Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Maksimova, O.D. Discussion and adoption of the Code of the RSFR on Marriage, Family and Guardianship of 1926 in the Russian Central Executive Committee

Abstract: The article concerns specific features of the legislative technique and principles of the law-making in 1920s, such as the influence of Revolutionary ideology and real situation in the sphere of family relations upon the formation of the new Soviet legislation. One of the most typical examples of active participation of the Soviet lawyers, delegates and common people in the law-making process is their participation in the discussion of the draft Code of the RSFR on Marriage, Family and Guardianship of 1926 (hereinafter, the Code). The author analyzed a large amount of stenographic materials of the RCEC, casting light upon the discussion and adoption of the 2nd Code on marriage and family in Russia – the Code of the RSFR on Marriage, Family and Guardianship of 1926. The contradictory character of legislative activities in the mid-1920s was due to the influence of some theoretical ideologists of law, who wished to see the revolutionary character in the novelties in the Russian law as a manifestation of its new historical nature. As the practice of the draft studies of the Code shows, in 1925-26 the workers wishes for the recognition of the de-facto marriage, while the peasants wanted marriages to be duly registered. The main reason for which the Soviet legislators have recognized de-facto marriages in the mid-1920s was the absence of social and legal guarantees for women and children when the marriage was not registered officially.


Keywords:

family law, legislative activity, law-making, RCEC, the Soviet Assembly, RSFSR, sociological approach, de facto marriage, registration of a marriage, revolutionary legal conscience.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format by registered users. Click this link to register or login.

References
1. Sevryukov D.S. Sudy obshchey yurisdiktsii i ispolnitel'naya vlast' v Sovetskoy Rossii v 1917 – 1936 gg.: normativnoe regulirovanie i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-12.-C. 1162-1167. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.12.10239.
2. Tret'ya sessiya VTsIK XII sozyva. Stenograficheskiy otchet. M., 1926.
3. Sem'ya i novyy byt. Sbornik s predisloviem D . I. Kurskogo. M., 1926.
4. Rozenberg E Proekt kodeksa zakonov o brake i opeke // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoy yustitsii. 1925. ¹ 48—49.
5. Polyanskiy P.L. Formirovanie semeynogo prava kak otrasli v Rossii (postanovka problemy) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 2010. ¹ 2.
6. Polyanskiy P.L. Razvitie ponyatiya braka v istorii sovetskogo semeynogo prava» // Sistema GARANT URL: http://base.garant.ru/3540414/#ixzz33g7MbJE0 (data obrashcheniya 17.06.2014).
7. Kosova O.Yu. Predmet semeynogo prava i semeynoe zakonodatel'stvo // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2000. ¹ 7.
8. Maksimova O.D. Stanovlenie sovetskogo brachnogo prava // Pravo i politika. 2013. ¹ 5.
9. Goykhbarg A.G. Sravnitel'noe semeynoe pravo. M., 1925. S. 185, 186.
10. Vorozheykin E.M. Semeynye pravootnosheniya v SSSR. M., 1972.
11. Vserossiyskiy Tsentral'nyy Ispolnitel'nyy Komitet XII sozyva. Vtoraya sessiya. Stenograficheskiy otchet. M., 1925.
12. Shershen' T.V. O printsipe ukrepleniya sem'i v Rossii // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON).-2009.-3.-C. 577-582.
13. V. A. Abel'beysov Sotsializatsiya sirot i detey, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditeley: novaya perspektiva // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-4.-C. 98-102.
14. Gulyaikhin V.N. Sem'ya kak sub'ekt ranney pravovoy sotsializatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 7.-S.56-66. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.9007. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9007.html
15. Abel'beysov V.A.. Obzor zakonodatel'noy bazy v otnoshenii zhizneustroystva i vospitaniya detey-sirot i detey, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditeley // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.5094
16. A. S. Galyautdinova. Sem'ya kak uchastnik nalogovykh pravootnosheniy // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2012. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107.
17. Petrenko D.S.. Nekotorye aspekty stanovleniya i pravovogo zakrepleniya instituta braka v Drevnem Rime // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.12.10619
18. Z.Z. Mukhina. Pravovoe polozhenie vdovy v russkoy krest'yanskoy srede: traditsii i novatsii (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo KhKh v.) // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.03.8
19. Yu. I. Motrenko. Transformatsiya ponyatiya sem'i v khode obshchestvennoy evolyutsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107
20. E. N. Danilova Konstitutsiya RSFSR 1937 goda: iz istorii
21. podgotovki, obsuzhdeniya i prinyatiya // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2011. - 4. - C. 99 - 109.
22. V. A. Abel'beysov Sotsializatsiya sirot i detey, ostavshikhsya bez
23. popecheniya roditeley: novaya perspektiva // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 98 - 102.
24. Abel'beysov V.A. Obzor zakonodatel'noy bazy v otnoshenii zhizneustroystva i vospitaniya detey-sirot i detey, ostavshikhsya bez popecheniya roditeley // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1335 - 1339. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.5094.
25. Abel'beysov V.A. Siroty i deti, ostavshiesya bez popecheniya
26. roditeley v sovremennoy Rossii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 1109 - 1113. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.5093.