Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Antonyan, A.G. Legal practice of the courts of general jurisdiction in the sphere of implementation of punishment with the use of estimate standards

Abstract: The object of studies involves the practice of application of norms with estimate standards by the courts of general jurisdiction in the sphere of implementation of punishments. The article provides an evaluation of description of specific estimate terms in the norms of criminal penal law of the Russian Federation. Based upon the information collected by the Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Service for the Execution of Punishments of the Russian Federation in 2013 on the most complicated and debatable issues, the author points out the unity of opinions of the territorial divisions of the criminal penal service system regarding the problem of estimate standards in the Criminal Penal Law of the Russian Federation as an acute and topical one. The courts of general jurisdiction play a great role in the sphere of application of norms of criminal penal law with the use of estimate standards, since they revise the legal practice of the criminal penal system in the process of challenging of specific acts and decisions. In the process of studies the author used theoretical and empiric methods (methods of analysis, generalization, synthesis, deduction, analogy and modeling), as well as formal logical and comparative legal methods. The scientific novelty is obvious, since the study of the problem of estimate standards in the criminal penal law never drew enough attention in the Russian legal science. Concerning the practice of legal application of estimate terms in the sphere of application of punishments by the courts of general jurisdiction with specific examples of specific cases, this is an unique study. The author draws a conclusion that some estimate terms should be excluded from the text of the Criminal Penal Code of the Russian Federation while some times need to be made more specific. It is a positive tendency that the courts (mostly, at the regional level) start to express their opinions regarding various estimate categories more clearly, defining contents of the said terms, including the situation of the absence of legal interpretation on the part of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

Keywords:

Estimate terms, court practice, criminal penal law, interpretation of estimate terms, judicial discretion, evaluation criteria, execution of punishments, problems of execution of punishments, Criminal Penal Code of the Russian Federation, criminal penal system.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Postanovlenie Nizhegorodskogo oblastnogo suda ot 03.08.2006 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
2. Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 28.10.2010 "Delo "Rudakov (Rudakov) protiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii" (zhaloba N 43239/04) Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta
3. Opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 07.02.2007 po delu N 22-1357/2007 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
4. Opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 27.04.2012 po delu N 22-2950/2012 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
5. Opredelenie Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14.10.2010 N 22-1610/2010 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
6. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Kirovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 11.08.2011 po delu N 33-2834 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
7. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Ivanovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 19.07.2012 po delu N 22-1744 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
8. Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Novosibirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 16.01.2012 po delu N 22-411-2012 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
9. Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Suda Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 22.05.2014 po delu N 33-1183/2014 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
10. Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Sverdlovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 20.11.2013 po delu N 33-14259/2013 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
11. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 16.06.2014 po delu N 10-7415/14 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
12. Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Lipetskogo oblastnogo suda ot 13.02.2014 po delu N 22-98/2014 Konsul'tantPlyus : sprav. pravovaya sistema. – Versiya Prof. – Elektron. dan. – M., 2001. – Dostup iz lokal'noy seti Nauch. b–ki Tom. gos. un–ta.
13. Otsenochnye priznaki v ugolovnom prave Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnoe i sudebnoe tolkovanie / Pod red. A.V. Galakhovoy. – M.: Norma, 2014. – 736 s.
14. «Glossariy ponyatiy i terminov ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo prava», razrabotannyy NII FSIN Rossii (ofitsial'no ne publikovalsya)
15. Belyaeva O.M. Otsenochnye kategorii v konstruktsiyakh pravovykh norm: osobennosti tolkovaniya i pravoprimeneniya // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. ¹7 (ch. 2),-s. 135.
16. Levina D.N. Teoreticheskie problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya otsenochnykh ponyatiy / Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk-Nizhniy Novgorod, 2007.-36 s.
17. Malan'in V.S., Litvishkov V.M. Osnovy protsessa obucheniya v uchebnykh tsentrakh FSIN Rossii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2014.3.11655. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_11655.html
18. Minyazeva T.F.. Zadachi Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy v svete Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 g. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
19. Popova E.E. K voprosu ob uchastii dukhovenstva v formirovanii instituta obshchestvennogo vozdeystviya kak sredstva ispravleniya osuzhdennykh v XIX – nachale XX vekov. // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 11.-S.105-111. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.11.10055. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10055.html
20. Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. K voprosu o predostavlenii otsrochki otbyvaniya nakazaniya bol'nym narkomaniey // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.5.10038
21. Solov'eva T.V. Ob otsutstvii edinogo normativno zakreplennogo poryadka privedeniya v ispolnenie postanovleniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.184-200. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.2507. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2507.html
22. Nikiforov A.V.. Polnomochiya nalogovykh organov pri primenenii otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.9912
23. Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A.. Voprosy vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9099
24. Shurukhnov N.G.. Problemy realizatsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za peredachu, libo popytku peredachi sredstv svyazi, a takzhe komplektuyushchikh, obespechivayushchikh ikh rabotu, litsam, soderzhashchimsya v uchrezhdeniyakh ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.06.
25. Minyazeva T.F. Zadachi Federal'noy sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy v svete Kontseptsii razvitiya ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 g. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 55 - 58.
26. Berezhnova N.D. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravleniya psikhologicheskimi sluzhbami Federal'noy
27. sluzhby ispolneniya nakazaniy Rossii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 5. - C. 53 - 56.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.