Library
|
Your profile |
Law and Politics
Reference:
Popov V.A.
Establishment of criminal enterprise or participation therein: separate questions of qualification
// Law and Politics.
2015. ¹ 12.
P. 1688-1692.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52552
Popov V.A. Establishment of criminal enterprise or participation therein: separate questions of qualificationAbstract: This article examines certain questions of qualification of the action of organizers and members of a criminal enterprise in the process of application of Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Such questions include: 1) questions pertaining to qualification by the rules of actual accumulation of crimes; 2) questions pertaining to possession of weapons by the members of the criminal enterprise; 3) questions that pertain to forceful participation in the criminal organization. The object of this research is the norms of criminal law and legal literature on this topic. The author formulates the corresponding rules of qualification for each of the aforementioned situations, which can be used as a certain methodological base in the work of the law enforcement agencies and courts, as well as for future research in the science of criminal law. The author also makes recommendations on possible changes to the current criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. Keywords: compulsion, objective imputation, incitement, organized crime, questions of qualification, criminal enterprise, criminal association, weapon possession, qualifying sign, criminal law
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 goda ¹ 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015g.) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus;
2. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 10 iyunya 2010 goda ¹ 12 «O sudebnoy praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (ney)» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus; 3. Petrov S.V. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo kak forma souchastiya: problemy teorii i praktiki: monogr. / S.V. Petrov. – N.Novgorod: NIU RANKhiGS, 2013; 4. Gaukhman L.D., Maksimov S.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii). Kommentariy – M.: Uchebno-konsul'tatsionnyy tsentr «YurInfoR», 1997; 5. Glazkova L.V. Banditizm i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy razgranicheniya: monografiya. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013; 6. Agapov P. Organizatsiya prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii): nekotorye problemy yuridicheskoy otsenki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. ¹ 2; 7. Arutyunov A. Organizovannye gruppy i prestupnye soobshchestva: voprosy kvalifikatsii // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2002. ¹ 9 (221); 8. Danilenko N.N. Ponyatie i kharakteristika organizovannykh prestupnykh formirovaniy // Zakon. 2006. ¹ 5; 9. Baleev S.A. Priznaki organizovannoy gruppy: problemy doktrinal'nogo i sudebnogo tolkovaniya // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2008. ¹ 4; 10. Galiakbarov R.R. Bor'ba s gruppovymi prestupleniyami. Voprosy kvalifikatsii. Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2000; 11. Savel'ev D.V. Prestupnaya gruppa v sfere ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2000; 12. Viden'kina Zh.V. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva ili uchastie v nem // Zakon i pravo. 2013. ¹ 12; 13. Ermakova T.N. Banda i prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya) kak formy souchastiya: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2009; 14. Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real'nost'. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press», 2001; 15. Agapov P.V. Nuzhna li v Ugolovnom kodekse RF otvetstvennost' za sozdanie organizovannoy prestupnoy gruppy? // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2006. ¹ 3; 16. Glazkova L. Sovershenie prestupleniy vooruzhennymi uchastnikami prestupnykh soobshchestv (prestupnykh organizatsiy) // Zakonnost'. 2011. ¹ 10; 17. Tsvetkov Yu.A. Prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya): ugolovno-pravovoy i kriminologicheskiy analiz: Diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004; 18. prigovor Orenburgskogo oblastnogo suda ot 29 yanvarya 2013 goda ¹ 2-89/2012. [Elektronnyy resurs] http://www.sudrf.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.03.2015g.); 19. Chernyy A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za organizatsiyu prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii) po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii, Belarusi i Ukrainy: sravnitel'nyy analiz: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2005; 20. Skotinina V.N. Komparativistskoe issledovanie sostava organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoy organizatsii): vnutrigosudarstvennyy, mezhdunarodnyy i zarubezhnyy aspekty: Avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. |