E/CN.16/1995/L.2. 22 May 1995. URL: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G95/517/71/PDF/G9551771.pdf?OpenElement (data obrashcheniya 20.03.2015) 3. Dok. OON A/RES/56/83. URL: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/477/99/PDF/N0147799.pdf?OpenElement (data obrashcheniya 29.03.2015) 4. Idayatov A.K. Transformatsiya roli mirnykh sposobov razresheniya mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva. – 2013. – ¹2 (71). – S. 14-16. 5. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: feder. zakon ot 30.12.2001 ¹ 195-FZ [red. ot 08.03.2015] // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2001. – ¹ 256. 6. Konventsiya OON 1998 g. O dostupe k informatsii, uchastii obshchestvennosti v protsesse prinyatiya resheniy i dostupe k pravosudiyu po voprosam, kasayushchimsya okruzhayushchey sredy. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/orhus.shtml (data obrashcheniya 20.03.2015) 7. Karpovich O. G. Voprosy prav cheloveka i natsional'noy bezopasnosti v SShA // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. – 2012. – ¹1. – S. 36-40. 8. Kurdyukov G. I. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie norm mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava // Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. Spetsial'nyy vypusk. – 2005. – S. 112-118. 9. Ob utverzhdenii sostava Komissii pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii po formirovaniyu i podgotovke rezerva upravlencheskikh kadrov, izmenenii i priznanii utrativshimi silu nekotorykh aktov Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 14.02.2012 g. ¹183 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2009. – ¹ 89. 10. Orlov A. A. Nachalo Vtoroy mirovoy voyny kak povod k fal'sifikatsii istorii // Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. – 2009. – ¹S4. – S. 332-336. 11. O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii: feder. zakon ot 05.05.2014 g. ¹ 128-FZ // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2014. – ¹ 101. 12. O Komissii pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii po protivodeystviyu popytkam fal'sifikatsii istorii v ushcherb interesam Rossii: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 15.05.2009 g. ¹549 // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2009. – ¹ 89. 13. Rekomendatsiya o razvitii i ispol'zovanii mnogoyazychiya i vseobshchem dostupe k kiberprostranstvu. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/multilingualism_recommendation.shtml (data obrashcheniya 29.03.2015) 14. Sazonova K.L. Osnovaniya mezhdunarodno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstv // Yuridicheskaya nauka. – 2012. – ¹4. – S. 77-79. 15. Sereda M.Yu. Zakreplenie prava na dostup v set' Internet v mezhdunarodno-pravovykh aktakh i zakonodatel'stve zarubezhnykh stran // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. – 2013. – ¹5 (74). – S. 44-47. 16. Skvortsov L.V. Teoriya istiny: tsivilizatsionnyy aspekt // Kul'turologiya. – 2005. – ¹2. – S.177-214. 17. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: feder. zakon. ot 13.06.1996 ¹ 63-FZ [red. ot 08.03.2015] // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 1996. – ¹25. – St. 2954 18. Sazonova K.L. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy: problemy i perspektivy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. - 2012. - 1. - C. 16 - 25. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wl/article_371.html 19. A. A. Borisenkov Mirovaya politika — vid politicheskogo vliyaniya // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 49 - 56. 20. Karyakin V.V. Sovreemnnye krizisy i konflikty: osobennsoti, stsenarii razvitiya i predotvrashchenie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 446 - 457. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11422. |