Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Sychev D.A. Some questions of classification of criminal procedural functions in the Russian criminal trial

Abstract: This article discusses and analyzes the different approaches to the determination of the number of criminal procedural functions in the Russian criminal trial. It is concluded that the joint criminal process associated with more than three main functions of criminal procedure. It is determined that there are three main features of criminal procedure specific to criminal proceedings in Russia. The author highlights the key arguments in favor of the qualitative differentiation of procedural functions of organs and persons in criminal proceedings and the main functions of criminal procedure as qualitative characteristics of the process. The author gives classification of criminal procedural functions. General scientific methods of gaining new scientific knowledge, in particular, systemic analysis and systemic theory, formal logical and other methods that would allow examining the correlation in legal relations in the sphere of criminal proceedings, as well as private methods - historical, comparative legal. The author determines the number by the number of criminal procedural functions inherent in the Russian criminal trial, as well as proposes an original classification. The author gives criteria of differentiation of criminal procedural functions from the functions of organs and persons, as well as the division of procedural functions into basic and advanced. The non-functional activity of the subjects of domestic criminal proceedings is being exposed.


Keywords:

system of functions, procedural features, competitiveness, the functions of the subjects, detective work, man functions, Criminal procedural functions, additional functions, criminal consequences, investigation

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Bozh'ev V. Sostyazatel'nost' na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Zakonnost'. 2004. ¹ 1. S. 4 – 6.
2. Bezlepkin B.T. Ugolovnyi protsess Rossii. 6 – e izdanie. M: KNORUS, 2010. – 496 s.
3. http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28Spravka%29?OpenAgent&RN=440058 – 6
4. Azarov V.A., Revenko N.I., Kuzembaeva M.M. Funktsiya predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya.-Omsk: Izd-vo OmGU, 2006. – 560 s.
5. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?base=LAW&n=148711&req=doc
6. Rezepkin A.M. Razdelenie osnovnykh ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsii kak element printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon // Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) MGYuA. Vypusk dvenadtsatyi. Orenburg, 2010. – 369 s. S. 149–151.
7. Kachalov V.I. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii // Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo. Pod obshch. red. prof. V.M. Lebedeva. M., 2012. S. 49 – 52.
8. Shpilev V.M. Uchastniki ugolovnogo protsessa. Minsk, 1970. – 176 s.
9. Khaliulin A.G. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii: (Problemy osushchestvleniya v usloviyakh pravovoi reformy). Diss. ... d-ra yurid. nauk / Khaliulin A.G.-M., 1997. – 261 c.
10. Rakhunov R.D. Uchastniki ugolovno-protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. – 277 c.
11. Daev V.G. Protsessual'nye funktsii i printsip sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1974. S. 48 – 72.
12. Ugolovnyi protsess: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod obshch. red. P.A. Lupinskoi. M., 1995.-544 s.
13. Motovilovker Ya.O. Funktsiya osushchestvleniya pravosudiya i sostyazatel'noe postroenie sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Voprosy povysheniya effektivnosti pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik. Vyp. 9 / Otv. red.: Nazhimov V.P.; Redkol.: Lukashevich V.Z., Martinovich I.I., Prokop'eva S.I., Tsvetinovich A.L.-Kaliningrad: Izd-vo Kaliningr. un-ta, 1981. – 154 c. S. 11–19.
14. Gataullin 3. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokurora // Zakonnost'. 2010. N 2. S. 9-13.
15. Antonov I.A., Gorlenko V.A. Funktsii prokuratury v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: ponyatie, soderzhanie, «tendentsii k sokrashcheniyu» // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2008. ¹ 20. S. 5 – 9.
16. Alekseev S.N. Nadzor za soblyudeniem prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa v sisteme konstitutsionnykh garantii prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina i polnomochii prokurora (dosudebnye stadii): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2002 S. 15 – 25.
17. Savitskii V.M. Sterzhnevaya funktsiya prokuratury – osushchestvlenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 1994. N 10. S. 24 – 28.
18. Yakubovich N.A. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya // Problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1980. S. 15 – 32.
