|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Solionov A.V.
Evolution of Pyotr Tkachev’s assessment of the potential of mass legal awareness among the Russian peasantry
// Law and Politics.
2016. ¹ 2.
P. 281-286.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52595
Solionov A.V. Evolution of Pyotr Tkachev’s assessment of the potential of mass legal awareness among the Russian peasantryAbstract: This article analyzes the early publications of Pyotr Tkachev, a prominent representative of the people’s movement, written by him during the 1860’s in the period of “Great Reforms” dedicated to the issues of law. The subject of this research is the regularities of the genesis and evolution of the thinker’s assessment of the potential of the mass peasantry legal awareness. The author substantiates the fact of the gradual evolution of his outlooks upon this issue and highlights the final point of this process, which testifies that he completely reevaluated his earlier positions; an attempt is also made to explain the root causes for such substantial metamorphoses. The main conclusion of this research is the thesis that the revolutionary’s publications dedicated to the participation of the public element in the jury trial greatly differ between those published before and after 1865. In author’s opinion, namely Tkachev’s complete resolution of this issue has served as the foundation for the political doctrine created by him during emigration in the 1870’s, which rejected the active role of the masses in both, the political and social revolution in favor of a small group of ideological revolutionaries. Keywords: authority, Pyotr Tkachev, narodniks, judicial reform, legal awareness, magistrates court, jury trial, feudal culture, society, history
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Stat'ya Tkacheva "O sovremennykh voprosakh ugolovnogo prava". // GARF f. 95, op. 2, ed. khr. 88. L. 4.
2. Tkachev P. N. Novye knigi (I. Rennenkampf. Ocherki yuridicheskoy entsiklopedii, A. Gradovskiy. Istoriya mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossii. Glazer. O vliyanii suda na prigovor prisyazhnykh.) // Delo. ¹ 9. 1868. S. 45. 3. Tkachev P. N. Narod i revolyutsiya. // Soch. v 2 t. – M., 1975. T. 2. S. 168-169. 4. Tkachev P. N. Dlya nashikh budushchikh prisyazhnykh (Yuridicheskie zametki). // Biblioteka dlya chteniya. ¹ 5. 1865. S. 98-100. 5. Tkachev P. N. Bibliograficheskiy listok. (Gue-Glunek. O sude prisyazhnykh.— A. Berner. O smertnoy kazni.— K. Mittermayer. Smertnaya kazn' po rezul'tatam nauchnykh issledovaniy, uspekhov zakonodatel'stva i opytov). // Russkoe slovo. ¹ 11. 1865. S. 51-52. 6. Tkachev P. N. O voznagrazhdenii prisyazhnykh. // Biblioteka dlya chteniya. ¹ 8. 1864. S. 30. 7. Tkachev P. N. Mirovoy sud po smyslu «Glavnykh osnovaniy dlya proektov grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i sudoustroystva». // Vremya. ¹ 11. 1862. S. 78. 8. Tkachev P. N. Nashi budushchie prisyazhnye. Sovremennoe obozrenie. // Vremya. ¹ 4. 1863. S. 105-110. 9. Tkachev P. N. O mirovykh sud'yakh (Po povodu «Pisem iz derevni» Sumarokova. «Otech. zap.», 1862, ¹ 6). // Vremya. ¹ 7. 1862. S. 90 10. Opredelenie Senata «O nepriznanii prava za zemskimi sobraniyami naznachat' posobiya prisyazhnym zasedatelyam». 5 sentyabrya 1873 g. // Sobranie uzakoneniy i rasporyazheniy, izdavaemykh pri Pravitel'stvuyushchem Senate. SPb., 1873.– ¹ 92.– St. 1159. 11. Kachorovskiy K. Narodnoe pravo. – M., 1906 g. S. 16-17. 12. Il'in I. A. O sushchnosti pravosoznaniya. – M., 1993. S. 40. 13. Efimenko A. Ya. Issledovaniya narodnoy zhizni, Vyp 1. Obychnoe pravo. – M., 1884. 382 s. 14. Demichev A. A. Istoriya suda prisyazhnykh v dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii (1864-1917 gg.) – M., 2007. S. 128-129. 15. Bezobrazov V. P. Mysli po povodu mirovoy sudebnoy vlasti. – M., 1866. S. 5. 16. Gue-Glunek. O sude prisyazhnykh. – SPb., 1865 g. – 360 c. 17. Foynitskiy I. Ya. Opravdatel'nye resheniya prisyazhnykh zasedateley i mery k ikh sokrashcheniyu. // Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava. ¹ 6. 1879. S. 46. |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
