Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Popov E.A. Sociologist as an expert: expanding the boundaries of law enforcement

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the various aspects of sociologists’ participation in the judicial sociological investigation. It reveals the difficulties and problem areas within the development of social knowledge as a whole and sociology in particular, which can affect the quality of forensic science within the framework of a specific criminal investigation. The author presents certain methods of raising the level of forensic examination by involving professional sociologists. Expansion of the boundaries of law enforcement allows a sociologist to participate in a wide spectrum of forensic examinations. The following are some of the main conclusions made in this research: the addition of new complex multivariable notions within criminal law justifies the need for involvement into forensic investigations of professionals such as sociologists; the level of success of forensic sociological investigation depends not only on the professional competency of the expert sociologist, but also on their knowledge of the legal environment.


Keywords:

Society, sociology, forensic science, expert, social group, sociological investigation, commune, law enforcement, legal environment, legal norm


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Zaryanov E.P. Teoreticheskie sotsial'no-politicheskie osnovy kontsepta «myagkoy sily» // Sotsiodinamika.-2014.-7.-C. 19-41. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2014.7.12730. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12730.html
2. Kabanov P.A. Obshchestvennaya ekspertiza kak forma obshchestvennogo kontrolya za deyatel'nost'yu organov publichnoy vlasti v sfere protivodeystviya korruptsii: teoretiko-pravovoy analiz // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-10.-C. 1168-1183. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.10.12978.
3. Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
4. Kabanov P.A. Nekotorye formy vzaimodeystviya institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva s organami mestnogo samoupravleniya v oblasti protivodeystviya korruptsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-5.-C. 5-8.
5. Vlasova N.V., Rafalyuk E.E. Yuridicheskaya nauka v poiske pravovykh mekhanizmov protivodeystviya korruptsii. // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2012.-3.-C. 41-53.
6. Aleynikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // Sotsiodinamika.-2013.-8.-C. 1-47. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2013.8.5109. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
7. Dokuchaev I.V. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvovedenie: tochki soprikosnoveniya // Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya v usloviyakh krizisa nauk i nauchnosti: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, 2014.
8. Utemis I.I. Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: praktika kompleksnogo analiza i poiska istinnosti znaniya // Sotsial'no-politicheskie issledovaniya v usloviyakh krizisa nauk i nauchnosti: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Irkutsk, 2014.
9. Chebotarev S.G. Sovremennoe sotsial'noe poznanie mira // Kul'turologiya: Daydzhest. M., 2012. ¹ 1 (60).
10. Kudryavtseva I.N. Kul'tura i sotsial'nyy meyozis: praktika prikladnogo issledovaniya i teoretizirovaniya // Chelovek. 2005. ¹ 2.