Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Shugurov M.V. Modern philosophy of the legal education: challenging globalization

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the analysis of the foundations and tendencies of modernization of the professional legal education that is defined by the vectors of development of law under the conditions of globalization. The author refers to the fundamental issues of the modern legal education through the prism of legal globalistics. These positions are the basis for rethinking the purpose and the point of legal profession in the modern society, which defines the limits of politics in the area of reform of the content and institutional aspects of legal education. A substantial part of this research includes the illumination of the integrational processes within the European education system as a whole, and the European field of legal education. The conducted analysis is directly linked to the research of the possible paths of development of the legal education system in Russia. The methodological foundation of the analysis consists in the understanding of the philosophy of modern legal education as more general approaches and principles that establish the purpose for the legal profession on both, national and international levels. The author bases the conclusion on the notion that increasing the role of law under the conditions of globalization suggests the forming of a new format of professional legal education that would solidify the value of law.


Keywords:

Legal profession, values of law, legal globalistics, Bologna process, juridical science, utilitarianism, fundamental education, educational sphere, European values, competitiveness of education

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Dyzenhaus, D. Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law // Law and Philosophy, 2001. Vol. 2(5). R. 461 – 498.
2. Edmundson, W.A. (ed.) The Duty to Obey the Law Selected Philosophical Readings. Oxford: Rowman&Littlefield, 1999. (352 pp.).
3. Conkin, W.E. Hegel's Laws: The Legitimacy of a Modern Legal Order. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008. (381 pp.).
4. Byrd, B. S., Hruschka, J. From the State of Nature to the Juridical State of States // Law and Philosophy, 2008. Vol. 27(6). R. 599 – 641.
5. Cohen, J.L. Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. (442 pp.).
6. Buchanan, A., Keohane, R. O. The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions // Ethics and International Affairs, 2006. Vol. 20(4). R. 405 – 437.
7. Buchanan, A. Political Legitimacy and Democracy // Ethics, 2002. Vol. 112(4). R. 689 – 719.
8. Brook T. The Legitimacy of Law in Literature: the Case of Albion W. Tourgée // Elon Law Review, 2012. Vol. 5(1). R. 170 – 198.
9. Bottoms, A., Tankebe, J. Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice // The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2012. Vol. 102(1). R. 119 – 170.
10. Besson, S., Tasioulas, J. (eds.) The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. (626 pp.).
11. Shugurov M.V. Pravovaya sub'ektnost' i inversii sovremennoy kul'tury // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2005. ¹ 1. S. 79 – 94.
12. Shatilo V.A. Voprosy legalizatsii i legitimatsii gosudarstvennoy vlasti // Mir cheloveka: normativnoe izmerenie – 3. Ratsional'nost' i legitimnost'. Sbornik trudov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Saratov, 13 – 15 iyunya 2013 g.). pod red. prof. I.D. Nevvazhaya. Saratov: Izdatel'stvo «Kubik», S. 348 – 349.
13. Podoroga V. Apologiya politicheskogo. M.: Izd. Dom GU – VShE, 2010. (288 s.)
14. Permyakov Yu.E. Metamorfozy legitimnosti // Mir cheloveka6 normativnoe izmerenie – 3. Ratsional'nost' i legitimnost'. Sbornik trudov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (Saratov, 13 – 15 iyunya 2013 g.). pod red. prof. I.D. Nevvazhaya. Saratov: Izdatel'stvo «Kubik», S. 307 –314.
15. Nersesyan V.S. Pravo i pravovoy zakon: stanovlenie i razvitie. Pod. red. V.V. Lapaevoy. M.: Norma, 2009. (384 s.).
16. Malakhov V.S. Gosudarstvo v usloviyakh globalizatsii. M.: Izdatel'stvo «KDU», 2007. (256 s.).
17. Kruch K. Post-demokratiya. M.: Izd. Dom GU – VShE, 2010. (192 s.). L'yuks S. Vlast': Radikal'nyy vzglyad. M.: Izd. Dom GU – VShE, 2010. (240 s.).
18. Kimlika U. Sovremennaya politicheskaya filosofiya: vvedenie. M.: Izd. Dom GU – VShE, 2010. (592 s.).
19. Gadzhiev G.A. Ontologiya prava: (kriticheskoe issledovanie yuridicheskogo kontsepta deystvitel'nosti). M.: Norma, 2014. (320 s.).
20. Dzolo D. Demokratiya i slozhnost': realisticheskiy podkhod. M.: Izd. Dom GU – VShE, 2010. S. 311 – 312. (320 s.).
21. Estlund, D. M. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. (312 pp.).
22. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Mihil, A., Quinton, P., Tyler, T. Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions // British Journal of Criminology, 2012. Vol. 52(6). R. 1051 – 1071.
23. Kochel, T.R. Can Police Legitimacy Promote Collective Efficacy? // Justice Quarterl y, 2011. Vol. 29(3). P. 384 – 419.
24. Lukas, H. M. (ed.) Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Law? 2009. (333 pp.).
25. May, L., Morrow, P. Procedural Justice. Burlington: Ashgate, 2012. (513 pp.).
26. Murphy, K., Tyler, T.R., Curtis, A. Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of Law? // Regulation & Governance, 2009. Vol. 3(1). R. 1 –26.
27. Rawls, J. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001. (214 pp.).
28. Röhl, K. F., Machura, S. Procedural Justice. Burlington: Ashgate, 1997. (240 pp.).
29. Sadurski, W. Equality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. (250 pp.).
30. Sadurski, W. Law's Legitimacy and 'Democracy-Plus' // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2006. Vol. 26(2). R. 377 – 409.
31. Schmitt, C. Legality and Legitimacy. Durham, London: Duke University Press Books, 2004. (216 pp.).
32. Schmitt, C. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 1998. (184 pp.).
33. Simmons, A. Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. (276 pp.).
34. Smith, D.J. New Challenges to Police Legitimacy, in Henry, A., Smith, D.J. (eds.) Transformations of Policing. Burlington: Ashgate, 2007. R. 273 – 306.
35. Tyler, T.R. Why People Obey the Law. Princenton: Princenton University Press, 2006. (320 pp.).
36. Vinx, L. Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. (230 pp.).
37. Wellman, Ch., Simmons, J. Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. (200 p.).
38. Wheatly, S. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2010. (400 pp.).
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.