Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Nikitina I.E. Institutional and legal significance of the involvement of forensic database and criminal records in the system of cooperation European Union member-states in criminal cases

Abstract: This work discloses institutional and legal significance of the involvement of forensic database and criminal record in the system of cooperation European Union member states in criminal cases. Analyzes the process of creating an information system automated exchange of criminal information, principles, foundation and entities, and institutional mechanism to ensure the implementation of the Treaty of Prum. Providing an interstate process of exchange criminal information, to promote the positive and minimize the negative effects of storage and transmission of personal information. Using the dialectical method, as well as the traditional importance of comparative legal methods of studying legislation to implement the fight against crime, this work presents an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of Treaty of Prum. Since the Treaty of Prum entry into force the process forward harmonization of legislation for the protection of human rights and freedoms was further developed. Conclusions of this work may be useful to law enforcement authorities in the detection and investigation of cross-border crimes.

Keywords:

System of international security, Information security, Criminal database, Cooperation, Treaty of Prum, Protection of personal data, Criminal information, Automated exchange, Unification of legislation, Criminal investigation, international security system, information security, forensic database, cooperation, The Treaty of Prum, protection of personal data, criminal records, automated exchange, harmonization of legislation, investigation of crimes

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Zoller E. La bonne foi en droit international public. Paris, 1977.-P. 350.
2. G. G. Shinkaretskaya Evropeyskiy soyuz i Evropeyskaya konventsiya
3. o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2012. - 1. - C. 54 - 64.
4. Rousseau Ch. Droit International Public. Paris, 1970. Vol. 1-P. 382-383.
5. Paul V. The Abuse of Rights and Bona Fides in International Law / Ӧsterreichishe Zeitschrift für ӧffentliches Recht und Vӧlkerrect. 1977. Bd. 28 N. 1/2. S. 125, 127, 128-129.
6. Schwarzenberger G. International Law. London. 1976. P. 382-383.
7. Renouf A. The rule of law in international affairs / Australian Foreign Affairs Record. 1975. July. P. 395-405.
8. Protocol integrating the Schengen acquis into the framework of the EU, 19 June 1990 / Official Journal C 30, 10 November 1997. Dostupno na sayte: www.europa.eu.
9. Oppenheim L. International Law / Ed. by H. Lauterpacht. London, 1958.Vol. 1 P. 345-347; 21. Oppenheim L. Op. Cit. P. 345-347.
10. OL L 210, 2008 8 6.
11. Official Journal C 193/2 of 24.06.1997.
12. Lia van der Westen. Legal Regulations Governing Forensic Scientific Methods // Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An inquiry into the desirability of and opportunities for international standards, Thela Thesis, The Hague, 2000.-P. 284.
13. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007) The Forensic Use of Bio Information: Ethical Issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics: London [Online] htpp://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/The%20forensic%20use%20of%20bioinformation%20%20ethical%20issues.pdf (14 December 2010).
14. Jacqué J.-P. Eléments pour une theorie de l’acte juridique en droit international public. Paris, 1972.-P. 171
15. Jeffreys A.J. et. al. Individual specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA, The Hague, 1985. P. 76–79.
16. Jackson S.W. The rule of law among nations / The Rule of Law. Dallas, 1961.-P. 71-86.
17. The Hague Program: strengthening freedom, security and Justice in the EU / Official Journal of European Communities, 2005. Vol. 48. C. 53. – P. 1–14. Some remarks on Schengen III / Statewatch Bulletin, 2005, 17 July. Dostupno na sayte: http:www.statewatch.org/news/2005/jul/17Schengen-III.htm.
18. Dicey A.V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of Constitution. London, 1960. P. 183-206.
19. Dok. Nr. 11367/12 Council of the European Union, Brussels, 20 June 2012.
20. Innocence Project (nd) [Online] http://www.innocenceproject.org/know/ (29 October 2010).
21. Cheng B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, London, 1953. P. 121-136.
22. Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Sbornik dokumentov Soveta Evropy «Zashchita prav cheloveka i bor'ba s prestupnost'yu» 2-e dopolnennoe izdanie. M., 2005. – S. 49.
23. MVD Finlyandii – Ministerstvo upravleniya, regional'nogo razvitiya i vnutrenney bezopasnosti. Khel'sinki, 2000.
24. Blakemore B., Blake Ch. Can the National DNA Database be effective and comply with human rights legislation? / Police Journal, Great Britain, 2010, Vol. 85, ¹ 3, P. 192.
25. Kalamkaryan R.A. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. M., 1990.
26. Kalamkaryan R.A. Gospodstvo prava Rule of Law v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. M., 2004.-S. 256-269.
27. Dmitrieva G.K. Printsip dobrosovestnosti v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave / Pravovedenie. 1979. ¹ 6.-S. 85-86.
28. Ivanov I.S. Verkhovenstvo prava v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh / Mezhdunar. zhizn'. 2000. ¹ 12.-S. 62-67.
29. Dmitrieva G.K. Stanovlenie printsipa nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya pravom / Sovetskiy ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1987. M, 1988.-S. 114 – 117.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.