Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Zhelonkin, V.S. On the goals of cassation proceedings in the Russian criminal process at its current stage of development

Abstract: On January 1, 2013 the Federal Law of December 12, 2010 N. 433-FZ “On Amendments to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and Loss of Effect of Some Legislative Acts (Provisions of Legislative Acts) of the Russian Federation” came into force, and it changed the very basis of understanding of nature, contents and object of cassation procedure, influencing the goals of review of the judgments, which have already entered into force. Taking into account the new interpretation of the object of cassation proceedings by the legislator, the understanding of the goals of revision of the judgments, which have already entered into force also needs to be revised. The methodological basis for the article is formed with the dialectic method of cognition. It also involved special scientific research methods, such as systemic-structural, specific sociological, comparative legal methods. The article substantiates the conclusion that the analysis of legislative novelties involving revision of the judgments, which are already in force show the tendency of bringing the Russian criminal procedural legislation closer to the legislations of the states of the continental legal system. It is manifested by the range and contents of goals of cassation proceedings. They include guaranteeing lawfulness of a judgment, methodological supervision of judicial practice, guaranteeing the uniformity of judicial practice, guaranteeing stability of judgments on criminal cases.


Keywords:

Criminal judicial proceedings, revision of judgment, cassation proceedings, supervisory proceedings, object of cassation proceedings, goals of cassation proceedings, lawfulness of a judgment, stability of a judgment, grounded judgment, fair judgment.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article


References
1. Sivolova A.A. K voprosu o spravedlivosti kak trebovanii, pred'yav-lyaemom k prigovoru suda po ugolovnomu delu. URL: // http://www.ksc67.ru/poleznye-materialy/spravedlivost-prigovora.html (6.04.2013).
2. Osnovnye printsipy nezavisimosti sudebnykh organov (prinyaty v g. Milane 26.08.1985-06.09.1985) // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. Sbornik dokumentov. T. 2. M., 1996.
3. Osmanov T.S. Aktual'nye problemy sovershenstvovaniya deyatel'nosti suda nadzornoy instantsii. Diss... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
4. Perlov I.D. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v ugolovnom protsesse. M., 1974.
5. Makarova Z.V. Glasnost' ugolovnogo protsessa. Chelyabinsk, 1993.
6. Mizulina E.B. Priroda nadzornogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam. Diss... kand. yurid. nauk. Yaroslavl', 1983.
7. Lupinskaya P.A. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriya, zako-nodatel'stvo, praktika. M., 2010.
8. Idrisov O.R. Polnomochiya kassatsionnoy instantsii po vyyavleniyu i ustraneniyu sudebnykh oshibok v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii. Avtoref. diss.... kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2012.
9. Zhilin G.A. Zadachi i tseli suda v apellyatsionnom i kassatsionnom pro-izvodstve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2005. ¹ 5.
10. Demidova E.T. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy nadzornogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam. Diss... kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2006.
11. Groshevoy Yu.M., Ponomarenko L.G., Khotenets V.M. Kassatsionnyy pro-test prokurora po ugolovnym delam. Kiev, 1989.
12. Grodzinskiy M.M. Kassatsionnoe i nadzornoe proizvodstvo v sovet-skom ugolovnom protsesse. M., 1953.
13. Volodina L.M. Problemy organizatsii i funktsionirovaniya sudebnoy vlasti // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2006. ¹ 12.
14. Vandyshev V.V. Ugolovnyy protsess. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chasti: uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov i fakul'tetov. M., 2010.
15. Bazhanov M.I. Zakonnost' i obosnovannost' osnovnykh sudebnykh aktov v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Diss... dokt. yurid. nauk. Khar'kov. 1967.
16. Adamenko V.D., Beregovoy I.E. Sudebnyy nadzor i osnovaniya otmeny, izmeneniya prigovora. Barnaul, 1995.
17. Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy B.K. Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik. M., 2012.
18. Apellyatsiya, kassatsiya, nadzor: novelly GPK RF i UPK RF. Pervyy opyt kriticheskogo osmysleniya /pod obshch. red. N.A. Kolokolova. M., 2011.
19. Fedorchenko A.A. Protsessual'nye prava postradavshikh v sudebnykh razbiratel'stvakh mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov ad hoc // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-¹ 4.-S.208-224. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11695. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11695.html
20. Fedorchenko A.A. Primenenie mezhdunarodnogo prava prav cheloveka k uchastnikam mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo protsessa // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2014.-¹ 2.-S.64-72. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.2.11703. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11703.html
21. Demidova L.N. Sistemno-funktsional'nyy podkhod i zakon o zolotoy proportsii v ugolovnom prave // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 7.-S.177-192. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8802. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8802.html
22. Abdulvaliev A.F. Predposylki i perspektivy vnedreniya elektronnoy formy ugolovnogo dela v deyatel'nost' sudebnykh organov // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 5.-S.150-164. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.345. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_345.html
23. Antonova E.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' korporativnogo (kollektivnogo) sub'ekta za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.192-220. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.568. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_568.html
24. Karchevskiy N.V. Osnovnye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v kontekste sotsial'nykh tendentsiy informatizatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-¹ 6.-S.152-196. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.8317. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8317.html
25. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html