|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Law and Politics
Reference:
Tashtemirova N.A.
The ratio of limits of international legal prohibition of use of force, and protection of civilians on the example of Yemen
// Law and Politics.
2015. ¹ 8.
P. 1129-1133.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=52476
Tashtemirova N.A. The ratio of limits of international legal prohibition of use of force, and protection of civilians on the example of YemenAbstract: The subject of this research is the theoretical and practical aspects of the position of rights and protection of civilian population during an armed conflict (on the example of Yemen). A special attention is given to the cooperation of regional organizations and the United Nations on the issue of use of force within international relations, and the practical application of Article 51 of the UN Charter. The postulation of the main problem is the ethics of use of force for the purpose of helping the civilian population, as well as the need to limit the means such as airstrikes and other means with low-precision destruction. The following conclusion is made: the only possible way to protect the civilian population can be ensured within the framework of a country through the creation of a working mechanism for holding parties accountable for serious violations of the norms of international humanitarian law and human rights during peace time, as well as during an armed conflict. Keywords: UN Charter, international law, international relations, regional organizations, UN, civilian population, protection, self-defense, Yemen, armed conflict
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
References
1. Doklad General'nogo sekretarya po voprosu o zashchite grazhdanskikh lits v vooruzhennom konflikte, S/2015/453, ot 18 iyunya 2015 g. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2015/453&Lang=R
2. Letter dated 12.03.2015 from the Charge d’Affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of France the the UN addressed to the Secretary General. S/2015/176. URL:http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2015_176.pdf 3. http://www.unhcr.org.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/Jan2015_Displacement_Facts_and_Figures_incMYT2014.pdf 4. http://www.un.org/ru/documents/charter/chapter1.shtml 5. http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/intlaw_principles.shtml 6. Vol'fgang graf Vittstum i dr. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo, Berlin, 2007, S.818. 7. Identical letters dated 26 of March 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Qatar to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council , S/2015/217 URL:http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_2015_217.pdf 8. Rezolyutsiya S/RES/2216 (2015) SB OON ot 14 aprelya 2015 g. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/103/75/PDF/N1510375.pdf?OpenElement 9. Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v.USA), Judgment of 27 of June 1986, paragraph 193, page. 92 (URL:http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/70/6503.pdf) 10. Konsul'tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo suda otnositel'no pravovykh posledstviy stroitel'stva steny na okkupirovannoy palestinskoy territorii, A/ES-10/273., ot 13 iyulya 2004g., S.58,URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/ru/advisory/advisory_2004-07-09.pdf 11. http://www.un.org/ru/documents/charter/chapter8.shtml 12. Khans-Peter Gasser «Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. Vvedenie», MKKK, M.:1995, S.92/ 13. Marco Sassoli, Antoine A.Bouvier, Anne Quintuin, “How does Law protect in war? Cases, Documents and teaching materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law”, Volume I, ICRC Third Edition, p.28. 14. Rezolyutsiya S/RES/2222 (2015) SB OON ot 27 maya 2015 g. URL:http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/153/83/PDF/N1515383.pdf?OpenElement 15. Punkt b stat'i 5 Deklaratsii o merakh po likvidatsii mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma, prinyataya rezolyutsiey GAOON ¹. 49/60 ot 09.12.1994g., URL:http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/terrdec1.shtml 16. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/510/54/PDF/N0551054.pdf?OpenElement 17. http://www.un.org/ru/law/icc/rome_statute%28r%29.pdf 18. D.Schindler, “International Humanitarian Law and internationalized internal armed conflicts”, International Review of the Red Cross, N.230,1982, p.255. 19. Mezhdunarodnyy ugolovnyy tribunal po byvshey Yugoslavii, delo ¹ IT-94-1-A72, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadića/k/a "DULE", Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995, para. 70 (1994-1995), 1 ICTY JR 352, para. 70. 20. Proekt statey ob otvetstvennosti gosudarstv za mezhdunarodno-protivopravnye deyaniya, stat'ya 23, Ezhegodnik Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2001 god, tom II, chast' 2. 21. Zaklyuchitel'noe kommyunike «Gruppy deystviy» po Sirii, Zheneva, 30 iyunya 2012 goda (1282-01-07-2012). 22. http://www.chemico-group.com/ru/images/stories/docs/ustav.pdf 23. Rezolyutsiya S/Res/ 2222 (2015) SB OON ot 27.05.2015 g. URL:http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/153/83/PDF/N1515383.pdf?OpenElement 24. Rezolyutsiya S/Res/ 2216 (2015) SBOON ot 14.04.2015 g. URL:http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/103/75/PDF/N1510375.pdf?OpenElement 25. Rezolyutsiya GA OON A/RES/66/176 ot 19.12.2011 g. URL:http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/469/40/PDF/N1146940.pdf?OpenElement 26. International Law (3d edn) [edited by] M.Evans. Oxford University Press, 2010, S.597. 27. Doklad General'nogo sekretarya po voprosu o zashchite grazhdanskikh lits v vooruzhennom konflikte, S/2015/453 ot 18 iyunya 2015 g. 28. Doklad General'nogo sekretarya po voprosu o zashchite grazhdanskikh lits v vooruzhennom konflikte, S/2015/453 ot 18 iyunya 2015 g. S.22/24. URL:http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2015/453&Lang= |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
