Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Teymurov E.S. On correlation of principles of fair and rational use of fresh water resources and the right of a country to a part of a transboundary water source

Abstract: This article examines the principles of fair and rational use of fresh water resources and the right of a sovereign nation to a part of transboundary fresh waters, their historical establishment, statutorization and explanation of their content on universal and regional levels. A special attention is given to the factors of determination of fairness and rationality of the use of the waters and their interconnection, as well as the international legal regulation of the correlation between various types of use of fresh water resources. In the course of the research the author determined the principles of usage and protection of fresh water resources are unified for international waterways and transboundary watercourses. The fairness of usage means an optimal distribution of water, and rationality – passing measures on maintenance and restoration of water resources to the level that ensures maximal benefit from its usage. The author proves that a fresh water object falls under the sovereignty of a nation due to the fact that the “reservoir” represents a part of the territory of the country.


Keywords:

equitable use of a watercourse, freshwater, rational utilisation, sovereignty over the watercourse, priority of uses of a watercourses, principles for the use of water, international watercourse, transboundary aquifer, vital human needs, reasonable use of a watercourse


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Konventsiya o prave nesudokhodnykh vidov ispol'zovaniya mezhdunarodnykh vodotokov ot 21 maya 1997 g. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/watercrs.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2015 g.).
2. Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava o rabote ee pyat'desyat vos'moi sessii: dok. OON A/61/10. N'yu-Iork: OON, 2006. S. 210.
3. International Law Association Committee on Water Resources Law (2004). Fourth Report, Berlin Conference (2004).
4. Proekty statei po pravu transgranichnykh vodonosnykh gorizontov s kommentariyami // Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava o rabote ee shestidesyatoi sessii: dok. OON A/63/10. N'yu-Iork: OON, 2008. S. 18-85.
5. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1993. Vol. II. Part 1. pp. 179-185. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1994. Vol. II. Part 1. pp. 113-128.
6. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 2003. Vol. II. Part 1. P. 123.
7. Barberis J.A. International groundwater resources law (FAO legislative study 40). Food & Agriculture Org., 1986. pp. 74. Caponera D.A. Principles for International groundwater law // Natural Resources Journal Vol. 18, 1978, pp. 589-619. Fuentes X. The Utilization of International Groundwater in General International Law (chapter 8) // The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie / Guy S. Goodwin-Gill and Stefan Talmon. Oxford, Carendon press, 1999. pp. 177-198. Zaharia F. The Law of Transboundary Aquifers in Practice – the Mures Alluvial Fan Aquifer System (Romania / Hungary) // International Community Law Review Vol. 13, 2011, pp. 291-304.
8. Caponera D.A. Op. Cit. P. 603.
9. Draft Articles on The Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses // Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1994. Vol. II. Part 2. pp. 89-135.
10. Tarlock A.D., Wouters P. Are Shared Benefits of International Waters an Equitable Apportionment? // Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy Vol. 18, 2007, pp. 525-527. Dombrowsky I. Revisiting the potential for benefit sharing in the management of trans-boundary rivers // Water Policy Vol. 11, 2009, pp. 125-126.
11. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1994. Vol. II. Part 2. P. 97. Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava o rabote ee pyat'desyat vos'moi sessii: dok. OON A/61/10. N'yu-Iork: OON, 2006. S. 209.
12. Fuentes X. Op. Cit. pp. 186-187.
13. Barberis J.A. Op. Cit. P. 51.
14. Revised Protocol on Shared Watercourses 07 August 2000. URL: http://www.sadc.int/files/3413/6698/6218/Revised_Protocol_on_Shared_Watercourses_-_2000_-_English.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2015 g.).
15. Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava o rabote ee shestidesyatoi sessii: dok. OON A/63/10. N'yu-Iork: OON, 2008. S. 45.
