Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Vasil'chenko E.I. On certain issues of procedure by the investigative branch in high-priority cases

Abstract: On the example of detective and investigative work by the branches of internal affairs of the Russian Federation on cases of illegal drug trade, the author gives a detail examination to the possibility of optimizing the procedure of preliminary investigation. Through the prism of the idea of procedural economy, the author reviews the norms of the criminal procedural code of the Russian Federation, which regulates the work of the investigative branch related to procedure up to the moment of indictment. Analysis is conducted on the statistics that reflect separate aspects of the work of the branches of internal affairs of the Russian Federation during the period of 2012-2014. The scientific novelty of this research consist in the fact that the author studied the contradiction of the norms of criminal procedural code of the Russian Federation, according to which the investigative branch up until the moment of indictment, which warrants preliminary investigation, lacks the right to conduct any investigative actions even if there is a need to secure pertinent information from possible loss or tempering. The author accents his attention on the possibility of optimizing the process of procedural recording of pertinent information should there be future improvements to the legal norms that regulate the procedure of high-priority investigative work.


Keywords:

internal affairs, pertinent information, forensic inquiry, criminal case, high-piority cases, procedural economy, indictment, investigative branch, initial stage of investigation, illegal drug trade


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva ot 20 noyabrya 1864 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS GARANT. – URL: http://base.garant.ru/57791498/17/#block_20200#ixzz3MmFAuEbq (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2015).
2. Ct. 216 i st. 219 UPK RSFSR 1922 goda, utverzhdennogo postanovleniem VTsIK ot 25.05.1922. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ESU_4006/ (data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015);
3. Ct. 215 UPK RSFSR 1923 goda, utverzhdennogo postanovleniem VTsIK ot ot 15.02.1923. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ESU_3551/ (data obrashcheniya 21.06.2015).
4. Punkt «s» chasti 3 stat'i 14 Mezhdunarodnogo Pakta ot 16.12.1966 «O grazhdanskikh i politicheskikh pravakh» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. – 1994. – ¹12.
5. Punkt 3 stat'i 5 Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod (Zaklyuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950) // Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov. – 2001. – ¹3.
6. Prokof'eva S.M. Kontseptsiya gumanizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Monografiya / Pod obshch. red. V.P. Sal'nikova. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii. 2002. – 448 s.
7. Gurevich M. A. Printsipy sovetskogo grazhdansko-protsessual'nogo prava// Trudy Vsesoyuznogo yuridicheskogo zaochnogo instituta. – .M., 1965. T.3.
8. Pashkevich P. F. Protsessual'nyy zakon i effektivnost' ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 1984. – 176 c.
9. Sokol P.Ya. Protsessual'nye garantii bystroty predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. – Avtoref. diss…kand. yurid. Nauk. – M., 1990.
10. Polyakov M.P., Smolin A.Yu. Printsip protsessual'noy ekonomii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Monografiya / N. Novgorod.: Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii. 2011. – 152 s.
11. P. 21 i p. 22 st. 1 Federal'nogo zakona ot 02.12.2008 ¹226-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –08.12.2008. – ¹ 49. – St. 5724.
12. P. 19 i p. 20 st. 2 Federal'nogo zakona ot 04.03.2013 ¹ 23-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –04.03.2013. – ¹ 9. – St. 875.
13. Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2012 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/804701/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015).
14. Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2013 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/1609734/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015);
15. Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii – yanvar'-dekabr' 2014 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt MVD Rossii. – URL: https://mvd.ru/reports/item/2994866/(data obrashcheniya 21.02.2015).
16. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 13.07.2015 ¹ 356 «O vnesenii izmeneniya v Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 5 maya 2014 g. ¹ 300 «O nekotorykh voprosakh Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii»//Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. –20.07.2015. – ¹ 29 (chast' II). – St. 4472.
17. Stat'ya 11 Federal'nogo zakona ot 12.08.1995 N 144-FZ (red. ot 29.06.2015) «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti». [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=181943 (data obrashcheniya 25.07.2015).
18. Ob utverzhdenii Nastavleniya po organizatsii ekspertno-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel'nosti v sisteme MVD Rossii: Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 11 yanvarya 2009 ¹ 7. [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=EXP;n=451495 (data obrashcheniya 25.07.2015).
19. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 04.02.1999 ¹ 18-O «Po zhalobe grazhdan M.B. Nikol'skoy i M.I. Sapronova na narushenie ikh konstitutsionnykh prav otdel'nymi polozheniyami Federal'nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»// Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. – 1999. – ¹3.
20. Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 23.12.2009 po delu ¹ A56-33508/2009 IFNS nepravomerno otkazala OOO v vozmeshchenii NDS, soslavshis' na podpisanie schetov-faktur neustanovlennym litsom, poskol'ku spravki ekspertno-kriminalisticheskogo tsentra GUVD o rezul'tatakh operativnogo issledovaniya, provedennogo v ramkakh ORM, ne mogut byt' priznany nadlezhashchimi dokazatel'stvami po dannomu delu.
21. Prigovor Nevskogo rayonnogo suda Sankt-Peterburga v suda po delu ¹ 1-780/11 [Elektronnyy resurs]: ofitsial'nyy sayt UFSKN po Sankt-Peterburgu i Leningradskoy oblasti. – URL: http://www.gnk.spb.ru/prigovor2012/13.htm (data obrashcheniya 23.07.2015).
22. Voprosy organizatsii proizvodstva sudebnykh ekspertiz v ekspertno-kriminalisticheskikh podrazdeleniyakh organov vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29 iyunya 2005 ¹ 511 (v red. ot 15 oktyabrya 2012). [Elektronnyy resurs]: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. – URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=141831 (data obrashcheniya 20.07.2015).
23. V. N. Grigor'ev Nachalo ugolovnogo proizvodstva: sistema sderzhek i protivovesov // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. - 2013. - 2. - C. 17 - 21.