19. Nazhimov V.P. Psikhologicheskie osnovy ucheniya ob ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiyakh // Pravovedenie. 1983. ¹5. S. 52 – 58.
20. Zhuk O.D. Sistema ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii // «Chernye dyry» v Rossiiskom Zakonodatel'stve. 2003. ¹ 4. S. 416-420.
21. El'kind P.S. Sushchnost' sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1963.-172 c.
22. Romanov S.V. Ponyatie, sistema i vzaimodeistvie protsessual'nykh funktsii v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. M., 2007. – 32 s.
23. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Tom 29. Izdanie pyatoe. – M.: Politizdat, 1973. – 783 s.
24. El'kind P.S. Tseli i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v sovetskom ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1976. – 143 c.
25. Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom V. Moskva: Sotsekgiz, 1937. – 716 s.;
26. Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom VII. Moskva – Leningrad: Sotsekgiz, 1934. – 380 s.
27. Chernyshev V.A. Problema funktsii v rossiiskoi nauke ugolovnogo protsessa: Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09. – Izhevsk, 1999. – 166 c.
28. Shpilev V.N. Soderzhanie i formy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU, 1974. – 144 c.
29. Tushev A.A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Sistema funktsii i polnomochii. Dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09 – Krasnodar, 2006. – 384 c.
30. Ugolovnyi protsess / Pod red. M.A. Chel'tsova. Vsesoyuznyi yuridicheskii zaochnyi institut. M.: Yurid. lit.,1969. – 463 s.
31. Ugolovnyi protsess. Problemnye lektsii. Pod red. V.T. Tomina, I.A. Zinchenko. M., 2013. – 799 s.
32. Shimanovskii V.V. K voprosu o protsessual'noi funktsii sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse // Pravovedenie. 1965. ¹2. S. 175–178.
33. Zinatullin Z.Z. Izbrannye trudy. Tom 1. Sankt-Peterburg, 2013. Izdatel'stvo: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press. – 608 s.
34. Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Uchebnik / Otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya. M., 2011. – 1072 s.
35. Gulyaev A.P. Sledovatel' v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981. – 192 c.
36. Yakub M.L. O ponyatii protsessual'noi funktsii v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1973. ¹
37. S. 83 – 89. 5.Larin A.M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessual'nye funktsii. M.: Yurid. lit., 1986. – 160 c.
38. Fatkullin F.N. Obvinenie i sudebnyi prigovor. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta,1965. – 532 s.
39. Strogovich M.S. Priroda sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa i printsip sostyazatel'nosti. M., 1939. – 380 s.
40. Bozrov V.M. Osnovy teorii ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsii. Obshchaya chast'. Monografiya. Obshchaya chast': Monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skii dom «Ural'skaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya». 2012. – 96 s.
41. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_41297/
42. http://www.rg.ru/2005/04/01/ks – zaklyuchenie – dok.html
43. Foinitskii I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. 3-e izd., peresmotr. I dop. SPb.: Senatskaya tipografiya, 1910. T. 2. S. 342-343.
44. Lebedev V.M. Sudebnaya zashchita svobody i lichnoi neprikosnovennosti grazhdan na predvaritel'nom sledstvii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Gorodets, 2001. – 158 c.
45. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_63693/
46. Motovilovker Ya.O. Osnovnye ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. Yaroslavl': Yaroslavskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1976.-94 s.
47. Khaliulin A.G. Osushchestvlenie funktsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya prokuraturoi Rossii. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1997. – 223 s.
48. Boltoshev E.D. Funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2002.-189 c.
49. Erezhipaliev D.I. Prokuror kak uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva so storony obvineniya v dosudebnykh stadiyakh. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk / Erezhipaliev D.I.-M., 2013.-200 c.
50. Ignatov S.D. Kontseptual'nye osnovy organizatsii advokatury v Rossii (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Monografiya. Izhevsk: Izd. dom «Udmurtskii universitet», 2006. –280 s.
51. Kan M.P. Protsessual'nye funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. Tashkent, 1988.
52. Berova D.M. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. SPb.: Izd-vo Fond «Universitet», 2009. – 275 c.
53. Kryukov V.F. Prokuror v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (istoriya i sovremennost'). Kursk, 2012. – 500 c.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.