16. Caponera D.A. Patterns of Cooperation in International Water Law: Principles and Institutions // Natural Resources Journal Vol. 25, 1985, P. 567.
17. McIntyre O. International Water Resources Law and the International Law Commission Draft Articles on Transboundary Aquifers: A Missed Opportunity for Cross-Fertilisation? // International Community Law Review Vol. 13, 2011, P. 245.
18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Development Law Service. Sources of International Water Law FAO legislative study 65. Food & Agriculture Org., 1998. pp. 212-215.
19. The Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers 1966. URL: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/meetings/legal_board/2010/annexes_groundwater_paper/Annex_II_Helsinki_Rules_ILA.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2015 g.).
20. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1994. Vol. II. Part 2. P. 101.
21. Doklad Komissii mezhdunarodnogo prava o rabote ee pyat'desyat vos'moi sessii: dok. OON A/61/10. N'yu-Iork: OON, 2006. S. 212.
22. Bekyashev K.A. Pravovoi rezhim mezhdunarodnykh vodotokov // Lex Russica. 2009. ¹ 2. 2009. S. 479.
23. Makhkambaev S.D. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie sotrudnichestva gosudarstv po ispol'zovaniyu transgranichnykh vodnykh resursov v regione Tsentral'noi Azii: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 227 s.
24. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1994. Vol. II. Part 2. P. 110.
25. Vodnyi Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 03.06.2006 g. ¹ 74-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2006. ¹ 23. St. 2381.
26. Vodnyi Kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ot 30.04.2014 g. ¹ 149-Z // Natsional'nyi reestr pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus'. 2014. ¹ 21.
27. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Development Law Service. Sources of International Water Law FAO legislative study 65. Food & Agriculture Org., 1998. pp. 21-202.
28. Vylegzhanin A.N. Upravlenie vodnymi resursami Rossii: mezhdunarodno-pravovye i zakonodatel'nye mekhanizmy: monografiya / A.N. Vylegzhanin, L.V. Savel'eva i dr.; Mosk.gos.in-t mezhdunar.otnoshenii (un-t) MID Rossii, kaf. mezhdunar.prava.-M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2008. S. 92.
29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Development Law Service. Sources of International Water Law FAO legislative study 65. Food & Agriculture Org., 1998. pp. 56-63.
30. Ibid. pp. 306-311.
31. de Chazournes L.B. Freshwater and International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2013. P. 132.
32. McCaffrey S. The Law of International Watercourses. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 291.
33. McIntyre O. Op. Cit. pp. 249-253.
34. Gureev S.A., Tarasova I.N. Mezhdunarodnoe rechnoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie / pod red. S. A. Gureeva. – M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 2004. S. 36-50. Nekoteneva M.V. Pravovye problemy ispol'zovaniya mezhdunarodnykh vodotokov: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 47-62. Makhkambaev S.D. Ukaz. soch. S. 86-94.
35. Kosareva M.A. Transgranichnye prirodnye resursy v mezhdunarodnom prave: ponyatie, status, rezhim: Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2008. S. 69-78.
36. McIntyre O. Op. Cit. P. 249.
37. Kosareva M.A. Ukaz. soch. S. 33.
38. Doklad o razvitii cheloveka 2006 «Chto kroetsya za nekhvatkoi vody: Vlast', bednost' i global'nyi krizis vodnykh resursov». M.: «Ves' Mir», 2006. S. 222.
39. Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong river basin 5 April 1995. URL: http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/policies/agreement-Apr95.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2015 g.).
40. Treaty relating to cooperative development of the water resources of the Columbia River Basin 17 January 1961. URL: http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/bi-145062.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2015 g.).
41. Soglashenie mezhdu Pravitel'stvom Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Pravitel'stvom Azerbaidzhanskoi Respubliki o ratsional'nom ispol'zovanii i okhrane vodnykh resursov transgranichnoi reki Samur ot 03.09.2010 g. URL: http://www.mid.ru/bdomp/spd_md.nsf/0/12B142813CAE27AA43257E6800415F32 (data obrashcheniya: 01.07.2015 g.).
42. V dogovornoi praktike gosudarstv imeyutsya primery vododeleniya v inykh proportsiyakh. Soglasno Polozheniyu po sovmestnomu ispol'zovaniyu vodnykh resursov v basseine reki Chu 1983 g. Kazakhstanu predostavleno 42 % vod, Kyrgyzstanu – 58%.